Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Monday, October 31, 2005

Theo Walks Away from the Red Sox

Epstein had done some agonizing soul-searching the past few days, torn between staying at the job he had always coveted since his childhood days in Brookline and leaving because of intra-organizational politics and power struggles that he ultimately decided he could not live with any longer.

Now do you guys believe me about the factions?

Thanks to the quick link by Keith Willoughby.

Dan Szymborski Posted: October 31, 2005 at 05:47 PM | 350 comment(s)
  Related News: Boston

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 2 of 4 pages  1 2 3 4 >
   101. Matt Clement of Alexandria  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:21 PM (#1713733)
It's not about who they replace him with. Theo's very good, but he's not irreplaceable. It's about the fact that whoever replaces him is not going to have any autonomy under Lucchino.
   102. The Balls of Summer  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:21 PM (#1713734)
San Francisco general manager Brian Sabean, a graduate of Concord (N.H.) High School, has also been mentioned as a possibility.


This is an interesting idea. Sabes would actually be pretty good for the Sox as they seem to be going the Yankee "win with veterans and don't give young players a chance" route.

As to where Epstein ends up, I would say that McCourt's Boston roots may override Fat Tommy, Bald Plaschke and the boys. If Sabes leaves the Giants, I'd be happy with him.
   103. The George Sherrill Selection  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:24 PM (#1713740)
How about managerial musical chairs?

Theo to the Dodgers
DePo to the As
Beane to Boston (for Youkilis, of course)
   104. E., Hinske  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:25 PM (#1713742)
Holy cow. That money could really smooth over lots of workplace issues for lots of people.

Yeah, that's what I was thinking myself. 300, 325 and 350 the last three years supposedly. That's nice money obviously, but it's not like he doesn't need to work. I'm not as close the nonsense surrounding the Sox, being outside Boston and all, but Lucchino better be a goddam magician at what he does to make it worth all the crap he stirs up. He's like Manny, but I have no idea if he's capable of a 1.000 OPS. Speaking of Manny...does this mean he's gone?
   105. The Balls of Summer  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:26 PM (#1713743)
Dysfunctional Front Offices (based on heresay and rumors)

Boston Red Sox
Los Angeles Dodgers
Arizona Diamondbacks
Washington Nationals
New York Yankees
Baltimore Orioles

Anyone else?
   106. Shinbone  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:26 PM (#1713744)
This is not a good day for Red Sox fans.

The reason is not just because Theo is leaving, but rather the fact that there is great instability/stupidity in the Red Sox front office, shown by the CHB story leaked on Sunday. Why was this done?

I liked Theo very much, thought he did a good job, but certainly not perfect (see Jeremy Giambi, BK Kim contract, Edgar Renteria). I have not great loathing for Lucky Lucchino, and having a heavy in the front office certainly can be an asset, but he'd better damn well be a SMART heavy........which the CHB story seems to indicate he's not. Why do you trash someone you're supposedly about to re-sign? Could he really be THAT Machiavellian?

Particularly disgusting in this story is CHB's water carrying for the LL faction. He must have been sleeping in the Journalism & Ethics class at Holy Cross.
   107. chris p  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:28 PM (#1713746)
Beane to Boston (for Youkilis, of course)

you really think beane would agreet to work for lucchino?
   108. danielj  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:28 PM (#1713749)
Imagine if Theo replaced Sabean in SF? The Bay Area would be all moneyball, all the time.
   109. ElGuaposGhost  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:29 PM (#1713750)
Anyone want my partial season ticket?
   110. shoewizard  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:30 PM (#1713752)
Byrnes has not filled the asst. GM slot in AZ yet, maybe Theo would like a gig out here and work on his golf game.

Seriously, this sucks for Boston, and baseball in general. We need more people like Theo in baseball, not less.
   111. danielj  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:30 PM (#1713754)
Beane to Boston (for Youkilis, of course)

you really think beane would agreet to work for lucchino?


I was starting to wonder if personnel dynamics didn't have something to do with Beane's decision to stay in Oakland.
   112. Шĥy  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:31 PM (#1713755)

Boston Red Sox
Los Angeles Dodgers
Arizona Diamondbacks
Washington Nationals
New York Yankees
Baltimore Orioles

Anyone else?


New York Mets
   113. karlmagnus  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:31 PM (#1713758)
Balls of summer, if they're going to try to be the Yankees with 65% of the budget, my guess is they'll win 65% of the number of games. This team has to get younger, fast
   114. Harold  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:32 PM (#1713759)
Beane to Boston (for Youkilis, of course)

Beane's a part-owner of the Athletics now. It's extremely unlikely he moves in a deal like this.
   115. Repoz  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:32 PM (#1713760)
Part of Theo's statement...

In my time as General Manager, I gave my entire heart and soul to the organization. During the process leading up to today's decision, I came to the conclusion that I can no longer do so. In the end, my choice is the right one not only for me but for the Red Sox.

My affection for the Red Sox did not begin four years ago when I started working here, and it does not end today. I will remain on the job for several days as we finalize preparation for next week's general managers meetings. Thereafter, I will make myself available to the organization to ensure a smooth and stable transition.


Brinks
   116. Chinook Arch  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:32 PM (#1713762)
You read it here first, J.P. Ricciardi will be the next Boston G.M.

-Boston Boy, knows all the writers, and more importantly knows how to work them.

