Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Monday, July 14, 2008

Slate:  Derek Jeter vs. Objective Reality

Derek Jeter is quite good at playing baseball. As such, he’ll earn north of $30 million this year in salary and endorsements. Despite a poor offensive season by his standards, fans voted Jeter to his ninth All-Star team, where he will start at shortstop for the American League on Tuesday night. Add to that his four World Series rings and dalliances with actresses and beauty queens, and there is a lot to recommend the Yankees star. There’s just one small blot on his résumé: When it comes to playing defense, Jeter sucks.

With input from Tango, “statheads” and all that jazz…

Fat Al Posted: July 14, 2008 at 03:47 PM | 37 comment(s) | Login to Bookmark
  Related News: GeneralNY Yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: July 14, 2008 at 04:49 PM (#2855978)
"Defense? Defense? Defense? We're talking about defense? I'm talking about the game. Defense?"
   2. SoSH U at work Posted: July 14, 2008 at 04:53 PM (#2855981)
If the sabermetric case against Jeter's glove has long been closed, why do the sabermetricians keep opening it? In an e-mail, Tom Tango joked that Jeter comes up again and again "because he gets far more girls than his fielding talents should allow." Tom Tango joked that Jeter comes up again and again "because he gets far more girls than his fielding talents should allow."


Nice line, Tango.
   3. Rich Posted: July 14, 2008 at 04:56 PM (#2855984)
Whatever, but he sucks significantly less this season given that he is 4th among AL SS according to ZR.
   4. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: July 14, 2008 at 04:57 PM (#2855987)
#3. small sample size ;)
   5. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: July 14, 2008 at 04:59 PM (#2855989)
One should not conflate playing the field with playing defense. Mr. Jeter obviously excels at one of these.

At any rate, Jeter's been a perfectly average defensive SS in 2008. It's too bad he can't hit.
   6. Rich Posted: July 14, 2008 at 05:09 PM (#2856007)
Jeter's OPS in June was .801, in July it's .824.
   7. Hubie Brooks (Not Really) Posted: July 14, 2008 at 05:17 PM (#2856018)
Why would anyone care if a 20+ Million dollar singles hitter can field? He is the captain of all captains, the Truest Yankee of all True Yankees. A Baseball God among men. He doesn't need no stinking glove.
   8. Rich Posted: July 14, 2008 at 05:31 PM (#2856031)
That singles hitter has a 121 career OPS+ which is higher than the 118 career OPS+ of the greatest singles hitter of all time, Pete Rose.
   9. AROM Posted: July 14, 2008 at 05:48 PM (#2856054)
Whatever, but he sucks significantly less this season given that he is 4th among AL SS according to ZR.


Also leading the AL in RZR, last I checked. Of course, if you want to call that small sample size and point to his crappy defensive stats of prior seasons, you are correct to do so. But if you choose that path, then you also have to shut up about his small recent sample of so-so hitting.

You can't have it both ways.
   10. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: July 14, 2008 at 05:57 PM (#2856073)
I always try and avoid underestimating the impact of having smart players in the middle of the action.
   11. SteveF Posted: July 14, 2008 at 06:01 PM (#2856088)
I know every time a shortstop fails to track down a ball in the hole the first thought that pops into my head is, 'If only he were just a little smarter!'
   12. Fancy Pants Handle is the AntAgonizer Posted: July 14, 2008 at 06:22 PM (#2856116)
Also leading the AL in RZR, last I checked. Of course, if you want to call that small sample size and point to his crappy defensive stats of prior seasons, you are correct to do so. But if you choose that path, then you also have to shut up about his small recent sample of so-so hitting.

You can't have it both ways.


I personally think that you would be stupid to write off Jeter's bat just yet, but I like playing devil's advocate sometimes. There is a phenomenon called decline phase, which players typically reach round about Jeter's age. And once this happens their hitting ability steadily goes downhill. However, I am not aware of any such phenomenon, that would explain a sudden increase in fielding prowess...

That singles hitter has a 121 career OPS+ which is higher than the 118 career OPS+ of the greatest singles hitter of all time, Pete Rose.


