Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Thursday, January 03, 2008

Roger Clemens tells ‘60 Minutes’ he received painkiller injections

Or as Francesa just said..."I don’t care if Jack Morris’ 1992 ERA was 8.04, he won 21 games and that’s a HOF season!” (and yes, I just Lidocained up)

Roger Clemens admits on “60 Minutes” that he received injections from his former personal trainer, but tells Mike Wallace that the shots were only for B-12 and the painkiller lidocaine, according to a statement released Thursday by CBS.

...When asked by Wallace if McNamee had ever injected him with any drugs, Clemens responded, according to the release: “Lidocaine and B-12. It’s for my joints, and B-12 I still take today.”

Clemens then calls the accusation that he used steroids or HGH “ridiculous” and says he “never” used any banned substances.

“Swear?” asks Wallace.

“(I) swear,” says Clemens.

Repoz Posted: January 03, 2008 at 05:16 PM | 122 comment(s)
  Related News: GeneralNY YankeesSteroids

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >
   1. Robert S. Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:30 PM (#2659681)
He didn't even pinky swear.
   2. 1k5v3L Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:40 PM (#2659687)
So Clemens got B-12 shots from Canseco, told McNamee they were steroids (because Clemens didn't want McNamee to think he was a sissy), and asked McNamee to inject him in the buttocks/naval, knowing full well he'll get McNamee in trouble with the Feds in a few years.

I think Darren will buy this story. Sounds very reasonable to me.
   3. flournoy Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:44 PM (#2659689)
Is he sure that it wasn't flaxseed oil or something?
   4. Moscow Hiding In The Shadows Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:45 PM (#2659690)
I think Darren will buy this story. Sounds very reasonable to me.

And if he'd only said "flaxseed oil"----but he didn't want to run into copyright infringement problems on that one....

EDIT: me, too. Sorry bout that, flournoy.
   5. DosRafaels Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:45 PM (#2659691)
Hahahahahahahahahah!!!!
   6. SugarBear Blanks Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:46 PM (#2659692)
He should have just told this story to the Mitchell people and he probably wouldn't have been named.
   7. Joey B. Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:47 PM (#2659693)
Wallace: "Swear"?
Roger: "Swear."

"Cross your heart and hope to die?"
"Cross my heart and hope to die."

"Stick a needle in your eye?"
"Stick a needle in my eye."

"Jam a dagger in your thigh?"
"Jam a dagger in my thigh."

"Eat a horse manure pie?"
"Yup!"
   8. marko Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:48 PM (#2659694)
"He should have just told this story to the Mitchell people and he probably wouldn't have been named."

He still would of been named.
   9. Ron Johnson Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:49 PM (#2659695)
Levski, Clemens didn't just tell McNamee that he was using Winstrol. McNamee said the bottles were helpfully labelled.

Which just shows you what kind of a stigma painkillers have. Roger obviously felt the need to cook up a convincing cover story.
   10. There's a chill wind blowing in Misirlou's soul Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:49 PM (#2659696)
He still would of been named.


would of?
   11. Jose Can Jussi Jokinen (Justin T) Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:57 PM (#2659701)
Don't get me started, Miserlou. Would of, should of and could of are way above unnecessary apostrophes on my list of annoyances.
   12. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 03, 2008 at 06:59 PM (#2659704)
Don't get me started, Miserlou. Would of, should of and could of are way above unnecessary apostrophes on my list of annoyances.

Your easily annoyed, then.
   13. 1k5v3L Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:00 PM (#2659706)
Next time I go to the dentist, I'll ask him to insist he's injecting Winstrol or HGH in my gums before he starts drilling. That's gonna impress the dental assistant.
   14. robinred Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:02 PM (#2659708)
Would of, should of and could of are way above unnecessary apostrophes on my list of annoyances.


Thats cool.
   15. 1k5v3L Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:03 PM (#2659710)
Your easily annoyed, then.


You mean "Your easily annoyed, than."
   16. Jose Can Jussi Jokinen (Justin T) Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:04 PM (#2659711)
You guys don't get it. I said unnecessary apostrophes. Leaving out necessary ones is rad.
   17. Robert S. Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:06 PM (#2659715)
This is alot of talk over something that, for all intensive purposes, is not to important.
   18. Ray DiPerna Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:07 PM (#2659716)
He should have just told this story to the Mitchell people and he probably wouldn't have been named.


Hmm. Let's see how this would play out.

Mitchell: "Roger, Brian McNamee says he injected you with Winstrol, which you supplied, several times. He says he injected you several times with testosterone from a bottle labeled either Sustanon 250 or Deca-Durabolin, which he got from Kirk Radomski. McNamee also says he injected you several times with human growth hormone, which he also got from Radomski."

Clemens: "No, he's not telling the truth. The only thing he ever injected me with is B-12 and lidocaine."

That gets Clemens's name out of the report?
   19. Edmundo, survivor of 7 right-sourcings Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:09 PM (#2659719)
Sister Marie Colette would have had you boys marching in the playground after school for 2 hours each day for an entire week for your poor grammar.
Kids today. Sigh.
   20. Joe Bivens, Ditch Digger Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:15 PM (#2659725)
That gets Clemens's name out of the report?

No, of course not. But the spontaneity of the answer would give us a sense that Clemens is telling the truth. The way it came out, days after the report, gives us a sense that they worked on making up a story.
   21. marko Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:23 PM (#2659729)
I agree crazy. Apparently it took clemens weeks to remember these so-called b-12 shots...
   22. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:24 PM (#2659731)
You mean "Your easily annoyed, than."

Irregardless, my point is made.
   23. Ray DiPerna Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:26 PM (#2659734)
No, of course not. But the spontaneity of the answer would give us a sense that Clemens is telling the truth. The way it came out, days after the report, gives us a sense that they worked on making up a story.


