Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Transaction Oracle > Discussion
Transaction Oracle
— A Timely Look at Transactions as They Happen

Monday, October 23, 2006

2007 ZiPS Projections - Chicago White Sox


Name                     P  Age   AVG   OBP   SLG   G  AB   R   H 2B 3B HR RBI  BB   K SB CS 
Jim Thome*               1b  36  .270  .407  .558 130 434  84 117 23  0 34 101  99 132  0  0 
Paul Konerko             1b  31  .288  .372  .535 154 553  92 159 26  0 37 115  70 105  1  0 
Jermaine Dye             rf  33  .293  .359  .546 143 526  85 154 27  2 34 110  51 116  6  3 
Ross Gload*              1b  31  .307  .355  .481  89 212  30  65 14  1  7  34  15  32  1  1 
Joe Crede                3b  29  .267  .317  .480 143 494  64 132 27  0 26  87  30  65  0  2 
Josh Fields              3b  24  .262  .336  .445 132 461  79 121 28  1 18  69  50 127 13  5 
Tadahito Iguchi          2b  32  .279  .348  .417 135 527  82 147 24  2 15  73  54 112 10  4 
Rob Mackowiak*           cf  31  .258  .332  .405 136 395  52 102 16  3 12  60  41  90  7  3 
Ernie Young              rf  37  .246  .334  .401 101 337  43  83 16  0 12  59  40 117  1  2 
A.J. Pierzynski*         c   30  .274  .319  .418 134 474  55 130 23  0 15  70  22  60  0  1 
Casey Rogowski*          1b  26  .258  .329  .400 130 462  68 119 29  2 11  65  47  99 14  8 
Ryan Sweeney*            cf  22  .279  .329  .388 125 451  68 126 21  2  8  56  32  61  4  5 
Juan Uribe               ss  27  .253  .292  .455 136 475  63 120 27  3 21  78  25  80  4  4 
Cory Aldridge*           lf  28  .232  .296  .426 107 371  52  86 17  2 17  47  31 113  7  4 
Bobby Smith              2b  33  .242  .296  .421 102 363  48  88 21  1 14  54  25  88  5  3 
Scott Podsednik*         lf  31  .261  .331  .354 140 537  83 140 27  4  5  51  54  93 45 16 
Aaron Cunningham         lf  21  .252  .316  .405  91 306  50  77 18  1  9  23  21  66 11  7 
Brian Anderson           cf  25  .247  .312  .392 116 360  51  89 21  2  9  43  31  85  3  4 
Pablo Ozuna              lf  32  .284  .321  .378  96 299  42  85 15  2  3  35  12  31 11  7 
Jerry Owens*             cf  26  .268  .329  .338 125 459  79 123 15  4  3  45  41  64 23 13 
Corey Smith              1b  25  .221  .297  .368 128 448  55  99 19  1 15  57  46 123  3  2 
Alex Cintron#            ss  28  .263  .298  .362 121 392  40 103 18  3  5  48  19  42  4  2 
Pedro Lopez              2b  23  .257  .294  .372 123 444  58 114 19  1 10  50  22  52  3  3 
Jorge Velandia           ss  32  .247  .295  .346 120 405  49 100 20  1  6  43  27  73  5  2 
Chris Stewart            c   25  .237  .284  .363  93 278  34  66 15  1  6  31  16  41  2  1 
Chris Getz*              2b  23  .245  .311  .302 115 441  60 108 13  3  2  28  42  38 11  5 
Sandy Alomar Jr.         c   41  .254  .288  .331  64 118   9  30  6  0  1  13   5  18  0  0 
Tony Torcato*            lf  27  .246  .283  .332 108 325  31  80 14  1  4  37  14  38  2  2 
Robert Valido            ss  22  .237  .268  .332  93 379  56  90 15  3  5  27  14  50 21  5 
Francisco Hernandez#     c   21  .196  .243  .291  81 265  23  52 10  0  5  18  13  29  1  1 

