Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Sunday, September 16, 2007

Yankee’s Prank Strikes Out - BostonHerald.com

Shelley Duncan for President (not of that silly fan club… for the actual job).

Griffin Whitman, a 10-year-old Red Sox [team stats] fan from Swampscott, was excited to attend his first Yankees vs. Red Sox game Friday night. The young autograph -collector was even more thrilled to score Yankees outfielder Shelley Duncan’s signature before the game. That is, until Griffin read the message from the 27-year-old rookie: “Red Sox suck! Shelley Duncan.”

[snip]

Griffin’s mother, Karen, blasted the Yankees slugger’s bad manners.

“This is someone who wears the Yankee uniform and is on the payroll and should be setting an example for 10-year-olds,” she said.

Like Ralphie, I’m guessing young Griffin (?) heard that terrible word for the first time at his father’s knee… example setting begins at home.

Hat tip to River Ave. Blues.

 

Sean McNally Posted: September 16, 2007 at 07:29 PM | 157 comment(s) | Login to Bookmark
  Related News: GeneralBostonNY Yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 2 of 2 pages  < 1 2
   101. There are no words... (Met Fan Charlie) Posted: September 17, 2007 at 02:56 PM (#2528452)
Gee, where are all the Yankee fans who were up in arms last season when David Wright refused to sign for a kid, 'cause "you're a Yankee fan," and whose parents then proceeded to call a security guard over to the dugout and shame Wright into signing for their yowling tot?
   102. SoSH U at work Posted: September 17, 2007 at 02:56 PM (#2528454)
Is there any particular reason for us to expect more from the average major league baseball player? Not hope for, but realistically expect. Seriously.


Perhaps not, but I'm not going to be proclaiming their awesomeness when they can't even reach their rather modest standard.
   103. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: September 17, 2007 at 02:58 PM (#2528457)
And why should Duncan care what the mother is trying to do with her son? If you are a parent and you thrust your kid upon strangers and demand that strangers be role models for their kids then that kid is going to suffer some bumps and bruises at the very least along the way.

wow.
   104. robinred Posted: September 17, 2007 at 03:17 PM (#2528493)
I am in the it is kind of funny but I don't think it was great move camp.

This is also one of those things where you'd need to see the interaction, in terms of how Duncan treated this kid and other kids when they were face-to-face. I am sre there will be follow-ups; we will see what Duncan says.
   105. TVerik, AKA Snoopy Snoopy Poop Dog Posted: September 17, 2007 at 03:17 PM (#2528494)
Gee, where are all the Yankee fans who were up in arms last season when David Wright refused to sign for a kid, 'cause "you're a Yankee fan," and whose parents then proceeded to call a security guard over to the dugout and shame Wright into signing for their yowling tot?

Really? Name two.
   106. Big Train Posted: September 17, 2007 at 03:19 PM (#2528501)
Gee, where are all the Yankee fans who were up in arms last season when David Wright refused to sign for a kid, 'cause "you're a Yankee fan," and whose parents then proceeded to call a security guard over to the dugout and shame Wright into signing for their yowling tot?

I had no idea this happened, but I would not be up in arms.
   107. There are no words... (Met Fan Charlie) Posted: September 17, 2007 at 03:23 PM (#2528510)
Really? Name two.


I have to go back to through the archives from last year, I remember there were at least a couple of Pinstripe Partisans who were in the "If this is true, Wright's a jerk" camp.
   108. McCoy Posted: September 17, 2007 at 03:35 PM (#2528528)
Yes, probably the same people who think this is atrocious as well.
   109. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: September 17, 2007 at 03:41 PM (#2528539)
I don't recall the story about Wright not signing, but I do remember Wright dropping so many censored F-bombs during last year's home run derby that my kids were asking me what was wrong with the sound. Neither one necessarily means that he's a jerk, but I'll bet the MLB marketing folks weren't all too happy about those events.
   110. NJ is feeling better Posted: September 17, 2007 at 03:44 PM (#2528541)
I don't recall the story about Wright not signing, but I do remember Wright dropping so many censored F-bombs during last year's home run derby that my kids were asking me what was wrong with the sound. Neither one necessarily means that he's a jerk, but I'll bet the MLB marketing folks weren't all too happy about those events.

