Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Transaction Oracle > Discussion
Transaction Oracle
— A Timely Look at Transactions as They Happen

Saturday, December 08, 2007

2008 ZiPS Projections - Detroit Tigers

Pretty clearly, the Tigers are one of the AL's Big 5, but I think they're probably still 5th, for the simple reason that they're ill-suited to handle injuries and various other unfortunate happenstances that can arise during the season. After the Renteria and Cabrera trades, the minor league system becomes quite a bit thinner and they simply don't have many player now, other than Porcello, that could expect to fetch much during the season. Obviously, it's a sacrifice you can make for Cabrera and Willis, but I think that's kind of a stretch for Renteria, an average SS who's still living off a defensive reputation earned years ago.

Now, if the starters stay healthy, this looks a lot like a 95-win team to me, but if Bonderman or Rogers go down, there's nobody you'd really want to plug into the rotation for a contending team - Jurrjens and Miller are gone and Durbin would be hard-pressed to put in an ERA under 5 again. There's still a whole winter to address this issue, however, so these concerns could be premature.


Name                     P  Age   AVG   OBP   SLG   G  AB   R   H 2B 3B HR RBI  BB   K SB CS 
Miguel Cabrera           3b  25  .318  .407  .559 162 601 107 191 42  2 33 122  86 105  4  2 
Magglio Ordonez          rf  34  .309  .366  .481 125 476  72 147 31  0 17  91  43  64  0  2 
Marcus Thames            lf  31  .261  .329  .534  89 283  47  74 15  1 20  62  27  75  1  1 
Carlos Guillen#          1b  31  .296  .359  .471 129 476  74 141 28  5 15  78  46  75 10  6
AVERAGE 1B ------------- 1b ---- .279  .358  .466 ------------------------------------------ 
Gary Sheffield           rf  39  .269  .366  .438  85 320  60  86 12  0 14  65  45  46  8  2 
Curtis Granderson*       cf  27  .278  .345  .475 161 608 104 169 31 13 21  87  58 153 14  3
Ryan Raburn              cf  27  .269  .344  .466 139 494  65 133 28  3 21  79  53 118 11  4 
AVERAGE LF ------------- lf ---- .277  .349  .447 ------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RF ------------- rf ---- .277  .346  .448 ------------------------------------------ 
Placido Polanco          2b  32  .317  .358  .419 122 499  77 158 26  2  7  61  24  26  4  2
AVERAGE 3B ------------- 3b ---- .274  .343  .439 ------------------------------------------ 
Edgar Renteria           ss  32  .287  .349  .395 136 547  93 157 27  1 10  62  51  85  9  4
AVERAGE CF ------------- cf ---- .272  .336  .416 ------------------------------------------
AVERAGE 2B ------------- 2b ---- .276  .337  .405 ------------------------------------------ 
Sean Casey*              1b  33  .283  .346  .388 118 410  46 116 25  0  6  55  34  48  0  1 
Jason Perry*             rf  27  .250  .328  .431 107 376  49  94 22  2 14  60  36 109  3  2
AVERAGE SS ------------- ss ---- .274  .329  .398 ------------------------------------------ 
Timo Perez*              lf  33  .279  .328  .392  95 319  31  89 19  1  5  39  21  34  5  3 
Mike Hessman             3b  30  .214  .305  .446 103 359  37  77 15  1 22  70  43 125  4  4 
AVERAGE C --------------- c ---- .260  .321  .393 ------------------------------------------
Jacque Jones*            rf  33  .267  .322  .390 119 415  50 111 19  1 10  54  30  74  5  2 
Freddy Guzman#           cf  27  .264  .335  .357 130 485  77 128 21  6  4  34  50  70 38 11 
Brandon Inge             3b  31  .246  .319  .400 152 528  69 130 27  3 16  75  50 130  5  4 
Jeffrey Larish*          1b  25  .224  .316  .387 138 478  39 107 25  1 17  65  57 125  5  4 
Ivan Rodriguez           c   36  .276  .296  .400 113 445  51 123 27  2  8  60  12  77  4  3 
Erick Almonte            ss  30  .253  .329  .349 105 372  38  94 19  1  5  41  44  88  7  4 
Michael Hollimon#        2b  26  .235  .307  .386 146 531  59 125 32  6 12  59  52 163 15  7 
Andres Torres#           cf  30  .248  .312  .373  94 327  39  81 14  6  5  32  28  81 10  6 
Tony Giarratano#         ss  25  .250  .308  .341 115 428  47 107 24  3  3  31  33  83 15  5 
Vance Wilson             c   35  .245  .296  .377  41 106  13  26  5  0  3  13   5  23  0  1 
Neifi Perez#             ss  35  .254  .282  .346  89 272  28  69 14  1  3  27  10  33  2  1 
Ramon Santiago#          ss  28  .244  .293  .335 110 349  44  85 16  2  4  33  19  55  9  5 
Brent Clevlen            cf  24  .214  .284  .326 132 420  36  90 16  2  9  40  41 153  5  3 
Henry Mateo#             2b  31  .231  .293  .311 105 350  42  81 18  2  2  27  27  64 18  9 
Matthew Joyce*           rf  23  .213  .274  .342 135 489  43 104 26  2 11  54  39 128  3  6 
Kody Kirkland            3b  25  .176  .236  .312 142 493  38  87 24  2 13  48  28 189  8  8 

