Pods has no business being on a major league roster, unless one thinks being able to help an offense score runs or a defense prevent runs is something to be valued.

Methinks this isn't what you meant.

Scott...of the Sahara!

Pods has no business being on a major league roster, unless one thinks being able to help an offense score runs or a defense prevent runs is something to be valued.

Also true of Albert Pujols. Unless...something was misworded?

Dan --

Are you going to get the rest of the teams as far as your ZiPS write-ups? I know you posted the Sox' ZiPS on facebook but I enjoy equally the team overview that usually goes along with them...

Are you going to get the rest of the teams as far as your ZiPS write-ups? I know you posted the Sox' ZiPS on facebook but I enjoy equally the team overview that usually goes along with them...

I got caught in a huge March ZiPS rush and then had an emergency to kept me mostly away from internet for more than a week. If people are still interested, I could do something for the Sox and Yankees, maybe post everyone's full ODDIBEs. I had kind of assumed that people didn't really care too much since the ZiPS for those teams were released, but I've been getting e-mails that suggest I should reconsider.

I think that it would be nice. I consider TO to be the Primer thread of record (so to speak) for transactions, both big and small, so it's nice to have something to refer back to. In a couple of years when someone accuses Primer group think on a particular acquisition, the TO entry is what I look at as a gauge for what the community was thinking. There's too many Newsblog threads with a relatively marginal search function, so usually it's too time-consuming to locate threads about particular transactions outside TO, IMHO.

Podsednik? What year is it?

Also, Civony? It's good marketing. As I'm living in my parents' basement, I could use a break from computing VORP, WARP, etc to play some Renaissance world conquering game. My Lord!