-A sabermetrics guy, but also has a significant mainstream scouting background

-Still under contract with the Jays until after 2007, but a bit of a lame duck with contract extension talks on hold, would have to beg out of his current situation.

-Experience as a G.M., mixed results in a tough division.

At the end of the day, being from Beantown and having experience will matter, the question , would he work for Lucchino? Would anybody work for this guy?
   117. So long Alex Chilton (Phil Coorey)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:33 PM (#1713764)
I saw the article...these are the questions you ask when you dont read that pricks articles.

Damn this, but there have to be other people out there who have half a clue about baseball.

I was hoping to have a nice easy relaxing off season.
   118. HOPE: Madison Obamagarner (Flynn)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:34 PM (#1713766)
Why do you trash someone you're supposedly about to re-sign? Could he really be THAT Machiavellian?

He trashed Pedro in the media when Pedro was thinking hard about resigning.

New York Mets

I'd say the Mets actually finally have some order in their FO, but yeah, they would have been on this list for about 15+ years.

Imagine if Theo replaced Sabean in SF? The Bay Area would be all moneyball, all the time.

I would be very happy if this happened, because it's been 51 years and it's time for my other team to win the World Series.
   119. JMM  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:34 PM (#1713767)
How about managerial musical chairs?

Theo to the Dodgers
DePo to the As
Beane to Boston (for Youkilis, of course)


Beane's daughter is still out west, and he now owns part of the team, so no.

Theo to Dodgers, Sabean to Boston, DePo in SF, maybe, though I suspect Ned Coletti or maybe #### Tidrow would have the inside track to replace Sabes.
   120. The Balls of Summer  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:35 PM (#1713769)
Balls of summer, if they're going to try to be the Yankees with 65% of the budget, my guess is they'll win 65% of the number of games. This team has to get younger, fast


So that's why they signed Renteria to block Ramirez and Varitek to block Shoppach? It doesn't look to me like the Sox are at all interested in getting younger.
   121. Derek J  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:37 PM (#1713772)
This is terrible. Can someone explain where CHB comes into the eqation , please?


It's because of this article CHB wrote on Sunday, which everyone says was planted by Lucchino. Here's a highlight:

Let's start with Theo being a ''baseball guy" while Larry is a lawyer with a lofty title (CEO). Granted, Epstein is a student of the game, but it's a mistake to say he knows more about baseball than Lucchino or anyone else in the Red Sox baseball operation. Theo is 31 years old and did not play baseball past high school. He spent four years at Yale and three years at law school. That hardly leaves time for much more than rotisserie league scouting. He can read the data and has a horde of trusty, like-minded minions, but we're not talking about a lifetime of beating the bushes and scouting prospects. Lucchino was a good high school baseball player and made it to the NCAA Final Four with Princeton's basketball team. He came to baseball as an executive in 1979, when Theo was 5 years old. That doesn't make him George Digby or Ray Boone, but he's not Les Otten, either.
   122. shoewizard  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:37 PM (#1713777)
As I am not up on the specifics of whatever dispute there might have been between Lucchino and Epstein, can someone give a summary of what types of conflicts they might have been having.

Is it general philosophy or just personalities and managerial style?
   123. Shinbone  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:38 PM (#1713778)
You know Ol' Shank's typing away right now, trying to work in some stupid Haloween angle in all of this mess............
   124. Matt Clement of Alexandria  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:39 PM (#1713779)
So that's why they signed Renteria to block Ramirez and Varitek to block Shoppach? It doesn't look to me like the Sox are at all interested in getting younger.
Ramirez is at least another year away, probably more. And Shoppach's a very mediocre prospect.

The Sox have Jonathan Papelbon, Dustin Pedroia and Kevin Youkilis set to join the starting roster next year.
   125. Shinbone  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:39 PM (#1713781)
Sorry, Halloween
   126. e  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:39 PM (#1713782)
My prediction with the Phillies is that they will show some interest in Theo, get distracted and lose Hunsicker to Tampa and Gillick to LA, and then when Theo decides to go to San Diego or leave baseball altogether to herd goats in Tibet for a year the Phils will be left to chose between a freshly fired Jim Bowden and Ruben Amaro Jr.


I don't quite believe this talk of herding goats (or other non-baseball hobbies) for Theo. Sounds like talk to keep his leverage in other negotiations. Starting at 1.5M per, of course.
   127. shoewizard  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:39 PM (#1713783)
Never mind, after reading 121, I now understand. It's simple jealousy, (assuming that story is indeed a Lucchino plant)
   128. AT in BC  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:43 PM (#1713787)
I wonder what Theo does now. After being GM for a crown jewel MLB franchise in a baseball mad city, and his hometown no less, I don't see him going for a GM or AGM job in any second class cities or for any second class teams. Theo isn't the type to think that his life or career is limited to baseball, especially at such a young age. I'm not saying he'll do the same thing as Ricky Williams; but, I don't see him simply taking another job in the game just because being a GM is his Sartrean identity - it's not. He's a bright guy and has a bright future in whatever capacity he chooses. I look forward to learning whatever he chooses.
   129. Matt Clement of Alexandria  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:43 PM (#1713789)
Here's the dump of my Front Office Conflicts file, if anyone cares. First, the trade deadline -

NY Daily News, 7/30/05:
The initial driving force behind the spirited discussions had been Red Sox CEO Larry Lucchino, who had been incensed by Manny Ramirez’s recent behavior... Lucchino’s willingness to part with Ramirez, the AL’s home run and RBI leader entering the weekend, who was booed at Fenway Park on Friday night during each plate appearance, had created a division within the Sox hierarchy. GM Theo Epstein and other front-office personnel were against trading Ramirez, realizing that would be the start of a need to retool the entire team.
Providence Journal, 7/31/05:
On Friday night, the Rockies dealt outfielder Eric Byrnes to Baltimore for Bigbie with the express purpose of flipping him to the Sox for Shoppach and Stern. The two teams had completed the necessary paperwork with the commissioner's office, but the Sox pulled out of the deal.

