User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.6770 seconds
40 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Mummy's curse?
Mini black holes in his cleats?
Kryptonite?
I dunno.
It's a landslide!
Varitek has definitely been prone to being overrated (Intangibles! Game calling!) But the man's a backup catcher who will make $3 million in 2010, likely his last as a player. Alfonso Soriano made $17 million last year.
I guess it depends on your opinion of "overrated" (by whom? by what measure?) but Fangraphs says Varitek was actually worth his salary last season, while Soriano should have been paying the Cubs $3.3 million to suck for them.
Now I've defended Jason Varitek. Curse you, Sporting News!
Apparently "most overrated" means "used to be good but now is bad for whatever reason" and has little to do with whether they are viewed as better than they really are. Of the four top votegetters, does anyone -- fan or writer or opponent -- really think Varitek, Soriano or Ortiz are feared hitters anymore?
I've noticed that, personally I have always defined overrated as meaning, "not as good as is commonly believed". Sori and Tek seem to be pretty fairy rated NOW, in their primes they were both definitely overrated imho.
However, players in decline do seem to be overrated on general- because cliff dives aside, the MSM seems to be reluctant to "downgrade" people.
Nice.
It wasn't the writer's opinion about 'Tek, he was just the messenger.
so instead maybe I'll rant on the leadoff hitter vote; it seems like the guys who decided Luis Aparicio was a great leadoff hitter years ago are the smae ones voting here. Do we not have any great leadoff hitters in the majors?
Ichiro plays 162 games many years. And has not finished in the top 6 in runs scored in a long time. And of course he does not drive in many. Last year he scored a whopping 88 runs. So the reason he's the best leadoff hitter is... ?
That's the problem with you statheads. You may stare at an encyclopedia with text that claims Bochy hasn't managed the Padres since 2006, but my eyes tell me that Bruce Bochy still is the manager in San Diego
OR
Bruce Bochy intentionally uses Eugenio Velez as the leadoff hitter, Bengie Molina as a cleanup hitter, and Buster Posey as bench material. One could say he does a great job improving 4 teams when most managers improve only 1. Given that the Padres have the most problematic financial situation, the boost that Bochy gives to the NL West teams is more beneficial to the Padres than any of the other teams.
The years when Seattle has put average or above average offenses on the field during Ichiro's career were 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2007. He finished 2nd, 9th, 7th, and 8th in runs scored those years. ("Top 6" seems a less arbitrary choice of endpoint after going through the data, though no more meaningful.)
EDIT: I'd take Sizemore, if healthy, over Ichiro as my leadoff hitter. And if you classify Jeter as a leadoff hitter, he's better too. But Ichiro's damn good.
Babe Ruth was the greatest living player, when he was alive.
You're dinging a manager for using a 22-year-old kid who played most of the season in A ball as a bench player during his September callup? And for using the regular with the second-best slugging percentage on the team as a cleanup man? Tough crowd.
1: He gets on base
2: He's fast and runs the bases well
3: The failure to score runs is not all his, case in point, in 2003 he reached base 254 times (246 accounting for CS), got himself in scoring positing 84 times, and scored 111 runs. In 2004 he reached base 315 times (304 accounting for CS), got himself in scoring position 73 times, and scored just 101 runs
Last year he scored less runs than in 2008, despite getting on base/ in scoring position at a higher rate than 2008...
Ichiro is not a HR hitter, he is dependent on those batting behind him to drive him in, and Seattle has some pretty woeful offenses of late.
That said he is overrated a tad.
Edison will be gratified to know his time machine worked. When do you go back?
You don't often see a player's ability to stay on the field as a point against him these days.
http://vixi.livejournal.com/198971.html
EDIT: Sorry for the livejournal link but the original seems to be gone - this is just some guy who copied and pasted it onto his blog
I think that web-based baseball fans have gotten tired of the underrated/overrated thing, you used to see it more often. Some players (like Brian Giles) the subject of "Who is underrated?" articles with absurd frequency.
By choice!
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main