Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Sox Therapy > Discussion
Sox Therapy
— Where Thinking Red Sox Fans Obsess about the Sox

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Here Come the Yankees!

Boy, the first 2/3 of 2008 sure is different from years in the past, isn’t it? The Red Sox start off strong, the Yankees look like they’re dead and buried. But low and behold, the Red Sox have cooled off a bit and the Yankees have gotten crazy hot and they’re back in the thick of things. And lo and behold, we’re going to have a big series between these two rivals in late July. I’ve never seen anything like it, except for every year for the past decade or so.

This weekend will be fun, but unless one team sweeps, not much will change. Both teams are in this (and of course, so is Tampa). 

Darren Posted: July 24, 2008 at 10:32 PM | 162 comment(s)
  Related News: Boston

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >
   1. villageidiom Posted: July 25, 2008 at 08:09 AM (#2872503)
Ten hours and nobody has taken the bait? What happened to this place while I was on vacation?

Darren is saying it's the same now as it's been for the last decade. Meanwhile, the Globe has Tim McCarver saying the roles are reversed. Who are we to believe?

Yeah, OK, I know who to believe. Just testing.
   2. Toby Posted: July 25, 2008 at 08:23 AM (#2872508)
Tampa is not in this. New York is not in this. Everything is going to be fine. We are simply a better team. We've been a better team without Papi and now we get Papi back. (Also, we've been a better team despite having Lugo and now Lugo is gone. :-)

Sure, bad things can happen. But I'm pretty happy with the season so far and with the outlook from here. Then again, I guess I always say that around this time of year ...

But enough about the Sox. To me, the thing that is different this year is the Yankees. They just aren't the same strike-fear-in-your-heart Yankees they have been in past years. Nothing about them scares me. There's no mystique and aura there this year.

I have this image of Manny playing LF for the Yankees next year and it doesn't bother me.
   3. Dave Cyprian Posted: July 25, 2008 at 09:59 AM (#2872610)
The Yanks have a good bullpen.
   4. Andy Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:07 AM (#2872620)
They should cancel the other 42 games and put these three on the four broadcast networks plus ESPN and every ExtraInnings channel. And cancel all campaign speeches for the weekend. This is what baseball is all about.
   5. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:08 AM (#2872622)
Wow, someone is actually talking baseball on this site, what a relief.

Joba/Beckett tonight is going to be such an awesome matchup, I can't wait to see it tonight. And of course, I'll be interested to see how Ortiz looks. He sure rocked AAA.

I'm chalking the Lester game up as a loss, so this game is pretty important for the Yanks.
   6. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:12 AM (#2872630)
I agree w/Toby. Boston's still the team to beat in my opinion. Yeah, we're hot, and the pitching's been surprisingly good, but our bats still seem awfully weak to me.
   7. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:17 AM (#2872637)
Yeah, we're hot, and the pitching's been surprisingly good, but our bats still seem awfully weak to me.

Agreed, even with second half Cano, the Yanks are punting offense at either DH, LF, or first depending on where Giambi and Damon are playing. That's unacceptable for a team trying to come back on two of the three best teams in baseball. The offense will show some more balance I think now that the guys who hit for average (Jeter and Cano) are showing signs of life, but the need that extra bat and they can do that with out weakening the defense.
   8. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:19 AM (#2872641)
I agree with Toby that the Red Sox are pretty clearly the better team. They're stomping the Yankees in run differential and all the basic component numbers, and they're healthier and younger.

Of course, (a) I could be wrong about who the better team is, especially if Pontoon (that's funny!) and the 12-deep Yankee bullpen are for real, and (b) even if I'm right, you give the better team a 3 game head start and they still lose about as often as Kevin Cash gets a base hit.
But enough about the Sox. To me, the thing that is different this year is the Yankees. They just aren't the same strike-fear-in-your-heart Yankees they have been in past years. Nothing about them scares me. There's no mystique and aura there this year.
The Yankees haven't scared me in a "mystique" way in quite a long time, but I don't like watching mediocre pitchers take on the heart of that lineup. Especially given Beckett's deep ball proclivities, his occasional wildness in the zone, I'm not wildly optimistic about this matchup. And on the nights when Chamberlain is throwing strikes, he's got a case to be the best pitcher in the world.