According to multiple baseball sources, the deal was killed by Red Sox ownership, which reportedly objected to the sheer number of players coming and going from the organization as the team discussed multiple trades involving slugger Manny Ramirez.
Denver Post, 8/1/05:
The Red Sox backed out. Monfort spoke directly with Red Sox president Larry Luccino, with whom he has had a good relationship in the past. "He said there were communication issues," Monfort said. "For a guy who's been in the business for as long as he has to operate that way, it's frustrating."
Gammons, 8/3/05:
The one mess was the six player deal between Boston and Colorado that the Rockies thought was done Friday night. Theo Epstein has long liked Larry Bigbie, and the Rockies did the Bigbie deal with Baltimore to move him to Boston with first baseman Ryan Shealy for Adam Stern, Abe Alvarez, Kelly Shoppach and a minor leaguer.

The offer that was faxed from Boston to Colorado was not signed, or a final document. It was negotiated by assistant GM Josh Byrnes because Epstein was consumed by the Ramirez trade and trying to get Ramirez calmed down and repair his damaged feelings. It never occurred to Epstein that a simple baseball deal that did not involve money was something ownership would consider objectionable. But, indeed, ownership and its assistant, Larry Lucchino, did object, because they were focused on the Ramirez deal.

So Lucchino nixed the deal, which -- rightly -- incensed Dan O'Dowd and the Rockies. But when Lucchino called Colorado owner Charlie Monfort, he threw Byrnes under the bus and did not accept the responsibility of killing it.

---------------

On Wednesday, Red Sox management agreed to keep quiet. At 8 a.m. Thursday, Lucchino did just the opposite, and Ramirez felt that he'd been lied to. When Ortiz and Millar talked to Manny, they knew Francona had already talked to him, and they told him not to worry about Lucchino. "He knows Larry wants him out of there," says one Red Sox player. "But he was told, 'Look, Larry hates all the players. Ask Jason Varitek. Ask anyone. You're not alone.' "
   130. Biff uses the power of mental thinking  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:44 PM (#1713791)
Sabes would actually be pretty good for the Sox as they seem to be going the Yankee "win with veterans and don't give young players a chance" route.

Yeah, that's why Jon Papelbon, who had about 30 innings of major league experience, was their primary set-up man in the playoffs.
   131. The Balls of Summer  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:45 PM (#1713792)
Theo to Dodgers, Sabean to Boston, DePo in SF, maybe, though I suspect Ned Coletti or maybe #### Tidrow would have the inside track to replace Sabes.


Although I think he's getting screwed in LA, I still don't want to see DePo in SF. My money would be on Coletti getting the job, but if Sabes leaves, I would like to see a GM that appreciates the usefulness of younger players.
   132. Golfing Great Mitch Cumstein  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:45 PM (#1713793)
his is terrible. Can someone explain where CHB comes into the eqation , please?


CHB is like the old sportswriters Comiskey would buy off with free booze and food, except Shank does it for the satisfaction of being an a##hat. He is an evil alien organism that survives on venom and hatred.

It's because of this article CHB wrote on Sunday, which everyone says was planted by Lucchino. Here's a highlight:


The quote following shows how disengenuous CHB is. What does going to the Final Four have to do with baseball? And it forgets that Theo worked full-time for the Pads while going to law school. If you are not going to be an attorney, there is a lot of free time at law school. And it ignores the fact that Lucky the Lobster does not have much of a baseball evaluation background, either.
   133. So long Alex Chilton (Phil Coorey)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:46 PM (#1713796)
The CHB article is (forget)ing amazing and hopefully in a (forget)ed way, might drive the turd out of town
   134. John Lowenstein Apathy Club  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:47 PM (#1713797)
You read it here first, J.P. Ricciardi will be the next Boston G.M.

This thing comes up every other week or so in the media here in Toronto. I don't think there's anything to it right now, for two reasons:

(1) Ricciardi's under contract and the Jays do not want to let him go right now. It's a sensitive point in the team's development and the Jays need continuity this offseason.

(2) Ricciardi's stock has fallen through the floor the last two seasons. I honestly think he's not much of a commodity right now.
   135. chris p  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:51 PM (#1713803)
so do people beleive that theo asked ownership to opt out of hte colorado deal? i don't, but i don't have any rational basis for that.
   136. The Clarence Thomas of BTF (scott)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:53 PM (#1713809)
#### YOU LUCCHINO!
   137. Golfing Great Mitch Cumstein  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:54 PM (#1713811)
Phil,
I have never heard or read an intelligent and thoughtful defense of CHB. Nobody who has a clue likes the turd, and he has been doing it for years. If you feel like ####ing into the wind, here are the emails for the sports editor and shank:

jtsullivan@globe.com

dshaughnessy@globe.com
   138. HOPE: Madison Obamagarner (Flynn)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:54 PM (#1713812)
Yeah, that's why Jon Papelbon, who had about 30 innings of major league experience, was their primary set-up man in the playoffs.