I wonder how they felt about FOX replaying Youkilis' "AHHHHHHHHHH!!!! ####!!!" a couple times without toning down the audio.

EDIT: What's the purpose of hiding kids from swear words and the like? Is it simply societal convention or has anyone done anywork that shows if your kid says #### at age 5, he's going to become a delinquent. I think it kind of creates an unneccessarily awkward transition...thing...in our society where when I'm on a job interview I'm expected to act incredibly "proper", but once I'm on the job I'm expected to jump in on the conversation about wanting to #### the secretary with the nice (insert your favorite body part here).
   111. JC in DC Posted: September 17, 2007 at 03:54 PM (#2528554)
"suck" is not inappropriate language, is it? I've got 5 kids (1 1/2 to 11); I'm pretty sure they've all heard worse from their mom (and maybe even their dad). "Suck" is so benign, I'm really stunned that people here find it at all offensive or juvenile. Offensive would have been: "Suck my dick, Sox fan. Yours, Shelley." Juvenile would've been: "Yankees Rool, Red Sox drool!!!111" "Red Sox suck" is nothing.
   112. villageidiom Posted: September 17, 2007 at 03:55 PM (#2528557)
I think it kind of creates an unneccessarily awkward transition...thing...in our society where when I'm on a job interview I'm expected to act incredibly "proper", but once I'm on the job I'm expected to jump in on the conversation about wanting to #### the secretary with the nice (insert your favorite body part here).

Actually, the latter can and will get you fired close to instantly in many jobs. I know two people who lost their jobs over something far less than that, because of zero-tolerance policies they were aware of but didn't take seriously.

And nobody is going to tell me where I can insert my favorite body part, thank you very much. ;-)
   113. McCoy Posted: September 17, 2007 at 03:59 PM (#2528561)
I had a master chef freak out on me once because I said suck. For my generation it is so ubiquitous that we don't even think it is a bad word to say in public. I think I said something like "oh man we put too much wood in the oven it is gonna suck to cook the pizzas in there" and the Chef who happened to be working near us turned around and started chiding me about my language and what is proper and what is not. After he left I asked the guy next to me what I said. I didn't recall saying any of the naughty four letter words or anything like that. He said you said "suck" and then I went "oh".
   114. McCoy Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:01 PM (#2528564)
Actually, the latter can and will get you fired close to instantly in many jobs. I know two people who lost their jobs over something far less than that, because of zero-tolerance policies they were aware of but didn't take seriously.

Of course it can get you fired but the problem is that 9 times out of 10 it doesn't. Even in zero tolerance places. For the two people that got fired was that the very first inappropriate conversation they had at the workplace? Probably not which is why they probably thought they were safe to say what they said.
   115. Kurt Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:04 PM (#2528569)
My six year old doesn't know any bad words (I don't think). We were up in an observation tower this summer by the ocean, and someone had spelled out "REDSUX" on the ground, with pinecones and branches. He didn't get it at all - he thought it was funny because someone misspelled it, and guessed that eventually someone would fix it. I wasn't offended, but I wasn't about to explain it either.
   116. NJ is feeling better Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:06 PM (#2528571)
My six year old doesn't know any bad words (I don't think). We were up in an observation tower this summer by the ocean, and someone had spelled out "REDSUX" on the ground, with pinecones and branches. He didn't get it at all - he thought it was funny because someone misspelled it, and guessed that eventually someone would fix it. I wasn't offended, but I wasn't about to explain it either.

And my question is why. What is the benefit of not simply saying, "It's a play on words. They misspelled it so that people know that they think the Red Sox aren't very good." Or something along those lines.
   117. Crispix Attacks Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:08 PM (#2528574)
Offensive would have been: "Suck my dick, Sox fan. Yours, Shelley." Juvenile would've been: "Yankees Rool, Red Sox drool!!!111" "Red Sox suck" is nothing.

