|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Hal Bodley from MLB.com with Charley Steiner says he can’t vote for post season BBWAA awards since he’s no longer with a newspaper. Notes many newspapers are laying off writers if not going bankrupt, and it’s time for the BBWAA to recognize more internet writers (not just the few they recently have). This being unlikely, Hal has an idea. He suggests the Hall of Fame vote be the first arm of the BBWAA to make the move to include a large number of internet writers.
Sweet Jesus Melendez...there’s hope yet!
Repoz
Posted: January 14, 2009 at 08:27 AM | 13 comment(s)
Related News: General, History, Hall of Fame, Media, Online, Awards
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to TedBerg for his generous support.
My Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I don't know why that conflicts with what Bodley said. Maybe the BBWAA took his vote away once he started working for MLB.com
Overall, it's absolutely absurd that people like Corky Simpson are voting for the Hall of Fame while people like Dan Rosenheck aren't.
Bodley's official ballot.
1-Rickey
2-Rice
3-Morris
Yes...Murray Chass talked Bodley into putting Morris on.
along with guys who have been writing mostly about other sports for years and years and don't actually follow baseball at all, just know a few names
Bodley said he can't vote for postseason awards. I'm not sure that's exactly true, but based on how they dole out voting assignments for those awards, he may no longer be a realistic candidate to get a vote.
He should still have his HoF vote.
Sean...My records (HA!) show no mention of MLB.com votes before 2005. Now they might have voted and not announced it, but I'm pretty sure they weren't recognized at that time.
The neo-monolith MLB.com.Harold.Network.Reynolds refused to release their block of HOF voters UNTIL after the 2:00 announcement. They posted at 2:15 and screwed up my final Fill/Partial gizmatic system!
Even if they are allowed, as seems the case, the voting pool is so large that the MLB.com writers wouldn't have that much weight. Which is a lot better than the NFL where a hand-picked 36-person committee seems to have many of the flaws of baseball's old Veterans Committee.
I thought only the beat writers got to vote for postseason awards. 2 for each team. The vast majority of the BBWAA already doesn't get to vote for the postseason awards and since Bodley doesn't cover a specific team (does he?) I'd have thought he hasn't voted in those awards in ages.
True, but I'm not sure that every award is covered by a different writer from each city (particularly as some papers prohibit voting), so the BBWAA may go to other members from national outlets still covering the game. They probably don't go to mlb.com, however.
Fair enough although papers prohibiting writers is a new phenomenon. But anyway, only 60 people vote for the MVP ... and I think it's the same 60 who vote for CYA and RoY; 539 voted for the HoF.
Of course judging from this hilaripus page, maybe the newspaper industry is in even worse shape than I thought. :-)
Anyway, I couldn't find any info about awards voting qualifications on their awful website (no surprise) ... and I even checked the BBWAA constitution (though it might have been in there).
That was never my understanding. I always thought it was separate voters for each award, or at least as much as possible.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main