|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Friday, April 18, 2008
Who’s in, who’s out? Seidman takes a HOF look.
In my favorite baseball book (as of now) Whatever Happened to the Hall of Fame? Bill James attempts to uncover what makes a hall of fame player as well as why Player A got in and Player B did not. While he did not necessarily find a common denominator he did notice that a large percentage of those enshrined reached certain statistical milestones. With that in mind he created a few tests to determine the likelihood of a player getting inducted.
The test I like to examine the most is the Hall of Fame Monitor. For a full explanation click the link of the title, but it essentially weights different milestones and awards points as players positively distance themselves from said achievements. Anyone with a score of 100+ is considered to have a shot; anyone with 130+ is considered a virtual shoe-in. For instance, Ken Griffey Jr. currently has a 225 and Alex Rodriguez has a 316; based on what others currently inducted have done, these two players would be no-doubters if they retired today or tomorrow.
There are currently 35 batters with 100+ not yet eligible for induction. I thought it might be fun to show them and get your thoughts on whether or not they are worthy, as well as why or why not. If we can get enough of a response we’ll have an official fan ballot. In just taking a cursory scan of these 35 I have a strong sense we will find some players with 130+ that are not necessarily worthy of induction based on the standards of some.
Repoz
Posted: April 18, 2008 at 06:39 AM | 3 comment(s)
Related News: General, Hall of Fame
|
My Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1) As hitting numbers skyrocketed in the early '90s, the number of players exceeding 100 did also. What would be considered impressive offensive statistics have changed quite a bit.
2) The HOF didn't expand the numbers of players inducted - if anything, it has shrunk, despite the increase in teams due to expansion, and the increase in hitting numbers.
Hmm checking the Monitor over at BBRef, I see that there's no points awarded for career RBIs-that can't be right.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main