Factor in a couple of years of declining hitting for Jeter, and I think the under for Jeter's career OPS+ at 118 is a safe bet...
   13. Greg Maddux School of Reflexive Profanity Posted: July 14, 2008 at 06:23 PM (#2856118)
That singles hitter has a 121 career OPS+ which is higher than the 118 career OPS+ of the greatest singles hitter of all time, Pete Rose.

Be sure to give us an update when Jeter's 45 and still writing himself into the lineup.
   14. phredbird Posted: July 14, 2008 at 06:35 PM (#2856131)
i think it would be great if he plays the whole game and the NL players smoke a bunch of grounders up the middle and he dives futilely at all of them.

don't worry, AL fans, it would never occur to the NL lineup that jeter is becoming a mere mortal, and play accordingly.
   15. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: July 14, 2008 at 06:43 PM (#2856137)
Actually, I'm not at all worried about the NL lineup trying to exploit Jeter's defense because I suspect that it is not such a simple thing to hit the ball exactly where you want to against all-star caliber pitching.
   16. phredbird Posted: July 14, 2008 at 06:46 PM (#2856142)
i know, but a guy can dream.
   17. Crispix Attacks Posted: July 14, 2008 at 06:46 PM (#2856143)
The NL's only hope would be for Cliff Lee to momentarily return to his 2007 performance during the two or three innings when Jeter is actually in the field.

(BTW, I find it amusing that the starting pitchers in the All-Star Game are a Brewer and an Indian, and neither one is CC Sabathia.)
   18. Nathan Kunkel Posted: July 14, 2008 at 06:49 PM (#2856146)
"
10. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: July 14, 2008 at 02:57 PM (#2856073)
I always try and avoid underestimating the impact of having smart players in the middle of the action.

11. SteveF Posted: July 14, 2008 at 03:01 PM (#2856088)
I know every time a shortstop fails to track down a ball in the hole the first thought that pops into my head is, 'If only he were just a little smarter!'
"

Wow. There's something poetically poignant about that post and response. Superficially it's as simple as 'well put, harvey' and 'gee, that steveF needs to pull the crap generator out from between his cheeks'; but that just states the obvious.

I'm thinking generational. Game-of-the-Week vs. Online-Demand.

[ never mind; personal moment ]
   19. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: July 14, 2008 at 07:10 PM (#2856167)
Nathan:

Personally, I don't understand Steve's comment. But since that is more of a reflection on me didn't feel the need to ask him to clarify.

If folks think I am being a dumb*ss it's better for all if they just state so clearly than try and be "cute" about it.

Otherwise, their beloved snark will be wasted. Because I "get" being called a dumb*ss.

If that helps anyone............
   20. Nathan Kunkel Posted: July 14, 2008 at 07:46 PM (#2856208)
Harvey, i think it points to a 'smarts and poise' vs. 'range and performance as illuminated by stat analysis' argument. a never ending argument; at least i imagine there will be no conclusion in our lifetimes. to my thinking there's been such an ever mounting glut of information feed the last 15 years, and so someone who grew up during that time 'perhaps' tends to give less weight to 'intangibles' than fans who grew up in less media driven, multiCORE powered times. not all fans, no, i'm not saying that. how and if this leads to snarkiness... is for more patient minds than mine to evaluate.

just laymen's mumblings here.
   21. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: July 14, 2008 at 07:50 PM (#2856214)
Nathan:

Well, I have never disputed the claims that Jeter is sub-standard in the standard sense of a shortstop. I noticed in 1997-98 timeframe that he struggled going to his left.

My point merely is that while he surrenders hits in some areas of the game it's possible, possible mind you, that because of his innate baseball instincts he provides defensive value in other ways.
   22. Rich Posted: July 14, 2008 at 07:51 PM (#2856215)
.... But if you choose that path, then you also have to shut up about his small recent sample of so-so hitting.

You can't have it both ways.


Except for one important caveat: Getting hit on the hand by Cabrera on May 20th severely impacted his offense.

