User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets. |
We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule |
Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers |
Page rendered in 2.9392 seconds
81 querie(s) executed


Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Or at least the game they were playing tonight.
The parallels between Manny and a really hot but mentally unstable woman are numerous; CHB just seems like the parent of someone Manny dissed on Myspace.
Red-headed Perm, take note: Manny's OPS+ in 2008 is HIGHER than his OPS+ was last year. By a lot.
Also, it should be pointed out that Manny's 2006 campaign (165 OPS+) was his highest since 2002 (184 OPS+). Thus, to bemoan the fact that at 36 he's down from his recent peak at age 34 is not much of a critique.
All that said, I tend to agree with the tenor of the Red-headed Perm's piece: Manny is selfish and always has been. He's also a complete idiot. Too many people have given him the benefit of the doubt -- "Manny Being Manny" -- assuming his idiosyncratic ways were reflective of his Forrest Gump-like low mental wattage, not selfishness. At this point, I don't see them being mutually exclusive.
What piss-boy do you know who doesn't wait for the tinkle?
Not going to even get into the hand rags.
Just say no. I really can't understand the momentum from Sox fans to acquire Holliday. The disparity in his home/road splits has been admittedly overplayed, but is alarming nonetheless. At it's not just the near .300 point swing in OPS. On the road, his walk rate is considerably lower and he also strikes out at a much higher frequency. We can talk about the adjustments players at Coors make having when they travel-- and I will accept that to a certain extent-- but a .389 home BABIP indicates he is getting a huge Coors boost. When you are talking about giving up top prospects and then inking the guy to an extension (for what would presumably be this age 30-36 seasons) at upwards of $20 mil in AAV, I want a safer bet. With Holliday, there is always going to be lingering doubts about his performance away from Coors... and you're probably going to be making the leap before you know for sure. Holliday might be more than an adequate replacement for Manny now, but he damn sure isn't the player Manny was eight years ago. Theo can do better.
GM Theo Epstein told FOX broadcaster Tim McCarver before Saturday's game that the Red Sox will make an effort to deal Manny Ramirez if he his no-trade clause.
Must be that time of year again.
-Albert Einstein
Too bad this counts posting the same "witty" quote over and over again. Believe me--I'm speaking from experience.
How?
Whatever kind of a guy Ramirez may be, he is a legit HoF hitter and is still damn good at the plate. Holliday is a hell of a player, but you can't just go and get a guy as good as Manny Ramirez, age 28, when you want one, no matter how smart you are and no matter how much money you have.
As far as moving him NOW, I think that is just noise. I'll be surprised if Ramirez--or Holliday--goes anywhere. The Red Sox have as good a shot as anybody at the 2008 title, and I don't see how they can move Ramirez right now without causing roster-construction offensive-core problems.
I had a long post about Ramirez in another thread, in which I predicted he would be back soon, (he is in the lineup today) will hit fine, and will be playing LF for the Indians next year. I'll stick with all 3.
I don't care. The man produces every year, and has produced a ton of value over his career, which is more than the vast majority of major leaguers can say. He's still producing at a high level, and I don't want to replace him with an inferior player just because some twits think he was faking an injury.
Because we're not hung up on trying to somehow clone a player so as to maintain the status quo, and are instead trying to figure out how to improve the team. Fans who ##### and moan that no one is equal to Manny in his prime to realize that Manny is not in his prime any more. We can't get Ted Williams to play LF, either. Consider their VORP/ EQAs/ and WARP for the last few years:
Manny:
'06: 66.1/ .342/ 5.2
'07: 34.6/ .303/ 4.1
'08: 36.9/ .322/ 4.3
Holliday:
'06: 56.8/ .308/ 7.9
'07: 75.0/ .325/ 10.2
'08: 46.4/ .342/ 5.2
Holliday sure looks like a player coming into his prime who's defense more than makes up for not being the hitter Manny was in his prime. I'm pretty sure that part of the Sox's thinking is that Manny's replacement will be a better defender. Now I don't particularly care for WARP's defensive component, but I don't think any other stat you'd care to look at will tell a different story.