Adding Papi back in to the Sox lineup will be damn sweet, though. Everything I've read about the rehab week suggests that the wrist is healthy, praytogod.
   9. Andy Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:20 AM (#2872643)
The Yanks have mostly been beating up on cripples, but I have to admit that their bullpen not only looks good, but Girardi's spaced out their usage so that not one reliever is in the AL's top 15 in terms of innings pitched. I was against firing Torre but this is making me have pleasant second thoughts about that.

And while I'm at it, I'll eat crow about Mussina. He seems finally to have reconciled himself to his loss of velocity and is putting his considerable pitching IQ to much more productive use. He's actually pitching into the 7th and even the 8th with a fair degree of consistency, and that's a far cry from last year. Not that this will do them any good over the weekend.
   10. NJ in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:22 AM (#2872647)
Guys, can we have a reunion chatter tonight?
   11. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:26 AM (#2872654)
Mussina's been great. He really does look like a guy worth re-signing.

The BP is excellent, and that does seem to be a consequence of better usage and therefore attributable to Girardi/Eiland.

But the bats and D are weak, and I'm not really sure how they're significantly improved this year. I wish they would encourage Posada to get the surgery and remove him from the picture. He seems only to complicate the DH/1b/LF problems, as I really don't envision him hitting like last year with a weakened shoulder. If he goes on the 60 day, Giambi is your 1b/DH, a platoon at 1b w/Sexson is not horrible, and then LF screams HELP!

What's the story on Christian, btw? I know little about him (not that I'm suggesting he's the answer for this year).
   12. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM (#2872657)
Of course, (a) I could be wrong about who the better team is, especially if Pontoon (that's funny!) and the 12-deep Yankee bullpen are for real

Sir Sid has pitched better than I expected, but he's not good. The bullpen is very real though. A lot of the Yanks chances will hinge on Good Andy showing up more often than Bad Andy, especially against the good teams. The Sox are better, but it's close enough that the Yanks have a decent chance. And the Yanks don't have to beat the Sox to get to the playoffs, so I'm overly concerned that the Sox are better.

Adding Papi back in to the Sox lineup will be damn sweet, though. Everything I've read about the rehab week suggests that the wrist is healthy, praytogod.

That makes the Sox really, really scary.

The Yanks have mostly been beating up on cripples,

C'mon, the A's and Twins aren't as good as their records, but I wouldn't count them as cripples. They beat the best pitcher in the league on Sunday.
   13. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:30 AM (#2872661)
What's the story on Christian, btw?

They found him the Federal league I think. I like him just because he's beaten very long odds to get here. And he's a million times better than Brett Gardner.
   14. NJ in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:30 AM (#2872662)
But the bats and D are weak

Bobby Abreu's D is weak. I'm comfortable with the defense otherwise.
   15. aleskel Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:32 AM (#2872664)
Mussina's been great. He really does look like a guy worth re-signing.

I love Moose, but if I'm the Yankees I'm not giving him more than a 1-year deal. He's been great this year mostly because he's been using a pitch (a 2-seam fastball) he never used before. He did this before in 2006 when he started using a new, slower changeup. I'm not convinced that this is a late-career revival rather than just a good year where the pieces came together.

Also, aren't Manny and Drew hurting? That could be the real difference in the series.
   16. NJ in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:33 AM (#2872666)
What's the story on Christian, btw? I know little about him (not that I'm suggesting he's the answer for this year).

Independent League guy who's a very good baserunner/base stealer. He was originally signed as a 2B but made an error every other game and so was switched to the OF. Solid bench guy. I'd rather go with him than Gardner right now.

And the Yanks don't have to beat the Sox to get to the playoffs, so I'm overly concerned that the Sox are better.

It's somewhat funny that the Yanks might not make the playoffs this year when this is their team best constructed for a long postseason run in quite some time. That sentence is really unclear.
   17. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:35 AM (#2872669)
I'm comfortable with the defense otherwise.