Player Spotlight (Beta) - Joe Crede
Name               AVG   OBP   SLG   G  AB   R   H 2B 3B HR RBI  BB   K SB CS
Optimistic (15%)  .288  .346  .532 154 539  84 155 34  1 32 109  38  60  1  1
Mean              .267  .317  .480 143 494  64 132 27  0 26  87  30  65  0  2
Pessimistic (15%) .249  .295  .424 111 389  46  97 20  0 16  60  20  55  0  2

Name                     Age    ERA   W   L   G  GS     INN    H   ER  HR   BB    K 
Bobby Jenks               26   3.70   4   2  64   0    73.0   63   30   6   28   80 
Boone Logan*              22   4.05   3   1  56   0    60.0   55   27   4   26   52 
Mike MacDougal            30   4.15   4   3  50   0    52.0   46   24   5   24   50 
Javier Vazquez            30   4.21  13  10  32  31   199.0  201   93  25   55  169 
Dustin Hermanson          34   4.30   5   3  45   9    90.0   87   43  10   32   65 
Mark Buehrle*             28   4.36  14  11  33  33   223.0  249  108  30   49  130 
David Riske               30   4.36   3   3  57   0    64.0   61   31  12   23   53 
Freddy Garcia             31   4.46  13  11  32  32   212.0  219  105  28   58  153 
Jose Contreras            35   4.55  12  10  31  31   192.0  193   97  26   72  140 
Brandon McCarthy          23   4.69   8   7  40  17   144.0  142   75  27   40  119 
Jon Garland               27   4.69  13  12  32  32   209.0  229  109  27   52  115 
Josh Fields               27   4.70   4   4  54   0    69.0   71   36   9   25   49 
Charlie Haeger            23   5.05  10  10  26  25   173.0  180   97  15   89   90 
Neal Cotts*               27   5.12   2   2  69   0    58.0   57   33   9   27   52 
Jeff Nelson               40   5.14   2   2  38   0    28.0   24   16   3   20   26 
Matt Thornton*            30   5.17   3   4  59   0    54.0   50   31   9   30   51 
Lance Broadway            23   5.45   6   8  23  23   147.0  172   89  26   43   71 
Ray Liotta*               24   5.47   8  10  28  27   163.0  185   99  20   72   78 
Tim Redding               29   5.65   8  11  28  25   156.0  177   98  29   57   86 
Arnie Munoz*              25   5.85   5   9  35  12   103.0  115   67  20   45   69 
Valerio de los Santos*    34   6.07   1   1  23   6    46.0   50   31   8   24   27 
Paulino Reynoso*          26   6.64   2   5  50   0    61.0   66   45  11   45   40 
Sean Tracey               26   6.78   5  13  32  23   150.0  174  113  36   81   79 
Edwardo Sierra            25   7.11   1   4  38   1    62.0   69   49  11   48   37 

* - Throws Left

Player Spotlight (Beta) -  Mark Buehrle
                    ERA   W   L   G  GS  INN    H   ER  HR   BB    K 
Optimistic (15%)   3.81  17  10  34  34  234  248   99  27   46  138
Mean               4.36  14  11  33  33  223  249  108  30   49  130
Pessimistic (15%)  5.40   9  12  28  28  180  222  108  30   44  102

Disclaimer:  ZiPS projections are computer-based projections of performance.  
Performances have not been allocated to predicted playing time in the majors - 
many of the players listed above are unlikely to play in the majors at all in 2007.  
ZiPS is projecting equivalent production - a .240 ZiPS projection may end up 
being .280 in AAA or .300 in AA, for example.  Whether or not a player will play 
is one of many non-statistical factors one has to take into account when predicting 
the future.
Dan Szymborski Posted: October 23, 2006 at 05:56 PM | 60 comment(s)
  Related News: Chi White SoxProjectionsZIPS

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. Gold Star for Robothal Posted: October 23, 2006 at 06:11 PM (#2222546)
Contreras' projection seems exceedingly pessimistic. His K rate went down this year, but so did his homers and walks.

Also, should the White Sox plug Ross Gload into leftfield and let him try to put up that projection over a full year?
   2. Dewey, Local Boy and Hero Posted: October 23, 2006 at 06:25 PM (#2222554)
Also, should the White Sox plug Ross Gload into leftfield and let him try to put up that projection over a full year?