It would also be in bad taste for him to write "what's up sexy, you are very cut it is bad that you are 15 the law is very strick about that kind of stuff but I may have to do an execption this time".
   118. TVerik, AKA Snoopy Snoopy Poop Dog Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:12 PM (#2528581)
"Meet me in the men's room in Minnesota".
   119. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:12 PM (#2528583)
"suck" is not inappropriate language, is it? I've got 5 kids (1 1/2 to 11); I'm pretty sure they've all heard worse from their mom (and maybe even their dad).

"Suck" has become a simple synonym for "stink." I'm sure that many younger folks don't even realize that it refers to fellatio. My kids were probably saying it by the time they were five, and I know that they have heard a lot worse from both of their parents. But I have to admit that I still cringe just a little when I hear a young kid casually say "you suck" to one of his/her peers. Not because it wasn't said just as often when I was their age, but because when we said it, we meant it.
   120. JC in DC Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:19 PM (#2528591)
But I have to admit that I still cringe just a little when I hear a young kid casually say "you suck" to one of his/her peers. Not because it wasn't said just as often when I was their age, but because when we said it, we meant it.


Well, I cringe or object anytime my children insult one of their peers (whether it's "you suck" or "you're stupid", or "I got a better grade than you." It's not the language, but the message that bothers me, and it's contextual. At a baseball game, where people are saying this stuff, and where - I think - kids understand the playful nature of competitive rivalry, I have no problem with Duncan's message, and would have explained it to my kids as such.
   121. McCoy Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:22 PM (#2528601)
Well 25 years ago when we said "You suck" we meant you stink or something like that. At 5 or 6 I knew damn and suck( I still remember getting in trouble for saying damn while making my bed) and that was about it, all the bigger ones and all the minor non-common (########### I didn't learn about until I was about 13) ones I had no clue about. We weren't running around calling each corksucker or anything like that. I don't think it became common until around my teenage years and even then it wasn't too common. My language didn't get truly foul until after I left home and then it went straight to hell with practically every other word a curse word.
   122. Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral Idiot Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:22 PM (#2528602)
JC, you and BBC should team up and start a nationally syndicated parenting column. Just don't use the extra cash to spoil em, and avoid all questions relating to Barry Bonds.
   123. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:24 PM (#2528606)
JC,

I wasn't suggesting that my cringing was rational. In fact, just the opposite. I agree that it's the message and the context rather than the language that matter.
   124. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:27 PM (#2528613)
Well 25 years ago when we said "You suck" we meant you stink or something like that.

Well, 40 years ago we often meant "you're a f***ing f****t." We'd almost never say it to girls, because that would have been a good thing.
   125. JC in DC Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:31 PM (#2528617)
i.e.: I wasn't really disagreeing with you so much as adding something, I think.
   126. PreservedFish Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:34 PM (#2528620)
I think I said something like "oh man we put too much wood in the oven it is gonna suck to cook the pizzas in there" and the Chef who happened to be working near us turned around and started chiding me about my language and what is proper and what is not.

What? How can anyone survive in the kitchen culture long enough to become a chef if they gasp at the word "suck?"
   127. bunyon Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:36 PM (#2528621)
I learned "You suck" and used it way before knowing what it referred to. I remember when I figured out what fellatio (or whatever it was called when I learned it) was and it clicked that this must be the foundation of "you suck". Really, it was a good lesson in linguistic deduction.

Still, a MLBer has no business signing an autograph that way for a kid. If Shelley wants to playfully interact with 10 year olds he should either be a Mets (edit: read Yankee fan, for JC) fan or join the priesthood.
   128. JC in DC Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:37 PM (#2528623)
Still, a MLBer has no business signing an autograph that way for a kid. If Shelley wants to playfully interact with 10 year olds he should either be a Mets fan or join the priesthood.


