Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Primate Studies > Discussion
Primate Studies
— Where BTF's Members Investigate the Grand Old Game

Monday, September 16, 2002

Win Values: Updated for 1969, 1974-1977

Introduction

The wonderful Retrosheet volunteers have recently released additional seasons of play-by-play data.  Thus, I am now able to extend my win value analysis for the 1969 & 1974-1977 seasons, in addition to the 1978-2001 seasons I reported in a previous article.

Yearly Results for 1969, 1974-1977

In this section I will report the top 10 Win Values for each league for each of the newly released seasons by Retrosheet.[1]

Table 57A: 1969 AL Win Value Leaders

  W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Denny McLain 24-9 134 4.2 5.56
Mike Cuellar 23-11 150 4.8 4.54
Mel Stottlemyre 20-14 123 2.9 3.67
Sam McDowell 18-14 128 3.3 3.57
Fritz Peterson 17-16 137 3.7 3.39
Jim Perry 20-6 130 3.0 3.28
Blue Moon Odom 15-6 118 1.7 2.80
Andy Messersmith 16-11 138 3.5 2.71
Jim Palmer 16-4 153 3.1 2.46
Dick Bosman 14-5 158 3.6 2.23

Denny McLain and Mike Cuellar tied for the 1969 AL Cy Young award.  McLain had the better W-L record while Cuellar had the better ERA.  Win values indicate that McLain actually contributed more to his team.  McLain was coming off his stellar 31-win 1968 season.  The Cy Young tie led to a change in the balloting.  Starting in 1970 voters designated 1st, 2nd, 3rd place pitchers, whereas previously they just voted for number one.  With this change, there hasn’t been a Cy Young tie since 1969.

Table 57B: 1969 NL Win Value Leaders

  W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Bob Gibson 20-13 164 6.2 6.60
Tom Seaver 25-7 166 5.5 6.32
Juan Marichal 21-11 167 5.9 5.94
Jerry Koosman 17-9 161 4.6 5.33
Steve Carlton 17-11 165 4.7 4.69
Bill Singer 20-12 142 4.7 4.39
Bill Hands 20-14 162 6.1 4.30
Phil Niekro 23-13 141 4.1 3.85
Larry Dierker 20-13 152 5.4 3.78
Fergie Jenkins 21-15 126 3.3 3.18

1969 was a great year for starting pitchers in the NL.  Gibson, Seaver, and Marichal all had great seasons.  Seaver was the runaway winner of the Cy Young award (remember the Miracle Mets), but both WAA and win values indicate that Gibson was the best pitcher in the league.  Like Denny McLain, Gibson followed up his stellar 1968 season with a great season of his own.  Of course, this was not the first nor would be the last year in which Cy Young voters were overly impressed by a pitcher’s W-L record (though I am not saying that Seaver was not a deserving Cy Young winner).

Table 58A: 1974 AL Win Value Leaders

  W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Gaylord Perry 21-13 144 5.1 5.30
Fergie Jenkins 25-12 126 3.5 4.77
Luis Tiant 22-13 132 3.9 4.71
Catfish Hunter 25-12 134 4.0 3.72
Nolan Ryan 22-16 119 2.6 3.62
Jim Kaat 21-13 128 3.1 3.61
Bert Blyleven 17-17 140 4.3 3.21
Al Fitzmorris 13-6 137 2.6 3.16
Steve Busby 22-14 113 1.7 3.15
Bart Johnson 10-4 136 1.6 2.94

Catfish Hunter edged Fergie Jenkins for the 1974 AL Cy Young award.  Actually, according to both WAA and win values, Gaylord Perry was the league’s best pitcher.  Perry had another very good year for the Indians after previously winning the 1972 Cy Young award with Cleveland.  Note that this was Jenkins’ first year in the AL after being traded by the Cubs to Texas.  So the top two pitchers in the AL in 1974 (according to win values) were both formerly stars in the NL.

Table 58B: 1974 NL Win Value Leaders

  W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Phil Niekro 20-13 159 5.8 4.71
Jon Matlack 13-15 148 4.4 3.95
Jim Barr 13-9 139 3.5 3.77
Buzz Capra 16-8 166 4.5 3.77
Lynn McGlothen 16-12 133 3.0 3.41
Andy Messersmith 20-6 132 3.5 3.30
Larry Dierker 11-10 120 1.9 2.66
Jim Lonborg 17-13 118 2.2 2.48
Tommy John 13-3 132 1.8 2.43
Jim Rooker 15-11 125 2.5 1.87

Phil Niekro comfortably led the NL in both WAA and win values in 1974 .  But Knucksie was destined never to come close to winning a Cy Young award.  Mike Marshall and his 106 relief appearances copped the Cy Young for the pennant-winning Dodgers.  We see that Jon Matlack had a losing record for the disappointing Mets despite a great ERA.  Also, we see the remnants of the very promising season in which Tommy John hurt his arm in mid-July.

