Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Friday, July 30, 2010

Rosenthal: Yankees moving quickly on Berkman deal

Oh, no Robo!

The Yankees are moving quickly toward a deal for Astros first baseman Lance Berkman, according to a major-league source.

Berkman, a switch-hitter, would serve as a DH and occasional first baseman. He would waive his no-trade clause for the Yankees without requiring the team to pick up his $15 million club option for 2011, the source said.

Berkman, 34, is batting a career-low .245 with 13 homers and 49 RBIs.

Repoz Posted: July 30, 2010 at 08:37 PM | 91 comment(s) | Login to Bookmark
  Related News: GeneralHoustonNY Yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. Der_K is getting more dogmatic. Posted: July 30, 2010 at 08:41 PM (#3604153)
Bump.
Idea supposedly is that he'd (likely) return to HOU next season and NYY wouldn't have to give up big prospects accordingly.
   2. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 30, 2010 at 08:45 PM (#3604168)
Now that's a Cashman move. Trading little more than money for a solidly above average player.

I hate the Yankees sometimes.

I hate the Yankees all the time, but some times I hate them with more of my conscious mind.
   3. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: July 30, 2010 at 08:52 PM (#3604179)
   4. The District Attorney Posted: July 30, 2010 at 08:52 PM (#3604180)
So they think Jorge can catch regularly?
   5. Mayor Blomberg Posted: July 30, 2010 at 09:01 PM (#3604188)
He'll catch as much as he can and possibly pick up DH duties against LHP.


[edit:] and when he's not in the lineup, as now, he can't DH anyway.
   6. Srul Itza Posted: July 30, 2010 at 09:02 PM (#3604192)
So they think Jorge can catch regularly?


I think they think he can catch at least some of the time, and when he does, it would be good to have a better bat in the line-up that what they have for DH's now.

I hope they get the guy who has been hitting .262/.435/.585/1.020 the last month, but I'm no so sure this is really that big of an upgrade.
   7. Mayor Blomberg Posted: July 30, 2010 at 09:08 PM (#3604200)
Strike that; I thought the NYY were picking up the option.

If it's just til the end of the year, what the heck. But I'd like to see Montero take swings in Sept.
   8. Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral Idiot Posted: July 30, 2010 at 09:09 PM (#3604201)
Doesn't Lisa have veto power over this?
   9. Joe Mauer Power Hour Posted: July 30, 2010 at 09:13 PM (#3604204)
Joel Sherman:
Deal is completed, Berkman consented to waive no-trade rights, just have to wait 24 hrs for the technicality #Yankees, #Astros
   10. Bitter Calculus Instructor Posted: July 30, 2010 at 09:52 PM (#3604250)
Cliff Lee, Dan Haren, ... Berkman? It's a good upgrade for DH, if it's for real.
   11. Mayor Blomberg Posted: July 30, 2010 at 09:54 PM (#3604253)
[8] Don't you think they'd be in contention this year if she did, Andy?
   12. Mayor Blomberg Posted: July 30, 2010 at 10:00 PM (#3604256)
& what does waiting 24 hrs mean practically. Does Lance have to wait until tomorrow to get on a plane to Tampa? Or is it just that he can't hop a charter and play tonight?
   13. bbc is prejudice bout men Posted: July 30, 2010 at 10:10 PM (#3604262)
Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Marching Through Georgia Posted: July 30, 2010 at 06:09 PM (#3604201)

Doesn't Lisa have veto power over this?


- i would rather have vetoed that terrible roy-o trade
brett wallace my butt

but no, i am NOT cheerin for no yankees, not even with lance on the team
   14. jyjjy Posted: July 30, 2010 at 10:56 PM (#3604317)
Is there any chance Berkman would still be a passable in the outfield?
   15. Dan Posted: July 30, 2010 at 10:57 PM (#3604318)
I'm sure Berkman would be more serviceable in the OF than Thames, for limited duty anyway.
   16. Chip Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:02 PM (#3604321)
Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe claimed little more than an hour ago that a Houston official told him the deal was far from done. Which, given Cafardo's track record, probably means it's done.
   17. aleskel Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:03 PM (#3604323)
Is there any chance Berkman would still be a passable in the outfield?

