Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Transaction Oracle > Discussion
Transaction Oracle
— A Timely Look at Transactions as They Happen

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. Russ Posted: November 26, 2005 at 06:42 PM (#1747096)
Definitely the most interesting team in baseball right now. If you are at or above league average at every position, you will be successful.

This team is one more stud starting pitcher and one stud hitter away from being a very scary contender. Does anyone know if they're going to go after Giles? If they rotated Giles, Jenkins, Lee and Hart among the four outfield positions (with Giles spelling Clark in center every once in a while) they could do a serious amount of damage and would have a lot of depth with a killer bat off the bench.
   2. Argu!!!! SATAN!!!! (Sessile Fielder) Posted: November 26, 2005 at 07:13 PM (#1747125)
You're advocating that they rotate those four players in and out of RF and LF, with Clark playing CF? Even throwing Hart out of the mix, which is unreasonable, there's no way that one of Giles, Jenkins, and Lee is sitting every day. I would prefer they package Lee and Overbay together to get something fantabulous. I suppose Giles could play center, but Brady Clark is cheap and effective. Basically, there's no point in signing Giles if they're not going to get rid of Lee or Jenkins, and given that they have several adequate-to-good in-house corner outfielders, like Hart and Nelson Cruz, I would say that the chances of signing Giles are nil.
   3. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: November 26, 2005 at 07:33 PM (#1747149)
Brian Giles would be an incredibly dumb investment. Though a fine player, he is clearly on the downside. Milwaukee needs to play their young talent at every opportunity as opposed to inserting some veteran who would consume valuable financial resources without providing anything close the return.

I am going to write this now so I can beat the Xmas rush. Ben Sheets will have his "breakout" season in terms of wins in 2006. Why? Why NOT?!!!

Sheets will stay healthy, pitch like, well, Ben Sheets, and the Brewers will actually score some runs for him.

Book it.
   4. Walt Davis Posted: November 26, 2005 at 09:15 PM (#1747264)
I seriously doubt the Brewers are going to do anything big in the FA market, but they should be big players in the trade market. They need to move Overbay now or at midseason. If ZIPS is right, Lee doesn't give them much over Cruz/Hart (especially if either of those guys is better defensively). He's a nice player to have around and they probably wouldn't get very much in return, but Hall is also expendable. (Or Branyan but he'll bring even less in return than Hall)

What they need most is starting pitching. This rotation isn't bad and is reasonably deep, but add a second top starter and this might well be a wild-card team this year. Or an ML-ready prospect with that kind of potential and in two years this could be a really good team. An upgrade at C wouldn't be bad but I don't know if anybody substantially better than Miller is available.
   5. Ziggy Posted: November 26, 2005 at 09:37 PM (#1747286)
I could see them signing Morris. Rumor has it they're increasing payroll this year, and he'd be a good fit.
   6. -3E8 Posted: November 26, 2005 at 09:41 PM (#1747292)
This team is one more stud starting pitcher and one stud hitter away from being a very scary contender.

You could probably say this about half the teams in the league.
   7. Chrysler Town & Country Slaughter (Walewander) Posted: November 26, 2005 at 09:46 PM (#1747297)
This team is one more stud starting pitcher and one stud hitter away from being a very scary contender.

So would a lot of teams. Nothing against the Brewers, but its true.
   8. A One-Shoed Craig K Posted: November 26, 2005 at 10:00 PM (#1747314)
As a Cardinals fan, that team scares the #### out of me.

If someone besides Sheets comes up with a breakout season, they're in the playoffs, at least as a wild card.

And 25 HRs from Fielder? Whoa.
   9. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: November 26, 2005 at 10:58 PM (#1747375)
Those Ks and BBs from Capuano look like a better ERA to me than that, even with the HR; it's not so many.
   10. Russ Posted: November 27, 2005 at 01:09 AM (#1747525)
You could probably say this about half the teams in the league.