As much as I like Ross Gload (and I do like Ross Gload), he's not a good outfielder. Before the Konerko re-signing and the Thome trade, I was advocating for him to be full-time first baseman in 2006, but now? I doubt he'll be on the team next year. I think he'll catch on somewhere where they need a cheap first baseman, and people will wonder where he came from.

A couple more comments -

1) I doubt Matt Thornton will regress as much as ZiPS thinks he will. I get why the numbers are what they are, but I doubt that his control problems will be as much of a problem going forward.

2) Charlie Haeger, as a knuckleballer, is basically impossible to predict. I'll take those numbers with a giant grain of salt.

3) All in all, I agree that this is a pretty mediocre pitching staff. If they experience another downgrade on defense, they may well give up 900 runs next year.
   3. CWS Keith Posted: October 23, 2006 at 06:59 PM (#2222578)
Dan, do you have a projection for Oneli Perez? He's a reliever who shot up through the Sox' system with some nasty K numbers.

Couple of comments...

1.) I don't think Fields would come near that line. I think he'd struggle as much as Anderson did last year, seeing that he struck out more than Anderson did at AAA.

2.) Wow, ZiPS really hates the Sox staff, ehh? If they perform like that, it's going to be a while until the Sox are playing baseball well into October.

3.) I think I'd be pretty happy if McCarthy put up that ERA in his first year as a starter.
   4. Gaelan Posted: October 23, 2006 at 07:09 PM (#2222587)
How much of these numbers are the park? Isn't Cellular a pretty extreme home run park?
   5. Dewey, Local Boy and Hero Posted: October 23, 2006 at 07:10 PM (#2222590)
Wow, ZiPS really hates the Sox staff, ehh?

I honestly don't see any projections that are clearly way off. Jose Contreras is hard to project, so he might beat that projection (then again, he might fall off the table), but other than that, those numbers pass the sniff test, at least for the starters. I dunno, maybe Mark Buehrle will bounce back.

I think they've got five mediocre starters that are very defense-dependent. Buehrle, Garland, and the new-and-not-improved Freddy Garcia, in particular, need good defenses behind them, or they'll fail.
   6. MM1f Posted: October 23, 2006 at 07:16 PM (#2222596)
The White Sox REALLY need to draft this guy in June...
   7. Dewey, Local Boy and Hero Posted: October 23, 2006 at 07:18 PM (#2222599)
Isn't Cellular a pretty extreme home run park?

Yeah, but it's almost neutral on overall offense levels. The park increases homers but suppresses other kinds of XBH.
   8. PH Posted: October 23, 2006 at 09:39 PM (#2222686)
Wow, ZiPS really hates the Sox staff, ehh?

The starters' ERAs are better in ZiPS across the board. The only one that's likely WAY off is Thornton. I think it undersells MacDougal, and a healthy Jenks beats his easily. Jenks didn't look right the last month of the season, though.
   9. CWS Keith Posted: October 23, 2006 at 10:23 PM (#2222708)
I think they've got five mediocre starters that are very defense-dependent. Buehrle, Garland, and the new-and-not-improved Freddy Garcia, in particular, need good defenses behind them, or they'll fail.

As is, I don't think Garcia is ever going to pitch in a White Sox uniform again. I think he's gone in a trade this winter.

The starters' ERAs are better in ZiPS across the board. The only one that's likely WAY off is Thornton. I think it undersells MacDougal, and a healthy Jenks beats his easily. Jenks didn't look right the last month of the season, though.

I suppose you're right. I'd bet that Contreras, Buehrle, and Garland each beat their projections, although I could see where the 'average-ish' projection is coming from.

That's also a pretty impressive line for Aaron Cunningham, considering he hasn't even played one game at Birmingham. I don't think he's even played a game at Winston Salem yet, either.

This projection also furthers my opinion that Kenny Williams needs to go out and find a backup right-handed catcher this winter. Considering that the main offensive weakness on the team lies in their (lack of) hitting against lefties, you'd think that it would be obvious to find somebody who can mash southpaws.
   10. Jason Kendall's #6,530,420,771 fan (AS) Posted: October 23, 2006 at 11:23 PM (#2222746)
I think he'll catch on somewhere where they need a cheap first baseman, and people will wonder where he came from.