I don't know if I would want to be starting him out there, but I can easily see him filling the role Eric Hinske played last year - late-inning matchup guy.
   18. aleskel Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:12 PM (#3604328)
what does waiting 24 hrs mean practically

"Article 19 of the Basic Agreement states that trades involving players with 10-and-5 rights cannot be announced until 24 hours after the player gives his consent to waive the no-trade provision that comes from those rights"

http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/hardball/yankees_could_trade_for_berkman_zlUaTRh15sl6bUs1h6L2YI
   19. Bitter Calculus Instructor Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:18 PM (#3604334)
[18] Just enough time for this deal to be Cliff Lee'd.
   20. Dan Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:21 PM (#3604339)
What is the point of that rule, exactly? I certainly don't see one.
   21. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:35 PM (#3604348)
Is there any chance Berkman would still be a passable in the outfield?

I don't know if I would want to be starting him out there, but I can easily see him filling the role Eric Hinske played last year - late-inning matchup guy.
No and no.

Berkman had offseason knee surgery. He does not run anymore. The stolen bases are a function of baseball smarts, which is pretty impressive.
   22. Best Regards, Larry Mahnken (Dewey is a slacker) Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:37 PM (#3604351)
What is the point of that rule, exactly? I certainly don't see one.
I would assume it's there to give the player a chance to change his mind.
   23. aleskel Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:37 PM (#3604352)
What is the point of that rule, exactly? I certainly don't see one.

the article sez: "The 24-hour window is designed to give a player a period of reflection after his consent."

don't make much sense to me, but there it is.
   24. Best Regards, Larry Mahnken (Dewey is a slacker) Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:41 PM (#3604357)
the article sez: "The 24-hour window is designed to give a player a period of reflection after his consent."
It doesn't allow him to retract his consent, mind you. It just gives him a chance to think about what he did.
   25. Benji Gil Gamesh is not being paid to be that guy Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:45 PM (#3604361)
That was my next question, Larry.
   26. Dan Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:53 PM (#3604371)
That's what I don't understand. It doesn't seem to indicate that the player can change his mind, so it seems pretty ####### pointless.

Apparently the Astros are even paying $4M of the $7.5M left on Berkman's contract. Why the hell weren't the Rays all over this? They need him about 50x worse than the Yankees do.
   27. Benji Gil Gamesh is not being paid to be that guy Posted: July 30, 2010 at 11:59 PM (#3604375)
Maybe it's so he can let his family know, so they don't find out from SportsCenter that hubby/daddy is off to New York?
   28. bbc is prejudice bout men Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:25 AM (#3604395)
i guess drayton didn't want lance going to the rays - make gerry hunsicker look good AGAIN

and if he pays 4 mill, that is 3.5 mill he gets to keep
   29. SoSHially Unacceptable Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:28 AM (#3604396)
Maybe it's so he can let his family know, so they don't find out from SportsCenter that hubby/daddy is off to New York?


That worked well.
   30. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:37 AM (#3604403)
This was a redundant acquisition. The NYY do not need another DH, Miranda/Thames would be fine, given the chance, and anyway, isn't that position most likely Posada's to lose?

Cashman had it right the first time: Vasquez/AJ/Pettitte may just screw the whole damn thing up, so getting a solid starter is paramount. Unfortunately, all three are gone now.

Consider the messenger, but I don't think the Yankees helped themselves today.
   31. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:45 AM (#3604407)
Lance Berkman is really obviously better than Miranda / Thames. Rest of year ZiPS projections:

Berkman: 386/486
Thames: 319/465
Miranda: 317/394
   32. Dan Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:49 AM (#3604409)
Yankees got Kearns now too for a 4th OF upgrade. Cashman is really kicking Friedman's and Theo's asses so far. Not that Kearns is a big deal, but it's pretty impressive that he's already pulled off Berkman today and turned around and made another decent acquistion.
   33. Best Regards, Larry Mahnken (Dewey is a slacker) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:51 AM (#3604411)
Cashman had it right the first time: Vasquez/AJ/Pettitte may just screw the whole damn thing up, so getting a solid starter is paramount.
If getting a solid starter were paramount, the Yankees would have Haren. They're the ones who turned down the trade.