Table 59A: 1975 AL Win Value Leaders

  W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Jim Palmer 23-11 168 6.6 7.12
Jim Kaat 20-14 125 3.1 3.44
Catfish Hunter 23-14 143 4.9 3.42
Steve Busby 18-12 125 2.7 3.07
Frank Tanana 16-9 136 3.4 2.89
Bert Blyleven 15-10 128 3.2 2.41
Dennis Eckersley 13-7 146 3.0 2.25
Mike Torrez 20-9 115 1.7 2.15
Roger Moret 14-3 113 0.9 2.12
Ed Figueroa 16-13 122 2.2 1.90

Jim Palmer won the 1975 AL trifecta: winning the Cy Young award and leading the league in WAA and win values.  This actually doesn’t happen very often.  Palmer’s season was the 7th best win value figure since 1974 (including 1969).  Actually, he edged out Catfish Hunter for the Cy Young award as the voters continue to be obsessed with a pitcher’s win total, especially getting to 20 wins.  Not to mention that this was Hunter’s first year pitching for the Yankees during which he received tremendous notoriety.  The Frank Tanana listed above threw very hard (unlike his later self), and led the league with 269 strikeouts.

Table 59B: 1975 NL Win Value Leaders

  W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Tom Seaver 22-9 146 4.4 4.73
Andy Messersmith 19-14 149 5.3 4.49
John Montefusco 15-9 132 3.1 4.31
Randy Jones 20-12 155 5.1 3.81
Jerry Reuss 18-11 140 3.5 3.75
Don Sutton 16-13 119 2.0 2.99
Don Gullet 15-4 149 2.6 2.76
Burt Hooton 18-9 112 1.9 2.49
Doug Rau 15-9 110 1.1 1.93
Bob Forsch 15-10 132 2.9 1.86

Tom Seaver edged Randy Jones for the 1975 NL Cy Young award.  I look forward to Retrosheet eventually releasing all of the seasons covering Seaver’s illustrious career since I am very curious in seeing how Seaver compares to the other pitching greats of the modern era.  In our historical journey, we see that Andy Messersmith had a great 1975 season for the Dodgers, the year before he was declared a free agent (after which injuries allowed him to win only 18 games for the rest of his career).

Table 60A: 1976 AL Win Value Leaders

  W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Mark Fidrych 19-9 159 4.9 5.95
Vida Blue 18-13 143 4.4 5.81
Frank Tanana 19-10 137 3.9 4.79
Jim Palmer 22-13 130 3.6 4.63
Bert Blyleven 13-16 125 2.4 4.05
Luis Tiant 21-12 128 3.2 3.51
Mike Torrez 16-12 134 3.4 2.48
Wayne Garland 20-7 123 2.1 2.19
Bill Travers 15-16 124 2.4 1.88
Dock Ellis 17-8 107 0.7 1.87

Jim Palmer won the 1976 AL Cy Young award.  Runner-up Mark Fidrych had his moment in the sun, leading the league in WAA and win values.  Palmer won 22 games in 40 starts whereas Fidrych won 19 games in only 29 starts.  Maybe Fidrych would have won the Cy Young had he gotten to 20 wins.  Vida Blue had another very good year, despite only an 18-13 record.  Blue’s career prospects might have never looked better than after his 27 year-old season; for his career to date he was 110-67 with a very good 129 ERA+. 

Table 60B: 1976 NL Win Value Leaders

  W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Don Sutton 21-10 111 1.3 3.74
Doug Rau 16-12 132 2.8 3.65
Jerry Koosman 21-10 123 2.2 3.62
Tom Seaver 14-11 127 2.8 3.40
Ray Burris 15-13 124 2.5 3.22
John Montefusco 16-14 128 2.8 3.12
Randy Jones 22-14 120 2.5 2.87
Steve Carlton 20-7 113 1.4 2.50
John Denny 11-9 140 3.0 2.44
J.R. Richard 20-15 116 1.9 2.35

1976 was a down year for NL starting pitchers.  Randy Jones won the Cy Young award in a fairly close vote over Jerry Koosman.  John Denny (and his 11-9 record) led the league in WAA and Don Sutton (gasp) led the league in win values.  If I were a Cy Young voter I may have looked for a relief pitcher, but this was the year before Bruce Sutter broke on to the scene.