Billy!

Though I am not really a Gload fan.
   11. Shredder Posted: October 23, 2006 at 11:27 PM (#2222750)
Athletic Supporter fought the war but the war won

Good lord, people are naming themselves after Metric references now?
   12. Rage against the big red machine Posted: October 23, 2006 at 11:36 PM (#2222752)
In answer to CWSKeith (post #3), Oneli Perez is a minor league FA, according to the MiLB FA list This surprised me, because his numbers were pretty eye-popping and the Sox had room on the 40 man roster. It seems like every offseason Kenny Williams feels he has to give up at least one talented player as a minor league FA.

As for the pitching projections, I think they're pretty fair. The Vazquez projection seems positively optimistic, but JV always has great peripheral stats and maybe that's fooling ZiPS? Contreras seems like a good candidate to falter more (unknown age, worked hard young, back problems...). Garland might do better though. He was very good after a terrible, terrible April-May. I'm actually optimistic about him posting better than career-average numbers next year.

I agree completely about getting a RH backup C. People are generally dismissive of the importance of a backup catcher (White Sox front office included, it seems). But a solid lefty-masher would be a huge boost for the Sox lineup. Plus AJ is getting older and could use some more days off. I'd be very happy if they somehow snagged Torrealba (who happens to be Venezualan, it's a perfect match).
   13. Gold Star for Robothal Posted: October 23, 2006 at 11:42 PM (#2222755)
Is Ramon Castro a free agent? He'd be an ideal lefty-mashing catcher.
   14. CWS Keith Posted: October 24, 2006 at 12:57 AM (#2222808)
Rage, I looked on that list, and Perez isn't on it. Am I missing something?
   15. PH Posted: October 24, 2006 at 01:28 AM (#2222831)
I'd be very happy if they somehow snagged Torrealba (who happens to be Venezualan, it's a perfect match).

I beat this drum plenty during the midseason, but that looks unlikely now. Closser's gone, Ardoin's done, and that leaves Torrealba and Iannetta, and there's no way they're letting the rookie hang by himself. The Rockies are sitting (crouching?) pretty.

My favorite thing about Torrealba is that you can rearrange the letters in his name to spell "Lavatory Orbiter."
   16. Rage against the big red machine Posted: October 24, 2006 at 01:51 AM (#2222840)
#14 -- No, you're absolutely right. Geez, I could have sworn I saw his name there. I checked BA's list and he's not listed there either. So, I guess all I can say is that I must not have properly ventilated my house while painting today. Anyway, I'm glad to be wrong. Promising arms are hard to find in the Sox minor league system.
   17. CWS Keith Posted: October 24, 2006 at 02:56 AM (#2222862)
Anyway, I'm glad to be wrong. Promising arms are hard to find in the Sox minor league system.

I certainly agree with that. It's depressing that (for all intents and purposes) the Sox' best pitching prospect, Lance Broadway, projects to have an ERA in the mid-fives. I'm not trying to take ZiPS as gospel, but looking up and down that list isn't pleasant. On that note, the Sox really need McCarthy to be an effective starter for the forseeable future, or else they aren't going to keep up with Detroit and Minnesota. And, while I respect the job that Kenny Williams has done over the past couple seasons, I'd like to see the Sox do a better job of infusing talent from Latin America. You'd think that Ozzie would have a bit of 'pull' in that area, but in Ozzie's three years here, we've seen nothing come from that area.
   18. Mark Edward's Got That Go Go Gadget Flow Posted: October 24, 2006 at 03:26 AM (#2222871)
Perez is listed as a free agent on this list, though I'm almost positive that's not correct.

