|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Monday, November 26, 2007
Crank up the HEPA air purification system…as Bob T. checks out the Lasorda-Plaschke book.
Plaschke depicts the 2000 Olympics as one of Lasorda’s shining moments as he rode a hastily prepared team of minor leaguers to a surprising gold medal win over Cuba. But in the book, Lasorda comes across as a prototypical “Ugly American” who tries to intimidate the opposing teams by encouraging rough play and continually baiting the umpires. In the gold medal game, Lasorda refused to let his pitching coach, Phil Regan, tell him what starter Ben Sheets’s pitch count was. Lasorda was going to leave him out there until the game was over. (I couldn’t find the pitch count, but Sheets threw a four-hit shutout and got a lot of ground ball outs, so it likely wasn’t too high.)
...And yet through it all, Lasorda remains a Dodger. He claims to value loyalty more than any other quality and he claims that’s why he’s been paid by the Dodgers for most of his adult life. Lasorda says he is loyal to the Dodgers above just about everything else. But is Lasorda loyal to the Dodgers or is he just a guy who knows how to survive? Is he “baseball’s last true believer” as the subtitle of the book implies or is he the ultimate politician? Plaschke doesn’t answer this question. He’s too busy admiring the façade that is Tommy Lasorda to find out.
BTW…Sheets pitch count was 103 in the gold medal game.
Repoz
Posted: November 26, 2007 at 11:31 AM | 16 comment(s)
| Bookmark
Related News: General, Reviews, Books, LA Dodgers
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Garrison: Repeat DUI Arrestee Dan McLaughlin Keeps Job as Cardinals Broadcaster (20 - 10:19pm, Feb 03)Last: AJMNewsblog: Brewers To Accommodate Fans With Peanut Allergies (280 - 10:18pm, Feb 03)Last:  Yankee Redneck is a Pinhead.Newsblog: Feds Won't Charge Lance Armstrong (3 - 10:06pm, Feb 03)Last: akrasianNewsblog: Sources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault (5044 - 9:57pm, Feb 03)Last:  ray jamesNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012 (52 - 9:53pm, Feb 03)Last: Matt H.Newsblog: Terence Moore: Designated hitter skews home-run totals (69 - 9:51pm, Feb 03)Last: GotowarMissAgnesTransaction Oracle: 2012 ZiPS Projections - Arizona Diamondbacks (23 - 9:30pm, Feb 03)Last: shoewizardNewsblog: Fraley: Rangers' Josh Hamilton has relapse with alcohol at area bar (186 - 9:26pm, Feb 03)Last:  Arbitol DijalerNewsblog: CBSNewYork/AP: Woman Charged With Stalking Yankees GM Brian Cashman (24 - 9:19pm, Feb 03)Last: JE (Jason Epstein)Newsblog: Tom Brady a Montreal Expo: What might have been (63 - 9:11pm, Feb 03)Last: EbessanNewsblog: The Economist: Draft dodgers no more (38 - 9:07pm, Feb 03)Last: Joe KehoskieNewsblog: Madden - Gary Carter attends Palm Beach Atlantic University baseball game (4 - 8:45pm, Feb 03)Last: JE (Jason Epstein)Newsblog: Adam Rubin: SNY bailing out Mets (17 - 8:37pm, Feb 03)Last: JE (Jason Epstein)Newsblog: HHS: Lou Brock is no Hall of Famer (30 - 8:26pm, Feb 03)Last: Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral IdiotNewsblog: Rex Hudler Favored For Royals TV Broadcast (18 - 7:34pm, Feb 03)Last: bads85
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
So in other words, the quoted passage is nothing more than a "PAP smear"?
*rimshot*
Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all day, unless I get called into a meeting.
*rimshot*
Thangu vurrry much.
Maybe, but are any of us here smarter than Mr. Peabody?
Sure, man.
Yeah, jmac66 is. He hobnobs with Carter Burwell.
Sure, man.
Quiet, you!
Just 10? No way, there are 15 in my neighborhood alone smarter than he is.
From the review:
Plaschke doesn’t press Lasorda too much on his three most prominent managerial failures: the 1980 tiebreaker playoff loss to Houston, the loss to the Giants on the last day of the 1982 season that gave the Braves the division, and the decision to have Tom Niedenfuer pitch to Jack Clark in the ninth inning of Game 6 of the 1985 NLCS.
I should dig out my 1986 Baseball Abstract, but didn't conventional wisdom suggest that he walk Clark while it was pitching to him was the right thing to do gametheorywise? First base was open, but the walk reduced the Dodgers chances of winning from @ 79% to 76%. Sure, Clark was a better hitter at the time but Van Slyke was a lefty. One thing that I couldn't find was whether or not Niedenfuer was a flyball pitcher. If he was, that makes it an even better decision to face Clark.
Chevy Chase as Fletch
Lasorda at the 2001 All Star Game
Some deep thoughts from Lasorda (NSFW)
Correct. Walking Jack to face a guy with the bases loaded AND the platoon advantage would have been the worse move. And against righties that season Andy hit .281/.360/.481 which back then was more impressive than it is now.
LaSorda did the right thing picking the lesser of two evils. 'Cause I understand folks looking at Jack Clark circa 1985 and thinking twice. The guy had a well-deserved rep for being a late game monster. Van Slyke was just a skinny kid.
Plaschke's a favorite over at FJM
How is he a Houkian?
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main