|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Monday, August 04, 2008
With special guest, J.C. Bradbury.
Question #3: Have the Boston Red Sox lost their minds?
Pizza Cutter: There are varying degrees of losing one’s mind, and thankfully because of my “real job” in psychology, I’m the one who gets to decide who’s sane and who’s not. (Someone out there just re-read my answer to question #1 and shook his head at that thought.) To look at the Manny trade as a pure value trade, it’s actually not all that bad. The Red Sox got back Jason Bay who is almost as good as Manny Ramirez and the guys they sent to Pittsburgh were unimportant. Bay is signed to a relatively cheap contract through next year, while Manny had a $20 million option. The Red Sox can at least make a sensible argument that they might very well break even and/or net out more value per dollar with Bay over Ramirez in the next year and a half. Maybe the thought process was “We still have a good chance to win in ‘08 and Bay improves our chances of winning in ‘09 and in total, the probabilities are actually greater that win something.” That’s at least rational.
With that said, let’s examine the premise of “We need to trade away one of the best hitters in baseball in the middle of a pennant race in which we are fighting for our lives… because he’s annoying.” I appreciate that Manny can be a pain (I grew up with the Indians in the 90s), but the reality is that the Red Sox made themselves (slightly) worse for this year by trading Ramirez. Even if Manny is lazy, he’s a lazy man who hits the ball better than a lot of guys in the league, and in the days leading up to the deadline, the Red Sox made it clear that they really just wanted Manny out. Given those parameters, they made a decent deal, but this was a trade that didn’t need to be made. One of the things that I do in my “real job” is to help people cope when things aren’t ideal or even comfortable. Everyone has to go through those times, and the trick is not to do something self-destructive to compensate. The Red Sox should pay a visit to my office.
Repoz
Posted: August 04, 2008 at 06:41 PM | 12 comment(s)
| Login to Bookmark
Related News: General, Sabermetrics, Boston
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Fangraphs: Cameron: The 10 Worst Transactions Of The Winter (87 - 6:59am, Feb 10)Last: LionoftheSenate (is roaring!)Newsblog: NY Daily News: Brian Cashman's accused stalker says Yankees GM misled feds on steroid probe (50 - 6:40am, Feb 10)Last: Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad)Newsblog: Orioles Scouts Banned from Korea (7 - 6:30am, Feb 10)Last: Swedish ChefNewsblog: MONEYBALL~ Oscar Nominations 2012: Academy Award Nominees List ~ MONEYBALL (595 - 6:22am, Feb 10)Last: Quiet Flows the Don Taussig Avenger (Edmundo)Newsblog: Knobler: Stay away from steroids -- but vote how you want (20 - 6:11am, Feb 10)Last: Athletic Supporter leads the nation in driftersNewsblog: Sources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault (5844 - 6:10am, Feb 10)Last: David Nieporent (now, with children)Newsblog: Rosenthal: Swapping Figgins for Ichiro at leadoff could revive Mariners' offense (1 - 6:02am, Feb 10)Last: A One-Shoed Craig KNewsblog: Jeff Sullivan: The Worst Team Ever Projected? (51 - 5:57am, Feb 10)Last: Sam Hutcheson is the 'saur with the rainbow roarNewsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 2-10-2012 (4 - 5:37am, Feb 10)Last: Not The Real Fausto Carmona (Dan Lee)Newsblog: Whatever Happened to the Spitball? (19 - 4:19am, Feb 10)Last: toratoratoraTransaction Oracle: 2012 ZiPS Projections - Texas Rangers (19 - 3:53am, Feb 10)Last: JebuddhallahNewsblog: Grantland/Bill James: An Open Letter to the Hall of Fame About Dwight Evans (26 - 2:04am, Feb 10)Last: DanGNewsblog: L.A. Times: 11 bidders remain in running to buy Dodgers (7 - 1:56am, Feb 10)Last: Joe KehoskieNewsblog: NYT: Alderson Remakes Needy Mets From Bottom Line Up (41 - 1:37am, Feb 10)Last: PreservedFishNewsblog: 'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s (282 - 12:44am, Feb 10)Last: MM1f
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I don't think there's a "might" about it. Bay's value per dollar should blow Manny's out of the water.
With that said, let’s examine the premise of “We need to trade away one of the best hitters in baseball in the middle of a pennant race in which we are fighting for our lives… because he’s annoying.”
But the trade makes sense from a baseball perspective, as you already detailed. Boston doesn't make this deal in the middle of a pennant race if it's only addition by subtraction.
IF you assume that they had not intention of picking up Manny's option for next year, then the bang for the buck argument becomes more problematic.
Then again, IF you assume that they had not intention of picking up Manny's option for next year, getting Jason Bay for next year at his current salary is also a very good fill in.
As to the short-term hit -- my concern is only two-fold. First is our standard concern about the accuracy of defensive run valuation (with the added Green Monster effect -- and Bay in LF may be a good way to get a handle on that). Second is Bay's 2007 which still scares me. I know, he's hitting like the Bay of old -- almost exactly his 2006 numbers. But if he's a substantial risk to turn back into Bay 2007, that's not good.
Bay was hurt pretty much all of last year, played through a lot of pain, he's better now. There are many bigger risks in baseball than Jason Bay.
Given that they were apparently desperate to dispose of Manny, getting Jason Bay in return is a great deal, depending on how you value those prospects they parted with.
Yes, that seemed much more intereting than the Manny comments.
While I agree with him that the Brewers really aren't that good, neither are the Cardinals, or Marlins, or Mets, and it isn't likely any of those teams are going to leave the Brewers behind far enough soon enough that they'd consider waiving Sabathia.
Assigning a value to those prospects is tricky as well, since both Moss and Hansen will be valued differently by the Pirates than they were by the Red Sox. For example, I think Moss will turn out to be a pretty decent hitter--let's say 105-115 OPS+ by the WAGNER projection--and his defense is good enough to play either corner OF spot. However, with the resources the Red Sox have, it's unlikely they would have "settled" for that, and so Moss's ceiling in Boston was probably 4th OFer with occasional spells at 1B. On the other hand, Moss's ceiling in Pittsburgh is everyday, above-average corner OFer, simply by virtue of a different opportunity. He could certainly develop into a fine player, but he wasn't going to get that chance in Boston.
I'm less sanguine on Hansen, mostly because I think his mechanics are ruinous. He's got potentially dominant stuff, but I don't think he'll ever be able to command it throwing the way he does. And if he tinkers with his mechanics to better harness his stuff, there's a strong possibility he loses some of that stuff. There's some evidence that this is exactly what happened during his time in the Red Sox minor league system: he made some changes, lost effectiveness, and then went back to his original mechanics. I wish him the best because his slider is an absolute thunderbolt when it's on, every bit as wicked as vintage K-Rod.
Overall, I think all three parties involved in the Manny-Bay deal did reasonably well for themselves. The Dodgers probably weren't under the same pressure to do something as the Red Sox and Pirates were, but it was a bold stroke for them and the early returns have been quite favorable. I don't see any clear winners or losers coming out of this trade; if anything, I'd be tempted to say everybody won.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main