* - Bats Left
# = Switch-Hitter

Name               CThr 1b 2b 3b ss lf cf rf 
Cabrera                       Fr             
Ordonez                                   Av 
Thames                  Av          Fr    Fr 
Guillen#                Av       Fr          
Sheffield               Fr          Pr    Pr 
Granderson*                         Vg Vg    
Raburn                     Fr Fr    Vg Av Av 
Polanco                    Ex                
Renteria                         Fr          
Casey*                  Vg                   
Perry*                              Fr Pr Fr 
Perez*                              Fr Pr Fr 
Hessman                 Av    Fr             
Jones*                                 Av Vg 
Guzman#                             Av Av Av 
Inge                          Vg             
Larish*                 Av                   
Rodriguez          Vg                        
Almonte                    Fr Fr Fr          
Hollimon#                  Av    Fr          
Torres#                             Vg Vg Vg 
Giarratano#                Vg Vg Vg          
Wilson             Fr                        
The Neifinator#            Av Vg Av          
Santiago#                  Av    Av          
Clevlen                             Fr Fr Fr 
Mateo#                     Fr    Fr Fr Fr    
Joyce*                              Av Pr    
Kirkland                      Av             

Player Spotlight - Curtis Granderson
Name               AVG   OBP   SLG   G  AB   R   H 2B 3B HR RBI  BB   K SB CS
Optimistic (15%)  .297  .374  .534 162 612 121 182 37 15 26 118  70 141 20  0   
Mean              .278  .345  .475 161 608 104 169 31 13 21  87  58 153 14  3 
Pessimistic (15%) .256  .314  .429 153 578  85 148 27 11 17  80  47 157  8  4

Top Near-Age Offensive Comps: Vada Pinson, Lloyd Moseby

Name                     Age    ERA   W   L   G  GS     INN    H   ER  HR   BB    K 
Joel Zumaya               23   3.53   7   3  61   0    74.0   62   29   8   38   73 
Todd Jones                40   3.75   4   2  59   0    60.0   62   25   4   15   32 
Justin Verlander          25   3.76  15   8  30  30   189.0  182   79  20   53  156 
Fernando Rodney           31   3.86   5   3  52   0    56.0   51   24   7   24   53 
Bobby Seay*               30   3.94   2   1  51   0    48.0   47   21   4   17   33 
Vic Darensbourg*          37   4.02   4   2  48   0    47.0   48   21   4   18   28 
Kenny Rogers*             43   4.11   9   6  21  21   127.0  131   58  13   42   61
LEAGUE AVERAGE RELIEVER ------ 4.21 ----------------------------------------------- 
Jason Grilli              31   4.31   4   3  54   0    71.0   72   34   7   28   50 
Dontrelle Willis*         26   4.34  14  13  35  35   224.0  241  108  23   77  162 
Jeremy Bonderman          25   4.34  12  10  30  30   197.0  205   95  23   51  166 
Nate Robertson*           30   4.45  12  11  30  30   186.0  197   92  22   60  116 
Clay Rapada*              27   4.50   5   4  60   0    68.0   70   34   6   29   43 
LEAGUE AVERAGE STARTER ------- 4.57 -----------------------------------------------
Tim Byrdak*               34   4.59   2   1  48   0    49.0   46   25   6   27   49 
Zach Miner                26   4.76   8   8  42  20   140.0  151   74  14   63   80 
Denny Bautista            27   4.91   5   5  40  12    88.0   92   48   7   53   61 
Yorman Bazardo            23   5.04   8   9  32  25   159.0  178   89  18   53   69 
Jason Karnuth             32   5.05   3   4  50   0    57.0   63   32   7   18   29 
Macay McBride*            25   5.19   4   4  66   4    78.0   82   45  10   41   58 
Preston Larrison          27   5.29   4   5  33   9    80.0   93   47   8   33   28 
Aquilino Lopez            33   5.29   3   5  51   0    68.0   73   40  13   22   55 
Ron Chiavacci             30   5.36   5   6  20  13    89.0   99   53  14   32   56 
Chad Durbin               30   5.43   5   8  27  19   126.0  144   76  22   44   62 
Jordan Tata               26   5.48   5   8  21  19   115.0  130   70  17   45   67 
Virgil Vasquez            26   5.62   6  10  25  24   149.0  173   93  29   38   88 
Dennis Tankersley         29   5.72   6   9  24  22   129.0  150   82  20   57   69 
Francisco Cruceta         26   6.04   6   9  34  21   143.0  160   96  29   63   94 
Chris Lambert             25   6.41   5   9  30  19   118.0  138   84  22   57   72 
Danny Christensen*        24   6.44   5  10  26  24   144.0  171  103  30   65   91 
Kyle Sleeth               26   9.69   2   8  22  14    65.0   88   70  22   49   34 