Of course, they yanked him out of the rotation for Fatty McBushlover, who was crap the rest of the season. He was the setup man in the playoffs because he was the best pitcher (other than Timlin or Wakefield) on the team at that point.
   139. The Balls of Summer  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:56 PM (#1713817)
Yeah, that's why Jon Papelbon, who had about 30 innings of major league experience, was their primary set-up man in the playoffs.


Right, because Papelbon was on the roster all year. It's not like they called him up because all of their veteran relievers sucked.
   140. Matt Clement of Alexandria  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:57 PM (#1713820)
And the negotiations edition...

Globe, 10/26/05:
It is not known whether that is the Red Sox' final offer, but it is believed that the matter will be resolved either way in the next 24-48 hours. While money is a major factor in the negotiations, it is growing increasingly apparent that there are other issues, namely a personality clash in management styles between Lucchino and Epstein that transcends chain-of-command questions.
Herald, 10/27/05:
And so, just three short years after celebrating Theo Epstein as their shining baby boy, the Red Sox are smearing their once-favorite son. They are trying to make him look like a spoiled and ungrateful brat, which makes you wonder whether things at Fenway Park ever change at all.

Theo could be gone soon, Red Sox followers. It may be just a matter of time now. Negotiations between Epstein and club president Larry Lucchino long ago became personal, so Lucchino and friends have launched into spin control, full speed ahead. Young Theo Epstein, it seems, has been ousted from the circle of trust as if he were a hardball embodiment of the unraveling Gaylord Focker.

...........

All of that brings us back to the Red Sox, Epstein and Lucchino, the latter of whom's behavior is growing astonishingly predictable. When the Red Sox failed in the Alex Rodriguez negotiations – and thank goodness for that – Lucchino blamed the players' union. When the Red Sox traded Nomar Garciaparra, members of the Red Sox (guesses, anyone?) leaked information to make the shortstop out to be the villain. And now, in the worst transgression of all, Red Sox management is smearing one of its own in the most sacrosanct negotiation, one that should have been conducted exclusively within the gilded walls of the front office at 4 Yawkey Way.
I should note, here, that a lot of people were very skeptical of the above Massarotti column. And not without reason - he had no sources to cite. I suggest, in hindsight, that he might have received the same leak Shaughnessy did, but chose not to run with it.

Globe, 10/27/05:
...there are other issues that could get in the way of a settlement.

Those issues revolve around management style and other philosophical differences that have left some members on the baseball operations side privately expressing anger at the way they are regarded by the Sox' hierarchy, i.e. Lucchino, who has always taken an active role in baseball decision-making with the Red Sox, as well as the other teams he previously served as CEO, the San Diego Padres and Baltimore Orioles. Lucchino has publicly denied ''chain of command" issues but otherwise has vowed to keep negotiations private.

Sources familiar with Epstein's thinking said he does not question the propriety of reporting to the CEO but chafes at times at the degree to which Lucchino involves himself in baseball decisions, and at a perceived lack of respect toward the baseball side.
Providence Journal, 10/29/05:
Epstein's contract expires Monday, and sources familiar with the negotiations say no announcement is expected over the weekend. The sides reportedly are still working toward an agreement on monetary issues after spending most of Thursday discussing the dynamics of the professional relationship between Epstein and CEO Larry Lucchino, which has been strained during the recent contract talks.
Herald, 10/31/05:
Greater autonomy for the baseball operations department that he heads is one of the chief battles Epstein was waging, with the general manager attempting to come to terms with his mentor, team president and CEO Larry Lucchino, on an acceptable and satisfying working relationship.
Herald, 10/31/05:
Epstein had come close to agreeing to a deal Saturday evening but had not officially conveyed acceptance of it. On Sunday, he began having serious misgivings about staying on. A leading contributing factor, according to sources close to the situation, was a column in Sunday’s Boston Globe in which too much inside information about the relationship between Epstein and his mentor, team president and CEO Larry Lucchino, was revealed -- in a manner slanted too much in Lucchino’s favor. Epstein, according to these sources, had several reasons to believe Lucchino was a primary source behind the column and came to the realization that if this information were leaked hours before Epstein was going to agree to a new long-term deal, it signaled excessive bad faith between him and Lucchino.
   141. Nate  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 07:57 PM (#1713822)
You know that scene in Billy Madison, where Adam Sandler is doing the competition with the evil guy who is trying to take over his Dad's company? Couldn't you just see Shaughnessy as the evil, weasle-like guy who totally freaks out when he's asked to explain Business Ethics?
   142. penguinmobile  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:00 PM (#1713828)
Well, once again, I thank my lucky stars that I don't work in baseball.

Actually, I've never thanked my lucky stars that I don't work in baseball. But I could.
   143. _  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:00 PM (#1713831)
All of the cheap shots in Shaugnessy's column were based on widely available information, so why do people think Lucchino must have "planted" it? I don't know; maybe Lucchino is jealous, but that isn't apparent from the article. And who ever said Theo "knows more about baseball" than anyone else, or that that's even an over-riding qualification to be GM? I'm pretty sure the Red Sox employ a consultant who "knows more" about baseball than the two of them combined. So what?
   144. So long Alex Chilton (Phil Coorey)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:00 PM (#1713832)
Thanks Mitch, with the sadness here on BTF and personally I might just wrtie something to the clowns.