Table 61A: 1977 AL Win Value Leaders

  W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Jim Palmer 20-11 131 3.7 5.50
Frank Tanana 15-9 155 4.4 4.13
Dennis Leonard 20-12 133 3.7 3.60
Nolan Ryan 19-16 142 4.5 3.48
Bert Blyleven 14-12 150 4.1 3.34
Ron Guidry 16-7 140 3.1 3.23
Dennis Eckersley 14-13 112 1.3 2.53
Gaylord Perry 15-12 122 2.2 2.40
Doyle Alexander 17-11 112 1.3 2.39
Dave Rozema 15-7 139 3.3 2.35

Sparky Lyle edged Jim Palmer (along with Nolan Ryan and Dennis Leonard) for the 1977 AL Cy Young award.  I guess the voters were tired of voting for Palmer every year; he had won 3 of the previous 4 Cy Youngs.  Palmer is another pitcher for whom I would love to see the complete record of win value figures.  We are currently missing the 1970-1973 seasons, in each of which Palmer had a great season.

Table 61B: 1977 NL Win Value Leaders

  W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
John Candelaria 20-5 170 5.0 6.43
Rick Reuschel 20-10 158 5.0 5.67
Tom Seaver 21-6 150 4.6 5.12
Steve Carlton 23-10 152 5.1 4.35
Tommy John 20-7 138 3.1 3.28
J.R. Richard 18-12 120 2.2 3.26
Bob Forsch 20-7 111 1.1 2.95
Don Sutton 14-8 120 2.1 2.51
Burt Hooton 12-7 146 3.7 2.33
Steve Rogers 17-16 123 2.8 2.17

John Candelaria’s 170 ERA+ is the highest among this new batch of seasons (1969, 1974-1977).  Of course, there have been numerous seasons with higher ERA+ since 1977; in addition, there were five instances of a higher ERA+ in the intervening 1970-1973 seasons (Seaver, Wood, and Blue in 1971, Carlton in 1972, and Seaver again in 1973).  Steve Carlton easily won the 1977 NL Cy Young award; he had a great season and the voters loved his 23 wins.  Carlton is another modern pitcher for whom I’d love to have the complete win value record.  Tom Seaver had another great year, despite being shockingly traded in mid-June from the Mets to the Reds.

Top Starters

In this section I will present the partial season-by-season Win Value records for several of the top starting pitchers of the 1970’s (whom I did not include in the previous article).  In all cases, their entire careers to date will be presented.[2]  I tried to include any pitcher who started a significant number of games in their career in seasons for which we have win values data (1969, 1974-2001) and had either 200 wins or 450 starts in their career.

Along with Win Values, I will report the pitcher’s W-L, ERA+, and WAA figures.  We will then be able to see if some pitchers’ career Win Value significantly exceed their WAA.  In such a case, the pitcher can be said to be under-valued by traditional sabermetric methods.

Table 62: Win Values for Top Stars since 1973[3]

  W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Roger Clemens (a) 280-145 145 65.2 66.56
Greg Maddux (a) 257-146 145 58.0 56.92
Tom Seaver 311-205 127 51.5 54.91
Jim Palmer 268-152 125 39.7 44.90
Randy Johnson (a) 200-101 141 41.8 42.36
Bert Blyleven 287-250 118 38.3 38.12
Gaylord Perry 314-265 117 39.1 37.33
Pedro Martinez (a) 132-59 169 36.8 35.09
Steve Carlton 329-244 115 35.1 35.02
Fergie Jenkins 284-226 115 29.4 33.63
Mike Mussina (a) 164-92 131 28.7 31.59
Nolan Ryan 324-292 112 26.1 31.05
Kevin Brown (a) 180-118 131 33.6 30.64
Phil Niekro 318-274 115 36.3 30.56
Tom Glavine (a) 224-132 122 28.3 30.53
Bret Saberhagen 167-117 125 27.0 28.30
Don Sutton 324-256 108 19.0 28.21
David Cone 193-123 119 25.1 27.45
Tommy John 288-231 110 23.6 26.69
Kevin Appier (a) 147-115 125 23.8 26.64
Jimmy Key 186-117 122 23.8 25.31
Curt Schilling (a) 132-101 126 23.1 25.07
Luis Tiant 229-172 114 20.4 24.49
Ron Guidry 170-91 119 19.9 24.28
Chuck Finley (a) 189-158 116 21.3 23.49
Rick Reuschel 214-191 114 21.9 22.87
Dave Stieb 176-137 122 27.2 22.84
John Smoltz (a) 160-116 122 22.0 22.73
Orel Hershiser 204-150 111 17.3 21.23
Jack Morris 254-186 105 7.4 18.79
Dwight Gooden 194-112 110 13.9 18.60
Vida Blue 209-161 108 12.6 18.55
Bob Welch 211-146 106 8.9 17.82
Frank Viola 176-150 112 16.0 17.14
Jerry Koosman 222-209 110 17.2 16.47
Dennis Martinez 245-193 106 10.7 14.17
David Wells (a) 166-114 110 11.1 14.12
Frank Tanana 240-236 106 10.4 11.44
Charlie Hough 216-216 106 10.4 9.22
Dave Stewart 168-129 100 -1.0 7.84
Catfish Hunter 224-166 104 7.1 7.46
Doyle Alexander 194-174 103 3.0 7.38
Mike Torrez 185-160 97 -4.1 1.31
Jerry Reuss 220-191 100 -0.3 -0.49
Joe Niekro 221-204 97 -4.9 -2.88

