User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.6312 seconds
82 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Thursday, May 17, 2007Yankees’ Farnsworth criticizes clause in Clemens’ contractOf course...what’s a Farnsworth tomorrow?
|
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Hardball Talk: Gleeman: Lenny Dykstra is back with some more can't miss investment advice (128 - 10:29pm, Feb 09) Last: Der_K 2 Newsblog: Joe Torre on "Castle" (17 - 10:14pm, Feb 09) Last: B.G. Gamesh Reeks of Anti-Yankee Bias (w/Zombies) Newsblog: Cashman: No new pacts for big three (14 - 10:01pm, Feb 09) Last: Kyle C welcomes back our OBP Savior Newsblog: Kansas City Kansan: Sloan: It's time to trade Greinke, Soria
(57 - 9:41pm, Feb 09) Last: Gaelan |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.6312 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Also, for him to say Clemens 'should' be there, then to say it won't be a concern, strikes me as contradictory. If it's not a concern, then why should he be there?
This is about the point where the skipper is supposed to pull the guy into his office and say, "If we WANT your opinion, WE'LL tell you what it IS."
Or, as Francona so euphoniously phrased it the other day -- Shut Up
We all know what #1 is.
I forgot who he beat up.
I forgot who he beat up.
Paul Wilson
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main