The fact that Clemens wears the number 22 gives you guys "a sense" that they worked on making up a story.
   24. David Nieporent Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:39 PM (#2659740)
The fact that Clemens wears the number 22 gives you guys "a sense" that they worked on making up a story.
Come on, Ray. The fact that he didn't deny it proves he's guilty. Er, the fact that he denied it through his lawyer rather than personally proves he's guilty. Er, the fact that he denied it personally rather than to a reporter proves he's guilty. Er, the fact that he denied it to a reporter he picked rather than to a bunch of reporters proves he's guilty.

(Guess we'll have to wait until Monday -- he's holding a press conference that day -- to figure out what the next excuse for believing him guilty is. But I'm betting that 'he protested too much' will probably somehow make it into the argument.)
   25. galaxieboi Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:41 PM (#2659743)
“Swear?” asks Wallace


"F*** you, Mike." responds Clemens
   26. xbhaskarx Posted: January 03, 2008 at 07:41 PM (#2659744)
So Clemens chose the Miguel Tejada defense over the Barry Bonds.
   27. Sparkles Peterson Posted: January 03, 2008 at 08:27 PM (#2659768)
The government should make B12 a scheduled substance. It doesn't do jack #### for people who aren't deficient, but people just love that placebo effect it has on them.
   28. Esoteric roots for the two worst teams in baseball Posted: January 03, 2008 at 08:40 PM (#2659774)
Once Clemens admitted to receiving injections of ANYTHING, he sealed his own doom in the court of public opinion. B-12 and lidocaine? Sure, Rocket, that's all it was, we believe you.

Note that I'm not actually passing judgment on whether his defense is true or not (I happen to think he's a lying jade), merely echoing what the public reaction is going to be: they ain't gonna buy it. Stick a fork in him, he's done.

Still a Hall of Famer, though.
   29. Ray DiPerna Posted: January 03, 2008 at 08:49 PM (#2659779)
(I happen to think he's a lying jade),


Really? Gee, I couldn't tell.
   30. Esoteric roots for the two worst teams in baseball Posted: January 03, 2008 at 08:53 PM (#2659782)
Yeah, sometimes I'm a little too subtle about it.

C'mon Ray, I was really just looking for a reason to use the phrase "lying jade."
   31. Joe Bivens, Ditch Digger Posted: January 03, 2008 at 08:58 PM (#2659785)
Come on, Ray. The fact that he didn't deny it proves he's guilty.

Of course that doesn't prove he's guilty, Irwin. But I'd have had a better feeling about Clemens' integrity had he chose to give everyone the finger and not commented at all.

Unless he's lying, he was injected with *something*. If it were B-12, why wait as long as he waited to tell the world? He had to know that the world was forming opinions. The best way to do damage control would be to tell the truth right away...that the injections were B-12. Unless, they weren't B-12 injections. Then, he's in a bit of a pickle, Irwin.
   32. marko Posted: January 03, 2008 at 09:01 PM (#2659787)
McNamee's response: Earl Ward, an attorney for McNamee, said his client stands by "everything he said to Senator Mitchell and federal investigators."

"Brian has a master's degree in sports medicine," Ward told ESPN The Magazine's Shaun Assael. "He knows the difference between Lidocaine, B-12 and testosterone. What he injected into Roger Clemens wasn't Lidocaine or B-12. It was testosterone."
   33. marko Posted: January 03, 2008 at 09:05 PM (#2659789)
Also: "There is a ton of evidence that the Mitchell report failed to explore that will corroborate Brian, and so it would be foolhardy for Clemens or Hardin to allow Clemens to trash Brian.''
   34. Edmundo, survivor of 7 right-sourcings Posted: January 03, 2008 at 09:10 PM (#2659790)
What he injected into Roger Clemens wasn't Lidocaine or B-12. It was testosterone."
Maybe Roger thinks testosterone is Italian for Lidocaine. Yeah, that's it, that's the ticket.
The best that I can say for him is that this is lame on Roger's part. The worst, well, time to fess up. Like some others here have stated, he should have said either "F...Y.." or come out with this statement immediately.

If a couple more Yankees show up with warts, I may have to start liking Jeter as a rose among all those thorns. I shudder at the thought ... :)
   35. Ray DiPerna Posted: January 03, 2008 at 09:20 PM (#2659793)
If it were B-12, why wait as long as he waited to tell the world? He had to know that the world was forming opinions.


So your argument is that it took him three weeks to think up the B-12 cover story?
   36. Traderdave Posted: January 03, 2008 at 09:58 PM (#2659802)
OK it WAS Winstrol, but I never inhaled.
   37. Darren Posted: January 03, 2008 at 10:02 PM (#2659809)
He took too long to say B-12? So if he had mentioned B-12 earlier, you'd have no problem believing him?

What if he had mentioned taking B-12, say, when the Grimsley story broke?

It's so funny to see the hoops people will jump through to convict someone that they don't like. Why not just come out and say "I don't like Clemens so I'm deciding to believe the other guy over him?" Why go through phony reason after phony reason for saying he's guilty?
   38. Eddieot Posted: January 03, 2008 at 10:21 PM (#2659819)
Lidocaine's a temporary local anesthetic. Why inject it in your butt? Unless that part of your butt is sore. Seriously. I suppose maybe it could help with sciatica pain but I never heard of Clemens suffering from that. Ignoring the obvious old-school Primer Mike Piazza post, why would anyone take a shot of Lidocaine in the butt?