 We will now turn to a season-by-season review of each of these top starting pitchers.[4]

Table 63: Win Values for Tom Seaver

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Tom Seaver 1967 16-13 123 2.3 n.a.
Tom Seaver 1968 16-12 137 3.0 n.a.
Tom Seaver 1969 25-7 166 5.5 6.32
Tom Seaver 1970 18-12 143 4.5 n.a.
Tom Seaver 1971 20-10 194 7.0 n.a.
Tom Seaver 1972 21-12 115 1.7 n.a.
Tom Seaver 1973 19-10 174 6.3 n.a.
Tom Seaver 1974 11-11 112 1.3 1.70
Tom Seaver 1975 22-9 146 4.4 4.73
Tom Seaver 1976 14-11 127 2.8 3.40
Tom Seaver 1977 21-6 150 4.6 5.12
Tom Seaver 1978 16-14 124 2.4 1.52
Tom Seaver 1979 16-6 119 1.7 2.20
Tom Seaver 1980 10-8 98 -0.2 0.40
Tom Seaver 1981 14-2 140 2.4 2.55
Tom Seaver 1982 5-13 67 -2.7 -2.13
Tom Seaver 1983 9-14 103 0.2 -0.85
Tom Seaver 1984 15-11 105 0.5 1.56
Tom Seaver 1985 16-11 136 3.4 2.81
Tom Seaver 1986 7-13 105 0.4 0.78
           
Career   311-205 127 51.5 54.91

70% of Seaver’s career is covered by win values (as another reminder, the career win value figure in the table above uses the WAA figures for any seasons for which win values are currently unavailable).  Tom Seaver is clearly an all-time great.  Seaver falls just a little short of Clemens and Maddux in career win values according to the table above.  But we will have more to say about where Seaver belongs in the next section.

Table 64: Win Values for Jim Palmer

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Jim Palmer 1965 5-4 93 -0.1 n.a.
Jim Palmer 1966 15-10 96 -0.7 n.a.
Jim Palmer 1967 3-1 107 0.1 n.a.
Jim Palmer 1968 Dnp - - -
Jim Palmer 1969 16-4 153 3.1 2.46
Jim Palmer 1970 20-10 134 3.9 n.a.
Jim Palmer 1971 20-9 125 2.8 n.a.
Jim Palmer 1972 21-10 149 4.3 n.a.
Jim Palmer 1973 22-9 156 5.5 n.a.
Jim Palmer 1974 7-12 106 0.4 0.63
Jim Palmer 1975 23-11 168 6.6 7.12
Jim Palmer 1976 22-13 130 3.6 4.63
Jim Palmer 1977 20-11 131 3.7 5.50
Jim Palmer 1978 21-12 142 4.4 4.02
Jim Palmer 1979 10-6 122 1.4 1.36
Jim Palmer 1980 16-10 100 -0.1 0.63
Jim Palmer 1981 7-8 97 -0.2 0.10
Jim Palmer 1982 15-5 129 2.6 3.34
Jim Palmer 1983 5-4 94 -0.3 0.15
Jim Palmer 1984 0-3 42 -1.3 -0.84
           
Career   268-152 125 39.7 44.90

67% of career covered by win values.  Jim Palmer was one of the very best pitchers throughout the 1970’s, winning 20 games eight times.  Palmer’s win values are moderately higher than WAA, and we are missing some of his best seasons (1970-1973).

Table 65: Win Values for Bert Blyleven

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Bert Blyleven 1970 10-9 117 1.2 n.a.
Bert Blyleven 1971 16-15 126 3.0 n.a.
Bert Blyleven 1972 17-17 118 2.1 n.a.
Bert Blyleven 1973 20-17 157 6.3 n.a.
Bert Blyleven 1974 17-17 140 4.3 3.21
Bert Blyleven 1975 15-10 128 3.2 2.41
Bert Blyleven 1976 13-16 125 3.0 4.05
Bert Blyleven 1977 14-12 150 4.1 3.34
Bert Blyleven 1978 14-10 122 2.2 2.02
Bert Blyleven 1979 12-5 108 0.8 0.72
Bert Blyleven 1980 8-13 95 -0.5 -0.10
Bert Blyleven 1981 11-7 126 1.7 2.01
Bert Blyleven 1982 2-2 84 -0.2 -0.48
Bert Blyleven 1983 7-10 109 0.6 0.21
Bert Blyleven 1984 19-7 143 3.8 3.06
Bert Blyleven 1985 17-16 134 4.0 2.70
Bert Blyleven 1986 17-14 108 0.9 1.20
Bert Blyleven 1987 15-12 116 1.9 2.48
Bert Blyleven 1988 10-17 75 -3.7 -2.44
Bert Blyleven 1989 17-5 140 3.5 4.12
Bert Blyleven 1990 8-7 73 -2.6 -2.08
Bert Blyleven 1991 Dnp - - -
Bert Blyleven 1992 8-12 84 -1.3 -0.91
           