Until May 20th:

.312 .351 .427 .778

From May 21st - June 1st:

.119 .255 .214 .469

From June 2nd - July 13th

.301 .367 .412 .779
   23. Rich Posted: July 14, 2008 at 07:52 PM (#2856218)
Be sure to give us an update when Jeter's 45 and still writing himself into the lineup.


As long as he's not playing SS. If he is, I'm going to hire you to take him out.
   24. Los Angeles ALBERT F. PUJOLS of Anaheim Posted: July 14, 2008 at 07:59 PM (#2856223)
My point merely is that while he surrenders hits in some areas of the game it's possible, possible mind you, that because of his innate baseball instincts he provides defensive value in other ways.
He knew to get across the diamond for The Flip in 2001. I'm with Harveys here; whatever his defensive difficulties may be, I'm not going to buy the argument that Jeter's head isn't filled with delicous brains.
   25. Nathan Kunkel Posted: July 14, 2008 at 08:19 PM (#2856238)
"My point merely is that while he surrenders hits in some areas of the game it's possible, possible mind you, that because of his innate baseball instincts he provides defensive value in other ways."

I'm on the same page. One challenge in evaluating Jeter is determining if and how much his documented heroics, his highight reel of 'clutch plays', are a result of misguided adulation. The flip side challenge is evaluating if and how much the developing slew of stats understate his defensive value.

[ Descartes proved the existance of God, but ... ; ) ]
   26. Inanimate Carbon Rod Barajas Posted: July 14, 2008 at 08:26 PM (#2856243)
Rich, you don't happen to be a Yankees fan, do you?
   27. Rich Posted: July 14, 2008 at 08:34 PM (#2856247)
Duh.
   28. Cooper Nielson Posted: July 15, 2008 at 04:34 AM (#2856710)
He knew to get across the diamond for The Flip in 2001

I'll agree that Jeter's overall defensive package is probably underrated on this site and we tend to focus on his obvious weaknesses (going to his left, reaching balls that 90% of shortstops get to, etc.). He's a smart player and, like Harveys says, that probably helps him defensively in ways that are hard to measure. But isn't "getting across the diamond" something that every shortstop does in such a situation?

I know this debate is 7 years old now, but back when people (except for us A's fans) were canonizing Jeter for "The Flip," there were a lot of dissenters pointing out that the play would have been less fantastic had Jeter actually been in the right position at the right time. Shortstops are SUPPOSED to be where he was.
   29. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: July 15, 2008 at 07:43 AM (#2856756)
Based on the coverage, either Derek Jeter is the golden god of wins who descends from the heavens 162 times a year to dispense clutchiness and ambrosia to a grateful world, or Derek Jeter is a collapsing white dwarf star of suck who befouls baseball by fruitlessly fist pumping at 100 six-hoppers up the middle per home stand.

So hard to choose one. Ah, if only there were a third option! But alas, this can never be.
   30. Flynn Posted: July 15, 2008 at 10:19 AM (#2856768)
I'm not going to buy the argument that Jeter's head isn't filled with delicous brains.

lol
   31. Lassus: Posted: July 15, 2008 at 10:30 AM (#2856769)
I know this debate is 7 years old now, but back when people (except for us A's fans) were canonizing Jeter for "The Flip," there were a lot of dissenters pointing out that the play would have been less fantastic had Jeter actually been in the right position at the right time. Shortstops are SUPPOSED to be where he was.

I seem to recall a certain amount of debate even in the regular press regarding this, but I hadn't been associated with the delicious, delicious braaaaaaaains of BTF at that point. Was there a prevailing listserv or whatnot opinion at the time? Um, an objective one? Don't laugh.
   32. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: July 15, 2008 at 12:22 PM (#2856825)
an objective one?

No.
   33. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 15, 2008 at 12:26 PM (#2856828)
Shortstops are SUPPOSED to be where he was.

Omar Vizquel was quoted as saying he would never have been there.

