User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.4566 seconds
58 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Burrell's WPA: +3.6
Howard's clutchiness: -1.2
Burrell's clutchiness: +1.0
Howard's performance in "close and late" situations: .163/.303/.347 119 PAs
Burrell's performance in "close and late" situations: .286/.439/.607 107 PAs
I'd say that's a pretty liberal use of the word monster. A .952 OPS in Citizen's Bank Park does conjure up the images of an offensive monster in my mind. When I saw the word, I thought he'd have at least eclipsed a 1.000 OPS. I mean, really monster out to be used to refer to numbers that you really only see at the very top of the league (Pujols like numbers) when you expand the sample size to a full year, not numbers that would be ninth best in the NL. Pretty good fits a whole lot better IMO. Not that I am the person to set the definitive use of the term, I just think that those numbers aren't particularly monstrous.
Burrell's opening hot streak, along with Utley's, carried Howard's anemic effort, they weren't grossly different in the middle, and now Howard's carrying the team.
It's all just fun with endpoints, the Phillies wouldn't be where they are now without either of their hot streaks. If anything, Burrell's total performance is about on par with expectations, while Howard's is still below expectation. If Howard had been Howard in April/June/August, the Phils would probably have a cushion right now.
@McCoy We feel the same way about Burrell.
Generally people who follow a team closely tend to observe which players are having multi-month-long streaks of terrible performance, and which players are having incredible hot streaks, and calibrate their praise and criticism according to those sorts of things, instead of averaging out a player's total performance over a 1-, 3- or 5-year period and then expressing virtually identical opinions of him every day, becoming 0.1% more critical after a bad day and 0.1% more positive after a good day.
It's pathetically subjective, but some people fall victim to the sort of mentality that leads to biasing current events over past events when talking about current events.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main