Career   287-250 118 38.3 38.12

82% of career is covered by win values.  I am confident that most people reading this will already be familiar with the puzzling case of Bert Blyleven.  By all sabermetric measures I have ever seen, Blyleven is a solid Hall of Famer.  There are reasons why Bert is having so much trouble getting into Cooperstown, but they are all crappy reasons.

Table 66: Win Values for Gaylord Perry

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Gaylord Perry 1962 3-1 73 -0.6 n.a.
Gaylord Perry 1963 1-6 79 -0.6 n.a.
Gaylord Perry 1964 12-11 130 1.6 n.a.
Gaylord Perry 1965 8-12 86 -0.9 n.a.
Gaylord Perry 1966 21-8 123 2.1 n.a.
Gaylord Perry 1967 15-17 126 2.8 n.a.
Gaylord Perry 1968 16-15 120 2.0 n.a.
Gaylord Perry 1969 19-14 141 4.6 2.52
Gaylord Perry 1970 23-13 124 3.3 n.a.
Gaylord Perry 1971 16-12 123 2.6 n.a.
Gaylord Perry 1972 24-16 168 6.8 n.a.
Gaylord Perry 1973 19-19 116 2.4 n.a.
Gaylord Perry 1974 21-13 144 5.1 5.30
Gaylord Perry 1975 18-17 117 2.2 1.87
Gaylord Perry 1976 15-14 111 1.3 1.47
Gaylord Perry 1977 15-12 122 2.2 2.40
Gaylord Perry 1978 21-6 122 2.3 1.99
Gaylord Perry 1979 12-11 116 1.6 1.95
Gaylord Perry 1980 10-13 106 0.6 -0.32
Gaylord Perry 1981 8-9 91 -0.6 0.33
Gaylord Perry 1982 10-12 97 -0.5 0.05
Gaylord Perry 1983 7-14 90 -1.2 -1.73
           
Career   314-265 117 39.1 37.33

55% of career covered by win values.  Gaylord Perry really was a great pitcher, despite the reputation that has surrounded him for years.  He will look even better when account is taken of his longevity in the next section.

Table 67: Win Values for Steve Carlton

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Steve Carlton 1965 0-0 153 0.2 n.a.
Steve Carlton 1966 3-3 115 0.4 n.a.
Steve Carlton 1967 14-9 110 0.9 n.a.
Steve Carlton 1968 13-11 97 -0.1 n.a.
Steve Carlton 1969 17-11 165 4.7 4.69
Steve Carlton 1970 10-19 111 1.2 n.a.
Steve Carlton 1971 20-9 101 0.2 n.a.
Steve Carlton 1972 27-10 182 8.2 n.a.
Steve Carlton 1973 13-20 98 -0.4 n.a.
Steve Carlton 1974 16-13 118 2.2 1.11
Steve Carlton 1975 15-14 105 0.6 1.09
Steve Carlton 1976 20-7 113 1.4 2.50
Steve Carlton 1977 23-10 152 5.1 4.35
Steve Carlton 1978 16-13 126 2.5 0.98
Steve Carlton 1979 18-11 106 0.7 1.47
Steve Carlton 1980 24-9 162 6.0 5.85
Steve Carlton 1981 13-4 150 3.3 2.69
Steve Carlton 1982 23-11 118 2.4 4.09
Steve Carlton 1983 15-16 115 1.7 1.47
Steve Carlton 1984 13-7 102 0.1 0.23
Steve Carlton 1985 1-8 111 0.5 -0.50
Steve Carlton 1986 9-14 83 -2.8 -2.79
Steve Carlton 1987 6-14 80 -2.3 -2.55
Steve Carlton 1988 0-1 24 -1.6 -0.26
           
Career   329-244 115 35.1 35.02

71% of career covered by win values.  Steve Carlton was a tremendous pitcher.  I am very curious to see how win values evaluates Carlton’s fantastic 1972 season (27-10 for the woeful 59-97 Phillies).  Like many players, he undoubtedly hung on too long but it is extremely difficult for any major leaguer, and especially stars, to pick just the right time to retire.