* - Throws Left

Player Spotlight - Jeremy Bonderman (Assuming his arm isn't shredded)
                    ERA   W   L   G  GS  INN    H   ER  HR   BB    K 
Optimistic (15%)   3.63  16   9  34  34  223  214   90  21   49  200
Mean               4.34  12  10  30  30  197  205   95  23   51  166 
Pessimistic (15%)  5.15   9  10  25  25  159  181   91  22   48  122

Top Near-Age Comps:  Oil Can Boyd, Javier Vazquez

Disclaimer:  ZiPS projections are computer-based projections of performance.  
Performances have not been allocated to predicted playing time in the majors - 
many of the players listed above are unlikely to play in the majors at all in 2008.  
ZiPS is projecting equivalent production - a .240 ZiPS projection may end up 
being .280 in AAA or .300 in AA, for example.  Whether or not a player will play 
is one of many non-statistical factors one has to take into account when predicting 
the future.

Players are listed with their most recent teams unless Dan has made a mistake.  
This is very possible as a lot of minor-league signings are generally unreported in
the offseason.  

ZiPS is projecting based on the AL having a 4.49 ERA and the NL having a 4.40 ERA.
Nationals Projections
Blue Jays Projections
Rangers Projections
Rays Projections
Cardinals Projections
Mariners Projections
Giants Projections
Padres Projections
Pirates Projections
Phillies Projections
A's Projections
Yankees Projections
Mets Projections
Twins Projections
Brewers Projections
Dodgers Projections
Angels Projections
Royals Projections
Astros Projections
Marlins Projections
Dan Szymborski Posted: December 08, 2007 at 09:48 AM | 65 comment(s)
  Related News: DetroitZIPS

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. Royce Rings Heath's Bell Posted: December 08, 2007 at 01:22 PM (#2638923)
Wouldn't Zach Miner be a potential fill-in starter? And Ryan Raburn should hopefully get a decent amount of at bats with his versatility. If only he could bat left-handed, they wouldn't have "needed" Jones.
   2. ASmitty Posted: December 08, 2007 at 02:43 PM (#2638960)
Oddly enough, Raburn had a pretty extreme platoon split last year. Only it was lefties he couldn't hit and righties he crushed.

Probably won't hold up over time, but I found that interesting.
   3. Margo Adams FC Posted: December 08, 2007 at 02:51 PM (#2638964)
That's a lot of question marks on the pitching staff for a 95-win team, and not much on the farm to help, any more. Poor, poor Tigers.
   4. Silencio Posted: December 08, 2007 at 03:31 PM (#2639001)
That's a lot of question marks on the pitching staff for a 95-win team, and not much on the farm to help, any more. Poor, poor Tigers.

5 guys in the rotation above average is alot of question marks? I think their pitching looks pretty good.
   5. GotowarMissAgnes Posted: December 08, 2007 at 03:31 PM (#2639002)
Boy, that seems pretty pessimistic on CGrand.
   6. ASmitty Posted: December 08, 2007 at 03:49 PM (#2639020)
I think most projection systems will be skeptical of Cowboy Curtis' ability to hit as many triples as he did last year.
   7. Lake Placido Polanco (Crispix Attacks) Posted: December 08, 2007 at 03:56 PM (#2639023)
Vada Pinson? Lloyd Moseby? Even the projection systems are using the complexion-based comparison technique!
   8. Stately, Plump Buck Mulligan Posted: December 08, 2007 at 04:06 PM (#2639034)
5 guys in the rotation above average is a lot of question marks?


No, 5 guys in the rotation above average is a pipe dream, especially if Cabrera is playing third base. Detroit's projected '08 rotation had a combined ERA of 4.62 in '07.
   9. Lake Placido Polanco (Crispix Attacks) Posted: December 08, 2007 at 04:18 PM (#2639045)
And they had a combined ERA of 3.86 in '06.
   10. Wally Frostbackman (Walewander) Posted: December 08, 2007 at 04:27 PM (#2639051)
If Verlander throws 180 IP, I'd bet heavily on the over for that K total.

