Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Count the Rings™ > Discussion
Count the Rings™
— Twenty-four, Twenty-five, Twenty-six.... ?

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

Debating Damon

The CTR staff got together last night and debated the wisdom of Jesus, or at least the wisdom of signing him to a four-year, $52 million contract…

Sean McNally: Am I’m only the person who doesn’t believe this isn’t the end of Yankee baseball as we know it?
RB: No, that’s definitely me as well
SG in ATL: I’ll get over it, but I’ll never embrace him
SJ: I wish instead of this deal, Brian Cashman would have driven to my home, knocked on my door, and kicked me in the groin.
Sean McNally: Why are you both so negative?
SG in ATL: 2004 ALCS, I’m so happy that I’ll get to see the face that helped lead the biggest collapse in baseball playoff history seven hundred times a year for four years
Sean McNally: Kevin Brown and Javy Vazquez are coming back to the Bronx?
RB: Yeah, but it might also be the face that leads them to another title. I’m more hardcore root-for-laundry than anyone here, I think
SG in ATL: Would you root for Varitek if he got traded to the Yankees?
Sean McNally: Eventually, but I would be salty about it for a while
RB: With great reluctance. But in the end, I’m happy when they win and sad when they lose. Maybe I’m happier when someone like Bernie helps them win, but in the end it’s still a happy/sad divide
SG in ATL: I don’t dispute that Damon was the best available option, but look at the holes that are going to be coming up
SG in ATL: They’re going to need a catcher and a RF next year
RB: But they have money coming off the books for a C and a RF
SG in ATL: Rodriguez, Jeter, Giambi, and Matsui have all probably had their best seasons
Sean McNally: I just try to think of baseball as rationally as possible
SJ: No you don’t, you’re a ridiculous homer
Sean McNally: And rationally this is a decent deal for the Yankees
SJ: Dude, all Cameron cost was Xavier Nady, a player the Mets didn’t need anyway
Sean McNally: And a better player than the Yankees had in their system
SJ: Xavier Nady is a piece of junk and the Yankees have pieces of junk like I have empty cigarette boxes
RB: But what could the Yankees have given for Cameron? Melky Cabrera? He’s not worth one of Cano/Wang/Duncan troika and the Mets wouldn’t take Kevin Reese or Crosby
SJ: Anything
Sean McNally: Transactions aren’t made in a vacuum.
SJ: We have tons ‘o junk
Sean McNally: In order to make that deal you need a piece of junk more shiny than the X-man
SJ: We could have worked a 3 way deal. Pavano to Tampa, Huff to the Mets, Cameron to the Yankees.
RB: But that wouldn’t work, Huff makes practically as much money as Cameron, the Mets were trying to lose the salary not the player.
SG in ATL: Imagine signing Bernie Williams at age 32
SG in ATL: Just in time for him to fall off the cliff?
Sean McNally: When did Bernie’s decline begin?
SG in ATL: He had one more good season at age 33, and then it happened:
333/.415/.493 at age 33
263/.367/.411 at age 34
.262/.360/.435 at age 35
.249/.321/.367 last year
RB: Right. And let’s face it, that age 35 season isn’t great. But AL CF hit .268/.322/.407 last year. So it’s better than that. This simply isn’t an end of the world signing by any stretch of the imagination
Sean McNally: Ok, but Bernie had the knee/back injuries
SG in ATL: Didn’t Damon have two shoulder injuries this year?
SJ And Bernie was better than Damon to start with, Bernie put up 9 seasons better than Johnny Damon’s best season.
Sean McNally: Contact injuries are less likely to recur then joint injuries
SG in ATL: And dammit, we paid Bernie back for years of excellence when he was underpaid
SG in ATL: We’re now paying Damon for screwing us over as a red sock
Sean McNally: Short-term, say the next two seasons, does this not improve the Yankees in 2006 and 2007
SG in ATL: They will win more games, but I will like them less
RB: Easily. In 2006, I say between 3-7 wins, probably closer to the 5-7 range.
Sean McNally: I would agree with Richard here
RB: And I think you’ll come around SG. If rLr can warm to Randy Johnson, I have faith you can to Johnny Damon
Sean McNally: Amen!
SG in ATL: Did rLr really warm up to Johnson?
Sean McNally: I think so
RB: Yeah, RJ’s run at the end of the season, culminating in the clincher at Fenway won rLr over
SG in ATL: The only thing that I think can save Damon is that by losing that stupid hair and beard I can stop associating him with the red sox
Sean McNally: Look, a haircut, a shave and some early April hitting will do a lot to help Damon’s acceptance among Yankee fans
Sean McNally: His top comp posted some attractive lines, ladies and gentleman, let me introduce you to Augie Galan:
32: .318/.426/.495
33: .307/.423/.441
34: .310/.451/.460
35: .314/.449/.416
Sean McNally: And his top comp through Age 31, Mr. Tim Raines
SG in ATL: Sim scores are not predictive
SG in ATL: Damon is a Fenway illusion
SG in ATL: He hits about 60 ops pts better at home than on the road
Sean McNally: I would take, and expect a line of .300/.400/.475
SJ: No one will score from second base on a fly ball
SJ: .475?
SJ: You are out of your mind
Sean McNally: Extra pops ‘round the pole
SG in ATL: You’d take a .400 OBP from a guy who’s NEVER HAD IT?
SG in ATL: Career high OBP is .382
Sean McNally: I think you guys are fairly reactionary
SG in ATL: I would like to change my c- to an f+
SG in ATL: Add declining defense in there
SG in ATL: We need Larry’s input. I bet he likes this
SJ: He is a closet Damon fan
RB: Is he likely to be more bullish on this than any of us?
Sean McNally: No, I doubt it
Sean McNally: Now that we have our new toy, what should Torre do with him?
SG in ATL: They still need another bat, by the way
RB: Honestly, I don’t like batting Damon lead-off, but I can’t see a situation where he doesn’t
SG in ATL: Damon will hit leadoff, and it shouldn’t make a ton of difference, really
RB: Well, it will result in Jeter bunting fifty thousand ####### times which is going to get me banned for swearing
Sean McNally: Damon-Jeter-Giambi-ARod-Matsui-Sheffield-Posada-Cano-Phillips
SG in ATL: They can’t hit Sheffield 6th
Sean McNally: Larry says great move!
RB: I think I’d do Damon-Jeter-ARod-Giambi-Sheffield-Matsui-Posada-Cano-Phillips
Sean McNally: I like that too
SG in ATL: I like Giambi ahead of Rodriguez
RB: I could flip/flop Jason and Alex that works for me. I like the R-L-R in 3-4-5 but I’m not endeared of it. Too early to say what it does with Boston, but I agree with what it does for us
SJ: That’s what he is going with
SG in ATL: Get your best on base guy in front of your best power hitter
Sean McNally: Larry says it makes the Yanks “five games better”
SJ: And Boston 5 games worse, a 10 game swing
SG in ATL: Well, Boston now has money to play around with
Sean McNally: And they have exactly what to spend it on?
RB: Finley!
Sean McNally: Ha
SJ: But when the braves are out of it and Andruw Jones is available......
Sean McNally: Naysayer
Sean McNally: Bottom line, Damon addresses the Yanks most obvious and vital need in a good way
SG in ATL: If good means overpriced, bloated, and risky, then I agree
Sean McNally: And at least we didn’t sign Jeff Conine or Jacques Jones
RB: So, let’s try to be somewhat rational. Give it a final grade for the deal
RB: B-
SJ: D
SG in ATL: C-
Sean McNally: B+ for 2006, B- for 2007 and a C+ for the final two years. Overall, B-
Sean McNally: So I think we average out to a C, not bad.