Just asking.
   39. Darren Posted: January 03, 2008 at 10:37 PM (#2659827)
What makes you think the lidocaine was administered to his butt?
   40. Dr Love Posted: January 03, 2008 at 11:07 PM (#2659834)
What makes you think the lidocaine was administered to his butt?


Because that's where McNamee said he injected Clemens.
   41. Nasty Nate Posted: January 03, 2008 at 11:11 PM (#2659840)
It's so funny to see the hoops people will jump through to exonerate someone that they like. Why not just come out and say "I really like Clemens so I'm deciding to believe him over the other guy?" Why go through phony reason after phony reason for saying he's innocent?
   42. tfbg9 Posted: January 03, 2008 at 11:12 PM (#2659841)
Roger Clemens is now and forever Roger Kaputnik.
   43. Moscow Hiding In The Shadows Posted: January 03, 2008 at 11:26 PM (#2659852)
It's so funny to see the hoops people will jump through to convict someone that they don't like. Why not just come out and say "I don't like Clemens so I'm deciding to believe the other guy over him?" Why go through phony reason after phony reason for saying he's guilty?


It's so funny to see the hoops people will jump through to exonerate someone that they like. Why not just come out and say "I really like Clemens so I'm deciding to believe him over the other guy?" Why go through phony reason after phony reason for saying he's innocent?


I guess that makes me the odd man out, since I like Clemens but I think there's about a 1% chance that he's telling the truth.
   44. David Nieporent Posted: January 03, 2008 at 11:28 PM (#2659854)
It's so funny to see the hoops people will jump through to exonerate someone that they like. Why not just come out and say "I really like Clemens so I'm deciding to believe him over the other guy?" Why go through phony reason after phony reason for saying he's innocent?
What hoops? What phony reason? I don't "really like" Clemens. For that matter, I haven't "exonerated" him. But I think that without any evidence, a person deserves the benefit of the doubt.

As Darren points out, yet another one of those ridiculously false idiocies people come up with -- "I would have believed him if he had said it right away, but since he waited until now, I don't" -- is baseless, since in fact Clemens came out with the B-12 claim a long time ago.
   45. Severiano Flitcraft Posted: January 03, 2008 at 11:32 PM (#2659855)
Why didn't Mitchell mention that Clemens said he took B-12 shots? Was it unclear that his saying so was related to McNamee?
   46. David Nieporent Posted: January 03, 2008 at 11:43 PM (#2659858)
Why didn't Mitchell mention that Clemens said he took B-12 shots? Was it unclear that his saying so was related to McNamee?
It didn't explicitly refer to McNamee, so perhaps.
   47. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: January 03, 2008 at 11:48 PM (#2659863)
I saw something today at the grocery store called "vegetable dopiaza." You don't want to know what my first thought was.
   48. Rich Rifkin Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:08 AM (#2659873)
If Clemens is not guilty, he should teach a course: how to appear guilty to everyone with common sense when you are in fact innocent.
   49. Darren Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:10 AM (#2659874)
It's so funny to see the hoops people will jump through to exonerate someone that they like. Why not just come out and say "I really like Clemens so I'm deciding to believe him over the other guy?" Why go through phony reason after phony reason for saying he's innocent?


I've said before I don't know whether Clemens is guilty or not. I just don't think it's reasonable to look at the evidence before us and assume that he's guilty.

What makes you think the lidocaine was administered to his butt?

Because that's where McNamee said he injected Clemens.


That has nothing to do with what Clemens said though. He said that he's been injected with lidocaine. He didn't say where.
   50. Darren Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:11 AM (#2659876)
If Clemens is not guilty, he should teach a course: how to appear guilty to everyone with common sense when you are in fact innocent.


Lesson 1: Repeatedly deny the charges against you.
   51. Nasty Nate Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:12 AM (#2659878)
It's so funny to see the hoops people will jump through to exonerate someone that they like. Why not just come out and say "I really like Clemens so I'm deciding to believe him over the other guy?" Why go through phony reason after phony reason for saying he's innocent?


What hoops? What phony reason? I don't "really like" Clemens. For that matter, I haven't "exonerated" him. But I think that without any evidence, a person deserves the benefit of the doubt.


umm, #41 was just supposed to be a good-natured mocking of #37. I guess you assumed I was responding to your post 17 slots above...?
   52. El Hombre 2 MVPs (Le Samourai) Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:17 AM (#2659881)
I think it's funny that people criticize players like Pettitte, McGwire, etc. that dodge the issue or offer half-hearted apologies, and then, when somebody finally just flat out denies the allegations against him, they say "Oh come on he's lying!"
   53. Sparkles Peterson Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:26 AM (#2659886)
Lidocaine's a temporary local anesthetic. Why inject it in your butt? Unless that part of your butt is sore. Seriously. I suppose maybe it could help with sciatica pain but I never heard of Clemens suffering from that. Ignoring the obvious old-school Primer Mike Piazza post, why would anyone take a shot of Lidocaine in the butt?


These weren't lidocaine shots, you just put a little bit of lidocaine in B12 shots to alleviate some of the soreness you get with any injection. I don't know if Clemens wasn't clear enough in his excuse or if the headline-writer just didn't know this.
   54. Sparkles Peterson Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:31 AM (#2659889)
Oh, and if Clemens had McNamee give him B12 injections in his ass, he probably had a thing for him.
   55. Ray DiPerna Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:32 AM (#2659892)
It's so funny to see the hoops people will jump through to exonerate someone that they like. Why not just come out and say "I really like Clemens so I'm deciding to believe him over the other guy?" Why go through phony reason after phony reason for saying he's innocent?


I'd love to know who you're referring to. The only person I've seen on this site come close to saying he's innocent is baseball chick.