Granderson's projection seems pretty accurate to me. I think his power was for real, but his BABIP forecasts a drop in average, thus in OBP.

Detroit's projected '08 rotation had a combined ERA of 4.62 in '07.

Two of them, maybe three, had years derailed by injuries. Seriously, how many other rotations project with 5 above average starters? How many rotations don't worry about people getting hurt? Zero. I share Dan's concerns about depth, but the frontline talent projects as well as anyone in baseball. Those same five starters put up great 06 numbers too... pitching fluctuates from year to year, but having five starters with the proven ability to throw lots of high quality innings, in a pitcher's park, with an above average defence behind them, backed by what looks to be a scary offence? That's a quandary almost any team would love to be in.

That's a lot of question marks on the pitching staff for a 95-win team, and not much on the farm to help, any more. Poor, poor Tigers.


Porcello is the definition of elite prospect. And as long as teams go along with Bud's idiotic slotting, DD will restock it with more high quality talent soon. Seriously, isn't this why you get high prospects? Either to get good cheap performance or acquire elite players? Should they have held onto them until they molder? We're talking about dealing for a 24 year-old on a HOF trajectory, and a 35 yr old with significant success, not Raul Mondesi or Andy Ashby.

The 06 Marlins had a pretty good pitching staff with Cabrera at 3B, didn't they? I'd rather have Inge there and Miggy in LF, but there is a good argument about accommodating your HOF bat, especially when you want to sign him long-term. He won't be Inge there, but I doubt his D is going to derail the whole season.

I have noticed a lot more Tigers sniping since the Miguel trade... not surprising, but it is kinda fun.

(BTW, I would project DET as the 2nd best team in the AL... and I have a feeling there will be a couple more parts to come).
   11. Margo Adams FC Posted: December 08, 2007 at 04:38 PM (#2639057)
Not to quibble with this strong roster, but when the combined era variance for your projected starting rotation over the last two years is 0.78 (and not in the good direction, either) then that suggests some questions to me, both in terms of injury risk that Dan cited and in the likely quality of innings pitched. Seriously, Willis, Rogers, Bonderman and Robertson scare no one. And as for Porcello, he ain't going to be ready next season. Still a good deal for Dombrowski, of course.
   12. Wally Frostbackman (Walewander) Posted: December 08, 2007 at 04:40 PM (#2639058)
As a bottom 2-5, how many teams would you put ahead of them in the AL? I count Angels and Red Sox.
   13. Wally Frostbackman (Walewander) Posted: December 08, 2007 at 04:41 PM (#2639059)
And is 0.78 a large swing? What is the year to year SP average?
   14. greenback06 Posted: December 08, 2007 at 04:48 PM (#2639066)
That's a positive projection for Inge. I figured he would be one of the "craters in his 30s" crowd.
   15. ASmitty Posted: December 08, 2007 at 04:52 PM (#2639070)
Seriously, Willis, Rogers, Bonderman and Robertson scare no one.


Rogers, Bonderman, and Robertson were 3/4ths of the postseason rotation that carried the Tigers to the World Series. Scary? Maybe not. Sufficient? Definately.
   16. Silencio Posted: December 08, 2007 at 05:02 PM (#2639072)
If these projections are correct there really seems to be no reason for Jones. Even with the platoon splits you'd probably be fine with some combination of Raburn and Thames against RH pitching next year. But then again the Raburn and Thames projections seem high.
   17. Dolf Lucky Posted: December 08, 2007 at 05:08 PM (#2639078)
Free Marcus Thames.
   18. 1k5v3L Posted: December 08, 2007 at 05:09 PM (#2639079)
Scary? Maybe not. Sufficient? Definately.


Or defiantly sufficient?
   19. bibigon Posted: December 08, 2007 at 05:32 PM (#2639100)
ZiPS differs pretty heavily from PECOTA on Cabrera.

.304/.381/.523 for PECOTA, as opposed to .318/.407/.559 here.
   20. Russlan roots for the mediocre Mets Posted: December 08, 2007 at 05:43 PM (#2639106)
PECOTA knocked down Cabrera's projection by 60-65 OPS points because of the league switch. Silver tends to think the difference between the leagues is about 10 wins which I find quite large but that might be the reason for the discrepancy. Either way, I hope how one player does won't be used as evidence either way.
   21. Dan Szymborski Posted: December 08, 2007 at 06:26 PM (#2639133)
I use league differences too, but I'm conservative about applying them and regress them moderately towards even.
   22. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy Posted: December 08, 2007 at 06:57 PM (#2639141)
Guillen suddenly goes from very good to league average. Tis a shame.
   23. GotowarMissAgnes Posted: December 08, 2007 at 07:16 PM (#2639144)
Sure, triples are fluky. Still that projection suggests CGrand's XBH drop by 23%. Some of those triples will become outs this year. And some will become HRs and doubles. Either way, I can't see his power dropping by that much.
   24. Margo Adams FC Posted: December 08, 2007 at 09:59 PM (#2639182)
Rogers, Bonderman, and Robertson were 3/4ths of the postseason rotation that carried the Tigers to the World Series.