I'm not. I think the D's lousy. Cabrera's extremely inconsistent in CF, Abreu is weak, as you acknowledge, and Jeter and Giambi just look like crap to me.
   18. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM (#2872678)
and Jeter and Giambi just look like crap to me.

Man, I thoroughly disagree with that. Giambi looks bad, but not comically bad. He even threw the ball to second accurately this week. He's not giving me the anxiety he has in the past, although he's still a liability (not as bad as Abreu though). And Jeter does not look bad at all. He's gotten to a ton of balls that he wouldn't have been able to spit at last year.
   19. aleskel Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM (#2872679)
I think the D's lousy. Cabrera's extremely inconsistent in CF, Abreu is weak, as you acknowledge, and Jeter and Giambi just look like crap to me.

Cabrera's fine and Jeter by most measures is having a fine year. If the only weak points are your defense is your rightfielder and a part-time first baseman, you're okay.
   20. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:38 AM (#2872680)
I love Moose, but if I'm the Yankees I'm not giving him more than a 1-year deal.


Let me put this differently. If I'm the Yankees, I'm signing Mussina to a 1-year deal, at least. He's been great this year and they don't have a surplus of starting pitching. Whether this is a late career revival may be unclear, but it's a worthwhile risk to take.

And it needs to be said again: The Chamberlain move worked.
   21. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:39 AM (#2872683)
And he's a million times better than Brett Gardner.
This is a little sad, because I was kinda looking forward to explaining over and over what a bad baseball player Brett Gardner is, but it turns out he's just as bad to watch as his stats show him to be. He's like the perfect prototype of the player whose already poor minor league numbers won't translate to the majors - he strikes out constantly and has no power? Sign me up!

I do think that the Yankee offense isn't this mediocre, and the Yankee pitching isn't this great. I watch them, and I don't see qualitative differences in Abreu or Cano or Jeter that suggest they're now below average hitters. Statistically, the offense is underperforming while the pitching is overperforming - relief IP sample sizes are low enough that a guy can hit on a good run just by happening to have his good control for 20 IP. I think Veras and Farnsworth are both having fluky-good control, and I'm expecting at least one good Red Sox rally off this bullpen. (Ramirez looks different to me, but he's another guy who's improved because he's suddenly commanding his fastball like a pro.)
   22. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:40 AM (#2872686)
Oh, I'd sign Moose to a two year deal. He's pitching brilliantly, he's unpredictable, he's throwing strikes, he's setting hitters up. I feel like this year was all about him learning to pitch better and it's not like that knowledge is going to regress.
   23. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:41 AM (#2872687)
Cabrera's fine and Jeter by most measures is having a fine year. If the only weak points are your defense is your rightfielder and a part-time first baseman, you're okay.
Yeah, but Jeter isn't actually this good. He's playing fluky-good defense, most likely, just like he's hitting flukily poorly. He's going to start missing balls in the field and connecting with them at the plate because, well, he's Derek Jeter. That's the package. Is there any reason, watching him play, to think he's not the same Derek Jeter? I don't see it.
   24. SoSH U at work Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:43 AM (#2872697)
And the Yanks don't have to beat the Sox to get to the playoffs, so I'm overly concerned that the Sox are better.


It's somewhat funny that the Yanks might not make the playoffs this year when this is their team best constructed for a long postseason run in quite some time. That sentence is really unclear.

I think if you just toss a "not" before overly and Cowboy's point clears right up.
   25. NJ in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:44 AM (#2872700)
I'm not. I think the D's lousy. Cabrera's extremely inconsistent in CF, Abreu is weak, as you acknowledge, and Jeter and Giambi just look like crap to me.

IIRC, you've never been a fan of Melky's defense despite what the objective evidence and everyone else states, so I guess there's no point arguing there.
   26. Templeusox has Red-State Street Cred Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:44 AM (#2872701)
Wasn't it said that (Jeter) just started paying attention to defensive scouting reports this season at the behest of Yankee management?
   27. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:44 AM (#2872703)
Is there any reason, watching him play, to think he's not the same Derek Jeter?