Kenny does tend to give up a lot of arms, and that may come back to hurt him someday, but I think he realizes a lot of minor league pitchers are very capable of burning out and he's willing to trade them for actual value before they flame out. Of the arms he gave up to get Carl Everett (I'm talking both times here), Francisco *may* turn out to be a hard-throwing quality middle reliever, Josh Rupe's ceiling is that of a LOOGY, Majewski's been OK in the majors so far but that low-K rate is a bit scary, and Rauch looks like he'll be a good middle reliever. In the Thome deal, Haigwood seems to be a fringe prospect with major control issues; Gio looks like a legitimately good prospect, though he also has control problems. And I'd take Alex Cintron over Bajenaru.

I'm really surprised Aaron Cunningham didn't make BA's top 20 Sally League prospects. .305/.386/.496 for a 20-year old playing in a pitcher's environment is pretty impressive. How's his defense? BA said he needs work on his outfield 'instincts,' but he played 2B in high school and college. It's also odd that Kyle McCulloch is missing from both the Pioneer and Carolina League lists. Granted, he only pitched about sixty pro innings this season, but I'd still consider him a pretty decent prospect.

As for minor-league FA catchers, there doesn't seem to be much outside of Juan Brito and J.R. House. Der-Kommiskar mentioned former prospect Guillermo Quiroz in another thread, and he's probably worth at least a look (.304/.359/.428 in 38 games for Tacoma, though he's only hit .200 in limited major-league playing time). Aside from that, well... there's Jamie Burke and Mark Johnson.
   19. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: October 24, 2006 at 03:37 AM (#2222875)
And Rauch's name means "smoke," which is cool.
   20. Mark Edward's Got That Go Go Gadget Flow Posted: October 24, 2006 at 03:37 AM (#2222876)
And, while I respect the job that Kenny Williams has done over the past couple seasons, I'd like to see the Sox do a better job of infusing talent from Latin America. You'd think that Ozzie would have a bit of 'pull' in that area, but in Ozzie's three years here, we've seen nothing come from that area.


To be fair, considering that Latin Americans are signed as teenagers, if there was any "Ozzie effect," the players would only be about 20 now and entering various rookie leagues. I'd give it a couple more seasons.

But yeah, of the Sox top 20 prospects or so, a good majority of them will probably be from the US.
   21. VG Posted: October 24, 2006 at 10:23 AM (#2223046)
Re: Latin America, I think the White Sox are at least thinking about starting an academy in Venezuela. They may have already put the wheels in motion on one. I can't remember.
   22. o_dawg Posted: October 24, 2006 at 11:20 AM (#2223108)
Why does Josh Fields have a pitching line? What am I missing?
   23. PH Posted: October 24, 2006 at 11:24 AM (#2223113)
Why does Josh Fields have a pitching line? What am I missing?

The Sox have two Josh Fieldses.
   24. battlekow Posted: October 24, 2006 at 12:11 PM (#2223183)
And Rauch's name means "smoke," which is cool.

This is cooler.
   25. Stealfirstbase (Liberalthinkfactory.org member) Posted: October 24, 2006 at 12:48 PM (#2223234)
Couple of things. Ok, more than a couple:

I think that Joe Crede has a great chance of beating that projection, but I'm not sure Field's has even that good a chance of matching his. I'll go out on a limb and say that Crede beats his 15th percentile projection by a wide margin.

ROSS GLOAD!

Also nice to see that Jermaine Dye looks to have another strong year in him.

The pitchers all look pretty good. I'm assuming these numbers are regressed, right? They've all got good to outstanding chances of beating those projections.

Once again, Boone Logan is not ready for the bigs. This is another Josh Fields situation, where I think the projections are far too optimistic. Oh, and Thorton, Cotts and Haeger could have ERAs anywhere from a run to two runs below those projections. I'm note sure that Cotts is finished yet.
   26. Dewey, Local Boy and Hero Posted: October 24, 2006 at 12:57 PM (#2223244)
I'll go out on a limb and say that Crede beats his 15th percentile projection by a wide margin.

You're saying he'll put together an All-Star caliber season? If he's healthy (which is far from a given), I don't think it a stretch for him to approach that optimistic line, but I think he already had his breakthrough season. I don't think we're getting too much more out of Joe Crede than we've already seen.