1. But for the longest time, the Brewers were in the other half.
2. The Brewers are one of the few teams that if you could do that, their sucess would be sustainable over a long period of time.
   11. Hang down your head, Tom Foley Posted: November 27, 2005 at 02:51 AM (#1747686)
Borders c

How cute.
   12. A One-Shoed Craig K Posted: November 27, 2005 at 03:46 AM (#1747777)
Looking at it again, it's a bit scary that the top 7 hitters up there are projected for 832 K's.
   13. Walt Davis Posted: November 27, 2005 at 05:23 AM (#1747934)
Looking at it again, it's a bit scary that the top 7 hitters up there are projected for 832 K's.

You can't spell Milwaukee without a K.

Of course, of those top 7, you won't have Overbay and Fielder both in the lineup nor both Lee (who doesn't K much) and Cruz. And Branyan hasn't had anywhere near that many PA since 2002 (Zips is not a playing time projector. :-) But yeah, their top 4 sluggers may get 550 Ks.
   14. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: November 27, 2005 at 05:49 AM (#1747952)
Rotoworld reports the Blue Jays turned down an offer of Lyle Overbay for P Dustin McGowan.
   15. Psychedelic Red Pants Posted: November 27, 2005 at 06:11 AM (#1747976)
Is Dustin McGowan much better than his numbers would imply? His 2003 was good, but since his apparent injury in 2004 he hasn't been the same guy, at least by the numbers.
   16. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: November 27, 2005 at 06:56 AM (#1748010)
You're sure it was the Blue Jays who turned that down?
   17. The Hop-Clop Goes On (psa1) Posted: November 27, 2005 at 07:58 AM (#1748045)
You're sure it was the Blue Jays who turned that down?

That's the report I've seen, multiple places (though I would imagine it all originates from the same source). I was surprised too -- though with rumors at this stage you never know if the Crew was also asking for JP's first-born.
   18. Eraser-X is emphatically dominating teh site!!! Posted: November 27, 2005 at 09:22 AM (#1748096)
J.P. realized that he could get a comparable 1B/DH type for only 5/$75mil and figured it was better to not give up the "prospect".
   19. Dolf Lucky Posted: November 28, 2005 at 01:29 PM (#1749530)
No Victor Santos?
   20. Rob Base Posted: November 28, 2005 at 01:32 PM (#1749532)
Still looks like a pretty $hitty team to me.
   21. Dan Szymborski Posted: November 28, 2005 at 02:02 PM (#1749567)
Victor Santos signed with the Royals. His projection with the Royals is a 5.21 ERA in 145 IP, 16 HR, 59 BB, 85 K.
   22. Mike Emeigh Posted: November 28, 2005 at 03:22 PM (#1749635)
I think the Brewers are going to need a consolidation year, as players like Fielder, Weeks, Hart, Cruz, et. al. begin (or continue) making their adjustments to the majors. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Brewers backslid to 75 wins or so, then took another leap forward in 2007.

-- MWE
   23. Dolf Lucky Posted: November 28, 2005 at 05:18 PM (#1749855)
Thanks Dan.
   24. _ Posted: November 29, 2005 at 12:23 AM (#1750443)
I agree with MWE. This team has several players - Hall, Clark, Turnbow, Ohka, Capuano - who can't be expected to do again next year what they did this year. I think people expecting Chris Capuano to win 18 games again are going to be very disappointed. Sure, he'll be a solid innings eater if he stays healthy, but if you believe in DIPS, or FIP, or anything like that, you can see he's headed for a correction.

Hardy and Weeks are the only two on the entire team from whom I'd expect better seasons. Maybe Sheets. A lot depends on what they get for Overbay, and whether they're able to move Lee or Jenkins, but it's unlikely even that those deals will pay off this season.

What Russ points out in post 1 is exactly why they aren't as good as people think, and exactly why they're in a difficult position right now in terms of making deals. They're fairly solid at every position, with no glaring weaknesses, but also with no franchise players. When you have a bunch of average-above average players, that's exactly what kind of team you'll have. You need superstars to win. This team really has only one, and he's coming off a serious injury. Then again, if the White Sox could do it. . .
   25. Argu!!!! SATAN!!!! (Sessile Fielder) Posted: November 29, 2005 at 01:05 AM (#1750472)
he's coming off a serious injury

I think that's a mischaracterization of a muscle tear.
   26. _ Posted: November 29, 2005 at 01:14 AM (#1750478)
Well, it's not a minor injury. It's not a given that he's going to come back the same pitcher, or that the peculiarities of his motion won't re-injure it.
   27. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: November 29, 2005 at 01:28 AM (#1750487)
No franchise players? Maybe at THIS PARTICULAR POINT OF TIME.