It seems like you're trying to have it both ways here. If you really "assume the worst", as you say in the first paragraph, then you have to say "He's still producing at a high level, and I don't want to replace him with an inferior player just because he was faking an injury". Is that what you believe? That's fine, but say so.
Really? Because it sure seems like throwing another $20 million dollar/year contract at a power-hitting left fielder (plus some cocktail of Bowden, Lowrie, Anderson, Reddick, et al) would be exactly that. Only this time, you're getting a guy with ominous road splits, vastly inferior plate discipline, and a batting average leaning on an unsustainable BABIP. Oh, but he plays a stellar left field!
How about you take one fifth of what it would cost for one season of Matt Holliday and bring Alex Meyer into the fold? Then, show some faith in a top rated farm system and wait to see if Anderson/Reddick develop into viable big league corners. If that means a year of Chris Carter in LF as a bridge, I'm on board. It's not that I have any aversion to making an expensive acquisition... it's that I have huge problem from handing $20 mil plus to a far-from-sure-thing player, possibly into his late-30s.
That's when I changed the channel.
Well, you know what the rule is. Attractive, mentally stable, single: Choose two.
Also, isn't the obvious thing for the Red Sox to sign Adam Dunn to take over in LF?
He's still producing at a high level, and I don't want to replace him with an inferior player just because he was faking an injury.
Not single can be worked around.
But then the Red Sox will pull him back and the Yankees has to compete against a better team.
I don't know that the Yankees would do but the Mets would. The Red Sox always do this with Manny. They'll say he's available, ask far too much for him, no one will be willing to Boston's terms, and Manny will finish the season with the Sox.
Further proof - in my opinion anyhow - that Boston is full of bigger whiners than even Queens, which is really saying something.
First off, I'm not suggesting that the Sox empty the farm, or just give into any demand that enters O'Dowd's insane little head. But the Sox have plenty of money, and Philly has been pretty persuasive in arguing that Sox are in the perfect position to take on a large contract for an impact player.
Holliday happens to fit the Sox immediate needs for a LFer and RH power bat who will play 150 games. There's not much I can do about how LFers are developed; it's an offensive position and the Sox can't afford to lose more offense from the roster. The reason that I brought up the stats I did is to get people off his road splits. Manny's component hitting stats don't hide just how truly awful he is as a defender, and they don't make him a better player than Holliday.
I think they can do both (from the rumors being floated it seems like Meyer is already close to being signed - even if they don't it looks like they're going to sign enough high-end HS players (like Westmoreland and Hissey) to infuse as much talent as they can into the system).
The problem is your scenario leaves the Sox essentially punting this year and next year. Carter is Manny-lite (all bat, no glove, and LHed to boot) and the one place the system is weak is power bats close to the majors. The Sox have a surplus of low level, high potential OFers who might make it down the road, but they also have enough talent to deal some to fix some immediate holes. I can agree with you about not wanting to take on the back end of large contract (which is almost certainly not going to be pretty), but the Sox have enough $ to deal with that when the time comes. I'm not really interested in the process of drafting a team the way the Rays did.
I just don't see anything happening with Ramirez's getting traded from and Holliday's being acquired by Boston.
Except they _don't_ have those "immediate needs." They have a HOF player still producing at a high level named Manny Ramirez, for this year and next, if they want him.
It's silly to throw resources at a problem that doesn't exist. They should be more worried about C and CF.
I don't care. The man produces every year, and has produced a ton of value over his career, which is more than the vast majority of major leaguers can say. He's still producing at a high level, and I don't want to replace him with an inferior player just because some twits think he was faking an injury.
He may or may not have been faking an injury, but he sure isn't faking any effort whenever he runs the bases. Today he hit a line drive that could have easily been misplayed into at least two bases, maybe even three, and yet he'd barely moved out of the batter's box by the time it was caught. And on that rally ending double play he looked liked he was channeling Stepin Fetchit. You've got to lean over backwards all the way to the floor to put up with that kind of shlt.
This is the sort of In Your Face loafing that for better or worse, he'd never get away with as a Yankee. The last Yankee who tried that on that consistent a basis was Neon Deion, and he was traded almost immediately. Cano and Cabrera do it once in a while, but never on Manny's scale, and never with the defiant air that Manny projects.