By that logic, David Eckstein is a championship-caliber shortstop twice over, right?
   25. Ennder Posted: December 08, 2007 at 10:25 PM (#2639194)
304/.381/.523 for PECOTA, as opposed to .318/.407/.559 here.


The difference in AVG shows up in SLG and in OBP so the majority of the difference in those lines is PECOTA doesn't like him hitting as high. If you adjust the PECOTA line to a .318 AVG those are pretty even projections.
   26. ASmitty Posted: December 08, 2007 at 11:57 PM (#2639214)
By that logic, David Eckstein is a championship-caliber shortstop twice over, right?


No, he was 1/9th of that offense, so you're distorting the argument. It's not even close to the same thing as saying that Robertson, Rogers, and Bonderman aren't good enough to be the 2-3-4 or 3-4-5 starters on a team when those exact guys, compromising 75% of the postseason rotation and 60% of the regular season rotation, got the job done in 2006.

I'm not saying the Tigers will have the best rotation in baseball, I'm just saying they have a rotation that's more than good enough to compete. You don't have to scare people to win, you just need togive your team a chance to win.
   27. zac schmitt Posted: December 09, 2007 at 02:58 AM (#2639284)
I'm not saying the Tigers will have the best rotation in baseball, I'm just saying they have a rotation that's more than good enough to compete. You don't have to scare people to win, you just need togive your team a chance to win.


i really don't think anyone is disagreeing with you or walewander here. i think the question that's being asked (and i hope i don't misrepresent anyone) is whether you'd prefer have those five guys and basically no backup options are better than having one, two, or three guys at or near that quality and a lot of options in the minors or elsewhere within the organization, as other teams do. i think the crux of the argument against the tigers' rotation is that those guys, although all solid to very good, aren't great enough that it's worth taking over the depth other pitching staffs offer.
   28. Lake Placido Polanco (Crispix Attacks) Posted: December 09, 2007 at 03:23 AM (#2639290)
What kind of backup options do you want? They still have the guy who was their fifth starter in 2006 (Miner) and in 2007 (Durbin).

Sure, they've traded away Miller and Jurrjens (and Ledezma), but that's trading from depth. They still have Bazardo and Jordan Tata. They've just developed a lot of young starting pitchers all at once.
   29. Chuck Van Den Corput Posted: December 09, 2007 at 09:24 AM (#2639342)
Once Cabrera was acquired, some were suggesting that Detroit had become a 1000-run team. Given all the regressions you are proposing, all of which make sense, I just don't see it. Still a very strong team, to be sure, but one that may not meet its now wild expectations.
   30. Jurgen Posted: December 09, 2007 at 11:59 AM (#2639383)
i think the crux of the argument against the tigers' rotation is that those guys, although all solid to very good, aren't great enough that it's worth taking over the depth other pitching staffs offer.


Angels, yes. Probably Toronto. (But the Tigers' offense looks a lot better than Anaheim's or Toronto's.) Boston, too.

But New York?
   31. ASmitty Posted: December 09, 2007 at 12:22 PM (#2639395)
What kind of backup options do you want? They still have the guy who was their fifth starter in 2006 (Miner) and in 2007 (Durbin).


This was more or less what I was getting at. The last two seasons the Tigers really haven't had a fifth starter and now that they've added Willis, they do. Their old fifth starters move to the pen or AAA and serve as emergency starters.

I just don't see how they have *less* depth than they have had the last two years pitching-wise. I can see the argument that they aren't particularly deep, but not the argument that they're any less so than in '06 or '07.

The Tigers organization isn't deep in prospects, but the last few years they've shown they're deep in "AAAA" type replacements, which as often as not perform as well as legitimate prospects who are still a few years away from being ready for the big leagues.
   32. Walt Davis Posted: December 09, 2007 at 03:04 PM (#2639498)
On Granderson, the primary question is his K-rate. Through 06, he K'd at 1 per 3.5 AB; in 07, he K'd 1 per 4.3 which is a pretty big deal. ZIPS has (knowingly?) projected him to a K-rate of about 1 per 4 which seems reasonable. ZIPS has also regressed his BA on-contact which is also reasonable (it was 393 last year, ZIPS has it at 371 which is below his career and possibly "over-regressed" a smidgen).