The rest of us simply haven't reached a conclusion given the state of the evidence. I've said before that I think there's a 25-30% chance he's "guilty," and I'm waiting to see what other information comes out. I haven't the foggiest clue how people are getting to 99% certainty.
   56. Nasty Nate Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:58 AM (#2659898)
It's so funny to see the hoops people will jump through to exonerate someone that they like. Why not just come out and say "I really like Clemens so I'm deciding to believe him over the other guy?" Why go through phony reason after phony reason for saying he's innocent?




I'd love to know who you're referring to. The only person I've seen on this site come close to saying he's innocent is baseball chick.


see post #51
   57. Benji Posted: January 04, 2008 at 02:11 AM (#2659925)
I try to stay out of steroid threads, but didn't Hardin first say McNamee didn't inject him at all?
   58. I lost my thrill on Glenallen Hill Posted: January 04, 2008 at 02:25 AM (#2659929)
Here are the Cubs' top prospects

1. Geovany Soto - I think he's better than Vitters
2. Josh Vitters
3. Jeff Samardzija
4. Donald Veal - sleeper, I like him
5. Tyler Colvin
6. Jose Ceda
7. Sean Gallagher
8. Allesandro Maestri

Just missed: Josh Donaldson, Tony Thomas
   59. Red Juice Posted: January 04, 2008 at 02:26 AM (#2659931)
I haven't the foggiest clue how people are getting to 99% certainty.


I don't either. it boggles the mind. I just label them 'sheep.' These are the people that take what ever the media feeds them when it comes to the juice. Its mind boggling because they spend pretty much 360 days a year at Primer, dissecting, what the media feeds them.

Andy. how can you arrive at 99% certainty?

You have three guys named by McNamee, a guy trying to save his ass from ..well we have no idea what he is saving his ass from, but he is still trying to save it.
Of the three guys he fingered, one admitted,[pettitte] and two denied.[rocket/justice].

Truth of the matter, if anybody here is lying, it is probably Pettitte.
It is amazing that you witch hunters let a guy off the hook for admission, even when by your own standards, he is telling a bigger lie. Show of hands; how many of you hunters believed Pettitte. but yet he lied to your face, and you are ok with that ..

mind boggling.

One again, David nails it.
Come on, Ray. The fact that he didn't deny it proves he's guilty.
Er, the fact that he denied it through his lawyer rather than personally proves he's guilty.
Er, the fact that he denied it personally rather than to a reporter proves he's guilty.
Er, the fact that he denied it to a reporter he picked rather than to a bunch of reporters proves he's guilty.


Er, the fact that he listened to his counsel, versus the media, PROVES he is guilty.
   60. I lost my thrill on Glenallen Hill Posted: January 04, 2008 at 02:37 AM (#2659934)
Those B12 injections just ruin the "It's all gonna come down to the birthmark on Roger Clemens' ass" thing. Shame.
   61. Rich Rifkin Posted: January 04, 2008 at 03:04 AM (#2659945)
"Lesson 1: Repeatedly deny the charges against you."

Someone missed the part about having common sense. I won't say who, Darren.
   62. baudib Posted: January 04, 2008 at 03:29 AM (#2659952)
Clemens is my all-time favorite player.

He did steroids.
   63. xbhaskarx Posted: January 04, 2008 at 08:05 AM (#2659988)
Is any person out there willing to say "I, [name], believe Roger Clemens when he says he never used steroids and only took Lidocaine and B-12 injections"?
   64. David Nieporent Posted: January 04, 2008 at 09:16 AM (#2659999)
Is any person out there willing to say "I, [name], believe Roger Clemens when he says he never used steroids and only took Lidocaine and B-12 injections"?
I've heard that Canseco was on the radio yesterday in Boston and backed Clemens up; I didn't hear the interview myself, though.
   65. Chris Dial Posted: January 04, 2008 at 09:37 AM (#2660005)
Crazy Joe said:
If it were B-12, why wait as long as he waited to tell the world? He had to know that the world was forming opinions. The best way to do damage control would be to tell the truth right away...that the injections were B-12. Unless, they weren't B-12 injections.


Oops:

It was mentioned in an affidavit involving former major league pitcher Jason Grimsley, and Jose Canseco wrote in his book, "Juiced," that Clemens' late-career success showed "classic signs" of steroids use. At the time, Hendricks told Newsday: "Roger says it is all nonsense ... takes vitamin B-12 shots ... and will pass every test."
   66. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: January 04, 2008 at 09:42 AM (#2660006)
For what it's worth, Canseco has also said that Clemens is the only player he ever knew in baseball who did not cheat on his wife. Presumably there must be a couple of others.

In the context of the locker room (and assuming Canseco is right), I find Clemens' marital fidelity more admirable than any player who chose not to use steroids.
   67. Craig Calcaterra Posted: January 04, 2008 at 09:46 AM (#2660009)
In the context of the locker room (and assuming Canseco is right), I find Clemens' marital fidelity more admirable than any player who chose not to use steroids.


Debbie Clemens is (a) pretty hot; and (b) probably the only person who could put up with Rocket's personality due to knowing him back before he was a big deal. He has every incentive to stay faithful.
   68. Pasta-diving Jeter (jmac66) Posted: January 04, 2008 at 10:10 AM (#2660031)
Once Clemens admitted to receiving injections of ANYTHING, he sealed his own doom in the court of public opinion. B-12 and lidocaine? Sure, Rocket, that's all it was, we believe you.

"whatever you do, don't sell that cow"
   69. kevin Posted: January 04, 2008 at 10:17 AM (#2660037)
He took too long to say B-12? So if he had mentioned B-12 earlier, you'd have no problem believing him?


