User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.7451 seconds
81 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Tuesday, September 23, 2008TFBG: Podhorzer: What Happened to Troy Tulowitzki?Uhh...he blew up my fantasy team like we used to blow up Chatty Cathy dolls with strategically placed M-80’s?
|
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Cincinnati Enquirer/Fay: Please don't mortgage future (7 - 5:20pm, Jul 05) Last: Harveys Wallbangers Newsblog: tampabay.com: Tampa Bay Rays minor-league affiliate's Ladies Night promotion causing a stir (26 - 5:13pm, Jul 05) Last: Justin Zeth Newsblog: L.A. Times: Game (not) over for Gagne (3 - 5:04pm, Jul 05) Last: Esoteric can feel Strasburg slowly slipping away Newsblog: Madden: Omar Minaya's Mets have issues with injuries and inside the clubhouse (7 - 5:04pm, Jul 05) Last: Mike Emeigh Newsblog: washingtonpost.com: The Jerk Who Saved Baseball
(9 - 5:03pm, Jul 05) Last: SoSHially Unacceptable |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.7451 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Whatever the reason, there's just an enormous split between his two halves this season, starting with the fact that his BABIP was .175 in the first half, and .351 in the second half. His overall second half numbers of .317/.381/.455 are actually an improvement on his rookie year.
Also, there was a lot of talk last year that Tulo was simply a creation of Coors Field. On the road last year, he hit just .256/.327/.393. On the road in 2008, those numbers have held steady, at .261/.321/.398. It's at home that the collapse has come.
God. I hate this silly reasoning.
He got hurt... and then didn't hit the ball very well when he got back... maybe there is a connection?
Yes, walk rate up a tick. More interestingly K rate down substantially (or contact rate up).
But that's the "problem". K-rate down substantially but BA down substantially, HR rate down substantially. To do those with a big drop in K-rate, you ain't hitting the ball hard anymore. On-contact numbers: 370/610 in 2007; 295/454 in 2008 (that is awful, like Ronny Cedeno career numbers awful). That's not "bad luck", that's a different approach to hitting. Well, OK, it could be "bad luck" but it's the bad luck of a guy who's really 330/530 on-contact following a year of good luck. (Note, if the new K-rate is real, that would put him at 285/450 overall and somewhere around a 105 OPS+ so a very good player; use the career K-rate and it's 265/425 which is fine for a SS.)
As MM1f suggests, the change is probably injury-related. If someone wants to say "Tulo was hurt last year and I expect him to bounce back to his 2007 self", that's reasonable. If they want to cite the fact that he's been hitting well for the last month or so as further evidence, I can dig it. But do not make the argument that this year hasn't been a disaster, didn't show a very different hitter, etc.
So who would you rather have, Tulo or Drew ?
Of course, I am biased, but I'd take Tulowitzki for the following reasons:
1. Tulowitzki is two years younger.
2. Tulowitzki is the superior defensive player.
3. Their career OPS+ are still virtually identical (95 for Drew, 94 for Tulo).
4. Even with Drew's breakout year and Tulo's flop, their OBPs are also about the same this year (.328 for Drew, .323 for Tulo).
Drew's big advantage is that his career is progressing in the right direction, whereas Tulowitzki appears to be going backward, but even there, Tulo's second half has been very strong. Going forward, I expect them to be roughly even as offensive players, with Tulowitzki maybe having a small advantage, but I also think Tulo will be a perennial Gold Glove candidate, while Drew will be more of a league-average defender.
Prior to 2007, I don't think anyone would have thought that Tulo would be the superior offensive player compared to Drew, even by a small advantage. 2007 of course changed that perception. But 2008 should flip perceptions/expectations back to the way they were before 2007. The age component is noted of course, but I don't think it's the overriding factor here.
Defensively, Drew is probably less than a league average defender, so he will have to continue to hit at least as well as 2008 going forward. While I would not argue for a second that Tulo isn't the superior defender, it's notable that his fielding bible +/- went from +35 in 2007 to just +3 in 2008, (ranked 13th) Drew is -6, and ranked 21st now. Tulo is better, but I'd be surprised if he ever put up quite such outstanding defensive statistics as he did in 2007
I hate to be the guy always saying nothing to see here, but I really don't see a lot to see here. Just because we don't like the blanket "luck & sample size" explanation doesn't make it any less accurate most of the time.
Link
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main