All that said, Ray's absolutely right about the tradeoff. Manny's still one of the best hitters in baseball and would be almost impossible to replace. I can only wonder what his reaction would have been if he'd been told in 2001 that his little games weren't going to be tolerated. Would he have fallen into line, or would he have chosen to go elsewhere?
In addition to that $6M, you have to add a large increase in the cost of linen service plus huge raises for all the clubhouse help, as well as a massive increase in plumbing repairs. For that and many better reasons, the Yankees would not claim Ramirez if he is waived by Boston. How would Manny leaving Boston hurt the Yanks?
On the FOX replay of Manny's double play it looked like he was barely trotting. Don't see how you can tolerate one guy making a half-hearted effort while 24 guys are going all out.
To quote, "MRIs do not work that way!"
I really hope the Red Sox pick up Manny's next option. I don't see a better solution - I'd rather overspend on a one-year contract for a limited player with a good bat than overspend on a six-year contract for a limited player with a good bat (Burrell/Dunn).
I am mildly hopeful that the attacks on Ramirez seem to be channeled to Lucchino's mouthpieces - CHB in particular - and they might not reflect the thinking of the baseball ops people. But the volume is great enough that it sure looks bad for Manny's fans who want him around in Boston.
If another team claims him and the Sox let them, there's no way that the Manny replacements could make up for his production over the rest of the year and (particularly) should there be playoffs.
If he's traded instead, the Yankees would not want the Sox to realize the talent that comes back.
I think the Yankees would claim him, if only to mess with what Boston wants to do.
If any team, Yankees or not, ever actually got Ramirez off the waiver list, Theo Epstein would be cheered by about 20% of the fan base, but the other 80% would build the biggest bonfire that Boston's ever seen, and throw the poor boy right into the middle of it. I think that Theo realizes that. Batters with Manny's numbers don't exactly grow on trees.
Back when Manny was a free agent, the Yanks made it clear they weren't interested, and they didn't claim Manny when Boston put him on waivers. If the Yankees didn't want Manny in his prime, why would anyone think that they'd overpay for his decline years. Not going to happen.
Have you not been paying attention for the last half week (or for the last 5 years for that matter)? I think there's a very good chance that they don't want him. Manny's HOF candidacy doesn't change the fact that he's pretty much overpaid for his total (including defensive) production.
Unfortunately I don't see much on the FA horizon for either catchers or CFers. Coco stands a good chance of being the best available CFer, and the options at C are just as bad. Upgrading the total production from LF would make it easier to carry Tek and let Jacoby develop, which seems like the only real option.
It'll likely come as no surprise to you, Andy, that I don't mind it at all. 99% of the time it doesn't make a bit of difference, and the other 1% is easily outweighed by his positive contributions. Those that obsess over this stuff can't see the big picture.
Besides, there's actually a very serious argument that not hustling 100% of the time helps him avoid tweaks and pulls and other injuries. Or play with an injury, such as... oh, I don't know... the sore knee that he had today. He's on pace to play 148 games this year, which is a pretty decent amount, so he must be doing something right.
This is just more of the Blame Your Best Players type of nonsense. It's not serious analysis.
OF/DH next year will be Damon/Melky(until Jackson comes up)/Nady, with Matsui DHing. If they decide to sign someone, it won't be a guy who can't even cover enough ground to play left field in Fenway well. And it also won't be someone close to 40. So I'd say there's a 5% percent chance they sign him, if they go after Burrell and Dunn and fail and Cashman is fired or Matsui is traded.
Manny does have better hair, though.
Geez, he's running like a guy with sore knees.
Oh, wait. . .
With Holliday, a team will also not have to excuse or otherwise explain away twenty "Matty being Matty" incidents every season.
Manny is one of the greatest hitters I've ever seen, but management must find it tiring to constantly have to deal with his erratic behaviour. The local press, however, must love his craziness.
Manny's one of the only real characters of our generation. I think history will look kindly on him for that.