His positioning is better. They are adjusting him from the bench more and having him study scouting reports. He also worked out his legs to improve his range. They talked about it before the season and then he happened to have a good defensive season. It could be a fluke or they could turned the clock back for him a bit. His ZR isn't out of line with his 04 and 05 numbers.

I think if you just toss a "not" before overly and Cowboy's point clears right up.

Yeah, thank you for clearing that up SOSH.
   28. NJ in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:45 AM (#2872706)
I think if you just toss a "not" before overly and Cowboy's point clears right up.

I was referring to my sentence.
   29. aleskel Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:46 AM (#2872711)
Is there any reason, watching him play, to think he's not the same Derek Jeter? I don't see it.

don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he turned into Ozzie Smith overnight - on even his best days he's still a tick below average - but I don't think this season only looks like a fluke when you compare it to last year, when he was gawd-awful. Of course, it became apparent that he was playing with nagging leg injuries for most of the season.

EDIT: CP explained it better in #27
   30. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:47 AM (#2872712)
Yeah, but Jeter isn't actually this good. He's playing fluky-good defense, most likely, just like he's hitting flukily poorly. He's going to start missing balls in the field and connecting with them at the plate because, well, he's Derek Jeter. That's the package. Is there any reason, watching him play, to think he's not the same Derek Jeter? I don't see it.


I agree, but given what I've seen, I'm not really sure he's playing flukey good defense as opposed to the idea his normally below-average defense is slipping past defensive analysis. He's just a below-average SS and nothing I see convinces me otherwise. And Giambi's below average at 1b. There's no way around that. Pointing out that he actually made an accurate throw only illustrates that. And I can't see how watching Cabrera in CF leads to a conclusion that he's more than an average CFer. He makes mistakes all the time. ALL the time, like that stupid-ass wave the other day. Sure, he's got decent range and a strong arm, but he's so feckin' inconsistent mentally that I'd rate him average at best. In my opinion they have 3 above-average defenders, only one of whom counts as "excellent": Cano, A-Rod, and Molina. Molina's excellent. As much as I love how he throws, he calls and frames a great game. He's so much better than Posada it's like I forgot how good a C can be.
   31. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:49 AM (#2872717)
(a) I could be wrong about who the better team is, especially if Pontoon (that's funny!) and the 12-deep Yankee bullpen are for real, and

Ponson is a sandwich away from a DFA, but that bullpen is for real. This is the best Yankee bullpen since Mendoza/Lloyd/Stanton/Nelson/Rivera.
   32. The Good Face Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:50 AM (#2872718)
I'm not. I think the D's lousy. Cabrera's extremely inconsistent in CF, Abreu is weak, as you acknowledge, and Jeter and Giambi just look like crap to me.


Odd, to my eyes Jeter and Giambi have both looked better in 2008 than they have in years, and the numbers don't show either to be horrific. Abreu's looked bad, and according to the some systems is the worst defensive player in the AL by a LOT, which seems strange to me, but whatever. This is an adequate defensive team to my eyes.

I'm much more worried about the offense. Even assuming Jeter and Cano are having second half rejuvenations and A-Rod/Giambi keep it up, the Yanks are punting 3 lineup spots with offensive non-entities. Gardner has no business on a ML roster as anything but a 5th OF (at best), Molina's bat is inadequate for an everyday player, and Melky's looking like his true talent level is an 85 OPS+ player.

Add me to the chorus of praise for Girardi's BP usage. He's given people opportunities to succeed, hasn't overworked anybody, and uses LaTroy in low leverage spots. The way he's handled the pitching staff has been very impressive, including the near seamless transition of Joba to starting pitcher.
   33. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:50 AM (#2872720)
IIRC, you've never been a fan of Melky's defense despite what the objective evidence and everyone else states, so I guess there's no point arguing there.


Sure there is. For one thing, a lot of the "everyone else" states stuff was simply a reaction to having a CFer w/good legs for a change. Yeah, Melky's healthy and runs well, but that's not enough to conclude he's a good CFer. He's got a very good CF arm. I agree. Do you deny that he's inconsistent? Do you deny he drops catchable balls? Do you deny his reads are inconsistent?