However, this team will move on. Who knows they might discover another Theo from within...
   145. OlePerfesser  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:01 PM (#1713834)
Never mind, after reading 121, I now understand. It's simple jealousy...

No, no, not at all, Shoe. That quote's a small part of the BS that Lucchino fed CHB. The bulk of it was pseudo-psych crapola about Theo resenting Lucchiavelli the way a son resents his father, etc.

Theo HAD to read that and just say, "how the eff can I work for a guy who would put this nonsense out there? This is disingenous, calculating, malignant, and manipulative... and I'm not gonna stand for it anymore."

So: KUDOS TO THEO. THIS IS THE MOST PRINCIPLED STAND I'VE SEEN IN SPORTS--OR IN BUSINESS--FOR A LONG TIME.

I'm disappointed, shocked--and damned proud of Theo all at the same time.

Strangely, while it makes me anxious about the near-term fate of my Sox, I find it reassuring that there are young men of high ideals like Theo.
   146. Vance Law Revue  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:02 PM (#1713835)
So Lucchino was a better high school baseball player than Theo Epstein? I guess I've been overrating Theo as a GM.

Anyhow, here is one Red Sox fan who is no longer a Red Sox fan. If there are any MLB owners reading, hire Theo and I'll become a fan of your team! (As long as you don't play in St. Louis or the Bronx, I still hate you #######).
   147. Dirty Tom Rackham  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:03 PM (#1713836)
You read it here first, J.P. Ricciardi will be the next Boston G.M.

Well, if he wanted the job he would have taken it three years ago.
   148. Bobby Bonilla's Annuity (Matt)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:03 PM (#1713837)
You know that scene in Billy Madison, where Adam Sandler is doing the competition with the evil guy who is trying to take over his Dad's company? Couldn't you just see Shaughnessy as the evil, weasle-like guy who totally freaks out when he's asked to explain Business Ethics?

Yes.
   149. Josh  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:03 PM (#1713839)
Phil,
I have never heard or read an intelligent and thoughtful defense of CHB. Nobody who has a clue likes the turd, and he has been doing it for years. If you feel like ####ing into the wind, here are the emails for the sports editor and shank:

jtsullivan@globe.com

dshaughnessy@globe.com

I also suggest emailing the ombudsman in the midst of their "review" of Globe "conflicts of interest."

ombud@globe.com
   150. chris p  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:03 PM (#1713841)
gammons just denied that lucchino was behind the leaks.
   151. Nate  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:04 PM (#1713843)
How does (forget)ers get through the Nanny? Paging Mr. Furtado.
   152. danielj  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:06 PM (#1713846)
Well, once again, I thank my lucky stars that I don't work in baseball.

Lucky that personality conflicts don't occur in non-baseball industries.
   153. Matt Clement of Alexandria  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:06 PM (#1713849)
Great post, Ole P.

---

VLR's response is certainly not mine. I don't think anything could make stop being a Red Sox fan. I just thank god they won the World Series in '04, because I don't see things improving from this point, for a while.
   154. shoewizard  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:06 PM (#1713848)
Thanks for the summary's Matt....much appreciated.
   155. So long Alex Chilton (Phil Coorey)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:06 PM (#1713847)
VLR, why the St. Louis hate??
   156. Norcan  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:06 PM (#1713850)
I seem to recall Gene "Stick" Michael might finally be out of the Yankees organization. I wouldn't mind he was a target. I would actually be very happy. If however, the targets are the usual GM candidates, I would feel pretty bad about it.
   157. The George Sherrill Selection  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:11 PM (#1713856)
VLR's response is certainly not mine. I don't think anything could make stop being a Red Sox fan. I just thank god they won the World Series in '04, because I don't see things improving from this point, for a while.

I don't think I will start actively routing against them... but I certainly won't care as much.
   158. Bobby Bonilla's Annuity (Matt)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:12 PM (#1713857)
The Red Sox looked at Arbuckle before, didn't they?

Perhaps they'll interview him again.
   159. So long Alex Chilton (Phil Coorey)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:13 PM (#1713861)
I have read Post #145 about 4 times now. Nice stuff.

I am so confused right now. A part of me is angry and wants to find out more about what about happened.

Another part of me is scared for the future of the team, while another just wants to find out who the hell is going to be the next friggin GM.

Sometimes I hate it, that I love this team so much.

I just told Lu and her first words were after "You have to be (forget)ing kidding me" were "So, I'll guess we'll be talking in a week"
   160. The Clarence Thomas of BTF (scott)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:13 PM (#1713863)
i won't drop the sox, but man am i disappointed. go #### yourself ownership. you ain't getting a word of praise out of me for a while.
   161. Handle's Messiah  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:18 PM (#1713869)
I seem to recall Gene "Stick" Michael might finally be out of the Yankees organization. I wouldn't mind he was a target. I would actually be very happy. If however, the targets are the usual GM candidates, I would feel pretty bad about it.

There are exceptions, but one of Steinbrenner's strengths is that despite the clashes, he seems to have been able to maintain overall front office stability for the last decade or so in terms of continuity of personnel. I'd be surprised if Stick left. Cashman said getting him back was important, but he also said he could not gurantee Stick wanted to come back.
   162. OlePerfesser  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:20 PM (#1713870)
gammons just denied that lucchino was behind the leaks

Where, crispy? And I'd love to know how the he11 Gammo would know. Reporters generally don't reveal their sources, especially to each other, so you'd have to guess Gammo is (once again) carrying Lucchiavelli's water.