It depends on what you mean by characters. There's all sorts of other guys whose lives would make for an interesting read - Bonds, Sheffield, Schilling, Big Papi, Pedro, Giambi, Jeter, Grieke, Sosa, Hamilton, and tons of others who I'm not thinking of right now. I guess the only difference is that Manny has more of a clown appeal than the others.
It's possible, but you never know. I think a lot of writers (and fans as they age) would take the view that his behaviour disrespected the game. Even now, there are a lot of writers who seem to want to take that route.
I also doubt that people would really want to reach back across history to read about Manny using the canny.
That's mostly writers that will be dead 30 years from now.
What I'm getting at was Manny was quirky, different, weird, in a generation where ballplayers are trained pretty much from birth to be, anywhere where there might be a camera or microphone, extremely bland. Yes, those guys you listed will make for good biographies, but they won't make for good 3-minute stories to tell at a dinner party. "There was this time in 2005 that Manny..." That's more what I'm driving at.
He may not only be wearing out his welcome in Boston, but in baseball as well.
Well, they can't hit like Manny either.
Andy, why do you say the Red Sox are willing to put up with Manny's crap but the Yankees wouldn't be?
If the Yankees had new ownership and inherited Manny's contract, how differently would the Yankees have handled him? Demand he hustle? Then he would just sulk and play like ####, and he still wouldn't hustle anyway. And his contract is awfully hard to move. That wouldn't change if he was wearing pinstripes instead.
How differently would the Yankees handle him? I don't see how, except to not pick up his option, as the Red Sox plan to(not) do.
As long as Manny doesn't kill someone between now and the winter, teams are going to be falling all over themselves to sign Manny. He has a 140 OPS. How many teams couldn't use a hitter that good especially in the AL where he can DH? Manny is going to make around 15 million next season.
The Astros gave Carlos Lee 100 million. The Dodgers gave Juan Pierre 40 million. The Angels gave Garry Matthews 50 million. Carlos Silva got 48 million. Jose Guillen got 3y/36m. Are you really telling me that Manny won't get at least 2y/25m from someone this offseason?
If Manny DHs, he actually becomes an even better player because he doesn't give any of his value back on defense. Any team that has an opening at DH and isn't interested in signing Manny is stupid.
Just goes to show, as Joaquin Andujar used to say... youneverknow.
Manny will get offers, but after seeing Barry Bonds not get a single offer this year, I wouldn't be shocked if Manny can't match the $20M per year of the team options on his current deal.
But no way is he ever making 20 mil again.
Russlan, teams did not fall all over themselves to sign Lee, Pierre, Matthews and Silva.
I didn't say that he would make 20 million. I said he'd make 15 million next season which I think will happen if he is willing to sign a 1 or 2 year deal. At the very least, Manny has the option of accepting arbitration and he'll get around 15 million that way. I was responding to the comment that Manny is wearing out his welcome in baseball. That's just crazy.
Because he is widely hated by the press (with good reason) and widely hated by every fan base save one, and because he is a key figure in the steroids situation, you really have to put Barry in a category by himself. It takes a lot to get blackballed in baseball when you can still hit well. Yet Bonds has done everything it takes. Man-Ram isn't even close, in terms of getting blackballed.
This has Mets written all over it.
Yes. Andy and I (and others) have pointed out that Bonds is unique; comparing him to anybody is pretty much pointless. In my opinion, he would have had a job this year if the Feds had decided not to indict. To me, that tipped the balance. Personally, I wish someone would have signed him. I still like to watch him hit, and I see baseball as entertainment, not as a moral hygiene lesson.
Haven't people given Manny the benefit of the doubt for his entire career? Is there any other player where a fun catch phrase has been created just to excuse his colourful behavior?
Overall, fans and the media have been pretty forgiving to Manny, no doubt due to his incredible bat. It's laughable that now that Manny is getting a bit of criticism, suddenly "few people ever give Ramirez the benefit of the doubt".
Funny nicknames, perhaps. "Rube" for several players. "Spaceman" Lee.
The same Red Sox management now vilifying him has even, via their NESN subsidiary, created a commercial celebrating the antics that inspired the "fun catch phrase," which gets aired about 12 times daily over the course of the pregame, game, and postgame telecasts.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main