User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets. |
We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule |
Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers |
Page rendered in 0.4421 seconds
81 querie(s) executed


Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
He planned about as well as the Giants did in a baseball-related way.
Their actual attendance is down more than the paid attendance, and they are setting record lows in paid attendance for individual games. They were able to tie many of last year's season tickets purchases to this year's so there are many more no shows than would normally be the case.
But getting rid of Bonds for the sake of getting rid of Bonds was kind of pointless. It's almost like the plan for 2008 was "Get Bonds off the team," with little regard for much else.
.
Yeah, I agree to a large extent. I said that awhile back, and others have said it as well, including a few SF fans.
now isn't baseball SO much better now that the man who invented steroids and introduced them to MLB and forced his helpless teammates to use them too (causing them unTOLD mental angwish over whether or not to defy - or is that deify His Excellence) and had the nerve to bring a barcalounger by his locker and unlike every single other star in any sport, was a prima donna - now he's gone?
isn't the giants a MUCH better team with MUCH happier ballplayers AND fans who now flooding the park now that The Cancer In Baseball has been surgically removed?
how fortunate that buddy boy had the sense to tell the other owners not to let him back in the game at ANY cost
And that one must feel pain before a wound is healed?
And that one must feel pain before a wound is healed?
If by "malignant tumor" you mean "resulted in more wins and higher revenue" then yes he was a tumor.
I'm not fan of Bonds but he was not a malignant tumor for the Giants. The amount of pain they are going to feel before the wounds heal is mostly self-inflicted. Barry being on the team had little to nothing to do with having a mostly barren organization now that he is gone.
Enron shares were doing pretty well before the the accountants took a closer look too.
So, it was Bonds who signed Barry Zito? Bonds, who is forcing the new Giants, the Giants that are emphasising youth, and pitching and defense, to start Ray Durham and Rich Aurilia and Dave Roberts, before Roberts was put out of his misery with a knee injury? It was Bonds who seriously considered trading Tim Lincecum, already arguably the best pitcher in the NL, for Alex Rios at the start of the season?
ZING!!!!! Boy, you got me there.
Excpet Bonds did provide ACTUAL dollars and wins as opposed to Enron's earnings which were fabricated. You have argued incessently that the reasons for the real dollars and wins were fabricated and that's fine but you can't say that the actual results did not happen. Therefore his affect on the Giants was positive or not malignant tumor-esque.
You know, if they had thought this out, they could signed a terrible righty pitcher to a huge, long contract and then there would be plenty more "Splash Hits".
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main