But I suppose it is a little odd that, based on the same number of AB, ZIPS has docked Granderson 15 hits with 19 of those 15 hits being xbh. :-)

Now here's a factoid -- Granderson has more career triples than steals. That's got to be extremely rare (for anybody who hits a reasonable number of triples at least).
   33. GotowarMissAgnes Posted: December 09, 2007 at 03:09 PM (#2639501)
Yes, I have no objection to ZiPS projection on the BABIP, BA, K rate, or OBP. It's the XBH and subsequent SLG that seems pessimistic to me.
   34. RMc is the President of the United States Posted: December 09, 2007 at 07:34 PM (#2639640)
Detroit Tigers: 2008 and 2009 World Series Champions.

I'm smellin' dynasty, baby.
   35. GotowarMissAgnes Posted: December 09, 2007 at 08:23 PM (#2639659)
Dan, remind how ZiPS handles platoon splits. In Granderson's case, he's either going to learn to hit lefties, or he's going to continue to have his playing time (and rate stats) biased towards his splits against RHP, because he's platooned or because he bats first versus RHP and much later versus LHP. Either way, unless Dan's ZiPS projection takes that into account, it might be misleading.
   36. kwarren Posted: December 09, 2007 at 09:58 PM (#2639697)
Detroit Tigers: 2008 and 2009 World Series Champions.

I'm smellin' dynasty, baby.


Wait until you get a taste of what Willis and Bonderman will be serving up this year. Gotta hope that offense can carry the load.
   37. Dan Szymborski Posted: December 09, 2007 at 10:09 PM (#2639703)
Dan, remind how ZiPS handles platoon splits. In Granderson's case, he's either going to learn to hit lefties, or he's going to continue to have his playing time (and rate stats) biased towards his splits against RHP, because he's platooned or because he bats first versus RHP and much later versus LHP. Either way, unless Dan's ZiPS projection takes that into account, it might be misleading.

It doesn't, actually. I'm not sure if any really do that - it's kinda frustrating because generic platoon splits predict future platoon splits far better than actual platoon splits do. So I just assume past usage and work from there.
   38. Alex Gordon's #1 Fan Posted: December 10, 2007 at 12:05 AM (#2639769)

5 guys in the rotation above average is alot of question marks? I think their pitching looks pretty good.


The rotation does, but I think their bullpen has question marks, especially with Zumaya out.

9.69 ERA for Sleeth? I had no idea ZIPs went that high.
   39. tiger337 Posted: December 10, 2007 at 12:12 AM (#2639773)
Walewander, I've noticed a lot of sniping since the Cabrera trade too and I like it! In 2006, they were a nice story. In 2008, they are a high payroll team that other fans will root against. It's going to be a fun season.

The projections seem pretty reasonable to me. I would never bet against Granderson being for real though. He has exceeded his expectations all the way up the ladder. I do expect drop offs for Ordonez and Polanco so that is no surprise. If the Tigers can match the ERAs and innings pitched totals of the projections, they should be in good shape.
   40. Dan Szymborski Posted: December 10, 2007 at 08:04 AM (#2639853)
Sleeth is the current record-holder for ZiPS, the record previously being 9.42 by Chad Bentz. That's kind of skewed, however, as I don't do every player and no doubt that there are guys in low-A and lower that would be killed just as badly.
   41. The Essex Snead Posted: December 10, 2007 at 11:03 AM (#2639961)
The rotation does, but I think their bullpen has question marks, especially with Zumaya out.

However, now that Rock Band's out, he can sing & not risk exacerbating his injury while on rehab. Just keep him away from the drums.
   42. AROM Posted: December 10, 2007 at 11:18 AM (#2639992)
By that logic, David Eckstein is a championship-caliber shortstop twice over, right?


Of course he was. I don't see what you're getting at. Eckstein has been a damn good player.

AS for championship team SS in recent memory, he's better than Lugo, Uribe, Cabrera (at least better in 2002/2005 than Cabrera was in 2004), Sea Bass, and Womack.

Last championship shortstop better than the Eck was Derek Jeter.
   43. kwarren Posted: December 10, 2007 at 08:32 PM (#2640816)
How many rotations don't worry about people getting hurt? Zero.

Unfortunately, Bonderman and Willis are already hurt, and the Tigers are apparently going to throw them out there anyways. This could have a huge negative impact on both of their careers.
   44. Lake Placido Polanco (Crispix Attacks) Posted: December 10, 2007 at 08:43 PM (#2640830)
Sleeth is the current record-holder for ZiPS, the record previously being 9.42 by Chad Bentz. That's kind of skewed, however, as I don't do every player and no doubt that there are guys in low-A and lower that would be killed just as badly.

