|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Thursday, November 13, 2008
The Cubs, facing the possible loss of closer Kerry Wood, have acquired right-hander Kevin Gregg from the Marlins, according to major-league sources.
Gregg, 30, closed for the Marlins for most of last season, but the Cubs likely would use him as a bridge to a Carlos Marmol if Wood departed as a free agent.
Marmol would take over as the closer, with the Cubs likely using a number of relievers — including Gregg, Jeff Samardzija, Angel Guzman, Neal Cotts, and Kevin Hart — leading up to the ninth inning.
It is not yet known whom the Marlins will receive in return for Gregg.
Thanks to Barnald.
Repoz
Posted: November 13, 2008 at 03:41 PM | 25 comment(s)
Related News: General, Chi Cubs, Florida
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to danielj for his generous support.
My Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
The Marlins are going to have a firesale, but getting rid of Jacobs, Gregg and Olsen made a lot of sense even if they weren't. Selling Willingham for pennies on the dollar was retarded.
There were a few teams (Tigers, Indians, Mets, Cards, Braves) that could use a closer/setup man in the back of the pen and you'd think they would offer more than Ceda. Seems like the Marlins are going home with whoever buys them a drink first.
I'm amazed that they're able to still remain competitive every year. Is it one person who has this magic eye for talent or does everyone there have the gift? If they had a $100 M payroll...scary stuff.
I agree. Since Josh is not a good defensive player, the Marlins are probably best off with an outfield of Ross, Maybin, and Hermida. But it's hard to imagine he wouldn't have some trade value. What's he going to make in arbitration, 5 million? Would you really rather pay 12 million to Pat Burrell?
The Angels could have used him, as currently they have openings in left field, RF or DH depending on where Vlad plays, and 1B. Willingham could have filled one of those spots regardless of whether the Angels sign Tex, Manny, Milton Bradley, or whoever. But then, I have a soft spot for OF/DH's who used to catch and provide power, walks, and a lot of HBP.
They're getting to be almost at the level of the Oakland A's for this stuff.
Fixed that for you.
Howry is cooked.
Surprised by that... but if Wood was thinking something approaching Billy Wagner money... say... 4/40 or anywhere in that ballpark, I agree with Jim.
I'm not necessarily convinced. 4.35 FIP, after all.
I don't know... after being burned on DIPS, I'm not sold on FIP... but I also saw a spike in gopher balls in 2008 - and dip in Ks. Visually, it sure looks to me like he's lost easily an 2-3 MPH on his fastball. He seems to work in the upper 80s more than the low 90s now. The guy just looked eminently hittable for most of the season.
He still throws strikes, I guess - and Howry's had a history of putting up some out of character down years every 3 or 4 years.... but at 35 in 2008, I won't be bothered if he leaves.
Not sure how the compensation works out - but if the Cubs can get a pick out of him, I wouldn't be that unhappy with an arb offer.
There's no real point to me mentioning this aside from the obvious fact that they aren't going to be after K-Rod and that I'm now bored in a different class.
We don't know what Wood is asking for though. I like the guy a lot, but he's not a good long term deal investment.
I'm not necessarily convinced. 4.35 FIP, after all.
I am.
I agree, but ... knowing how much he liked playing in Chicago (or at least from what he's said), I have to think he wouldn't have asked for anything outrageous. WAG is that whatever he ends up getting, he would have stayed for a year less and 80% of the yearly value (i.e. if he signs for 4/40, the Cubs probably could have kept him for something like 3/24). Again, just a WAG based on gut feeling - my guess is that Hendry has backed himself into a corner where he has no payroll breathing room this season.
Still, even if I'm right about that, 3/24 isn't even necessarily a good deal, but considering some of the other contracts Hendry's given out, it's hardly a drop in the bucket for a guy that can perform the way Wood does.
When I think "completely and irrevocably finished", it's usually closer to a 2000/2001 Ramon Martinez or a 2008 Matt Morris than the type of season that Howry just had.
As for Wood, I know it makes business sense not to resign him to a long term contract. But as a Cubs fan, I find it incredibly sad. In a era where few players stay in one place long. I got attached to Woody over the last 14 years, even if many of them were spent on the DL. He was always a standup guy who it seemed genuinely loved playing at Wrigley.
You started following him in high school?
That's sarcasm in reference to all the asinine, "JJ Hardy for a bag of gummy bears" trade suggestions.
Good luck Kerry
You either overestimate the value of JJ Hardy or underestimate the value of gummy bears.
I think you can call it now ... best bet on the over-under board next March will be over whatever the number is for the Marlins. The public appearance is another fire sale, but (despite the fact that their returns were pretty crummy), one could probably argue that they shouldn't be downgraded one win in 2009 compared to a projection done two weeks ago. (Maybin's offense and defense versus Willingham's, Jacobs and Gregg having pretty mainstream stats without good value to back them up, full seasons of Johnson and Sanchez and hopefully improvement from Miller replacing Olsen.)
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main