Table 68: Win Values for Fergie Jenkins

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Fergie Jenkins 1965 2-1 158 0.3 n.a.
Fergie Jenkins 1966 6-8 111 0.4 n.a.
Fergie Jenkins 1967 20-13 127 3.0 n.a.
Fergie Jenkins 1968 20-15 120 2.2 n.a.
Fergie Jenkins 1969 21-15 126 3.3 3.18
Fergie Jenkins 1970 22-16 133 4.2 n.a.
Fergie Jenkins 1971 24-13 142 5.2 n.a.
Fergie Jenkins 1972 20-12 119 2.4 n.a.
Fergie Jenkins 1973 14-16 102 0.2 n.a.
Fergie Jenkins 1974 25-12 126 3.5 4.77
Fergie Jenkins 1975 17-18 96 -0.8 0.67
Fergie Jenkins 1976 12-11 120 1.8 1.70
Fergie Jenkins 1977 10-10 122 1.9 0.92
Fergie Jenkins 1978 18-8 124 2.4 3.26
Fergie Jenkins 1979 16-14 102 0.0 0.71
Fergie Jenkins 1980 12-12 103 0.3 1.47
Fergie Jenkins 1981 5-8 77 -1.5 -0.90
Fergie Jenkins 1982 14-15 119 1.8 0.49
Fergie Jenkins 1983 6-9 88 -1.2 -0.54
           
Career   284-226 115 29.4 33.63

60% of career covered by win values.  Fergie Jenkins was a consistent 20-game winner for the Cubs in the late 1960’s/early 1970’s.  One key to his success was that Jenkins did not walk many batters (a key to winning in a hitter’s ballpark).

Table 69: Win Values for Nolan Ryan

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Nolan Ryan 1966 0-1 24 -0.6 n.a.
Nolan Ryan 1967 Dnp - - -
Nolan Ryan 1968 6-9 98 -0.5 n.a.
Nolan Ryan 1969 6-3 104 0.1 -0.02
Nolan Ryan 1970 7-11 118 1.0 n.a.
Nolan Ryan 1971 10-14 86 -1.3 n.a.
Nolan Ryan 1972 19-16 128 2.9 n.a.
Nolan Ryan 1973 21-16 124 3.1 n.a.
Nolan Ryan 1974 22-16 119 2.6 3.62
Nolan Ryan 1975 14-12 103 0.2 0.87
Nolan Ryan 1976 17-18 99 0.0 1.62
Nolan Ryan 1977 19-16 142 4.5 3.48
Nolan Ryan 1978 10-13 97 -0.5 0.07
Nolan Ryan 1979 16-14 114 1.3 1.05
Nolan Ryan 1980 11-10 98 -0.2 0.22
Nolan Ryan 1981 11-5 195 3.5 2.66
Nolan Ryan 1982 16-12 105 0.6 1.53
Nolan Ryan 1983 14-9 114 1.2 2.10
Nolan Ryan 1984 12-11 109 0.8 0.68
Nolan Ryan 1985 10-12 91 -1.2 -0.38
Nolan Ryan 1986 12-8 108 0.7 0.77
Nolan Ryan 1987 8-16 142 3.2 2.41
Nolan Ryan 1988 12-11 95 -0.6 -0.43
Nolan Ryan 1989 16-10 124 2.3 2.80
Nolan Ryan 1990 13-9 114 1.2 1.01
Nolan Ryan 1991 12-6 139 2.4 3.20
Nolan Ryan 1992 5-9 102 0.1 0.14
Nolan Ryan 1993 5-5 85 -0.7 -0.95
           
Career   324-292 112 26.1 31.05

80% of career covered by win values.  There is almost no way to accurately capture Nolan Ryan’s career.  He is the most extreme in many dimensions, so if there is any slight “bias” in a stat, it will be magnified the most for Ryan.  Win values indicate that Ryan truly was a great pitcher during his career (note that win values are moderately higher than WAA).  Remember that win values looks at run prevention in its totality; that is, it does not consider whether the pitcher was a strikeout artist or a control pitcher who relies on his defense.  I guess that means that win values may undervalue Ryan.

