User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 1.2911 seconds
81 querie(s) executed
|
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Monday, May 05, 2008The Black (and Gold) Spot: Things that make me crazyMe being Vlad. Things = crazy being Jonah Keri’s “The failure dynasties” article.
|
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: N.Y. Observer: Megdal: Scott Schoeneweis and the Absence of Boos (18 - 11:53am, May 16) Last: Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Newsblog: Fred Schwarz on Baseball & Conservatives on National Review Online (4588 - 11:51am, May 16) Last: AlouGoodbye Sox Therapy: The Disincetive for the Red Sox to Lock Up Their Young Players (6 - 11:50am, May 16) Last: villageidiom Newsblog: Crosscut: Van Dyk: The M's need a smarter management team (5 - 11:48am, May 16) Last: Shooty misses Bill King Newsblog: Billy Wagner rips Mets teammates for ducking media (50 - 11:45am, May 16) Last: So's my mom! Oh wait...(Met Fan Charlie) Hall of Merit: Ranking the Hall of Merit First Basemen - Discussion (75 - 11:44am, May 16) Last: Paul Wendt Newsblog: Newsday: Best: SNY's Cohen gets to call Mets game from upper deck
(3 - 11:44am, May 16) Last: Pagans in the Outfield (Matt) |
|||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2007 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 1.2911 seconds | ||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
It wasn't the worst thing ever written, but I expected something better from him, too. A little too mainsteam-media-ish.
I've only been following baseball since 1998. Therefore I can't remember a time when the Cubs were a pathetic franchise. They look like the poor man's Red Sox to me. Consistent self-pity, incredibly big fan base, crowded ballpark with high ticket prices, and for the most part, good teams.
Looking at their bb-ref page, though, I see that this has not been the pattern throughout their history. Still, it would not make sense to put them in with teams that have a history of failure that actually extends to the present decade.
On the ESPN-scale, so does the back of my shampoo bottle.
If you really are an alternate personality of mine, Russ, you could be doing a little better job of pulling your weight on the blog. Just sayin'.
Sorry, but I really do find that background unbearable.
Good piece, Vlad. Passionate and in control at the same time, tough trick.
Thanks for reading and commenting, guys.
Not being a Pirates fan, I remember both the injury to Kendall and the contract through the lens of Baseball Tonight, as this all happened well before I began using the Internet as my primary source of baseball information. I remember believing that it was a good deal at the time. You're right. Sometimes it doesn't work out. Good results oriented analysis doesn't proclaim a *particular* result good or bad on its own merits. It uses *many* results to determine the system that will generally provide good results. All results must be examined in light of what the right system would have produced. No system can be 100% right all the time. Of course, that's why it's easy to turn the Kendall scenario in a cheap shot: the Pirates' system has been consistently, horribly broken.
Also, kudos on the Treasure Island reference. Quite brilliant.
1999, 2000, 2002, and 2006 really weren't that long ago. Over the past decade, the Cubs have alternated between decent (85 - 89 wins) and really bad - they've lost 95+ games 4 times in the past decade. Maybe at the moment they look like a "poor man's Red Sox" but this franchise is always right on the edge of collapsing into abject failure.
I probably should've mentioned it, especially since I tried to pick guys with similar PT, in addition to a similar stat profile.
Kendall through 26: 653 games, 2294 at-bats
Cochrane through 26: 646 games, 2204 at-bats
Dickey through 26: 617 games, 2206 at-bats
[Those three are really, really tight across the board. It's almost spooky.]
Kendall through 25: 501 games, 1715 at-bats
Mauer through 25 (so far): 442 games, 1622 at-bats
Yeah, I checked BRef to be sure. They really are good comps from a usage perspective. Anyways, as I said, the Kendall signing seemed more than reasonable to me at the time.
Wouldn't this make Vlad Bach?
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main