Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Monday, November 23, 2009

Rosenthal: Blue Jays bring in more scouts to help fill roster

And Eddie Bane just renewed his subscription to Kamehameha Garment Monthly!

Six years after the release of “Moneyball,” the stats vs. scouts debate is coming almost full circle.

“Moneyball,” written by Michael Lewis, detailed the A’s use of statistical analysis to exploit inefficiencies in the player market, demeaning the role of scouts in the process.

Alex Anthopoulos, the Blue Jays’ new general manager, is increasing the team’s number of domestic scouts from 28 to 54 in an attempt to better compete with the Yankees and Red Sox in the AL East.

Anthopolous, 32, is no old-school throwback, longing for the days when teams relied solely on scouts’ opinions and not computers. Quite the contrary. He grew up reading Bill James, believes in blending subjective and objective analysis, and uses Tom Tango, a leading sabermetrician, as a consultant.

His increased emphasis on scouting, while more retro than radical, is certainly a departure from the current trend. But Anthopoulos sees it like this: So many clubs employ statistical analysis, the numbers no longer offer as significant a competitive advantage.

..."I’m a younger guy. I’ve been exposed to all that (statistical) stuff,” Anthopoulos says. “But the numbers on the page aren’t going to change — they’re a tangible item. Every organization in baseball has access to the same information. The way it’s analyzed, the way it’s cut up, that can be a competitive advantage. But the numbers don’t change.

“When you’re analyzing a player from a scouting perspective, it’s not a tangible process. Everyone has their own checklists and things that they look for. ‘People’ are the competitive advantage. The organizations that have the better evaluators have something that is specific to them and can’t be transferred to another organization the way the statistics can.”

Repoz Posted: November 23, 2009 at 07:24 AM | 21 comment(s)
  Related News: GeneralMinor LeaguesProspect ReportsScoutingSabermetricsToronto

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. JRVJ (formerly Delta Socrates)  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 08:29 AM (#3394391)
Or phrased differently, there's not much chance to find hidden gems through statistical analysis, but perhaps there are still gems out there that can be found through rigorous scouting (an area which has lost much of what little luster it has because of the scouts vs. stats debate).

I don't know if the Jays will be successful, but if you believe that the whole point of what Beane was doing was find value where others didn't see it (or weren't looking for it), it'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
   2. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 08:34 AM (#3394393)
It makes sense. Zig when the others zag. The A's themselves have been more agressive with highschoolers and internationals lately, too, which I'm assuming is based on more rigorous scouting.
   3. Tricky Dick  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 08:57 AM (#3394404)
Yes, the article says that Bean agrees with this approach. He says the A's have been expanding their amateur scouting.

But, truthfully, I'm skeptical that just increasing the number of scouts will produce sufficient marginal returns, particular with respect to scouting major league player(which is a key part of the Jays' plan). If all your plan does is generate more diverse and numerous opinions about particular players, you have to successfully identify which opinion is most likely correct.

After reading the article, perhaps the most significant part of the Jays' plan is to increase average salaries for scouts and improve working conditions. I suspect that increasing the quality of scouting may be more important than increasing the number of scouts, and making the job more attractive should help retain good scouts.
   4. Ryan Jones  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 09:00 AM (#3394405)
He grew up reading Bill James, believes in blending subjective and objective analysis, and uses Tom Tango, a leading sabermetrician, as a consultant.


Well, it looks like Tango should expect 800 WTF?!? emails from me every time the Jays do something stupid.
   5. snapper  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 09:32 AM (#3394415)
Or phrased differently, there's not much chance to find hidden gems through statistical analysis, but perhaps there are still gems out there that can be found through rigorous scouting (an area which has lost much of what little luster it has because of the scouts vs. stats debate).

I think the next frontier is video analysis. I'd rather send out video teams to film prospects and send the feed back to a central facility. The video can be subjected to quantitative analysis and viewed by my best scouts.

Good talent evaluators are hard to find. Don't waste their time driving six hours between podunk towns. Save the in-person viewing for once you've narrowed the population down.
   6. Zuvella!  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 09:40 AM (#3394419)
I can't believe Tango recommended that Wells contract.
   7. Bobby Bonilla's Annuity (Matt)  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 11:08 AM (#3394501)
Interesting story. But zero context. How many scouts do other teams have? Is this just Toronto finally catching up with everyone?
   8. Ryan Jones  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 11:15 AM (#3394505)
Is this just Toronto finally catching up with everyone?


It's not entirely clear, but a couple recent articles have indicated (or at least hinted) that this is a matter of Toronto both catching up and surpassing the number of scouts employed by other teams - AA has made repeated reference to emphasising scouting (both pro and amateur) within the Toronto organization as a way to help Toronto compete with the Red Sox and the Yankees.

I'm not aware of any central list that allows for comparison of the number of scouts in different organizations.
   9. rfloh  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 11:25 AM (#3394511)

But, truthfully, I'm skeptical that just increasing the number of scouts will produce sufficient marginal returns, particular with respect to scouting major league player(which is a key part of the Jays' plan). If all your plan does is generate more diverse and numerous opinions about particular players, you have to successfully identify which opinion is most likely correct.


According to Anthopolous, they are increasing the number of scouts so that a particular scout can focus more on a smaller area, instead of having to cover a (much) larger area.

So their goal isn't so much generating more opinions, as it is generating more in depth, more detailed opinions.
   10. philly  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 01:51 PM (#3394702)
Interesting story. But zero context. How many scouts do other teams have? Is this just Toronto finally catching up with everyone?