Uh, I disagree on the former and am offended by the latter.
   129. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:42 PM (#2528626)
Not because it wasn't said just as often when I was their age, but because when we said it, we meant it.

You did?

When someone says "that blows", do they mean sexually or vomitorily?

Also, what does "bite me" mean?

I'm a bit surprised how "screw you" or "he's screwed" has casually entered our common lexicon. As well as anything about bending over and taking it or "getting bent".
   130. McCoy Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:43 PM (#2528627)
What? How can anyone survive in the kitchen culture long enough to become a chef if they gasp at the word "suck?"

Because when you get to the top you get to rule like a dictator and dictator tend to have idiosyncracies. I had a chef chew me out because I said "Yeah I got it" instead of "Yes chef I have it" He hated the word "Yeah" and would lecture anyone who said it. Of course I am not immune to this effect. Since getting to the top I lecture anyway who says carmel or "au jus". I'm guessing what causes this is the fact that nobody can say no to you and after ten, fifteen, twenty years of hearing something that grates on you, you finally can't take it anymore and say enough.
   131. Bob Dernier Cri Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:47 PM (#2528635)
I told my wife about this and she pointed out that the Red Sox do suck.

Re: origins of "suck" as a term for things that suck: there is the fellatio connection, but there's also a term from years back, "sucking wind": often in the phrase "your ### is sucking wind," the idea that something had a big hole in it or had been punctured and was gasping for breath in a futile manner. I think both meanings converged in the notion that something simply sucks. It doesn't necessarily suck any specific item or substance, anymore, it just sucks, like Buffalo winter weather, Jerry Hairston Jr., re-runs of the Drew Carey Show, that sort of thing.
   132. Kurt Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:51 PM (#2528639)
And my question is why. What is the benefit of not simply saying, "It's a play on words. They misspelled it so that people know that they think the Red Sox aren't very good." Or something along those lines.

What's the benefit of my telling him? He's got most of his life to be a cynical bastard, and years of childhood ahead of him doing the "this sucks; that sucks; everything sucks" routine. I don't see any need to rush the process.

Really, it's more the concept than the language. He roots for the Yankees, and knows the Red Sox are their rivals, but I'm more interested in him enjoying baseball and rooting for his team for now, and not worrying about whether the other team sucks.
   133. villageidiom Posted: September 17, 2007 at 04:52 PM (#2528645)
For the two people that got fired was that the very first inappropriate conversation they had at the workplace? Probably not which is why they probably thought they were safe to say what they said.

In one case he used language that wasn't intended to have sexual overtones, but could have been (and was) interpreted as such. He thought he was safe to say what he said because he was thinking in terms of single-entendres. (The sexual meaning was a bit of a reach, IMO; but someone reached, and that's all that mattered.)

In the other case the offense was the use of the word "suck" (specifically a slight misspelling of "succotash"). I can't say there was any thought behind it at the time, though since then he's thought about learning how to spell better.

So, yeah, your entire premise that the workplace enabled their comfort with such conversation is a bit off. I wish you luck in future employment.
   134. PreservedFish Posted: September 17, 2007 at 05:02 PM (#2528654)
This is really funny. Inspired by #133 I looked up "suck" in the OED. It didn't teach me much about the origin of the slang term, but it did include the following quote:

1973 E. BULLINS Theme is Blackness 79 You heard what I said, #####..take me to dinner and suck mah dick and et cetera fa dessert.


I love this dictionary. The earliest citation for the word suck to mean fellatio is 1928, quoted from A.W. Read's Lexical Evidence from Folk Epigraphy Western N. Amer. The first citation for "suck" in the way we are discussing it is from 1971.
   135. McCoy Posted: September 17, 2007 at 05:03 PM (#2528655)
It is a bit off because their firing was a bit off and I wouldn't be surprised if most lawyers in this world wouldn't take these cases in a heartbeat. So a guy spells suckotash and gets fired? You don't think that is a bit off?