You slay me, Darren.
   70. kevin Posted: January 04, 2008 at 10:25 AM (#2660042)
I've heard that Canseco was on the radio yesterday in Boston and backed Clemens up; I didn't hear the interview myself, though.


Inadmissable hearsay, David.
   71. Moscow Hiding In The Shadows Posted: January 04, 2008 at 10:33 AM (#2660044)
Andy. how can you arrive at 99% certainty?

You have three guys named by McNamee, a guy trying to save his ass from ..well we have no idea what he is saving his ass from, but he is still trying to save it.

Of the three guys he fingered, one admitted,[pettitte] and two denied.[rocket/justice].


Actually you forgot Chuck Knoblauch, who hasn't been heard from but who I'm sure hasn't confessed, either.

Truth of the matter, if anybody here is lying, it is probably Pettitte.

GR, just ask yourself a simple question. Which of these two scenarios seems inherently more likely to be truthful:

A guilty player denying that he juiced? Plenty of examples of that out there.

Or an innocent player confessing to something that he didn't do? Name one.

Why on earth would Pettitte confess to something he didn't do?

Is he part of a diabolical plot to destroy McNamee's credibility? I think I saw something like that in an old Bogart movie, with Bette Davis playing the Pettitte part. Yes, maybe Randy Hendricks was surfing TCM one night and got inspired by Marked Woman.

More seriously, although Pettitte's confession doesn't necessarily force a conclusion that McNamee was telling the truth about the other three, it certainly doesn't hurt his overall credibility, as even David admits. We can argue about whether that makes it 2% certain or 99% certain that Clemens juiced, but that's little more than our individual hunches speaking. And in this case, I certainly hope that your hunch is correct and that I'll be proved a gullible chump for believing McNamee.
   72. Mayonnaise Savant (DTM) Posted: January 04, 2008 at 10:38 AM (#2660050)
More seriously, although Pettitte's confession doesn't necessarily force a conclusion that McNamee was telling the truth about the other three, it certainly doesn't hurt his overall credibility, as even David admits. We can argue about whether that makes it 2% certain or 99% certain that Clemens juiced, but that's little more than our individual hunches speaking. And in this case, I certainly hope that your hunch is correct and that I'll be proved a gullible chump for believing McNamee.


This is what I think at this point. I'd say there's an 85% chance Clemens used steroids, but in the end it's still based on evidence that is nowhere near conclusive.
   73. kevin Posted: January 04, 2008 at 10:39 AM (#2660052)
mind boggling.


I agree. The 99% thing is pretty shaky.

The chance that Clemens is lying here is 100%.
   74. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: January 04, 2008 at 10:51 AM (#2660062)
Coincidentally, that's the same percentage of Astro, Yankee, Toronto, and Red Sox management figures who knew that their players were greenying and roiding, and rewarded them for it.

Change the phrasing to present day, and maybe we'll let them claim the lower 99% figure.
   75. David Nieporent Posted: January 04, 2008 at 11:43 AM (#2660100)
The chance that Clemens is lying here is 100%.
Let's see. A steroids accusation not involving a current Red Sock. Chances of Kevin being able to rationally interpret it: 0%.
   76. haplo53 Posted: January 04, 2008 at 11:54 AM (#2660116)
"Who told you your incompetent little fingers had the requisite skills to edit me???"
   77. Backlasher Posted: January 04, 2008 at 11:59 AM (#2660121)
What if he had mentioned taking B-12, say, when the Grimsley story broke?

That would have been a good thing. In your scrapbook of Roger Clemens life works, can you find where Clemens actually did this?

What you have linked is Clemen's agent saying things allegedly told to him by Roger. For all those people typing "hearsay", you know have a more operable example of it.

If you want Clemens actual statements after Grimsley they are:

"I just think it’s incredibly dangerous to sit out there and just throw names out there,” Clemens said, before the Astros lost to the Braves, 3-1, in Atlanta to end their season. “I haven’t seen it, nor do I need to see it.”

“I’ve been tested plenty of times,” Clemens said. “My physicals I’ve taken, they have taken my blood work, I have passed every test. Again, I just find it amazing that you can throw anybody out there.”

“I’ll continue to use Mac to train me,” Clemens said. “He’s one of a kind.”

Tomorrow they are going to accuse us of robbing a bank,” Clemens said. “Bottom line is, if it’s not in my frappacino, I’m all right.”


The B12 statement by Hendricks came after the frappacino statement. In Roger's defense, it was a little before we found that Roger liked to dip into the Vioxx.

At that time, Roger told us,
"''I'm going to find anything I can to get into my body that is healthy, that will make me stronger, so I feel like I'm going to be able to stay up with 20-year-olds. You rely on physicians and people to tell you what's shaking in that world.''


If we want to see how Jose fits in, here is his take on B-12 and Clemens from page 211-212 of Juiced:

"[Steroids] was so open, the trainers would jokingly call the steroid injections "B12 shots," and soon the players had picked up on that little code name, too. You'd hear them saying it out loud in front of each other: "I need to go in and get a B12 shot," a player would say, and everyone would laugh. (Of course, that was the kind of joke you really only made around other steroid users, because obviously they were in the same boat as you. What were they going to do, tell on you? Not hardly.)

It was the pitchers that kept the "B12" joke going. For example, I've never seen Roger Clemens do steroids, and he never told me that he did. But we've talked about what steroids could do for you, in which combinations, and I've heard him use the phrase "B12 shot" with respect to others.

A lot of pitchers did steroids to keep up with hitters. If everyone else was getting stronger and faster, then you wanted to get stronger and faster, too. If you were a pitcher, and the hitters were all getting stronger, that made your job that much more difficult. Roger used to talk about that a lot.