I see Ben Sheets, Rickie Weeks, and Prince Fielder as guys who could make the leap.

Mike and I have disagreed on Bill Hall for several years now. If he continues to edge forward on his plate discipline I believe he will solidify the gains from 2005.

Brady Clark is only considered a fluke because nobody was intelligent enough to play him five years ago when he deserved a job. Go look at his minor league numbers where he twice led leagues in OBP and explain to me again why he can't post a .370 OBP in the majors.

Why was Capuano a prospect in Arizona but in Milwaukee he's a fluke? Yes the wins total is a reflection of support, yada, yada, yada. But the PERFORMANCE is there to be a solid rotation starter. And if you keep your team in the game SOMEBODY will get the wins.

Derrick Turnbow has a 98 mph fastball. That cannot be either manufactured or created. It just IS. Maybe he loses the control in 2006. Maybe Mike Maddux continues to help the lad master his stuff.

But hey, you go ahead and insist they stink, they were a fluke, and why bother taking a bunch of hayseeds seriously.
   28. NTNgod Posted: November 29, 2005 at 01:45 AM (#1750502)
Bill Hall made strides in pitch recognition last year, which, of course, isn't easy to do at the major league level.
Hall was actually pretty amusing to watch last season, in that you could occasionally see him straining himself not to swing at certain pitches he use to chase with regularity. He did succeed in cutting his strikeouts down by quite a bit (from 119 in 390 ABs in 2004, to 103 in 501), while increasing the number of pitches he saw per AB (3.80 to 4.16).

He's got good power for a middle infielder (especially to RF) - in a non-Hardy world where Hall played everyday at SS, his .837 OPS would have ranked second to Felipe Lopez' .838 amongst NL SS.
Hall was probably among the least-known players who had a VORP above 40 last year (42.7)...
   29. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: November 29, 2005 at 01:56 AM (#1750513)
NTNgod:

And don't forget the defense. And the baserunning.

I love all these folks wanting to find reasons for the Brewers to stink in 2006.

If they regress it's a consolidation year. If they move forward I get to gloat about being right.

I'm diggin' 2006. :)
   30. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: November 29, 2005 at 01:58 AM (#1750518)
By the way, I cannot access the Newsblog link. Just repeatedly craps out.

Other parts of the site are accessible. Just an FYI......
   31. Teufel's Graveyard Posted: November 29, 2005 at 02:16 AM (#1750532)
The newsblog interface seems to be having issues, but there's a workaround. If you go the home page and click on one of the new articles linked at the top, that will allow you to then see the current newsblog hot topics. You can also bookmark a newsblog thread once you get there, and that lets you in. At least that's how I figured it out.

Regarding the Brew Crew, they will be an exciting team to watch. I'm hoping for a second place finish, hopefully an 85ish win team.
   32. _ Posted: November 29, 2005 at 06:06 AM (#1750808)
Jesus, don't be so defensive. I'm one of the hayseeds, OK? I believe "solid" is exactly the word I used to describe Capuano. Forget the wins; he's not going to have an ERA under 4.40. I never said anyone stinks; I said they won't be as good as they were in 2005. If you think they're going to do in 2006 what the Cleveland Indians did in 2005, look at the rosters and tell me this team has as much talent as Cleveland. They're not there yet. When they are, I'll be the first in line.
   33. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: November 29, 2005 at 02:33 PM (#1751109)
The Brewers are set for a long, long time, as long as they can hang onto Melvin. Most under-rated GM in the game.
   34. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: December 05, 2005 at 09:40 PM (#1762373)
Dan, what's the ZiPS for Victor Santos? He fell in between the KC and Milwaukee releases and didn't get a write-up for changing teams...
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Martin Hemner
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Syndicate

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.5867 seconds
38 querie(s) executed