Are you honestly telling me you have never heard blue language in your workplace and not had the person immediately fired?
   136. PreservedFish Posted: September 17, 2007 at 05:15 PM (#2528663)
Also in the OED:

1975 E. HANNON Doors 123 White chicks dig suckin, that's a fact. That's cause suckin's sophisticated.
   137. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: September 17, 2007 at 05:16 PM (#2528664)
"I'm sure that many younger folks don't even realize that it refers to fellatio."

This is the point that I was trying to make. People of Duncan's generation don't really think anything of the phrase, but a lot of sportswriters are older, and they might not understand the linguistic shift that's happened.
   138. Babe Ruths Chris Steak Posted: September 17, 2007 at 05:23 PM (#2528672)

The greatest autograph of all time: "Avoid the clap. Jimmy Dugan."


"Your majesty is like a dose of Clap"
   139. DCW3 Posted: September 17, 2007 at 05:31 PM (#2528686)
"suck" is not inappropriate language, is it? I've got 5 kids (1 1/2 to 11); I'm pretty sure they've all heard worse from their mom (and maybe even their dad).

"I gotta go, my damn wiener kids are listening."
   140. JC in DC Posted: September 17, 2007 at 05:42 PM (#2528696)
I took that gratuitous shot at my wife b/c of the following:

A few weeks ago, my 3rd child, 6 years old, is brushing her hair in front of the mirror in my bedroom as I'm reading on the bed to our 4 year old daughter. I hear her say, "Argh [Yeargh?], I can't get this ####### hair right!" I said, "What? Your what hair?" "My ####### hair," she replied. It's not staying straight." I start laughing and call out to my wife, to come down and ask her daughter about her hair. When pressed, my daughter revealed that she "heard mom say that a lot." It was very funny.
   141. JC in DC Posted: September 17, 2007 at 05:43 PM (#2528698)
####### is g0ddamn, which my 6 year old can say, but we adults are not permitted to read.
   142. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: September 17, 2007 at 06:46 PM (#2528797)
When someone says "that blows", do they mean sexually or vomitorily?

I have no idea. We never said "that blows" in my youth. We did use "blow me" however, and that was obviously not meant in the vomitorial sense.

Also, what does "bite me" mean?

That you're a Letterman fan?
   143. TVerik, AKA Snoopy Snoopy Poop Dog Posted: September 17, 2007 at 07:15 PM (#2528837)
FUBAR has entered into business parlance, and I've heard it at meetings where a regular F-bomb would have been noticeable.
   144. villainx Posted: September 17, 2007 at 07:36 PM (#2528867)
I would like to believe a 10 year old has developed a sense of humor. But I'll go with the camp that Shelley should have been more careful. 10 year olds probably look anywhere from 7-12, so it gets sticky. Of course, if there was interaction and Shelley figured the kid could take the joke or might find it funny/cool, it's cool with me.

Getting a sort of personalized message is better than just scribbling a name.
   145. bunyon Posted: September 17, 2007 at 07:43 PM (#2528872)
Of course, if there was interaction and Shelley figured the kid could take the joke or might find it funny/cool, it's cool with me.

Yeah, that's true. If there was banter beforehand, no problem. It's hard to know. Of course, if there was, is it likely that the kid will tell his mom? No way.
   146. villainx Posted: September 17, 2007 at 07:52 PM (#2528883)
Of course, if there was, is it likely that the kid will tell his mom? No way.


Not to say anything, but parents overreact on a lot of things, especially if it means getting on the news. And of course, the media typically likes to add fuel to any fire.

And oh yeah, as a parent I would probably point out the cool aspect of the autograph. Though, 10 year olds may still tend to be rather emotional about all sorts of things. So yeah, again, Shelley should have been more careful. But if he keeps it, the kid will likely treasure the ball in future years.
   147. villainx Posted: September 17, 2007 at 07:53 PM (#2528884)
Or treasure the story.
   148. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: September 17, 2007 at 08:18 PM (#2528914)
Or treasure the story.

