Fever Pitch
In the new movie “Fever Pitch,” Drew Barrymore plays a workaholic cutie
who has the great misfortune to fall in love with a rabid Red Sox fan.
The movie starts weakly and ends implausibly, but manages to capture
the depth and breadth of one man’s sports obsession and how that
obsession nearly contributes to his personal ruin.
Jimmy Fallon plays Ben, a Boston high school teacher whose sensitivity
and genuineness attracts Lindsay Meeks’s (Barrymore) hesitating
interest. Their romance blooms over the winter, but Lindsay’s
30-something friends wonder why Ben is still available. Any single man
their age must be fatally flawed. Finally Ben confesses – he loves the
Red Sox with a passion so profound that Ben’s romance calendar is
forced to squeeze into the spaces left by the Red Sox’s open dates, a
circumstance that begins in Spring Training.
At first Lindsay is accommodating – plenty of guys love sports, she
says, and she’s not the neurotic attention-seeker who is threatened by
that – but when the dog days hit, Lindsay finds out how profound, and
hurtful, Ben’s obsession can be. When Ben finally skips a game – and a
Yankees game at that – to go with her to a special occasion, their
relationship appears to finally make an important breakthrough, only to
have the specter of Ben’s Red Socked mistress appear at the most
improbable and painful moment.
The movie also captures the wider communal passion of Bostoners for
their team. Ben’s friends turn the arrival of that year’s season
tickets into a day-long celebration. The regulars who populate Ben’s
section at Fenway are Ben’s substitute family who feel the bone-deep
pathos of Red Sox history. Although Lindsay gamely attempts to fit into
Ben’s odd social circle, her efforts are only partly successful and
ultimately increase the tension between Ben’s deepening life with her
and his passion for his team.
The formula works, mostly because of the performance and chemistry
between Barrymore and Fallon. Both play characters who are as
sympathetic as they are flawed, and the romance and, especially, their
subsequent troubles ring true. The result is the ultimate movie paradox
– a chick flick for guys; the sports fanatic’s ultimate romantic
fantasy, and one that can succeed with women. It’s a date-movie for
two.
The movie has choppy moments. Early scenes with Barrymore seem flat and
uninspired, and the climatic moment – which includes a slapstick chase
through the Fenway’s centerfield during a playoff game – has a degree
of unbelievability that can ruin the spell for any knowledgeable
baseball fan. Only a little more minor is the hairdressing disaster
that strikes every female role in this movie – Barrymore most violently
– and which should justly send a dozen Hollywood hairdressers to the
unemployment line.
Even so, the movie manages to capture complex emotion and a variety of
evolving interpersonal entanglements in a way that seems real and deep.
Baseball fans will value the real game footage and the on-location
filming (although one scene announces Rocco Baldelli’s turn at bat
during a Texas Rangers game) which doesn’t just bring Fenway to life,
but also brings it and its inhabitants vibrant personality. Movie buffs
will enjoy the powerful onscreen relationships and the movie’s
undeniable sense of place. Although it doesn’t have the pin-point
artistry of Greg Maddux, “Fever Pitch” still finds its location.
Wheelhouse
Posted: April 10, 2005 at 09:55 AM |
25 comment(s)
Related News:
General
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Anyway, read the book. It might seem familiar, but it was the original fan obsession book and spawned several million imitations. It might not be excessive to say that it changed the way a lot of people look at football, it suddenly became ok to be a football nerd. Hornby's a good chap too.
Drew Barrymore can't act a lick. Fortunately for her, they found the one leading man who is certain NOT to out-act her on screen: Jimmy Fallon.
Boring. Predictable. A walking talking cliche about everything from romance to the Red Sox.
My favorite part of the movie was the scene where Drew's friends are in the gym boxing and Ione Skye's character sits there and explains to the audience just why there is a rivalry between Drew and her friend. Oh, THANK you Farrelly brothers for explaining that...blah.
They took the most exciting Red Sox season in memory and glossed over it without a smidgen of drama. They took two completely bad actors and tried to create chemistry between them on-screen and fell horribly flat. They tried to remake the same sports/romance feel of "Jerry McGuire" and completely missed on both counts.
The only good thing about this movie? Ione Skye is still hot.
She had that run of three great films in the late-80s-early-90s (Say Anything, River's Edge, Gas Food Lodging) and then nothing. I always thought she would become a much bigger star than she did. She's hot and she can act.
Who's Anne?
I know of an Egg...
Let me vouch for the original Fever Pitch book as well. A book much more suited to primates is without a doubt "High Fidelity" however.
I liked the real-life experience that was Fever Pitch, when Hornby goes into fiction, as with High Fidelity, I don't think he is half as good a writer. On the other hand, the (US) movie High Fidelity is much better than the (British) Fever Pitch. It's not a book that immediately cries out to be filmed. I haven't seen the US movie and I'm not in a hurry to see it.
And Phil, how about "tandoori"?
Tandoori?
I loved the British "Fever Pitch". I used to show it to people and scream out, 'that's me!.'
Remember The Rachel Papers? That was awesome.
Fallon said on Letterman that there was no plan to do the same with the US film until the Sox got to the series (ie had they failed, there was no plan for a fantasy ending where they won). I can't see it would have ended instead - surely not as upbeat.
As Phil may recall, I've argued about the merits of Fever Pitch on here before (my chief gripe being that Hornby is a bandwagon jumper so far as supporting Arsenal is concerned) but if you haven't read it, it's well worth a look.
Hey Richard, hope you are well.
When did Hornby actually start supporting the gunners?
Missed you in a great little cricket thread last week about Gilchrist playing for the Sox!
As for Arsenal's ups and downs, it's not been a bad run. Hornby first went in 1968 and in the first 5 years his team won the League and Cup double, reached 1 other FA Cup final and 2 League Cup finals and won the UEFA Cup. They've won things consistently since. In fact, co-incidence or not, Hornby hardly went between 1980 and 1986 when they won nothing.
These are minor quibbles though as the book describes brilliantly the highs and lows of being a sports fan.
Phil - I am very well, thanks. Not been able to post as I've changed jobs. Hope you and the missus are well. Looking forward to the Ashes but disappointed there's no tests until July.
As for Gilchrist/Red Sox, I think it must be worth poaching a few good hitting/batting propsects from crichet. Goodness knows the money would be tempting enough, particularly for players from, say, the sub-continent.
You got to lock that down.
Not always - I'm from Blackpool but I'm a Sheffield Wednesday supporter because my cousin is from there, and it was he (a lifelong diehard Owls supporter) who introduced me to the game and took me to my first match. It seemed only natural for me to root for Wednesday, rather than Blackpool...
Bet you had fun when Blackpool turned the Owls over 4 times in 2003-4, Vortex...
I just thought the British flick lacked pace and seemed choppy. Wasn't nearly as humorous as Hornby's other film adaptations. And I kept expected some "football as a metaphor for life" but it was kind of weak.
And I don't think the female lead could pass as attractive even in the UK.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main