My guess is that he'll either beat his mean projection by quite a bit, or he'll have a miserable, injury-plagued season and fail to match even his pessimistic line.
   27. Stealfirstbase (Liberalthinkfactory.org member) Posted: October 24, 2006 at 01:04 PM (#2223250)
I should explain. I'm optimistic about the Sox's starters because I think--and I could be wrong--that these numbers are regressed and have 2006 as their most recent statistical baseline. I don't think McCarthy's 2006 out of the bullpen does him justice, so I could see him coming in at around 4.1 for ERA. The same could be said of Buehrle and Garland and especially Contreras. I'd give them all great odds of beating those projections. The same applies to many members of the bullpen, with the exception of Boone Logan.
   28. Stealfirstbase (Liberalthinkfactory.org member) Posted: October 24, 2006 at 01:08 PM (#2223251)
My guess is that he'll either beat his mean projection by quite a bit, or he'll have a miserable, injury-plagued season and fail to match even his pessimistic line.

For the vast majority of the season, about 4 1/2 months, he hit .300. And he hit .300 pretty consistently. His walk rate sucked, like always. His K rate halved. I agree that his back could put him out of commission as could any number of other injuries. But I'd say his true talent level is at or below .300. I think he does well in 2007.
   29. Dewey, Local Boy and Hero Posted: October 24, 2006 at 01:10 PM (#2223252)
The same could be said of Buehrle and Garland and especially Contreras. I'd give them all great odds of beating those projections.

I wish I had your confidence. I wouldn't be surprised if Garland beat that projection, but Buehrle's projection looks really optimistic to me given how he finished the season this year, and Contreras is impossible to predict.
   30. retro-shiite Posted: October 24, 2006 at 01:18 PM (#2223262)
Ernie Young's in the Sox organization? Cool!
   31. Dewey, Local Boy and Hero Posted: October 24, 2006 at 01:20 PM (#2223263)
Ernie Young's in the Sox organization?

Yeah, I think he broke the career minor-league home run record in a Knights uniform this year.
   32. Stealfirstbase (Liberalthinkfactory.org member) Posted: October 24, 2006 at 01:21 PM (#2223264)
JRE, I'm just happy ZIPS doesn't predict a collapse for any of the starters. Considering that 2006 is the most recent baseline for the statistical analysis and that the numbers are regressed anyway, anything under 5 looks like an ERA success to me. I think these guys are great bounce back candidates. I've been right before and I've been wrong before, and time will tell which camp I fall into this time.
   33. retro-shiite Posted: October 24, 2006 at 01:22 PM (#2223267)
And Rauch's name means "smoke," which is cool.

This is cooler.


Hm...kind of a beer/scotch hybrid. Intriguing.
   34. Mike Emeigh Posted: October 24, 2006 at 01:39 PM (#2223284)
Yeah, I think he broke the career minor-league home run record in a Knights uniform this year.


He did. Young's day is long gone, though.

I'm really surprised Aaron Cunningham didn't make BA's top 20 Sally League prospects. .305/.386/.496 for a 20-year old playing in a pitcher's environment is pretty impressive.


The SAL is a big league; it's hard for anyone to make a top-20. Cunningham's season was nice, but Eric Campbell (the position player ahead of him on the top-20) had a season that was at least as good, is about the same age, and is an infielder to boot. Also, Kannapolis was a pretty bad team most of the season, which makes it easier for a good prospect to be overlooked.

It's also odd that Kyle McCulloch is missing from both the Pioneer and Carolina League lists. Granted, he only pitched about sixty pro innings this season, but I'd still consider him a pretty decent prospect.


He didn't pitch enough at either level to qualify. He'd have been top-5 in the Pioneer, probably top-15 in the CarL.

-- MWE
   35. bhoov Posted: October 24, 2006 at 02:17 PM (#2223317)
Just comparing 2006 ERAs to ZIPS. Of course the big four from 2005 all had ERA's under 4 in 2005.

ZIPS really doesn't like Garland. It predicts him to have the 2nd worst year of his career at age 28 despite his greatly improved walk rate the last 2 years. All of the others seem pretty reasonable. Although I expect Contreras to be better than that. I'd be quite happy if Vazquez, Garcia and Buehrle reach those projections.