Yeah, considering that the autograph is on a piece of notebook paper. Maybe Duncan should have signed it, "Hey Mom, next time spring for a baseball."
   149. standuptriple Posted: September 17, 2007 at 09:08 PM (#2528942)
When will Andy Rooney give us his thoughts on the matter? Stupid Shelley Rodriguez.
   150. NJ is feeling better Posted: September 17, 2007 at 09:58 PM (#2528977)
   151. Joe Bivens, Schmoo from Massachoosetts Posted: September 17, 2007 at 10:07 PM (#2528982)
The only opinion on this that matters to me would be Jack Keefe's.
   152. plim Posted: September 18, 2007 at 03:05 PM (#2529883)
if anyone's still reading this...

i think the biggest irony/hippocracy/stupidity is who did this: this was shelley duncan. this wasn't some kid who just made it and is adjusting to life to the big leagues. he was literally born in the stadium, grew up there, and probably got his first wood there too (read that how you want =).

if there's anyone who knows what it's like to be a ballplayer, to be around ballplayers, and to be around fans (let alone kids)...it's him.

make no mistake: he knew exactly what he was doing: making an @$$ of himself.
   153. McCoy Posted: September 18, 2007 at 03:49 PM (#2529929)
If you are going to use that line of reasoning then doesn't it make more sense that he and not some newb did this? Duncan has probably seen hundreds of crazy interactions with fans over the years and nothing has ever happened because of them.
   154. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: September 18, 2007 at 04:01 PM (#2529948)
make no mistake: he knew exactly what he was doing: making an @$$ of himself.

Right. Because people go around intentionaly making asses of themselves all the time.
Page 2 of 2 pages  < 1 2

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
aleskel
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogMets owners knew about Maddoff
(7 - 4:30pm, Feb 10)
Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)

NewsblogFSKC announces on-air lineup for Royals - Rex Hudler and Steve Physioc to join
(1 - 4:30pm, Feb 10)
Last: asinwreck

NewsblogSources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault
(6098 - 4:29pm, Feb 10)
Last: billyshears

NewsblogESPN: Law: Top 100 Prospects (paywalled)
(8 - 4:27pm, Feb 10)
Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)

NewsblogWhatever Happened to the Spitball?
(25 - 4:21pm, Feb 10)
Last: Something Other

NewsblogGrantland/Bill James: An Open Letter to the Hall of Fame About Dwight Evans
(42 - 4:20pm, Feb 10)
Last: Fred Lynn Nolan Ryan Sweeney Agonistes

Newsblog'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s
(289 - 4:16pm, Feb 10)
Last: The Good Face

NewsblogMLB: Hall of Fame worthy? Furthest thing from Schilling's mind
(34 - 4:16pm, Feb 10)
Last: Something Other

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012
(407 - 4:15pm, Feb 10)
Last: Athletic Supporter leads the nation in drifters

NewsblogL.A. Times: 11 bidders remain in running to buy Dodgers
(29 - 4:14pm, Feb 10)
Last: chris h. is a member of Team Keefe!

NewsblogNYT: Alderson Remakes Needy Mets From Bottom Line Up
(46 - 4:03pm, Feb 10)
Last: Sam M.

NewsblogBluetales blog: JetBlue’s 605 Wears Red Sox Colors!
(5 - 4:00pm, Feb 10)
Last: The Piehole of David Wells, Red Sox Colostomy Bag

Transaction Oracle2012 ZiPS Projections - Oakland A's
(48 - 3:52pm, Feb 10)
Last: zenbitz

NewsblogKovacevic: Take the Pirates' money, please
(14 - 3:42pm, Feb 10)
Last: The Piehole of David Wells, Red Sox Colostomy Bag

NewsblogFangraphs: Cameron: The 10 Worst Transactions Of The Winter
(90 - 3:32pm, Feb 10)
Last: Something Other

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.9967 seconds
40 querie(s) executed