That's what I don't understand. It doesn't seem to indicate that the player can change his mind, so it seems pretty ####### pointless.
The player can change his mind. It's the entire point of the 24-hour period.
   34. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:53 AM (#3604414)
Lance Berkman is really obviously better than Miranda

At this point of their careers? doubt it. fact: Berkman was acquired because the Yankee braintrust 1) didn't have faith 2) didn't give time, to Miranda. And what are we talking here, Miranda has had 61 AB's on the season. That's some serious impatience.
   35. Dan Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:58 AM (#3604418)
The player can change his mind. It's the entire point of the 24-hour period.


Yeah I kind of figured that after my initial reaction to the wording of "reflecting" on the decision.

I can't believe anyone would seriously object to getting Berkman because it means burying Juan freaking Miranda.
   36. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:59 AM (#3604420)
If getting a solid starter were paramount, the Yankees would have Haren

On the presumption that Lee was theirs. Which makes sense, in a way, but why would this team ignore Oswalt and Haren if they could help today while Lee may not help ever?
   37. dingo powered war machine (CoB) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:14 AM (#3604430)
That's some serious impatience.


Speaking of which, reportedly the prospect going to Houston in the deal is Mark Melancon, who hasn't done much in his brief ML appearances and who hasn't been all that good in AAA this year, but who certainly didn't get anything near an honest shot from the team.
   38. Mayor Blomberg Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:15 AM (#3604431)
[36] probably because you're the only troll on this board who's believing what you're writing.
   39. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:19 AM (#3604433)
Sorta threadjack. Would someone please explain to me why Lee was a "special case"?

I'm asking because it kinda smells like poo-poo to me, in that he's certainly less "special" than CC was, and the NYY may had cost themselves a playoff spot by not making that acquisition. So what does "special case" mean? Is it to cover their desire to trade a most excellent DH prospect or more an indictment of the team's pitching? Or maybe that they are not at all sure that he's theirs.

If I were Epstein would I overpay for Lee? Damn straight I would.
   40. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:24 AM (#3604435)
[36] probably because you're the only troll on this board who's believing what you're writing.

Gotcha. So my problem, besides trolling, is that I don't have enough faith in AJ and Vasquez not collapsing in a playoff scenario. Fine, but I'd have issues relying on Buchholz and Dice, the same, so there's that.
   41. Avoid running at all times.-S. Paige Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:24 AM (#3604436)
Would someone please explain to me why Lee was a "special case"?


Check out his kk:bb ratio.
   42. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:29 AM (#3604439)
Excellent starter, but CC was too. What's the diff?
   43. Dan Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:30 AM (#3604441)
Yankees are likely going to get a backup 3B and Ted Lilly before 4:00 tomorrow too. That'll be a pretty impressive 48 hours of work by the Yankees FO.
   44. Avoid running at all times.-S. Paige Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:36 AM (#3604445)
Excellent starter, but CC was too. What's the diff?


consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.
   45. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:36 AM (#3604446)
Robothal is reporting that Austin Kearns has been dealt to the Yankees, which explains why he was pulled mid-game.
   46. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:48 AM (#3604451)
consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.

Bah: consistency. No, it's something else. The NYY were willing to forgo playoff baseball in '08 because they wouldn't trade prospects for CC (who they knew they'd get, and who they desperately needed at the time), yet they were willing to forgo their number one prospect+ for Lee (who they also know they'll get, but they don't especially need). It doesn't make sense. I'm really curious about this.
   47. Never Give an Inge (Dave) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:51 AM (#3604453)
Jesus Christ, even though I have no love for the Astros, Berkman and Oswalt were among my favorite non-Mets. Now one is a Phillie and the other a Yankee?
   48. Avoid running at all times.-S. Paige Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:57 AM (#3604459)
I'm really curious about this.


a couple of things could be at work. based on the reports about the lee trade, the yanks feel a lot better about their farm system these days than they did back then. secondly, it could be that since montero is basically blocked he is more expendable than the top prospects the indians were asking for in 2008.
   49. AROM Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:07 AM (#3604473)
Why the hell weren't the Rays all over this? They need him about 50x worse than the Yankees do.