Table 70: Win Values for Phil Niekro

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Phil Niekro 1964 0-0 73 -0.1 n.a.
Phil Niekro 1965 2-3 122 0.5 n.a.
Phil Niekro 1966 4-3 88 -0.3 n.a.
Phil Niekro 1967 11-9 178 3.8 n.a.
Phil Niekro 1968 14-12 116 1.5 n.a.
Phil Niekro 1969 23-13 141 4.1 3.85
Phil Niekro 1970 12-18 101 0.0 n.a.
Phil Niekro 1971 15-14 125 2.7 n.a.
Phil Niekro 1972 16-12 124 2.9 n.a.
Phil Niekro 1973 13-10 119 2.0 n.a.
Phil Niekro 1974 20-13 159 5.8 4.71
Phil Niekro 1975 15-15 118 2.2 1.61
Phil Niekro 1976 17-11 115 1.8 2.13
Phil Niekro 1977 16-20 110 1.7 -0.41
Phil Niekro 1978 19-18 141 5.1 2.76
Phil Niekro 1979 21-20 120 3.0 1.06
Phil Niekro 1980 15-18 103 0.4 1.06
Phil Niekro 1981 7-7 116 1.0 0.47
Phil Niekro 1982 17-4 104 0.5 0.50
Phil Niekro 1983 11-10 98 -0.3 0.67
Phil Niekro 1984 16-8 123 2.0 2.03
Phil Niekro 1985 16-12 98 -0.3 0.64
Phil Niekro 1986 11-11 96 -0.6 -2.11
Phil Niekro 1987 7-13 73 -3.1 -1.41
           
Career   318-274 115 36.3 30.56

70% of career covered by win values.  Phil Niekro racked up a ton of innings in his career.  In the middle of his career, he started over 40 games three seasons in a row (and over 300 innings).  Note that Niekro’s win values seems significantly lower than WAA.  I am not sure why.  Possibly Niekro gave up a lot of unearned runs in his career, which would be reflected in his win values (but not his WAA).

Table 71: Win Values for Don Sutton

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Don Sutton 1966 12-12 110 1.0 n.a.
Don Sutton 1967 11-15 79 -2.7 n.a.
Don Sutton 1968 11-15 106 0.5 n.a.
Don Sutton 1969 17-18 96 -0.6 -0.37
Don Sutton 1970 15-13 94 -0.9 n.a.
Don Sutton 1971 17-12 127 2.7 n.a.
Don Sutton 1972 19-9 160 5.2 n.a.
Don Sutton 1973 18-10 142 3.7 n.a.
Don Sutton 1974 19-9 106 0.7 1.61
Don Sutton 1975 16-13 119 2.0 2.99
Don Sutton 1976 21-10 111 1.3 3.74
Don Sutton 1977 14-8 120 2.1 2.51
Don Sutton 1978 15-11 99 -0.3 -0.42
Don Sutton 1979 12-15 95 -0.7 -1.07
Don Sutton 1980 13-5 159 4.0 4.40
Don Sutton 1981 11-9 126 1.6 1.37
Don Sutton 1982 17-9 112 1.3 1.65
Don Sutton 1983 8-13 92 -1.1 -0.29
Don Sutton 1984 14-12 102 0.1 0.30
Don Sutton 1985 15-10 101 0.0 1.29
Don Sutton 1986 15-11 110 0.8 1.96
Don Sutton 1987 11-11 92 -1.0 -0.07
Don Sutton 1988 3-6 85 -0.7 -0.89
           
Career   324-256 108 19.0 28.21

68% of career covered by win values.  Don Sutton was a notorious Hall of Fame case a few years back, but win values is pretty kind to Sutton, especially in comparison to WAA.

Table 72: Win Values for Tommy John

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Tommy John 1963 0-2 164 0.2 n.a.
Tommy John 1964 2-9 92 -0.3 n.a.
Tommy John 1965 14-7 103 0.8 n.a.
Tommy John 1966 14-11 121 2.0 n.a.
Tommy John 1967 10-13 126 2.4 n.a.
Tommy John 1968 10-5 153 2.8 n.a.
Tommy John 1969 9-11 119 2.0 1.60
Tommy John 1970 12-17 119 2.2 n.a.
Tommy John 1971 13-16 100 -0.1 n.a.
Tommy John 1972 11-5 115 1.3 n.a.
Tommy John 1973 16-7 111 1.1 n.a.
Tommy John 1974 13-3 132 1.8 2.43
Tommy John 1975 Dnp - - -
Tommy John 1976 10-10 110 0.9 0.34
Tommy John 1977 20-7 138 3.1 3.28
Tommy John 1978 17-10 107 0.5 -0.27
Tommy John 1979 21-9 138 3.9 3.92
Tommy John 1980 22-9 115 1.7 3.16
Tommy John 1981 9-8 136 2.0 1.56
Tommy John 1982 14-12 108 0.9 0.57
Tommy John 1983 11-13 93 -1.0 -0.68
Tommy John 1984 7-13 88 -1.4 -0.69
Tommy John 1985 4-10 72 -1.8 -1.08
Tommy John 1986 5-3 140 1.0 1.12
Tommy John 1987 13-6 109 0.7 0.54
Tommy John 1988 9-8 88 -1.4 0.06
Tommy John 1989 2-7 67 -1.7 -1.57
           
Career   288-231 110 23.6 26.69

65% of career covered by win values.  Tommy John missed a season in mid-career, but more than made up for it by pitching until he was 46.  Tommy John is a tough Hall of Fame call, though he is clearly greater than many HOF pitchers. 