Sean McNally Posted: December 21, 2005 at 12:26 PM | 24 comment(s)
  Related News: NY Yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. Larry Mahnken Posted: December 21, 2005 at 01:44 PM (#1788452)
B+
   2. Guapo Posted: December 21, 2005 at 01:45 PM (#1788456)
This reminds me a little bit of the Wade Boggs signing. Of course, Damon's no Wade Boggs, but on the other hand, a lot of people thought Boggs was done after his poor 1992.

This deal is easy to criticize, until you realize the difference between Damon and Crosby is probably the difference between playing in October and staying home. Then the deal seems to make a ton of sense.
   3. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 21, 2005 at 01:53 PM (#1788475)
Damon was the best option at the time, and all he cost was money. If Cashman doesn't sign him, there's a good chance the Yanks don't make the playoffs and Tampa takes over again. He's not blocking anyone for at least two years, it screws the Red Sox, and it makes the Yanks the favorites in the division. I'm gonna agree with Larry, B+. The only down side for me is that I don't want Damon to be a Yankee, as a baseball move, I think it's a pretty good one.
   4. Michael Kay Posted: December 21, 2005 at 02:03 PM (#1788503)
I'm sorry, I don't see how signing one of the Red Sox biggest fans hurts Boston that much. And more to the point, how does this help the Yankees? I've never seen any evidence that Damon is capable of playing baseball, let alone the hallowed centerfield in sports' greatest cathedral, Yankee Stadium.
   5. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 21, 2005 at 02:04 PM (#1788505)
You can't be Michael Kay, you didn't mention how his facial hair was a disgrace to the game.
   6. Michael Kay Posted: December 21, 2005 at 02:07 PM (#1788513)
I just made a terrible mistake, guys. It's Johnny Damon who the Yankees signed, not Matt. Johnny was the guy they signed. I apologize to Matt. That's awful. I just got my Damons all mixed up.