Rays should just call up Dan Johnson and let him DH. He's been killing the ball all year in AAA.
   50. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:08 AM (#3604475)
Mark Melancon, who hasn't done much in his brief ML appearances and who hasn't been all that good in AAA this year, but who certainly didn't get anything near an honest shot from the team.

It's kinda tough to give a guy much of a shot when he walks or hits every other batter he faces. His walks are through the roof in AAA this year too. I think he still has his stuff, so he still has potential, and I hope he turns it around and has a decent career for himself. But there's clearly something wrong with the kid, and I really can't say that I wish he'd pitched more innings for the Yankees the past two seasons.
   51. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:10 AM (#3604480)
That could be, Zuvella. But still, when have the Yankees ever prioritized their farm over making the playoffs? Alas, maybe they just considered 2008 a "bridge year" to allow their yutes to grow a bit, gain more value.
   52. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:14 AM (#3604486)
It doesn't allow him to retract his consent, mind you. It just gives him a chance to think about what he did.


So Lance Berkman is in "timeout"?
   53. Mayor Blomberg Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:21 AM (#3604490)
What might CC have been worth? Three wins? It wasn't enough. That was a depressing (by NYY recent standards) team.

Haren's last year and a half haven't been worth trading for. Roy O != Lee and we don't even know if he'd come NY.
   54. Dale H. Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:23 AM (#3604493)
Yankees are likely going to get a backup 3B and Ted Lilly before 4:00 tomorrow too. That'll be a pretty impressive 48 hours of work by the Yankees FO.

Haven't we been here before?
   55. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:39 AM (#3604508)
That may actually be the answer, Mayor. It's hard for me to think of the Yanks giving up but that was a pretty rancid team.

Still believe Lee/Haren/Oswalt would have been a meaningful upgrade, while Berkman is not, though. Given decent odds, I'd bet that Miranda would better Berkman, but that will never be proven so -- bah.
   56. Freeballin' (Tales of Met Power) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:40 AM (#3604509)
If Austin Kearns is going to the Yankees, does that mean Berkman isn't?
   57. Drew (Primakov, Gungho Iguanas) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:48 AM (#3604515)
Yankees are likely going to get a backup 3B and Ted Lilly before 4:00 tomorrow too. That'll be a pretty impressive 48 hours of work by the Yankees FO.


It's not that impressive, considering that every year they trade with teams who have the revenue-sharing incentive to keep trading with the Yankees. Not to mention that the players they get are eminently tradeable to the Yankees because only the Yankees are willing to pick up the whole salary to improve on the margins (which is exactly what getting Kearns, Lilly, and a backup 3B is doing).

So no, it's not impressive. Useful to the Yankees, sure. But most GMs could do the same with the same resources as Cashman has. Cashman is good in that he's not Dayton Moore or Bill Bavasi. Big whoop.
   58. Mayor Blomberg Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:58 AM (#3604522)
The whole salary? Not Berkman. Kearns is making $750K for the year; I think a few teams could afford that, even KC.
   59. bbc is prejudice bout men Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:16 AM (#3604531)
well berkman is going SOMEwheres for the rest of the year

he packed his stuff and said goodbye to his teammates

and ed freaking wade is paying 4 million to the yankees to take berkman and give us back a really dreadful middle reliever

i just HATE ed wade and drayton EFF mclane
   60. Mayor Blomberg Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:19 AM (#3604533)
Yankees are likely going to get a backup 3B


Welcome Home Miguel Cairo!!!!!!!!!
   61. Drew (Primakov, Gungho Iguanas) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:33 AM (#3604537)
The whole salary? Not Berkman. Kearns is making $750K for the year; I think a few teams could afford that, even KC.