Did you do a ZiPs for Jason Neighborgall this year? I want to see quadruple-digit walks.
   45. kwarren Posted: December 10, 2007 at 08:47 PM (#2640837)
5 guys in the rotation above average is alot of question marks? I think their pitching looks pretty good.

Let's not get too carried away with this rotation just yet.

Three year trends for Willis.

Hits allowed......213, 234, 241

Home runs allowed.....11, 21, 29

BB allowed......55, 83, 87

K's......170, 160, 146

The cause of all this. He was overworked at too young an age.

197 IP at age 22, 236 IP at age 23, 224 IP at age 24.....this is sick.
Even worse than the abuse Mulder, Hudson, and Zito endured.


And then there is the Bonderman situation

Bonderman threw 234 innings (including post-season) in 2006 at age 23.
This is far too many for somebody at that age, especially for a guy
who's previous high was 189 IP.

The negative impact of this was very apparent in 07. His K-rate
dropped by 12%, and his HR-rate increased by 57%. His ERA trend from
May to Sept in 07 is as follows - 2.66, 4.99, 5.31, 6.05, 12.15. Not
too promising.

And Rogers is 43. Nuff said.

The Tigers have a great offense, but the rotation could be very
disappointing.

Ken
   46. ASmitty Posted: December 10, 2007 at 09:15 PM (#2640863)
Willis declined badly last year, but the whole "three year trend" thing, to me, is cherry picking.

Of course Willis declined in '06, who *wouldn't* decline fron that '05? His '06 was perfectly fine and better than his '04, I feel like you shouldn't penalize a guy for having a great year.

I'm not saying he'll be above average net year, I'm just saying the notion that "well he's declined two years straight" is a litle unfair.
   47. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: December 10, 2007 at 09:30 PM (#2640872)
Poor Kody Kirkland. A few years ago, it looked like he might be something, but now he'll be lucky to end up with Craig Brazell's career.
   48. kwarren Posted: December 10, 2007 at 09:42 PM (#2640881)
Willis declined badly last year, but the whole "three year trend" thing, to me, is cherry picking.

Of course Willis declined in '06, who *wouldn't* decline fron that '05? His '06 was perfectly fine and better than his '04, I feel like you shouldn't penalize a guy for having a great year.

I'm not saying he'll be above average net year, I'm just saying the notion that "well he's declined two years straight" is a litle unfair.



Of course it's cherry picking. When you want to make a point you tend to use evidence that illustrates it. However any evidence to suggest that Willis is fine, and will have a successful 08 season is skimpy at best. Don't forget that he is moving to a much tougher league. Take a look at Beckett's, Pavano's, Clement's, Vazquez's, Batista's, Horacio RAmirez's, Chan Ho Park's first AL seasons. Not pretty.

Based on his performance as a pro there was really no reason, other then workload abuse, to think that he couldn't maintain the 05 level. Until he was over-worked he was consistently superb at all levels and in every season. Just to refresh your memory his minor league ERA(s) were 2.98, 1.83, 1.80, and 1.49. And this was at 19-21 years of age. He had/has the stuff to be a Jake Peavy. To say that he "had to" decline after his 05 season, is actually pretty ridiculous. The best pitchers do maintain that level, and Willis was one great pitcher at that point. There was no real reason to expect any kind of a decline. Were you predicting one? If so, why? At least part of the reason he declined in 06 was workload related. And his 07 season was an absolute disaster, where his skill level would not even have been good for AAA.

If you don't think that he'll be above average next season, you are basically agreeing with me, while saying that you disagree. You say my method is "unfair", and yet you draw the same conclusion. Interesting.
   49. Jurgen Posted: December 10, 2007 at 10:09 PM (#2640905)
I love this new hatred for the Tigers... It's like 1908 all over again!
   50. DCA Posted: December 10, 2007 at 10:17 PM (#2640908)
Of course it's cherry picking. When you want to make a point you tend to use evidence that illustrates it.

But when you want to make a good point, you present all the evidence, and then you explain what it means.
   51. Russlan roots for the mediocre Mets Posted: December 10, 2007 at 10:18 PM (#2640910)
Willis should be in the NL. He's a tremendous hitter for a pitcher and that makes him more of an asset to a team. A .639 OPS in a tough park is very impressive.
   52. AROM Posted: December 10, 2007 at 10:55 PM (#2640929)
If Willis was on the Blue Jays could they bat him and DH for John McDonald? Or is there some rule against that?
   53. kwarren Posted: December 10, 2007 at 11:33 PM (#2640955)
But when you want to make a good point, you present all the evidence, and then you explain what it means.