I looked closey at 10-15 organizations a couple years ago. It was all of the playoff teams and some other ones that were notable for generally having good farms.

In terms of scouting for the draft, most teams had 15-16 area scouts and 3-4 crosscheckers under thier scouting director.

The team that had the most was the Red Sox with 19 area scouts and 5 crosscheckers.

The article states that the Jays will go from 14 area scouts to 25 and increase to 8 total crosscheckers. That looks like a pretty substantial increase.

Btw, the smallest dept a couple of years ago was the A's who only had 12 area scouts and 3 crosscheckers. Nobody else was below 14 and you cuold just tell from the areas those guys were based in that they had to be stretched extraordianrily thin and/or large tracts of the middle of the country were barely covered. It was mentioned in the article that the A's started to beef up their scouting ranks a couple years ago and sure enough they were up to 17 area scouts last year.
   11. Walt Davis  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 01:52 PM (#3394705)
1. Stats have always been and will almost surely continue to be nearly useless for evaluating amateur talent. You might be able to extract some useful info on college players but generally the sample sizes are teeny, the quality of competition effects are much more variable and god only knows what park effects must be like. And let's not even think about Latin American signings based on stats.

2. The marginal return on hiring your first stat analyst vs. an additional scout likely leans in the direction of the stat analyst pretty heavily. The marginal return on hiring your second stat analyst vs. an additional scout probably lies with the scout. By the time you get to your third stat analyst, you're just hiring a guy to spend his day reading primer, fangraphs, THT, etc.

3. I think Snapper's on the right track. If there's an "inefficiency" to be exploited here, it's going to be someone who figures out a different way of scouting or a third prong that's added to stats and scouts. Imagine a portable pitch/fx setup -- then maybe you start getting some useful data on amateurs. Of course a portable pitch/fx setup would disseminate quite quickly.

4. Anyway, it's hard to see how it could hurt. 26 scouts combined can't possibly make more than an FA utility infielder I wouldn't think.
   12. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 01:53 PM (#3394706)
Thanks philly. That's good stuff.
   13. Ryan Jones  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 01:55 PM (#3394708)
By the time you get to your third stat analyst, you're just hiring a guy to spend his day reading primer, fangraphs, THT, etc.


If you see one of these jobs available, could you let me know?
   14. JRVJ (formerly Delta Socrates)  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 02:04 PM (#3394714)
By the time you get to your third stat analyst, you're just hiring a guy to spend his day reading primer, fangraphs, THT, etc.


This is a problem, how?
   15. The Mighty Quinn  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 02:17 PM (#3394743)
"I think the next frontier is video analysis. I'd rather send out video teams to film prospects and send the feed back to a central facility. The video can be subjected to quantitative analysis and viewed by my best scouts."



The Jays currently have 3 video scouts doing this. I was surprised when I first heard this - I didn't think this sort of analysis was happening.
   16. The Mighty Quinn  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 02:28 PM (#3394772)
Here's the mention of the video guys from a Bob Elliott story


Tinnish will have three video co-ordinators west, central and east.

"Video helped with Mike McDade (a sixth-round selection in 2007) and he's done well," Tinnish said. McDade hit .277 with 16 homers and 57 RBIs at single-A Lansing this season.

Here's the link-http://www.torontosun.com/sports/columnists/bob_elliott/2009/11/13/11732296-sun.html

(Sorry guys I don't know the proper way to do the links.)
   17. Mike Emeigh  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 02:49 PM (#3394807)
The Jays currently have 3 video scouts doing this. I was surprised when I first heard this - I didn't think this sort of analysis was happening.


Video scouting is happening a lot these days; it's a cost-effective way of separating wheat from chaff.

-- MWE
   18. Bobby Bonilla's Annuity (Matt)  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 02:50 PM (#3394808)
Philly: Good stuff. I wonder how many teams have turned to trimming scouting departments in the past few years to cut costs. All this has me thinking...story!
   19. Mike Emeigh  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 02:53 PM (#3394812)
(Sorry guys I don't know the proper way to do the links.)


Use the bracket-a-bracket tag above the comments.

-- MWE
   20. You Forgot Walewander  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 04:15 PM (#3394918)
It should be noted that the key factor ascribed to the Jays rise in the 80s was their exceptional scouting, especially in the DR.
   21. Eddieot  Posted: November 23, 2009 at 05:12 PM (#3395013)
I would think that stats only really paint a picture once the players are in the minors and teams have a sense of the competition. Otherwise, you need eyeballs. I think the video analysis point is excellent. Use those eyeballs efficiently and check out everybody rather than traveling from point A to point B with one target in mind. I would think that scouting staffs will grow in the coming years.
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
BarrysLazyBoy
for his generous support.

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy concert tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Baseball Bats

JustGreatTickets.com provides the best value for Chicago Cubs Tickets, MLB tickets including Red Sox Tickets, Yankees Tickets, SF Giants Tickets, LA Dodgers Tickets, Cleveland Indians Tickets. Get the best concert tickets like Jonas Brothers tickets and more Chicago Tickets.

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Major League Baseball: All Star Game, New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox, LA Angels, Washington Nationals, Chicago White Sox, and the Chicago Cubs.

Find terrific deals on Yankees tickets for the new home, Cubs tickets for classic Wrigley, or Red Sox tickets for Fenway with OnlineSeats. We have seats for every baseball game, including Dodgers tickets.

Page rendered in 1.3332 seconds
82 querie(s) executed