Jose Contreras 4.27 4.55
Jon Garland 4.51 4.69
Freddy Garcia 4.53 4.46
Javier Vazquez 4.84 4.21
Mark Buehrle 4.99 4.36
Average 4.63 4.45


Brandon McCarthy 4.68 4.69
   36. DCW3 * Posted: October 24, 2006 at 04:21 PM (#2223413)
No projection for Jack Keefe?
   37. Lee Smith & Wesson Posted: October 24, 2006 at 05:02 PM (#2223433)
Yeah, no Keefe projection is a Major Oversight. He was a lynchpin, cheerleader and all-around great guy during their run to Glory in 'O5.
   38. Jason Kendall's #6,530,420,771 fan (AS) Posted: October 24, 2006 at 06:53 PM (#2223496)
Good lord, people are naming themselves after Metric references now?

Um, is there a problem?
   39. If theres a bunt w'all remember twas back in ol 92 Posted: October 24, 2006 at 07:11 PM (#2223505)
I think he's implying Metric isn't a very good band

Or maybe it's just frustrating that Canadian bands like that continously make it big in the States while Joel Plaskett and the Hip stay at home
   40. Jason Kendall's #6,530,420,771 fan (AS) Posted: October 24, 2006 at 09:37 PM (#2223668)
What? Metric has by no means "made it big" in the States.
   41. If theres a bunt w'all remember twas back in ol 92 Posted: October 25, 2006 at 12:16 AM (#2223858)
Sure they have!
I don't see Joel or the Weakerthans playing no Conan

And if O'Brien isn't the biggest it gets, I don't know what is
   42. If theres a bunt w'all remember twas back in ol 92 Posted: October 25, 2006 at 12:18 AM (#2223862)
I suppose I should ammend that

In the minds of Canadians I think having more than 3 Americans know who you are counts as "making it big"
   43. Darren Posted: October 25, 2006 at 06:29 AM (#2223923)
Why do people keep talking about Garcia like he's toast? From someone who didn't see him much this year, his numbers look like a slightly down year from a remarkably consistent pitcher. Cut those HRs a bit and he's once again very good. What am I missing?
   44. VG Posted: October 25, 2006 at 10:34 AM (#2224013)
Why do people keep talking about Garcia like he's toast? ... What am I missing?

It's what GarcĂ­a was missing for most of the year -- 5-6 mph on his fastball, sometimes more (or less, I guess). He pitched well down the stretch, having recovered some of that velocity. I guess the question is whether his first 4-1/2 months of the season are closer to what he'll be going forward than the last six weeks or so.
   45. Gaelan Posted: October 25, 2006 at 11:08 AM (#2224022)
Joel Plaskett is one seriously talented musician. All you Americans out there this is your chance to get in on the ground floor.
   46. Shredder Posted: October 25, 2006 at 11:16 AM (#2224030)
I think he's implying Metric isn't a very good band

Actually, I like Metric quite a bit. Combat Baby is as close to being a perfect pop song as one can get. The only better hooks I've come across lately are from Ted Leo.
   47. Walewander Has CD Tower Power Posted: October 25, 2006 at 01:58 PM (#2224156)
Joel Plaskett is one seriously talented musician. All you Americans out there this is your chance to get in on the ground floor.

Only 15 years into his career! And the Weakerthans last album was poo. 5 best bands/musicians in Canada right now:

1. Ladyhawk
2. Metric
3. New Pornographers
4. the Hip (still)
5. Plaskett

Do not ask 'Where's Broken Social Scene?' or I'll stab you with something rusty. Like the Tigers offense.
   48. Walewander Has CD Tower Power Posted: October 25, 2006 at 02:01 PM (#2224158)
Crap. Wolf Parade shopuld be in that top 5 somewhere.
   49. shaftr Posted: October 25, 2006 at 02:05 PM (#2224159)
Garcia developed a splitter towards the end of the year, if i remember correctly.
   50. If theres a bunt w'all remember twas back in ol 92 Posted: October 25, 2006 at 05:59 PM (#2224388)
Hooray!
The infamous Canadian Music Scene hi-jack