I should have left out Kearns--he's an example of bolstering the margins that any team might do. But you're nitpicking. If Ed Bleeping Wade is actually paying the Yanks $4M for Berkman, that means that the Yankees just spent $10.5M for a sometime DH and spot starter at first. When they had Posada at DH. Or Thames and Miranda. They're not relying on Berkman to do much other than that. Which is the definition of improving at the margins. No other team is willing to spend $10M on ONE PLAYER to improve so little. So Ed Wade had little competition. He could wait for someone to give him better prospects in exchange for the Astros picking up most of the salary. Which the Astros weren't willing to do because they're in sell mode. I'm sure Drayton drooled at the thought of saving $10M on a player who wasn't going to contribute to the next contending Astros team. And with the Yankees' payroll going up, the revenue-sharing checks go up, as well.

Note that I don't blame the Yankees for doing this. They do it because they're allowed to. I just don't think it's some great strokes of genius or savvy that allows Cashman to grab Berkman. Or Lilly, tomorrow. He can do it because his is the only team who desires to.
   62. bbc is prejudice bout men Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:43 AM (#3604540)
primakov

the yankees are spending only 3 mill on berkman - no option, no arb

ed bleeping wade could only get a crappy middle reliever like melancon and some aball guy for 4 MILLION?
   63. Tom Cervo, backup catcher Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:57 AM (#3604549)
Miranda's MLE for this season is a .752 OPS (.762 against RHP), and that's the highest of his career. He's at least 27 (and there's a lot of speculation he's at least a couple years older), is a poor defender, and has contact issues against minor league pitchers. He's nice to stash in AAA in case of injuries, but I doubt he's much better than replacement level.

If Berkman just maintains his performance this year he's a huge improvement over what the Yankees can expect from Miranda. DH'ing, playing half his games in NYS, and being further out from knee surgery makes me hopeful he will hit better than that, too.
   64. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 04:19 AM (#3604553)
Miranda could be 47, but he still bats .941 vs RHP and doesn't cost $5.5m and a fine RHP. Redundant x 1000. Overkill. What's the ####### point?
   65. The District Attorney Posted: July 31, 2010 at 04:44 AM (#3604558)
bats .941 vs RHP
Apparently they don't think that.
a fine RHP
Apparently they don't think that.
doesn't cost $5.5m
Apparently they don't mind.
   66. dingo powered war machine (CoB) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 04:51 AM (#3604560)
It's kinda tough to give a guy much of a shot when he walks or hits every other batter he faces. His walks are through the roof in AAA this year too. I think he still has his stuff, so he still has potential, and I hope he turns it around and has a decent career for himself. But there's clearly something wrong with the kid, and I really can't say that I wish he'd pitched more innings for the Yankees the past two seasons.


Well, he could be injured, or maybe he didn't take well to being jerked around.

But I'll say I wish he'd gotten an ACTUAL chance to pitch for the Yankees last year.

When he had a .906 WHIP, 1.9 BB/9, 9.2 K/9 and 4.91 K/BB in SWB.

He was called up 3 times and sent down twice (last call up was after the 40 man expansion). The second time he was called up he went *18* days between appearances. Still, in his 4 outings after that break, he went 5.2 innings, allowed 2 hits, 1 walk, 5ks and lowered his ERA to 3.18.

His reward? A return trip to SWB.

I'm not sayin' he would have established himself as some sort of bullpen ace with more innings pitched at the ML level last year, but I am saying that I sure wish Tyler Clippard was pitching in our bullpen right now and I hope I don't find myself saying the same thing about Melancon a couple of seasons from now because Joey Joe Joe couldn't be bothered to find innings for him and the Yankees couldn't be bothered with patience.
   67. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 05:09 AM (#3604567)
bats .941 vs RHP
Apparently they don't think that.

True, but how would they know?
a fine RHP
Apparently they don't think that.

Obviously they don't think that, but they also didn't think that with Clippard, Coke, and Veras.
doesn't cost $5.5m
Apparently they don't mind.

