|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Fresh from taking in an FDA Epitonine game…JCB digs deep into the Clemens statistical report.
Clemens’s study looks at his performance in reference to the changing playing environment of the league. For many potential reasons (e.g., new ballparks, expansion, juiced balls, etc.) the run environment dramatically changed over the course of Clemens’s career. To combat any bias from this, the authors of the study compare Clemens’s ERA to the average of the league, looking at the difference. It is no surprise that his ERA difference fluctuated quite a bit over the course of his career (p. 6). ERA is inherently a volatile statistic. In fact, in my book I use Clemens as an example of how drastically a pitcher’s ERA can change during a career, and I show that his variation in performance was well within the normal range (p. 165).
What I would like to do is to take this analysis one step further. One of the reasons that ERA is volatile is that it includes the performance of fielders and random bounces of the ball. If we use the novel idea of Voros McCracken’s DIPS, then we can more closely examine the components of Clemens’s performance over his career using factors that were solely in his control. The major defense-independent components of pitcher performance are strikeouts, walks, and home runs. In particular, I would expect Clemens’s strikeout numbers to influence and reflect his decision to use performance-enhancing drugs. Because these statistics occur at different rates, I compare how Clemens performed relative to the league average as percent of the league average.
...This in no way proves that Clemens didn’t use steroids; he is right when says he can’t prove a negative. Others may interpret the data differently than I do. But, the more I look into these numbers, the more I am convinced that McNamee is the one who is lying. Until I see some other corroborating evidence—I wonder what is in those seized 2004 drug tests—I have to conclude that Clemens pitched without the aid of steroids.
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012 (386 - 10:58am, Feb 10)Last:  Moses Taylor demands to be housewarmedNewsblog: MLB: Hall of Fame worthy? Furthest thing from Schilling's mind (14 - 10:56am, Feb 10)Last: The Good FaceNewsblog: Sources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault (5889 - 10:55am, Feb 10)Last:  tshipmanNewsblog: Rosenthal: Swapping Figgins for Ichiro at leadoff could revive Mariners' offense (13 - 10:54am, Feb 10)Last: DannyNewsblog: Grantland/Bill James: An Open Letter to the Hall of Fame About Dwight Evans (30 - 10:52am, Feb 10)Last: SoSHially UnacceptableNewsblog: L.A. Times: 11 bidders remain in running to buy Dodgers (16 - 10:43am, Feb 10)Last: zackNewsblog: 'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s (285 - 10:42am, Feb 10)Last:  Der_K is getting more dogmatic.Newsblog: Tom Brady getting new bro-in-law: Red Sox’ Kevin Youkilis! (6 - 10:39am, Feb 10)Last: rudygambleNewsblog: The SnakePit Interview: Diamondbacks GM Kevin Towers, Part 1 (1 - 10:39am, Feb 10)Last: donlockNewsblog: Kovacevic: Take the Pirates' money, please (7 - 10:38am, Feb 10)Last: flournoyNewsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 2-10-2012 (12 - 10:36am, Feb 10)Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)Newsblog: Jeff Sullivan: The Worst Team Ever Projected? (58 - 10:19am, Feb 10)Last: tl; dr (Voxter)Newsblog: Strange Times in Baseball: 1891-1895 (15 - 10:16am, Feb 10)Last: Crispix AttacksNewsblog: Fangraphs: Cameron: The 10 Worst Transactions Of The Winter (89 - 10:00am, Feb 10)Last: Nasty NateNewsblog: YES Commemorates 10th Anniversary with Special Logo, Programming (6 - 9:32am, Feb 10)Last: villageidiom
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
And in a gamelog of the 98 season they note that he was pitching erratically for a 6 game stretch, when in fact, for the middle 4 games of the 6, he threw 29 inn, gave up 15 hits and only 2 runs. That's erratic?
Isn't this a fundamental flaw of any study that tries to identify the impact of steroids on a specific individual? If steroids affect performance - e.g., if steroid use will improve a pitcher's strikeout rate - then one of the factors driving the league strikeout rate will be the percentage of pitchers using steroids. If the league K rate goes up because more pitchers begin to take steroids, and Clemens' K rate goes up at the same time by the same amount, couldn't that just as well indicate that he started using steroids around the same time that everybody else did?
I'm not saying that's how I would interpret the data here; I'm just saying that seems to me to be a perfectly reasonable possible interpretation of the data.
Then the final sentence he concludes that Clemens didn't pitch with steroids. That does not follow from the evidence, he's relying solely on faith here.
I thought Caminiti believed they helped him right away. Could be he had a lucky game after roiding up, or some sort of placebo effect.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main