Table 73: Win Values for Luis Tiant

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Luis Tiant 1964 10-4 127 1.1 n.a.
Luis Tiant 1965 11-11 99 -0.3 n.a.
Luis Tiant 1966 12-11 123 1.5 n.a.
Luis Tiant 1967 12-9 119 1.6 n.a.
Luis Tiant 1968 21-9 185 4.2 n.a.
Luis Tiant 1969 9-20 102 0.2 -1.21
Luis Tiant 1970 7-3 110 0.4 n.a.
Luis Tiant 1971 1-7 76 -1.2 n.a.
Luis Tiant 1972 15-6 169 3.6 n.a.
Luis Tiant 1973 20-13 120 2.3 n.a.
Luis Tiant 1974 22-13 132 3.9 4.71
Luis Tiant 1975 18-14 102 0.2 1.85
Luis Tiant 1976 21-12 128 3.2 3.51
Luis Tiant 1977 12-8 99 -0.1 0.72
Luis Tiant 1978 13-8 125 2.1 2.82
Luis Tiant 1979 13-8 105 0.3 0.71
Luis Tiant 1980 8-9 80 -1.8 -1.00
Luis Tiant 1981 2-5 92 -0.2 -0.75
Luis Tiant 1982 2-2 70 -0.6 -0.07
           
Career   229-172 114 20.4 24.49

58% of career covered by win values.  Luis Tiant also missed significant time in mid-career with a bad arm.  His Hall of Fame case seems to be centered on the fact that he was better than Catfish Hunter.

Table 74: Win Values for Rick Reuschel

  Year W-L ERA+ WAA Win Value
Rick Reuschel 1972 10-8 130 1.5 n.a.
Rick Reuschel 1973 14-15 132 3.0 n.a.
Rick Reuschel 1974 13-12 89 -1.6 -0.58
Rick Reuschel 1975 11-17 103 0.3 -0.14
Rick Reuschel 1976 14-12 112 1.3 1.37
Rick Reuschel 1977 20-10 158 5.0 5.67
Rick Reuschel 1978 14-15 118 1.9 0.32
Rick Reuschel 1979 18-12 114 1.5 1.77
Rick Reuschel 1980 11-13 115 1.8 0.93
Rick Reuschel 1981 8-11 119 1.2 0.44
Rick Reuschel 1982 Dnp - - -
Rick Reuschel 1983 1-1 97 0.0 0.20
Rick Reuschel 1984 5-5 76 -1.6 -0.78
Rick Reuschel 1985 14-8 158 Rob Wood Posted: September 16, 2002 at 01:00 AM | 3 comment(s)
  Related News: General

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. tangotiger Posted: September 16, 2002 at 08:47 PM (#606254)
A big shout out to Rob for running the data.

When you present a sound methodology, and data, with reasonable assumptions, with very little interpretation, there's very little to "debate". But, I just want to say thanks for the probably many countless hours you spent to run this.

   2. emancip8d Posted: September 17, 2002 at 08:48 PM (#606313)
In Part 4 ParkAdder is defined as

ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF)=WinProb2(RS,Z,PN)-WinProb2(RS,Z,PF)

In a hitters' park (PF>100), WinProb2(RS,Z,PN)>WinProb2(RS,Z,PF) which makes ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF)>0. When PF<100, ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF)<0. That is what is reflected in Part 6, Table 8 and the text that follows. For instance, Wells' 4/8 game at Tex had a ParkAdder>0 and Wells' 4/24 game at Oak had a ParkAdder<0.

However, in Part 4, Eq. 7, ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF) is given as

ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF)=PAddPct(RS)*(2*(100-PF))*(Z/9)+

which produces the opposite sign. I believe Eq. 7 in Part 4 needs to be corrected to

ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF)=PAddPct(RS)*(2*(PF-100))*(Z/9)+

From the tables and the text it appears the calculations were correctly made using this last equation.
   3. Rob Wood Posted: September 17, 2002 at 08:48 PM (#606322)
Thanks Tango for your kind words. Yes, compiling and running the data through the Win Value routines takes hours. But the longer part, and the most fun, was developing the methodology in the first place. Of course, the tireless Retrosheet volunteers deserve a tremendous amount of credit (and gratitude) for doing all the original data collection and computerization. Thanks again to those good folks.

I fear that emancip8d has caught an error in one of the formulas. As he suggests, the error is only in the exposition and not in the analysis. Thanks for catching the error. I will see if the error can be corrected and the article re-posted.
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 0.4634 seconds
63 querie(s) executed