User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets. |
We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule |
Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers |
Page rendered in 0.6214 seconds
83 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
thanks!
Well, sure if you've just got a couple extra Rays-Rangers tickets to dump for face value, you're not going to give anyone your personal phone. But if it's a ticket worth thousands, and disposable phones cost ten or twenty bucks, there will be a secondary market in phones as tickets.
The only way to eliminate scalping is to check, as airlines do, the identity of the user of the ticket. And unfortunately that approach also prevents giving your friends your season tickets to a particular game, a nice perk of season-tickethood. Customers -- particularly corporate customers -- aren't going to like that. So I have no doubt that the phone-ticket will remain just another convenient delivery device, not an anti-scalping measure.
To hide the money from MLB revenue sharing?
Does that work? Because if so, all any team needs to do is sell all their tix for 1¢ to a phony-baloney holding company. Seems pretty blatant even for the Lords.
Worked for the Cubs.
There is more negative PR backlash if they just raised the actual face value. With WFPTS, they can have their cake and eat it, too.
Has there been a crackdown on this yet, like the undersold broadcast rights fees to TBS, WGN, YES, etc.? It seems like it would be pretty easy to police.
It would be, if the owners had any interest at all in doing it.
It would be, if the owners had any interest at all in doing it.
Why wouldn't the small market/low revenue owners have an interest in doing it?
Because if they pushed the big-market owners too hard on this, the big-market owners might start wanting more accountability as to where the revenue-sharing dollars are going.
And they got absolutely hammered on it, although they have weathered it. Plus it bet it wasn't for 1¢.
Maybe not, but they can raise a stink about it. George Steinbrenner's always grousing about subsidizing small-market teams. Take away his ability to play shell games with his money, and he can raise a very big stink.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main