so how many of you are Canadian?
and on a side note, just arranged to get my Hip ticket for January
It's too bad Plaskett isn't opening for them again...*drool
   51. Shredder Posted: October 26, 2006 at 05:02 PM (#2225262)
Any list of top Canadian bands that doesn't prominently feature the High Dials is worthless.
   52. Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Posted: October 27, 2006 at 11:02 AM (#2226191)
Any list of top Canadian bands that doesn't prominently feature the Guess Who is worthless.
   53. asinwreck Posted: October 27, 2006 at 11:11 AM (#2226199)
No love for Final Fantasy? Destroyer?
   54. Shredder Posted: October 27, 2006 at 08:49 PM (#2226721)
I'm a big Destroyer fan, but I thought I'd let it go since Bejar is in New Pornographers as well.
   55. Jason Kendall's #6,530,420,771 fan (AS) Posted: October 27, 2006 at 11:11 PM (#2226900)
Any list of top Canadian bands that doesn't prominently feature Shania Twain is worthless.
   56. Shoeless Don Posted: November 01, 2006 at 11:11 AM (#2229576)
Josh Fields going 4-4 as a starting pitcher summarizes my impression of the value of this prognostication....ha-ha...

But, projecting only two players with over 150 hits emphasizes the need for two batters at the top of the order...
   57. Azteca Posted: November 01, 2006 at 11:15 AM (#2229579)
Josh Fields going 4-4 as a starting pitcher summarizes my impression of the value of this prognostication....ha-ha...


I think you're confused: as mentioned above, the Sox have two minor leaguers named Josh Fields. If you understand that distinction, you'll also notice that Fields 'the pitcher' isn't projected to start any games. Rather, he's projected to go 4-4 in 56 relief appearances.
   58. Mike Emeigh Posted: November 01, 2006 at 11:19 AM (#2229580)
Josh Fields going 4-4 as a starting pitcher summarizes my impression of the value of this prognostication


As has been pointed out before, the White Sox have both a position player named Josh Fields (Joshua D. Fields) and a pitcher named Josh Fields (Joshua Lee Fields); they are two separate individuals.

-- MWE
   59. Shoeless Don Posted: November 01, 2006 at 05:47 PM (#2229839)
Thanks...I was just being sarcastic relative to my lack of respect or attention to the fact that numeric analysis has taken over the focus of those who watch the game...I guess I wasn't more clear in my humor....thought the ha-ha covered it...sorry....
   60. AROM wants you off his lawn Posted: November 01, 2006 at 06:08 PM (#2229849)
As has been pointed out before, the White Sox have both a position player named Josh Fields (Joshua D. Fields) and a pitcher named Josh Fields (Joshua Lee Fields); they are two separate individuals.

Do you have proof? Have you seen them on the field at the same time?
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Pirates - Acquired Milledge
(28 - 1:52am, Jul 05)

Cardinals - Acquired DeRosa
(25 - 1:36pm, Jul 04)

White Sox - Acquired Castro
(3 - 1:52pm, Jul 01)

Yankees - Acquired Hinske
(8 - 1:22pm, Jul 01)

Mariners - Acquired Langerhans
(6 - 12:49am, Jun 30)

Transaction Oracle - 3/1/01
(6 - 4:51am, Jun 25)

Orioles - Released Walker
(8 - 2:20am, Jun 23)

Braves - Acquired McLouth
(191 - 5:50pm, Jun 11)

Royals - DFAed Ramirez
(24 - 5:09pm, Jun 07)

Mets - Acquired Putz
(19 - 5:22pm, Jun 05)

Orioles - Promoted Wieters
(15 - 3:26pm, May 30)

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy concert tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Baseball Bats

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Major League Baseball: All Star Game, New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox, LA Angels, Washington Nationals, Chicago White Sox, and the Chicago Cubs.

Find terrific deals on Yankees tickets for the new home, Cubs tickets for classic Wrigley, or Red Sox tickets for Fenway with OnlineSeats. We have seats for every baseball game, including Dodgers tickets.

Page rendered in 0.7497 seconds
62 querie(s) executed