Then why did they let the more expensive (at the time) Damon and Matsui go?
   68. The District Attorney Posted: July 31, 2010 at 06:07 AM (#3604582)
how would they know?
From his minor league career.
Obviously they don't think that, but they also didn't think that with Clippard, Coke, and Veras.
First off, this list makes no sense. Clippard was not traded for or displaced by a veteran, but rather traded for another young reliever; almost anyone would have done the Granderson deal; and if you actually do mean Jose Veras, I don't know why, because he's terrible. The larger point is that, even if you had better examples, it still doesn't constitute a real argument. Should the Mets not have traded Carlos Gomez because it had been a bad idea to trade Scott Kazmir? Once a team makes a mistake, does this mean they're condemned to not attempt to solve their future problems, because any move they attempt might turn out to be wrong?
Then why did they let the more expensive (at the time) Damon and Matsui go?
Because they wanted to get a little cheaper and younger with Brett Gardner and Nick Johnson. The Gardner part worked; Johnson, however, got hurt, so now they're bringing in someone else.
   69. Drew (Primakov, Gungho Iguanas) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 06:38 AM (#3604587)
the yankees are spending only 3 mill on berkman - no option, no arb


Well, I feel dumb. I was taking the full salary Berkman is owed for 2010--while failing to remember that the season is half over, so the Yankees don't owe him the full season's worth of cash.
   70. jyjjy Posted: July 31, 2010 at 08:30 AM (#3604594)
What I don't get is that NY has probably the best offense baseball and one of the best rotations. The bullpen has been shaky at best is the obvious place to improve and yet apart from the Soria rumors they don't seem to be going after a reliever.
Perhaps they were/are going hard after Lee/Haren(now Lilly?) so they can put Hughes back in the pen? Would make sense because of his innings limit I suppose.
   71. SugarBear Blanks Posted: July 31, 2010 at 10:01 AM (#3604601)
It's not that impressive, considering that every year they trade with teams who have the revenue-sharing incentive to keep trading with the Yankees. Not to mention that the players they get are eminently tradeable to the Yankees because only the Yankees are willing to pick up the whole salary to improve on the margins (which is exactly what getting Kearns, Lilly, and a backup 3B is doing).

So no, it's not impressive. Useful to the Yankees, sure. But most GMs could do the same with the same resources as Cashman has. Cashman is good in that he's not Dayton Moore or Bill Bavasi. Big whoop.


And for that, sir, you shall be sentenced to write "CORE FOUR" a thousand times, neatly, on the nearest blackboard.
   72. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:07 PM (#3604620)
maybe he didn't take well to being jerked around

He didn't get jerked around. He pitched like crap pretty much every time he was called on. He could not throw strikes. Yeah, he got buried and then sent back down. Because he deserved to get buried and then sent back down.

The second time he was called up he went *18* days between appearances.

Do you realize that those eighteen days included the all-star break, which was four days for the Yankees? Melancon pitched 2.1 innings on July 10, so he wasn't available the next day. He wasn't needed the day after that. Then came the break, so that's six of those days right there. Check the box scores from July 17-27 and tell me when he should have pitched, and who he should have been used ahead of. Bruney pitched one inning during that stretch. Robertson went twelve days between appearances around the same time. Should Melancon have been pitching high leverage innings ahead of Aceves or Hughes?
   73. Steve Balboni's Personal Trainer Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:23 PM (#3604626)
I don't think that Cashman is kicking Friedman's and Theo's asses, as an earlier poster wrote. This is where the Yankees $$$ advantage really kicks in - the Red Sox have said, quite explicitly, that they are just over the luxury tax threshhold, and that any extra salary they take on this year will cost them an amount they are not willing/able to pay.

And I say that with the knowledge that the Yankees payroll is $40 million ahead of the #2 team - the Red Sox.