If so, that'd be a huge miscalculation on Petey's part: This is gonna blow up big time for Lucchiavelli. He's always been too clever by half, too smarmy and lawyerly for his own good. Finally, it's gonna cost him, in that his true nature isn't hidden from the masses.
   163. Harveys Wallbangers  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:21 PM (#1713871)
Hmmmm....

This is likely not to be received particularly well, but then tact has never been my strong suit.

For heaven's sake, he quit over THAT??

Look, big companies of all types have office politics. There is always, ALWAYS, one guy with a title (if not SEVERAL) who are pr*cks. B*stards. MFers. They revel in playing folks off one another.

Now, if you are going to play with the big kids you have to understand it. You do NOT have to ACCEPT it per se. But certainly you have to understand that it exists and if you have a PASSION about being someplace and BELIEVE you are the one who can make a difference you work through it.

Is it easy? No. Can it be stressful? Obviously. Do you risk becoming one of THEM? Perhaps, if you lose center trying to WIN as opposed to doing what's right.

But to pick up your marbles and go home? This is NOTHING. It's SOP for any organization experiencing success. Success has a million fathers while failure is an orphan. Anyone else remember that quotation?

Please tell me there is something else.

Cause kid, it don't get any easier.

Paulie got canned because he couldn't outmaneuver TOMMY LASORDA for CRISSAKES. And now Theo walks away. And I really don't understand why.

Principled??? More like perplexing.
   164. Vance Law Revue  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:22 PM (#1713873)
Phil,
I'm a Cubs fan.
   165. So long Alex Chilton (Phil Coorey)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:22 PM (#1713874)
Phil,
I'm a Cubs fan.


oops
   166. RB in NYC (Now with Job Hunt!)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:23 PM (#1713875)
Stick is reportedly reporting to NYC to take part in the Yankee organizational meetings, so he's unlikely to be going anywhere, he's back in the loop
   167. Golfing Great Mitch Cumstein  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:24 PM (#1713876)
Seen on BSMW:

Larry "Scooter" Lucchino
   168. Repoz  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:28 PM (#1713878)
Anyhow, here is one Red Sox fan who is no longer a Red Sox fan.

Hey...I walked away from the Yankees 32 years ago after a tiff with the Boss...and I've never looked back, I'm gruesomely lonely during pennent races, but I stand by my assheadedness!.
   169. Where's Vince Lloyd Now That We Need Him?(sjs1959)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:29 PM (#1713879)
Think Sons of Sam Horn will be busy tonight?
   170. Alex_Lewis  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:30 PM (#1713880)
It's different when you know that you're going to be instantly hired for millions of dollars the second you walk out the door, Harvey. He can easily afford to say "#### it." I can't fault Theo in the slightest - if I were in his situation, I'd very likely do the same thing. Remember, when the Red Sox won the World Series, the players talked about Theo Epstein's good work and not Luchino's (or so I seem to recalled) which got them where they wanted to be. And it was Epstein standing with a beer in hand gazing happily at his new trophy, soaked through with champagne and tittering joyfully to the American public about how blessed he was...

Someone screwed up here and I'm thinking it wasn't Theo Epstein.
   171. Vance Law Revue  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:31 PM (#1713881)

oops


Well, I can always hope that MacPhail will take this as an opportunity to dump Hendry and Baker.

That could happen. Right?

Alternatively, I should probably relearn how to enjoy rooting for a crappy team.
   172. OlePerfesser  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:32 PM (#1713884)
Now, if you are going to play with the big kids you have to understand it.

Sorry, Harvey, I couldn't disagree more.

Thinking that way is thinking like Lucchino.

When people fail to treat you with honesty and respect, and instead use the media to belittle you and establish their dominance, if you "understand" it and take their money to keep "understanding" it, you are making the world a worse place.

If, OTOH, you say "take your job and your unscrupulous nature and shove it," and you move on to a better place where people ARE honest and respectful, you are admirable, worthy, and doing what's right. Lie down with dogs, etc. etc.

I say again: Theo's principled stand is rare and worthy of praise. The good feeling I get from that far outweighs the momentary concerns about how the Sox will make out.
   173. haven  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:34 PM (#1713886)
A lot of doom and gloom on this thread.

To be honest I think the Red Sox will be fine.

The person I think is going to end up regretting this is Epstein. He is probably never going to be in as good a situation. Office politics be damned. Few teams have the resources of the Red Sox. No town is going to give Epstein any kind of grace period like he would get now in Boston because of the World Series victory. Good luck to Epstein. I hope things work out the way he wants....
   174. schuey  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:34 PM (#1713887)
I thought Steinbrenner was supposed to be the mean ogre who drives good people away. You mean it is actually the Boston ownership that is dysfunctional? That will come as news to anyone who ever listened to ESPNitwits.
Maybe George can send them Connors and Emslie as a sort of leand-lease.
   175. penalcolony  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:36 PM (#1713889)
Mr. Epstein is more than welcome here in the nation's capital.
   176. Handle's Messiah  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:37 PM (#1713890)
I have stupid questions for those with superior knowledge and insight--is the Manny rumor true? If yes, could it be something about which Lucchino might have called on Manny's agents before they called on Boston? Which Lucchino would leak to enrage Theo because Lucchino wants Theo out? Could Scooter Lucchhino hire Scooter Libby?
   177. baseball chick (now, with NEW blog)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:38 PM (#1713891)
Harveys Wallbangers Posted: October 31, 2005 at 09:21 PM (#1713871)
Hmmmm....

