|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
John Buzhardt...RIP. And one of my first cards.
John Buzhardt and I met at the Mid-Carolina Country Club grill room to talk about his professional baseball career, and seldom has an interview been so entertaining.
That journey into yesteryear comes to mind today with the news of John Buzhardt’s death Sunday at his home in Prosperity.
He pitched 11 years in the major leagues, worked for Carolina Eastman for another 21 and spent the September of his seasons enjoying life and spreading good cheer. A stroke suffered in 2002 kept him off the golf course, but nothing could interfere with his sense of humor.
Buzhardt’s 71-96 record in the major leagues does not attract much attention, but his career ERA of 3.66 tells far more. Many pitchers today would pay a king’s ransom for an ERA like his.
Thanks, I guess, to Baseball Musings.
|
My Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
RIP
He had a 97 ERA+ - same as Jason Marquis has in his career
What do you want the guy to say? "While his 3.66 ERA is impressive by today's standards, in the context of his time and his usage pattern, it was really about average. Of course, a mediocre ERA is a step up from his won/loss record, which was pretty poor, although subject to the overall poor quality of the teams for which he toiled." Of course not! (I owe somebody money for that, right?) He's trying to say nice things about a guy he liked who just passed away. Tell some good stories. Accentuate the positive.
Usage pattern. Hmm. When did bullpen ERAs become better than those for starters?
You mean the coming off an All Star, 143 OPS+ year, Roy Sievers? While Sievers was to begin his spiral, he did put up a 117 OPS+ in '62 for the Phils. I didn't realize that he had been so good so immediately before the trade. I think Sievers was obtained to provide veteran presence, if memory serves.
After Buzhardt's 2 "big" years for the Phils, he never pitched 200 innings in a season again.
I especially like his 5-16, 100 ERA+ year in '60. Interesting how a guy who went through that kept a wonderful sense of humor whereas a guy like Feller, who had quite a lot go his way, epitomizes the grumpy old man. People is funny that way.
EDIT: 1st paragraph clean up
Obviously. I wasn't meaning to put Sievers down (oops!), just thinking they probably undervalued Buzhardt.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main