One other thing I'm asking my friends in New England, who are angry that the Sox aren't making some moves -- what moves, outside of more middle relief/setup pitching, would the team try to acquire? In about 10 days, the roster will be:

C - Martinez
IF - Youkilis, Pedroia, Beltre, Scutaro
OF - Ellsbury, Cameron, Drew
DH - Ortiz
SP - Lester, Buchholz, Beckett, Lackey, Matsuzaka
RP - Paps, Bard, and some iffy other relievers
Bench - Varitek, Hermida, Lowell, Lowrie, Hall

Where are the weaknesses? Maybe power in the outfield, but would you get?
   74. Mayor Blomberg Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:33 PM (#3604630)
.906 WHIP, 1.9 BB/9, 9.2 K/9 and 4.91 K/BB in SWB


Because we all know how infallibly those things translate. I don't regret the Clippard trade, either. Just waiting for Alby to stick. He's even BETTER in SWB this year: .795, 2.5, 11.6
   75. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 31, 2010 at 12:58 PM (#3604642)
One other thing I'm asking my friends in New England, who are angry that the Sox aren't making some moves -- what moves, outside of more middle relief/setup pitching, would the team try to acquire?
The problem is that they should have made a move in July for a catcher. That could have made a game or two difference, given that they started sub-replacement level players for a month. But that's over, so there isn't much they need to do. They need a reliever, but relievers have been running expensive this season while everyone else has been cheapish.

Mark Melancon is a relief prospect. Those have somewhere between zero and negligible value.

In conclusion, Italics.
   76. Biff isn't really an apt handle anymore Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:13 PM (#3604650)
If you can't see Lance Berkman is a much better hitter than Juan Miranda, well...I don't even know how to respond to that, really.
   77. RB in NYC (Now with New Running Goal!) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 01:32 PM (#3604664)
If you can't see Lance Berkman is a much better hitter than Juan Miranda, well...I don't even know how to respond to that, really.
This.
   78. Lassus: Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:47 PM (#3604723)
WTF kind of definition of "quickly" is this, exactly?
   79. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:50 PM (#3604730)
I don't think that Cashman is kicking Friedman's and Theo's asses, as an earlier poster wrote. This is where the Yankees $$$ advantage really kicks in

They took about $4.75M total in getting Berkman and Kearns.

The Pirates are absorbing more salary in taking Chris Snyder. Why didn't the Sox go after him two months ago?
   80. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 02:53 PM (#3604734)
What I don't get is that NY has probably the best offense baseball and one of the best rotations. The bullpen has been shaky at best is the obvious place to improve and yet apart from the Soria rumors they don't seem to be going after a reliever.
Perhaps they were/are going hard after Lee/Haren(now Lilly?) so they can put Hughes back in the pen? Would make sense because of his innings limit I suppose.


They didn't like the price for the RP available. If you can't improve the run prevention, improve the run production.

Between Robertson, Albaladejo, Logan, Joba, and Aceves they figure they can patch together the bullpen.

Also, in the playoffs, one of Hughes/Vazquez will be in the pen.
   81. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:00 PM (#3604747)
If you can't see Johnson Granderson Lance Berkman is a much better hitter than Matsui Damon Miranda, well...I don't even know how to respond to that, really.

No, it's not obvious to me. At best, Berkman is redundant; at worst, super unhappy if Posada doesn't catch. Setting aside the probability of Berkman getting his ring after so many years of awesomeness, I don't see his acquisition being especially meaningful.
   82. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:03 PM (#3604751)
No, it's not obvious to me. At best, Berkman is redundant; at worst, super unhappy if Posada doesn't catch. Setting aside the probability of Berkman getting his ring after so many years of awesomeness, I don't see his acquisition being especially meaningful.

Rest of year ZiPs projection:

Berkman: 267/384/489 .383 wOBA
Miranda: 248/317392 .315 wOBA

Where's the mystery here?
   83. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:09 PM (#3604764)
The mystery is how often he starts and how Miranda would have done, given the shot.
   84. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:14 PM (#3604772)
The mystery is how often he starts and how Miranda would have done, given the shot.
Page 1 of 1 pages


Probably 4 or 5 times a week. DH vs. RHP.

You can disagree with the relative player evaluations. Maybe Miranda is as good. I don't think so, but you're entitled to that opinion.

But, it shouldn't be a surprise as to why most people think this is a big upgrade based on standard evaluation/projection.
   85. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:29 PM (#3604793)
Yeah, at 4 or 5 times a week, Berkman gets the nod. I'm not as confident as you are that he will be used that often, though.
   86. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:41 PM (#3604810)
Yeah, at 4 or 5 times a week, Berkman gets the nod. I'm not as confident as you are that he will be used that often, though.