It was a brain cramp.
   7. Michael Kay Posted: December 21, 2005 at 02:11 PM (#1788529)
Yes, now that I'm clear, his hair is disgraceful. When I was growing up in the '70s, players never wore their hair like that. They had too much respect for the game. I'm surprised Mr. Steinbrenner would agree to pay his money to an "idiot" like that, but that's what can happen when you let go of the reins and let a novice like Brian Cashman try to prove his mettle.
   8. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 21, 2005 at 02:14 PM (#1788538)
Excellent recovery.
   9. JoelW Iz in Ur Baseball Posted: December 21, 2005 at 02:25 PM (#1788570)
Larry, your article seems to be saying, "The Yankees should have signed Damon for an $18-20 million, 1-year deal. That would definitely be a B+ move. You're right in your article when you say that this year it helps the Yankees a lot and hurts the Red Sox (though I think 10 wins is an overstatement, and I think Johnny will be markedly worse this year than last) for next year. But don't we as fans think that we'll be fans in years after this one?
   10. JoelW Iz in Ur Baseball Posted: December 21, 2005 at 02:30 PM (#1788590)
I apologize, and will post over in the Larry article thread.
   11. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: December 21, 2005 at 02:54 PM (#1788660)
when i was roped into this chat, I did not realize this would be for public consumption.

If I had, I would have been 300%-400% funnier. My apologies to the readers.
   12. mommy Posted: December 21, 2005 at 03:01 PM (#1788678)
why apologize? i think this site really needs more screen-filling, masturbatory circle-jerk intros to its discussions.
   13. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: December 21, 2005 at 03:15 PM (#1788712)
i think this site really needs more screen-filling, masturbatory circle-jerk intros to its discussions.

Aren't all circle jerks mastubatory by definition?
   14. zoperino,if youre not into the whole brevity thing Posted: December 21, 2005 at 03:22 PM (#1788728)
Circle-jerks are, by definition, unmasturbatory.
   15. JoelW Iz in Ur Baseball Posted: December 21, 2005 at 04:15 PM (#1788845)
Well, the event could be described as masturbatory, but certainly not the site of one.
   16. Josh Posted: December 21, 2005 at 04:16 PM (#1788848)
They rarely fill screens, though.
   17. zoperino,if youre not into the whole brevity thing Posted: December 21, 2005 at 04:47 PM (#1788914)
what would bernie do then? split half the games in cf with jesus?

point taken. Perhaps, however, mommy meant that the post was a "screen-filling, masturbatory game of ookie-cookie\".
   18. mommy Posted: December 21, 2005 at 05:02 PM (#1788935)
Hmm. i suppose i meant that the act of posting this expert roundtable analysis as fodder for discussion was masturbatory. But simply calling it a "masturbatory intro" could be vague -- "does he mean that reading it makes him masturbate?" So adding the circle-jerk descriptor specifies that the posting of this discussion is an act of both self- and mutual-masturbation by the Counters of the Rings (c-rings).

or something like that. it was a couple hours ago, i don't remember
   19. kevin Posted: December 21, 2005 at 08:27 PM (#1789283)
This is so ####### stupid. The first time he knocks in a big run, you'll be burning your Jeter photographs and jerking off over Damon's instead.
   20. Guapo Posted: December 21, 2005 at 08:46 PM (#1789298)
The first time he knocks in a big run, you'll be burning your Jeter photographs and jerking off over Damon's instead.

I don't think I'm that coordinated.
   21. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: December 21, 2005 at 09:10 PM (#1789356)
I will root for damon to do well, because he is a yankee.

I will not like rooting for him. And I will never burn my photographs of Jeter (they are are digital).
   22. Шĥy Posted: December 21, 2005 at 09:37 PM (#1789392)
I can't believe you just posted a chat as its own thread. I don't really give a #### but it is funny.
   23. RB in NYC (Now with an Plane Tickets!) Posted: December 21, 2005 at 11:54 PM (#1789584)
I can't believe you just posted a chat as its own thread. I don't really give a #### but it is funny.


Hey, I spent the better part of an afternoon editing the chat into a post. If you think its slightly disjointed now, you should see the first version
   24. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: December 22, 2005 at 12:03 AM (#1789589)
WE did get a 1st round pick.

[snark]

Is this the 25th thread on this topic?

[/snark]
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Well, well, what do you know?
(4 - 10:57am, Oct 08)

Jinx!
(85 - 12:29am, Oct 04)

It's been a while ...
(1 - 8:17am, May 31)

The Dog Ate My Blog
(37 - 10:26am, Mar 29)

Happy Yankee Day!
(17 - 5:34pm, Jan 29)

Tough spot
(156 - 2:40pm, Dec 07)

Taking Stock
(33 - 4:43pm, Oct 11)

Here kitty, kitty . . .
(51 - 1:15am, Oct 10)

In the clinch
(11 - 7:23pm, Sep 27)

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

Ticket Nest sells Braves, Cubs, Padres, Indians, Marlins, Nuts, Pirates, Rangers, Patriots, Royals, Stars, Tides, Tigers, Twins, Phillies, Wings, Mets, Yankees, Angels, Dodgers tickets, and Dragons tickets.

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 0.5868 seconds
61 querie(s) executed