|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Friday, March 07, 2008
Bah!...Bill “ZiPS” PECOTA used to bat anywhere in the Mets lineup!
Still, I greatly respect the hard work and willingness to be so precise in laying it out there in black and white so that we can debate their relative merits. I’m using three projection systems. The father of the sabermetric movement, Bill James, is represented as published in The Bill James Handbook. We use the PECOTA system of Nate Silver as published in the Baseball Prospectus annual. That system was partially inspired by James’ “player similarity scores” but is more rigidly modeled. And Dan Szymborski’s ZiPS projections come courtesy of BaseballThinkFactory.com, which consistently lives up to its name. ZiPS looks at similar skills more than players in calculating projections.
...So, let’s go right down the projected starting lineup, leading off with shortstop Jose Reyes.
James gives Reyes a .789 OPS with 14 homers and 69 steals. Amazingly, PECOTA tabs him at .788 with 14 homers and 60 steals. ZiPS says 800 with 15 homers and 70 steals.
When did Reyes turn into such a projectable player? None of the three projected Reyes to hit .300 again. I do because his barely average .302 average on balls in play is very low considering his speed. Blame the elevated fly ball rate. That was a bad deal for Reyes because his rate of homers on fly balls was cut in half. His now (just about) 1-to-1 strikeout-to-walk ratio is what you look for from a guy who can contend for a batting title even when they can’t motor like Jose.
Repoz
Posted: March 07, 2008 at 03:28 PM | 18 comment(s)
Related News: General, Sabermetrics, Projections, ZIPS, NY Mets
|
My Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I haven't looked at the numbers, so this is purely speculation, but the Mets seem like a high variance team to me. Feels like they could win 110 games if everything broke right, and yet it also feels like it could implode and they could lose 85. Not that either of those outcomes is anything other than wildly remote, of course, but I guess no outcome for the 2008 Mets would really shock me.
That said, it's WAAAAAAAY too early to be worried. If they are 26-29 and still fighting injuries on June 1, maybe. Until then, barring a major injury, I'm pretty much assuming the Mets will win 90+ games.
That's my take too. They could be terrific or hugely disappointing, maybe the largest spread in the league. Of course with a NY based team, the second one is always much more entertaining.
I think the Mets are the second-most likely team to win their division, after the San Francisco Angels of Southern Louisiana.
I don't think anything short of a cholera outbreak is going to keep the West out of the Angels' hands.
Frankly, while the Angels look a lock, none of the other divisions are cut and salted. Mets, as shown by their ST injury woes, are not a perfect team, and need a lot to go right to win the division.
NL East to me is 40 mets, 30 Phillies, 29 Braves, 1 for the Gnats or Marlins.
I think the Braves should be favored over the Phils at least. Their 4th and 5th figue to be much better. Their CF cannot be much worse than Andruw's stink bomb last year.
Perez was 88-91 today and the defense was just horrible because of weather conditions and errors. He should have been put of the inning easily. He got 5 outs in the 3rd inning. His line should have been 3 IP, 2 H, 1 ER.
I know Perez allowed a lot of unearned runs and that's a problem but the team defense was horrible. A wet field and wind made every popup an adventure. Seriously, today's outing means nothing.
Let me introduce you to Mark Kotsay's 2007 batting line: .214/.279/.296
I think the Braves should be favored over the Phils at least.
i am a Braves' fan, and i can't see it. The core 3 starters are on the older side, and Hudson needs to replicate his performance from last year. Chipper is injury prone. Say what you will about Andruw, just from watching, last year was one of his best defensive years in the last 5.
OTOH, Myers is back in the rotation. They picked up Lidge. Madson might be healthy this year. Utley missed some time. Burrell took the first half of the year off. And they improved significantly at 3B.
They are going to miss Rowand, but Victorino might replace some of it, atleast the defence. RF should be decent with a Werth/Jenkins platoon.
I think the Phillies have improved.
Can we dismiss a projection system out of hand based on one absurdity? How off do the basic equations have to be to project a 41 year-old outfielder to suddenly increase his playing time after a three year trend toward less ABs?
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main