OK - here is all the evidence that indicates that Willis in not "damaged goods" and that he will pitch well in 08.

- he managed to finish the season on the active roster (probably a strategic decision by the Marlins to make him more tradeable)

- he is only 25

- he has good intangibles

- the Marlins screwed around with his mechanics. the Tigers will let him pitch the way he wants.

- he will be more motivated in a pennant race

- Sheffield & Magglio will get him on the "cream" to build up his strength

- AL hitters will not be comfortable facing his unorthodox delivery

- Pudge (who also knows a bit about PED) knows how to handle pitchers better than Olivio

- Granderson will be in centre field

- Leyland is better at handling pitchers than his Florida counterparts

- less hot weather to deal with in Detroit


There you have it. The opposing viewpoint. Willis will likely get his ERA back to 3.50.
   54. strummer Posted: December 11, 2007 at 03:31 PM (#2641617)
Willis will likely get his ERA back to 3.50.

Whew. I'm glad that is decided; I was getting worried there for a while.

Go Tigers!
   55. AlexIsADirtySanchez Posted: December 14, 2007 at 12:16 AM (#2645279)
Dan, I am interested in the Rule 5s. I would love to see some of the picks compared to available players on the farms. Any chance you could look at those?
   56. Margo Adams FC Posted: December 14, 2007 at 12:44 AM (#2645296)
By that logic, David Eckstein is a championship-caliber shortstop twice over, right?


Of course he was. I don't see what you're getting at. Eckstein has been a damn good player.


Point I was making is that when a team wins it tells us very little about any given player on that team, beyong the fact that they're at least serviceable, like Eckstein.
   57. scoresheetwiz Posted: December 29, 2007 at 09:38 PM (#2656648)
That's a lot of question marks on the pitching staff for a 95-win team, and not much on the farm to help, any more.


It seems lately the Tigers have had a way of producing adequate fill-in pitching out of nowhere. I am more worried about their not coming up with any dominant relief pitching.
   58. GotowarMissAgnes Posted: January 04, 2008 at 02:13 PM (#2660239)
It doesn't, actually. I'm not sure if any really do that - it's kinda frustrating because generic platoon splits predict future platoon splits far better than actual platoon splits do. So I just assume past usage and work from there.


While I buy that for the majority of players generic platoon splits predict best, I would bet that for a subset of left-handed hitters actual platoon splits, appropriately regressed to the mean, would predict better. It'd be interesting to see some research on that.
   59. Dan Szymborski Posted: January 04, 2008 at 04:41 PM (#2660437)
I should note I also have a policy about doubling the word for minimal gain!
   60. GotowarMissAgnes Posted: January 05, 2008 at 05:26 PM (#2661192)
I can understand trying to focus on the best bang for the buck, but maybe this could put you over the top in next year's projection assessments!
   61. Joe C isn't Posted: January 10, 2008 at 01:03 PM (#2665494)
Detroit Tigers: 2008 and 2009 World Series Champions.

I'm smellin' dynasty, baby.


The fifth best team in the AL? Good luck with that.
   62. Clarence Thomas luuuvs Jacoby Ellsbury (scott) Posted: January 15, 2008 at 05:14 AM (#2668551)
i just wanted to point out that Miguel Cabrera was rated fair by Syzm at 3b.

i'd posit the system for that might need a touch of retuning.

unless Fr means Freaking Terrible.
   63. Dan Szymborski Posted: January 15, 2008 at 10:17 AM (#2668588)
i just wanted to point out that Miguel Cabrera was rated fair by Syzm at 3b.

i'd posit the system for that might need a touch of retuning.


My cutoff for guys who I have solid stats for is -12 runs.

I have Cabrera projected at -11. Chone has him at -10. The last 2 years, I have him at -11. The last 2 years, Pinto had him at a total of 24 plays below average, which is less than 24 runs.

He's on the cusp, but he's clearly not quite at PR yet.
   64. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: January 15, 2008 at 10:24 AM (#2668594)
"There you have it. The opposing viewpoint."

You forgot the bit about the Marlins having a horrible, horrible infield defense.
   65. Dan Szymborski Posted: January 15, 2008 at 10:27 AM (#2668598)
The last 2 years, I have him at -11.

That's per, not total.
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

Ticket Nest sells Braves, Cubs, Padres, Indians, Marlins, Nuts, Pirates, Rangers, Patriots, Royals, Stars, Tides, Tigers, Twins, Phillies, Wings, Mets, Yankees, Angels, Dodgers tickets, and Dragons tickets.

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 1.5565 seconds
61 querie(s) executed