This is likely not to be received particularly well, but then tact has never been my strong suit.

- grinning
too true. but you are absolutely dead honest with zero BS and no sneaky or slimy. no backstabbing. which is why i like you.

For heaven's sake, he quit over THAT??

- well, he's not THAT old. what's wrong with saying there's too much bad with the good and you want to do something else with your life. there's a whole lot of things he can do where he's his own person and don't hafta spend most of his time playing politics. of course, there's lot of politics in social work. but maybe he likes what he'd be doing more.
   178. John DiFool2  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:39 PM (#1713893)
Given other questionable "decisions" Henry has made in another
arena recently (e-mail for details), I'm not at all surprised
he effed these negotiations up. Sheesh.
   179. Golfing Great Mitch Cumstein  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:40 PM (#1713894)
Latest from the Globe

he 31-year-old Epstein was reportedly offered about $4.5 million for a three-year extension -- quadruple his previous salary. But it was still short of the $2.5 million a year the Red Sox offered Oakland's Billy Beane in 2002 before making Epstein the youngest GM in baseball history.


A devotee of statistical analysis who values his scouts as well, Epstein's tenure has been marked by bold adventures that often conflicted with baseball orthodoxy:

--He signed first baseman Kevin Millar, despite an unspoken agreement not to poach from Japanese clubs.

--He went without a traditional closer in his first year, with disastrous results.

--He tried to trade for reigning MVP Alex Rodriguez -- a deal that would have meant shipping out Manny Ramirez and Nomar Garciaparra -- and then, without remorse, pulled the plug when the deal became too expensive.

--He ate Thanksgiving dinner with Curt Schilling in a college football-style recruiting trip that lured the right-handed ace to Boston.

--He traded Garciaparra, the face of the franchise, for the parts he needed to complete the World Series puzzle.




The Red Sox reached the AL championship series in 2003 before the lack of a closer doomed Grady Little in Game 7 at Yankee Stadium. The next year, with a new manager and the closer it had lacked, the ballclub won its first World Series in 86 years.


The Dodgers, Phillies and Devil Rays have GM openings, but none has a $120 million payroll to match the one Epstein was given in Boston.


What a load of ####! There is no evidence Theo asked for $2.5M, Grady Little blew it, the Globe still does not understand the Jamesian theory of reliever usage, and Theo has shown he has talent for putting together a team that finds cheap talent and builds the minors so going to LAD or PHI with $80M would not be an impossible task.
   180. karlmagnus  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:42 PM (#1713896)
John DiFool2, quite so; just because you make $700mm in a hedge fund in a market bubble doesn't mean you can run a hot dog stand. Henry may well not be the Sox owner by 2015, methinks. In which case the new owner may hire Theo back -- he'd still only be 42.
   181. Handle's Messiah  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:43 PM (#1713900)
I thought Steinbrenner was supposed to be the mean ogre who drives good people away.

This was more true in the past, and even then soem but I think very few high profile folks actually quit on him. He was more likely to fire you--Howser, Martin, Lemon, Yogi, etc. I think Gabe Paul left to got to Cleveland.

Steinbrenner is difficult day to day, but I think he has a strong streak of human kindness and even graciousness that shows itself often enough that his charges find him almost endearing. Enough, when coupled with the money and prestige, it keeps people around.
   182. Norcan  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:43 PM (#1713901)
Stick is reportedly reporting to NYC to take part in the Yankee organizational meetings, so he's unlikely to be going anywhere, he's back in the loop

Where did you hear this? I'm not doubting you. With Cashman returning, it wouldn't surprise me if Michaels stayed. He still has three years remaining on his contract but there were reports just four days ago that he was requesting a buyout because he was upset over being stripped of postseason scouting duties and the demotion of his top two aides. Still, Steinbrenner never lets anyone leave, even those he doesn't listen to; Brian Sabean and Bob Watson are I think the only FO people who have left over the past 15 years. My dream of Michaels leading the Red Sox FO is probably farfetched.
   183. Chris Dial  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:47 PM (#1713905)
Cause kid, it don't get any easier.

HW,
I'm with OleProf on this one.

When you are at the top of the game, and Theo is, he can write his own check - he doesn't need to share anything with Lucchino - the Dodger job, the Phillies job.

I mean, Theo brought a WS title to Boston! Do you have any idea how impossible that was? Those losers? The biggest choking dogs I've ever laid eyes on?

Theo *knows* there are politics everywhere, but he also knows he can *pick* his politics right now.

It was a great move.
   184. Robert S.  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:47 PM (#1713907)
To be honest I think the Red Sox will be fine.

Of course they will. Boston didn't win the World Series because of their sabermetric acumen, though it played a part; they won it because they had the resources to outspend almost everyone else in the league and benefit from a salary dump.
   185. 6 - 4 - 3  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:48 PM (#1713910)
So has Boston replaced the Curse of the Babe with the Curse of the Boy Genius? We'll have to check back in 86 years or so...

I'm just curious--why was Epstein's initial contract only two years? It seems like most GMs (DePodesta, Ricciardi)typically get three or more years (I think those two got 5 year contracts). Does anyone know if it was Lucchino or Epstein that wanted to first deal to be so short?
   186. Matt Waters  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:49 PM (#1713911)
Disgraceful job by Lucchino.

