User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.8240 seconds
81 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Friday, March 07, 2008SNY: Salfino: Projecting the Mets’ lineupBah!...Bill “ZiPS” PECOTA used to bat anywhere in the Mets lineup!
Repoz
Posted: March 07, 2008 at 03:28 PM | 18 comment(s)
Related News: General, Sabermetrics, Projections, ZIPS, NY Mets |
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Plain Dealer/Pluto: Matt LaPorta is still in the minors because of Grady Sizemore's cranky elbow (3 - 1:08pm, Jul 05) Last: Rough Carrigan Newsblog: Kovacevic: Giants eye Sanchez, LaRoche (11 - 1:03pm, Jul 05) Last: Biff. You know, for kids! Newsblog: tampabay.com: Tampa Bay Rays minor-league affiliate's Ladies Night promotion causing a stir (6 - 12:37pm, Jul 05) Last: Justin Zeth Newsblog: Steve Kettman: A review of the unmaking of 'Moneyball: The Movie' (5 - 12:36pm, Jul 05) Last: Robert Machemer Newsblog: Kids Prefer Cheese: Mr Pujols: Walk him, just walk him (30 - 12:35pm, Jul 05) Last: Frisco Cali Newsblog: NYT: Kilgannon: Why Short Al From Brooklyn, Talkative Fan, Calls No More
(14 - 12:26pm, Jul 05) Last: cardsfanboy |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.8240 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I haven't looked at the numbers, so this is purely speculation, but the Mets seem like a high variance team to me. Feels like they could win 110 games if everything broke right, and yet it also feels like it could implode and they could lose 85. Not that either of those outcomes is anything other than wildly remote, of course, but I guess no outcome for the 2008 Mets would really shock me.
That said, it's WAAAAAAAY too early to be worried. If they are 26-29 and still fighting injuries on June 1, maybe. Until then, barring a major injury, I'm pretty much assuming the Mets will win 90+ games.
That's my take too. They could be terrific or hugely disappointing, maybe the largest spread in the league. Of course with a NY based team, the second one is always much more entertaining.
I think the Mets are the second-most likely team to win their division, after the San Francisco Angels of Southern Louisiana.
I don't think anything short of a cholera outbreak is going to keep the West out of the Angels' hands.
Frankly, while the Angels look a lock, none of the other divisions are cut and salted. Mets, as shown by their ST injury woes, are not a perfect team, and need a lot to go right to win the division.
NL East to me is 40 mets, 30 Phillies, 29 Braves, 1 for the Gnats or Marlins.
I think the Braves should be favored over the Phils at least. Their 4th and 5th figue to be much better. Their CF cannot be much worse than Andruw's stink bomb last year.
Perez was 88-91 today and the defense was just horrible because of weather conditions and errors. He should have been put of the inning easily. He got 5 outs in the 3rd inning. His line should have been 3 IP, 2 H, 1 ER.
I know Perez allowed a lot of unearned runs and that's a problem but the team defense was horrible. A wet field and wind made every popup an adventure. Seriously, today's outing means nothing.
Let me introduce you to Mark Kotsay's 2007 batting line: .214/.279/.296
I think the Braves should be favored over the Phils at least.
i am a Braves' fan, and i can't see it. The core 3 starters are on the older side, and Hudson needs to replicate his performance from last year. Chipper is injury prone. Say what you will about Andruw, just from watching, last year was one of his best defensive years in the last 5.
OTOH, Myers is back in the rotation. They picked up Lidge. Madson might be healthy this year. Utley missed some time. Burrell took the first half of the year off. And they improved significantly at 3B.
They are going to miss Rowand, but Victorino might replace some of it, atleast the defence. RF should be decent with a Werth/Jenkins platoon.
I think the Phillies have improved.
Can we dismiss a projection system out of hand based on one absurdity? How off do the basic equations have to be to project a 41 year-old outfielder to suddenly increase his playing time after a three year trend toward less ABs?
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main