“Ruth Bought by the New York Americans for $125,000 Highest Price in Baseball Annals”
“Ruth Bought by the New York Americans for $125,000 Highest Price in Baseball Annals” is how the headline read in the January 6, 1920 addition of the New York Times. Even 86 years ago baseball’s off-season has been marked with headlines as bold as those created during the season.
“Acquisition of noted Batsman gives New York Club the Hard-Hitting outfielder long desired” As a child I often heard how brilliant the Yankees were for acquiring a left-handed pitcher, and converting him to the outfield where he went on to the be best and most important player in baseball history. Well that wasn’t exactly true, as Ruth pitched 133 league average innings in 1919. While stepping to the plate over 500 times. He was considered a slugger at the time, much more so than a pitcher.
“Babe Ruth of the Boston Red Sox, baseball super-slugger, was purchased by the Yankees yesterday for the largest cash sum ever paid for a player. The New York Club paid Harry Freeze of Boston $125,000 for the sensational batsman who last season caused such a furore in the national game by batting out twenty-nine home runs, a new record in long-distance clouting. ” From this quote it was pretty clear that Ruth was acquire to be a slugger first and foremost.
“Colonel Ruppert, President of the Yanks, said that he had taken over Ruth’s Boston contract, which had two more years to run. This contract calls for for a salary of $10,000 a year. Ruth recently announced that he would refuse to play for $10,000 next season” I don’t remember ever hearing a reference to a potential salary depute between Ruth and the Red Sox, just that it was all about No, No, Nanette.
Talk about being prophetic “The short right field wall at the Polo Grounds should prove an easy target for Ruth next season and, playing seventy-seven games at home, it would not be surprising if Ruth surpassed his home run record of twentynine circuit clouts next Summer.” I would say 54 in 1920, and then 59 in 1921 exceeded 29, never mind the famous 60 in 1927.
Mister High Standards
Posted: December 13, 2005 at 03:47 PM |
26 comment(s)
Related News:
History,
Boston,
NY Yankees
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Also, while I enjoyed reading this, I didn't like it posted within the Newsblog, as I think only current news should be posted there. That blog is already cluttered enough.
I don't know Rex - I havent gotten that far yet... maybe in the next installment :-)
Wasn't the language used in these quotes much more vibrant than todays sports writing.
Whatever.
OK, that made me laugh. Well done.
There has been some pretty funny stuff posted since last night. It's 5:15 AM here and I just woke my family up with my laughing.
My wife just went back to bed. I fear for my life.
Best Regards
John
Even at 25k, the Sox would have quintupled thier money on the two Ruth transactions and won 3 WS.
It's almost like they came out ahead on the whole Ruth business.
This really was the very start of the tipping point where home runs came into vogue. In the teens the HR leader was routinely in teens. Only 3 times did the league leader in homeruns have more 20 homers in teens (Ruth in 19, Schulte in 11, and Cravath in 1915.
Then in 1920 Ruth broke out with 54 (with 3 more guys in the AL with more than 20 so a change was clearly underway... Ruth was just way way ahead of the curve) in the AL while Cy Williams lead the NL with 12. 1921 was also a slowish year for the homer, then in 1922 we more or less started seeing guys lead the league with levels similar to modern levels as guys start hit 40 bombs a year regularly.
Well, my sense is that, in general, HR /were/ devalued because they were the equivalent of triples today-- that is to say, they were largely a product of luck. Power hitters at the time had a ton of triples and a smattering of homers, which hints that most HR were inside-the-park jobs.
Ruth, of course, was the exception, and fun to watch, I would imagine.
I am sorry to be harping on this, but I guess I know of the change, but there wasn't much documentation on it.
I'm not 100% sure about this, though.
I guess I can sort of buy that managers were discouraging people from hitting homeruns, but how can you stop someone who swung for doubles and triples not to swing for homeruns. (unless they were like Jeter, and love to sac bunt when they should be swinging away). As well, did players listen to managers more then?
And the celebration and notice of Ruth's 29 roundtrippers from the quote above seem to suggest homeruns were an attraction. Or I suppose, becoming an attraction.
Anyway, this is part of why I think this will make a great blog.
A propos of absolutely nothing, the passage in that book which runs from p. 256 to p. 258 is one of the greatest passages ever written in a baseball book, describing a series of three brilliant defensive plays by the Cubs which broke the back of the Tigers in the fourth game of the 1908 World Series. That book in general is one of the top half dozen baseball books of all time, and that two page bit on the 1908 Series should be at the lead of any baseball anthology.
BTW Hughie Fullerton was the only writer to pick the 1906 "Hitless Wonders" White Sox over the 116-36 Cubs in that year's World Series.
Well, was Hughie right?
Only syphillitic prostitutes.
I bought this book on ebay about 3 years ago, and it went for over $100. Fun reading.
1) Live ball (this happened early in the decade, maybe 1911)
2) Spitballs were outlawed (I think this happened in 1919)
This combination was a huge boon for offense. I think replacing discolored balls happened around this time too. My dates may be off a bit, but I imagine without Ruth, HRs would have increased just fine in the 1920s.
In other news, Babe Ruth was good.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main