Jeter was supposed to be at/or around second in case they tried to get the tailing runner. No SS in the world would have been positioned behind the first baseman.
   34. Bob Dernier Cri Posted: July 15, 2008 at 12:43 PM (#2856840)
Shortstops are SUPPOSED to be where he was

If you think about it, if shortstops were supposed to be where he was, we'd see that play more often :)

The Flip is one of those Immaculate-Reception, Havlicek-stole-the-ball kind of plays that doesn't strongly reveal a repeatable, dependable skill, but is simply perfect in terms of its timeliness and impact on a game. Jeter, Havlicek, and Franco Harris all deserve appropriate credit. And uncoincidentally, they are all Hall of Famers with reputations for smart, hustling play.
   35. Repoz Posted: July 15, 2008 at 12:48 PM (#2856845)
Jeter was supposed to be at/or around second in case they tried to get the tailing runner. No SS in the world would have been positioned behind the first baseman.

I saw Jeter interviewed last week where he said he was in the right position (between first and home)...as they practice their relays from the RF corner that way all the time.
   36. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 15, 2008 at 12:52 PM (#2856850)
I saw Jeter interviewed last week where he said he was in the right position (between first and home)...as they practice their relays from the RF corner that way all the time.

The play. No one is covering second. If the Yanks practice that, and I've seen him say that before, if he's telling the truth, it's certainly an unusual practice.
   37. SoSH U at work Posted: July 15, 2008 at 01:14 PM (#2856875)
The play. No one is covering second. If the Yanks practice that, and I've seen him say that before, if he's telling the truth, it's certainly an unusual practice.


Agreed CP. The shortstop would, in almost all cases, go to second base on a ball hit to the right side of the outfield (while the second baseman serves as the cutoff man). The SS would generally remain there even if the batter was heading for third, in the rare event that a rundown ensued. If that's indeed the Yankees' practice, it's not standard.
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
The Ghost of Sox Fans Past
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogRosenthal: Swapping Figgins for Ichiro at leadoff could revive Mariners' offense
(2 - 7:54am, Feb 10)
Last: Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader

NewsblogSources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault
(5848 - 7:49am, Feb 10)
Last: Lassus:

NewsblogL.A. Times: 11 bidders remain in running to buy Dodgers
(8 - 7:41am, Feb 10)
Last: LionoftheSenate (is roaring!)

NewsblogNY Daily News: Brian Cashman's accused stalker says Yankees GM misled feds on steroid probe
(51 - 7:30am, Feb 10)
Last: ray james

NewsblogFangraphs: Cameron: The 10 Worst Transactions Of The Winter
(87 - 6:59am, Feb 10)
Last: LionoftheSenate (is roaring!)

NewsblogOrioles Scouts Banned from Korea
(7 - 6:30am, Feb 10)
Last: Swedish Chef

NewsblogMONEYBALL~ Oscar Nominations 2012: Academy Award Nominees List ~ MONEYBALL
(595 - 6:22am, Feb 10)
Last: Quiet Flows the Don Taussig Avenger (Edmundo)

NewsblogKnobler: Stay away from steroids -- but vote how you want
(20 - 6:11am, Feb 10)
Last: Athletic Supporter leads the nation in drifters

NewsblogJeff Sullivan: The Worst Team Ever Projected?
(51 - 5:57am, Feb 10)
Last: Sam Hutcheson is the 'saur with the rainbow roar

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 2-10-2012
(4 - 5:37am, Feb 10)
Last: Not The Real Fausto Carmona (Dan Lee)

NewsblogWhatever Happened to the Spitball?
(19 - 4:19am, Feb 10)
Last: toratoratora

Transaction Oracle2012 ZiPS Projections - Texas Rangers
(19 - 3:53am, Feb 10)
Last: Jebuddhallah

NewsblogGrantland/Bill James: An Open Letter to the Hall of Fame About Dwight Evans
(26 - 2:04am, Feb 10)
Last: DanG

NewsblogNYT: Alderson Remakes Needy Mets From Bottom Line Up
(41 - 1:37am, Feb 10)
Last: PreservedFish

Newsblog'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s
(282 - 12:44am, Feb 10)
Last: MM1f

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.6828 seconds
40 querie(s) executed