"You hitters are so darn strong from steroids," he'd say.

"Yeah, but you pitchers are taking it, too. You're just taking different types," I'd respond.

And sometimes Roger would vent his frustration over the hits even the lesser players were starting to get off good pitchers. "Damn, that little guy hit it odd the end of the bat and almost drove it to the wall," he would say. He would complain about guys who were hitting fifty homers when they had no business hitting thirty. It was becoming more difficult for pitchers all the time, he would complain.

I can't give chapter and verse on Roger's training regimen. But I'll tell you what I was thinking at the time:

One of the classic signs of steroid use is when a player's basic performance actually improves later in his career. One of the benefits of steroids is that they're especially helpful in countering the effects of aging. So in Roger's case, around the time that he was leaving Boston-and Dan Duquette, the general manager there, was saying he was "past his prime"-Roger decided to make some changes. He started working out harder. And whatever else he may have been doing to get stronger, he saw results. His fastball improved by a few miles per hour. He was a great pitcher long before then; it wasn't his late-career surge that made him great. But he certainly stayed great far longer than most athletes could expect. There's no question about that.




Clemens reaction to Canseco's first accusations:

"I could care less"''I've talked to some friends of his,'' Clemens said. ''And I've teased them that when you're under house arrest and have ankle bracelets on, you have a lot of time to write a book.''


I've said before I don't know whether Clemens is guilty or not. I just don't think it's reasonable to look at the evidence before us and assume that he's guilty.


ROFLMAO. What does this mean-that you think he did not take PEDS; that you aren't able to form conclusions on your own until somebody tells you what to think?
   78. Backlasher Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:10 PM (#2660129)
What hoops? What phony reason? I don't "really like" Clemens. For that matter, I haven't "exonerated" him. But I think that without any evidence, a person deserves the benefit of the doubt.


David, I think that is responsive to Darren's fanboy defenses. The ones where he insults anyone that examines the issue in anyway.

As for benefit of the doubt, that is well and good, but I think we do need to examine things.

We have gone from taking Vioxx to nothing but frappacino to having Wallace say no injections from McNamee to B12 and lidocaine in the ass. At some point the Rocket has to land.
   79. Joe Bivens, Ditch Digger Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:12 PM (#2660131)
Oops:

It was mentioned in an affidavit involving former major league pitcher Jason Grimsley, and Jose Canseco wrote in his book, "Juiced," that Clemens' late-career success showed "classic signs" of steroids use. At the time, Hendricks told Newsday: "Roger says it is all nonsense ... takes vitamin B-12 shots ... and will pass every test."


Chris: I suppose it's possible Clemens actually believes he was getting b-12 injections. [/blank stare]

People are going to believe what they're predisposed to believe. Meanwhile, the nooses are tightening...
   80. Ray DiPerna Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:27 PM (#2660145)
Thanks for the link to the NYT story, BL. I found that interesting.

Canseco:
One of the classic signs of steroid use is when a player's basic performance actually improves later in his career. One of the benefits of steroids is that they're especially helpful in countering the effects of aging.


This statement is laughable coming from Canseco, a player who peaked between the ages of 23-26 and managed to play just two full seasons thereafter. (It looks like he missed time in 1994, but of course that was the strike year and he actually played in 111 of the 114 games.)
   81. Backlasher Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:30 PM (#2660149)
I did not provide Brian McNamee with any drugs to inject into my body.


Then where did the B12 and lidocaine come from Roger?

According to CBS, when Wallace asked Clemens if McNamee had injected him with any drugs, Clemens responded: "Lidocaine and B-12. It's for my joints, and B-12 I still take today."

Which is it Roger? Did you have to backtrack when McNamee threatened to sue?
   82. Pasta-diving Jeter (jmac66) Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:33 PM (#2660151)
Chris: I suppose it's possible Clemens actually believes he was getting b-12 injections. [/blank stare]

so Clemens says to McNamee, "Geez I'm beat; I need something to make me feel better--got any B12 ?"

and McNamee says: "ummm.. B12? you sure?--yeah, I got me some of that"

so Clemens actually meant B12, while McNamee thought he meant "B12"


(nah, I don't believe it either)
   83. kevin Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:34 PM (#2660154)
The flaxseed oil tablets clouded his memory temporarily, BL.
   84. kevin Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:38 PM (#2660157)
See, even though you can take B-12 orally, it's important to get it into the blood stream as quickly as possible, to avoid the life-threatening consequences of having normal B-12 levels. That's why you need to have a trainer inject it surreptitiously.
   85. Backlasher Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:38 PM (#2660159)
I guess its possible kevin. Like Jmac said, it could be that:

(1) McNamee provided all the drugs (including lidocaine which most likely is going to require a prescription for any indicated injectable form)
(2) Roger asked for B12 and literally meant B12.
(3) And he would be shocked, shocked if McNamee used illicit substances
(4) In fact, he would not believe McNamee would do any such thing which is why he said he had "never taken steroids or hGH"

That is the Bonds defense, B12:steroids::flaxseed:HgH
   86. Backlasher Posted: January 04, 2008 at 12:41 PM (#2660162)
See, even though you can take B-12 orally, it's important to get it into the blood stream as quickly as possible, to avoid the life-threatening consequences of having normal B-12 levels. That's why you need to have a trainer inject it surreptitiously.


Especially in the offseason. Its also doubly important to get it in the ass.

Just to be safe, you need to get that lidocaine in the ass too.
   87. David Nieporent Posted: January 04, 2008 at 01:05 PM (#2660179)
What you have linked is Clemen's agent saying things allegedly told to him by Roger. For all those people typing "hearsay", you know have a more operable example of it.
Objection overruled. Admissible as a prior consistent statement, not for the truth of the matter asserted, so not hearsay at all.