Really? They have no DH. Miranda and Curtis have been playing quite a bit.
   87. Mayor Blomberg Posted: July 31, 2010 at 03:46 PM (#3604813)
wasting yr breath, snapper.
   88. Spaceman Posted: July 31, 2010 at 04:36 PM (#3604839)
Last 15 games @ DH:

Curtis
Swisher
Posada
Teixeira
Posada
Arod
Jeter
Jeter
Thames
Miranda
Thames
Posada
Miranda
Thames
Swisher

Eliminate all Thames starts, three to rest regulars, and all Posada starts, leaves 6 games for Berkman. Also keep in mind that Cervelli has caught 40% of July's games.

It won't go exactly like that, for sure, but you can see where I'm coming from.

Mayor is right. At this point, I'm just badgering. We'll see how vital a role Berkman plays once the games are played.
   89. Crispix Attacks Posted: July 31, 2010 at 04:42 PM (#3604841)
Given decent odds, I'd bet that Miranda would better Berkman, but that will never be proven so -- bah.


Too bad, because I would have given you about 200 to 1 on that prospect.
   90. APNY Posted: July 31, 2010 at 05:46 PM (#3604894)
Too bad, because I would have given you about 200 to 1 on that prospect.

Miranda's career AAA OPS is worse than Berkman's career low full season Major League OPS. Berkman's had 85 bad (for him) games, but it would still be an interesting bet as is.
   91. Ron J Posted: August 02, 2010 at 07:58 PM (#3606420)
Given decent odds, I'd bet that Miranda would better Berkman


Only makes sense if you think Berkman is seriously damaged goods. Given his age and recent injury history a non-zero probability.

But Miranda is one of those guys that you don't have to do an MLE for. His raw minor league numbers are pretty meh and there's no reason to think major league pitchers won't hold him to less than what he's done in AAA.
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Los Angeles ALBERT F. PUJOLS of Anaheim
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogSources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault
(5819 - 12:01am, Feb 10)
Last: Jay Z

NewsblogJeff Sullivan: The Worst Team Ever Projected?
(38 - 11:55pm, Feb 09)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogNYT: Alderson Remakes Needy Mets From Bottom Line Up
(33 - 11:52pm, Feb 09)
Last: Sam M.

NewsblogThe Book Blog: MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential
(78 - 11:50pm, Feb 09)
Last: RayDiPerna

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012
(379 - 11:31pm, Feb 09)
Last: robinred

NewsblogGrantland/Bill James: An Open Letter to the Hall of Fame About Dwight Evans
(25 - 11:28pm, Feb 09)
Last: Dan Szymborski

NewsblogNY Daily News: Brian Cashman's accused stalker says Yankees GM misled feds on steroid probe
(46 - 11:13pm, Feb 09)
Last: The Piehole of David Wells, Red Sox Colostomy Bag

NewsblogWhatever Happened to the Spitball?
(17 - 11:00pm, Feb 09)
Last: Richard

NewsblogYankees TV host Bob Lorenz charged with drunken driving; cops found YES anchor passed out in car
(15 - 10:56pm, Feb 09)
Last: boteman

NewsblogStrange Times in Baseball: 1891-1895
(13 - 10:48pm, Feb 09)
Last: boteman

Newsblog'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s
(281 - 10:43pm, Feb 09)
Last: phredbird

NewsblogJustice: 5 things that could make the 2012 season a successful one for the Astros
(28 - 10:17pm, Feb 09)
Last: bbc is prejudice bout men

NewsblogFangraphs: Cameron: The 10 Worst Transactions Of The Winter
(82 - 10:10pm, Feb 09)
Last: Cooper Nielson

NewsblogMLB: Hall of Fame worthy? Furthest thing from Schilling's mind
(11 - 10:00pm, Feb 09)
Last: Squash

NewsblogOrioles Scouts Banned from Korea
(2 - 9:31pm, Feb 09)
Last: Voros McCracken, Human Shield

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 1.6092 seconds
40 querie(s) executed