Mueller.
Ortiz.
Getting Dave Roberts.
Having the sack to trade Nomar.

Theo did other great stuff, and other than having a little too much faith in Matt Clement [money], never really made any DUBIOUS moves.

But as a Yankee fan, I must say, awesome job Lar. Lar... heh.
   187. HOPE: Madison Obamagarner (Flynn)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:50 PM (#1713913)
they won it because they had the resources to outspend almost everyone else in the league and benefit from a salary dump.

Bollocks. If that was the case, the Yankees would have won the Series.

The Red Sox won because they got David Ortiz for nothing, while every other team in baseball had its thumb up their butts.
   188. Socrates Brito's #1 Platonic Fan (1k5v3L)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:51 PM (#1713914)
The biggest choking dogs I've ever laid eyes on?

man, that's harsh.
   189. So long Alex Chilton (Phil Coorey)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:52 PM (#1713915)
I'm just curious--why was Epstein's initial contract only two years?


It was 3 years. He started in November 2002
   190. Harveys Wallbangers  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:52 PM (#1713916)
OP:

That's an idealized world you live in my friend. Not trying to sound like Kissinger here but you can't make a place better from the outside. You gotta be IN the sandbox to build the castle.

You can either work to raise folks up or let them beat you down.

Now some might respond that if Theo doesn't have the passion to get past this stuff then he should walk. And I would retort that if he loses his mettle in these circumstances then maybe he's not designed to be a power broker like some have claimed.

LL is pretty run of the mill stuff from what I have followed from afar. If you can't finesse your way around this level of stooge might as well accept your lot as the next GM in Kansas City or Pittsburgh. Where "getting by" will win you an "Exce of the Year" award from MLB and free lunches for a year from the Rotarians.

Yipee.
   191. sunnyday2  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:53 PM (#1713918)
And now, the very final word:

62 percent on yahoo sports say this is indeed a bad omen.

38 percent say he can be replaced.
   192. RB in NYC (Now with Job Hunt!)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:53 PM (#1713919)
Where did you hear this?

The NY Post--a dubious source if ever there was one, I admit--reported that:
Since the meetings are in New York, Torre might attend, and Gene Michael, whom Cashman wants back in the loop after being pushed aside by Steinbrenner, could be there, too.


Personally, I think George would rather pay Stick his full salary for three years rather than let him go to Boston, but that's me.
   193. HOPE: Madison Obamagarner (Flynn)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:55 PM (#1713921)
LL is pretty run of the mill stuff from what I have followed from afar.

IMHO, he's one of the bigger jerks in MLB, HB.
   194. karlmagnus  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:55 PM (#1713922)
Sox won in 2004 because they got lucky. However, they had to be in a position to get lucky, which they weren't in 1991-94 or in 2005 (not good enough). If they keep the youngsters and get a few good dierolls, they could win again in 2006-7. If they trade Manny and swap several of the youngsters for veterans, no amount of luck will help them.
   195. Golfing Great Mitch Cumstein  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:57 PM (#1713924)
It was three. November 2002 through October 2005.
   196. chris p  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:57 PM (#1713925)
Where, crispy? And I'd love to know how the he11 Gammo would know. Reporters generally don't reveal their sources, especially to each other, so you'd have to guess Gammo is (once again) carrying Lucchiavelli's water.

he was on espnews.
   197. Dread Pirate Dave Roberts  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:58 PM (#1713926)
Re: #179

Not that I'm not surprised by the tone of it, but it's also practicly word for word from the AP article which is on ESPN.com. So I don't necessarily think it's part of the PR spin.

Sad day for the franchise. Good luck to Theo. LL seems like the modern day Haywood Sullivan.
   198. 6 - 4 - 3  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:58 PM (#1713927)
Huh, never mind then. For some reason, I thought he had joined the FO before 2004 (guess I'm thinking of DePodesta?).
   199. So long Alex Chilton (Phil Coorey)  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 08:58 PM (#1713928)
The biggest choking dogs I've ever laid eyes on?


Stop talking about Mariano Rivera.

:)
   200. Bromadrosis  Posted: October 31, 2005 at 09:01 PM (#1713931)
Good day to be the Devil Ray fan.
Page 2 of 4 pages  1 2 3 4 >

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Andere Richtingen
for his generous support.

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy concert tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Baseball Bats

JustGreatTickets.com provides the best value for Chicago Cubs Tickets, MLB tickets including Red Sox Tickets, Yankees Tickets, SF Giants Tickets, LA Dodgers Tickets, Cleveland Indians Tickets. Get the best concert tickets like Jonas Brothers tickets and more Chicago Tickets.

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Major League Baseball: All Star Game, New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox, LA Angels, Washington Nationals, Chicago White Sox, and the Chicago Cubs.

Find terrific deals on Yankees tickets for the new home, Cubs tickets for classic Wrigley, or Red Sox tickets for Fenway with OnlineSeats. We have seats for every baseball game, including Dodgers tickets.

Alliance Tickets has cheap tickets available to all MLB games. We also have tickets to major concerts and theater events. Get tickets to the Colorado Rockies, the Seattle Mariners and all your favorite baseball teams. We also carry tickets to all the major Sporting Events.

Page rendered in 27.6340 seconds
75 querie(s) executed