Which is it Roger? Did you have to backtrack when McNamee threatened to sue?
You're getting pretty desperate here. Wallace backtracked, not Clemens. So Wallace sloppily says "No injections" when he means "no injections of steroids," and then he clarified it.

Canseco backs Clemens (Audio file of radio interview with Canseco yesterday.)


Then where did the B12 and lidocaine come from Roger?
From McNamee, one would presume.
   88. Ray DiPerna Posted: January 04, 2008 at 01:06 PM (#2660180)
I did not provide Brian McNamee with any drugs to inject into my body.


Then where did the B12 and lidocaine come from Roger?


If they came from McNamee, then Clemens's statement (that he did not provide McNamee with any drugs to inject into his body) is 100% true.

And I assume that a trainer would be more likely to supply B-12 and lidocaine than the athlete. Regardless, let's suppose Clemens provided the B-12 and lidocaine to McNamee. So taken literally, Clemens's statement would not be true. But then you're accusing him of "lying" about doing something that was perfectly legal and legitimate.

I'm not moved.

According to CBS, when Wallace asked Clemens if McNamee had injected him with any drugs, Clemens responded: "Lidocaine and B-12. It's for my joints, and B-12 I still take today."

Which is it Roger? Did you have to backtrack when McNamee threatened to sue?


Backtrack? Where?
   89. Ray DiPerna Posted: January 04, 2008 at 01:09 PM (#2660185)
Especially in the offseason. Its also doubly important to get it in the ass.

Just to be safe, you need to get that lidocaine in the ass too.


Where are you getting the location of the injections from? I haven't seen Clemens comment on that.
   90. robinred Posted: January 04, 2008 at 01:13 PM (#2660192)
Where are you getting the location of the injections from? I haven't seen Clemens comment on that.


BL just likes to make ass jokes. He's an ass man--we had a nice (albeit too short) conversation about Jessica Alba's ass once.
   91. Backlasher Posted: January 04, 2008 at 01:27 PM (#2660203)
Objection overruled. Admissible as a prior consistent statement, not for the truth of the matter asserted, so not hearsay at all.


I still didn't hear Clemens say it. His agent said he used it. Also, it also appears the timeline is wrong as being asserted by Darren. The statment by Hendricks appears to have occurred after "Juiced" and was to counter Canseco's statements about "B12" being code. Specifically, Hendricks was saying that Roger does take B12, with an implication that all the other steroid talk with Canseco was just Roger trying to be cool.


From McNamee, one would presume.

Oh, so McNamee had that much control over what went into the syringe?

Is this a case of not knowingly taking steroids.

And certainly Roger wouldn't let McNamee inject him with something for which Roger needs a prescription. Or was he just putting anbesol in the syringe?

But then you're accusing him of "lying" about doing something that was perfectly legal and legitimate.


First, I haven't accused him of anything. You may find it easier to respond to what is being said rather than doing your best to figure out what people mean.

Second, if you want an implication, the implication is that Clemens changes his story to suit the moment. That should shed light on his veracity. Whether you are impressed (or why you would need to be impressed) is totally irrelevant.

Third, the lidocaine may not be legal either. He would require a prescription for injectable forms.
   92. Backlasher Posted: January 04, 2008 at 01:33 PM (#2660208)
Where are you getting the location of the injections from? I haven't seen Clemens comment on that.


So you think that McNamee was lying about where the injections were given too?
   93. kevin Posted: January 04, 2008 at 01:40 PM (#2660214)
Would it be redundant to mention, at this point, that lidocaine is not indicated for the problem Clemens claims McNamee injected him for?

maybe not. he might have needed a root canal in his posterior. I suppose that's possible, seeing as how Clemens has been known to talk out of his ass so much.
   94. Joey B. Posted: January 04, 2008 at 01:47 PM (#2660218)
Where are you getting the location of the injections from? I haven't seen Clemens comment on that.

And you don't find that just a little weird? Because I sure do. To the best of my knowledge, normal adults typically don't receive injections in their gluteus maximus. I've received as many as ten vaccinations in one day, and strangely enough not a single one of them was in my rear end. If the nurse had publicly claimed that it was, I would deny it out of sheer embarrassment.
   95. David Nieporent Posted: January 04, 2008 at 01:59 PM (#2660228)
I still didn't hear Clemens say it. His agent said he used it.
Well, if Clemens said it, it wouldn't be hearsay at all, so I'm not sure what your point is.

Also, it also appears the timeline is wrong as being asserted by Darren. The statment by Hendricks appears to have occurred after "Juiced" and was to counter Canseco's statements about "B12" being code. Specifically, Hendricks was saying that Roger does take B12, with an implication that all the other steroid talk with Canseco was just Roger trying to be cool.
Yes, and? The point here is that some people were trying to claim that the time that elapsed between when the Mitchell report was released and Clemens' statement that he used B-12 was evidence that he was lying about B-12 -- the theory, I guess, being that he's really slow and took several weeks to think of that alibi. But in fact we know that it didn't take him several weeks to think it up; he had already used it.

So you think that McNamee was lying about where the injections were given too?
Falsus in uno...

He also claimed that Clemens stopped getting HGH because he didn't like a belly button shot, even though HGH isn't injected into the belly button. Dr. McNamee, PhD, has some credibility since Pettitte admitted his allegations about him, but not a lot.


Where are you getting the location of the injections from? I haven't seen Clemens comment on that.

And you don't find that just a little weird? Because I sure do. To the best of knowledge, normal adults typically don't receive injections in their gluteus maximus. I've received as many as ten vaccinations in one day, and strangely enough not a single one of them was in my rear end. If the nurse had publicly claimed that it was, I would deny it out of sheer embarrassment.
Are you on (non-injectable) drugs? Ray points out that Clemens didn't say that they were in the ass, and then you respond that it's strange that Clemens got injected in the ass? Where are you getting the claim that they were injected in the ass?

And your argument is self-refuting anyway; if you don't think someone would get injections in the ass, then that discredits McNamee.
   96. Backlasher Posted: January 04, 2008 at 02:28 PM (#2660256)
Well, if Clemens said it, it wouldn't be hearsay at all, so I'm not sure what your point is.


It would be in the same way that everyone is claiming "hearsay, hearsay" in that it was repeated by a paper.

My point is that you have so many of the fanboy legion trying to discredit something by saying "Hearsay" when a statement or report directly quotes someone's admissable assertions that it is comical when they cite as evidence:

(a) A newspaper relaying
(b) A statement allegedly made years before
(c) by another person
(d) that implies but does not expressly state, it was a statement by Clemens.

The point here is that some people were trying to claim that the time that elapsed between when the Mitchell report was released and Clemens' statement that he used B-12 was evidence that he was lying about B-12 -- the theory, I guess, being that he's really slow and took several weeks to think of that alibi. But in fact we know that it didn't take him several weeks to think it up; he had already used it.


There is some truth in that report. The slow crawl of information makes very little sense. It would seem prudent for Clemens to make a statement immediately afterwards that "I did not use HGH, and the only injections ever given to me by McNamee where for B12, which I have used for ___ years."

Instead we get Rusty telling us that people should "get a good lawyer." Now, Rusty is saying it was his idea to have this slow crawl of information. Maybe Roger needs "to get a good PR person"


He also claimed that Clemens stopped getting HGH because he didn't like a belly button shot, even though HGH isn't injected into the belly button.

Hgh is administered in the belly. Roger apparently preferred the ass.

And your argument is self-refuting anyway; if you don't think someone would get injections in the ass, then that discredits McNamee.


They don't think you would get B12 injections in the ass, unless you just liked getting shots in the ass.
   97. David Nieporent Posted: January 04, 2008 at 03:09 PM (#2660303)
(b) A statement allegedly made years before
I don't know what you're looking at, but if you google it, you can find a newspaper relaying the statement when it was made, not "years before." And it wasn't "another person" like some random guy in a bar; it was Clemens' spokesperson. And the statement wasn't being offered as evidence of truth, but as evidence that in fact it was not recently invented. Classic non-hearsay.

There is some truth in that report. The slow crawl of information makes very little sense. It would seem prudent for Clemens to make a statement immediately afterwards that "I did not use HGH, and the only injections ever given to me by McNamee where for B12, which I have used for ___ years."
And, of course, if he had said that, you'd have believed him.
Instead we get Rusty telling us that people should "get a good lawyer." Now, Rusty is saying it was his idea to have this slow crawl of information. Maybe Roger needs "to get a good PR person"
For what? People decided they didn't believe him, and then afterwards manufactured reasons not to do so. If he threatens to sue, he's guilty because he's overreacting; if he doesn't, he's underreacting. He had the wrong body language when he denied it. He denied it in the wrong order. He should have said it in Pig Latin. You have Rich claiming that he knew Clemens was guilty because several people here say that polygraphs are not accurate. (Not because Clemens refused to take one, but because Primates said it was pointless to take one.)

Why would Clemens volunteer a completely irrelevant bit of information -- that being something he didn't do wrong -- which he had already previously announced? He denied that he gave anything to McNamee; he denied that McNamee gave him any PEDs. There was no "slow crawl." This came out because Wallace asked him it, not because Clemens suddenly announced it three weeks later.

If people want to think Clemens is guilty, they will, no matter what he does. If McNamee comes out and says that he lied because prosecutors forced him to, people would still think of some reason why Clemens was guilty. They'd claim Clemens paid him off. So don't worry; on Sunday you can claim you don't believe him because he blinked too much. And then after his press conference on Monday, you can claim you don't believe him because he wore the wrong color shirt.


Hgh is administered in the belly.
Thigh, normally, actually. But neither the thigh nor the belly is the "belly button," which is what the Mitchell Report quoted McNamee as saying.

And if McNamee were being offered as a defense witness, you'd laugh at the idea that anybody would believe him.

They don't think you would get B12 injections in the ass, unless you just liked getting shots in the ass.
Why would you get anything injected in the ass, Mike Piazza jokes excepted?
   98. kevin Posted: January 04, 2008 at 03:12 PM (#2660309)
Why would you get anything injected in the ass, Mike Piazza jokes excepted?


It's a very large muscle and can absorb more volume and take a longer needle than smaller muscles like the deltoid or tricep.
   99. Ray DiPerna Posted: January 04, 2008 at 03:23 PM (#2660320)
And then after his press conference on Monday, you can claim you don't believe him because he wore the wrong color shirt.


BL won't need to go quite that far. He can just claim that Clemens had his fingers crossed during the interview, and that we only didn't see that because Wallace -- a friend of Clemens, dontchaknow -- told the camera crew to film Clemens only from the shoulders up.
   100. Dylan Formerly in Phx Posted: January 04, 2008 at 03:29 PM (#2660326)
They don't think you would get B12 injections in the ass, unless you just liked getting shots in the ass.


They should google "B12 shot buttocks" then. My mother is vitamin deficient and has regularly received B12 shots in her ass to help her. They can also be applied to the arm (usually alternating) or the stomach
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 0.7957 seconds
81 querie(s) executed