Pardon me for not believing the hype that he's more than an average CFer. I just don't see it.
   34. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:50 AM (#2872721)
I would sign Moose to a lifetime contract. Pitch as long as he wants, because I love him that much.
   35. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:51 AM (#2872722)
I agree, but given what I've seen, I'm not really sure he's playing flukey good defense as opposed to the idea his normally below-average defense is slipping past defensive analysis.
Right, I was imprecise. I'm not seeing Jeter play any better, but he might be happening to get to a couple more balls anyway, or he might be doing what he always does, and the massive error bars on defensive stats are hiding that from us statistically.

I agree on Giambi, too. He's terrible - but he's going to be DH'ing full time now, right? That shouldn't be an issue any more.
   36. aleskel Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:51 AM (#2872723)
Sure, he's got decent range and a strong arm, but he's so feckin' inconsistent mentally that I'd rate him average at best.

really? Not this season, from what I've seen. He's been guilty of making a dumb, overly aggressive throw in previous years, but he hasn't been doing much of that this year. And that waving-to-the-crowd play was genuinely odd - watch the replay, and he clearly had his eye on the ball when he got to it, but it took a bad hop and clanked off his glove. Maybe he wasn't concentrating enough to adjust to the hop, but there's no way of telling. Also, the runner never scored, so you can just chalk that up to water-under-the-bridge, in my book.
   37. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:52 AM (#2872726)
The Yankees are not going to have Gardner/Christian in LF the rest of the year. They will get someone. They still have a week.

What is Strawberry doing?
   38. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM (#2872729)
I agree on Giambi, too. He's terrible - but he's going to be DH'ing full time now, right? That shouldn't be an issue any more.


He is?
   39. Sane Joe Bivens, Obnoxious fan of Other Team Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM (#2872731)
I'm just hoping for three good games that each take right around 3 hours from start to finish.
   40. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:54 AM (#2872733)
Giambi has been ok with the glove. He isn't going to kill them there.
   41. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:55 AM (#2872734)
I really don't think the Yankee bullpen is for real. Maybe Veras and Farnsworth and Ramirez all learned to command their fastballs and seen real qualitative changes, but I bet at least one or two of them has just been getting lucky and has the same old poor fastball command that determined their careers until this season. Veras especially. I'm going to predict he's going to get lit up badly in one of these games. Everyone loves predictions!

To be clear, I think the Yankee bullpen is good - Rivera is still excellent, and they've done a good job filling in around him with good pitchers. Right now, those, a couple of those pretty good pitchers are performing way over their heads because they're throwing fastballs to the corners of the plate in ways they were never able to before. I'm skeptical.
   42. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:56 AM (#2872735)
Odd, to my eyes Jeter and Giambi have both looked better in 2008 than they have in years


Giambi's never looked good and still doesn't. Every time he stretches to catch a throw to first, I weep thinking of Donnie Baseball or John Olerud.

Sure, Giambi's only part-time, so it doesn't kill them, but is Posada gonna be better? And, my point was and remains that compared to their competition (Boston and TB), NY's D is a weakness.
   43. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:56 AM (#2872736)
Do you deny that he's inconsistent?

No.

Do you deny he drops catchable balls?

Nope, but he catches way more balls that shouldn't be catchable. He's excellent on going back into the gaps. Most of his problem are coming in. So he gives up some extra singles and takes away some XBHs, I think it easily balances out in his favor.

Do you deny his reads are inconsistent?

Inconsistent compared to who? He makes some mistakes off the bat, he's got good enough body control to contort his way back and he cuts off and catches a lot of balls I see other guys miss. He's not as natural as Adam Jones out there, but I think you're really focusing on the negative because he just doesn't look the part.

Pardon me for not believing the hype that he's more than an average CFer. I just don't see it.

I'm not taking offense to it and don't want to be nasty about it, but most of the people on this site see him as a good CFer, and have for a while and saw the potential before he was a good one. The Yanks see him as one. Other clubs do as well (Pittsburgh and Atlanta at least). And the numbers suggest he is as well. Do you think that the Yanks would be preventing runs this well if Melky, Jeter, Giambi and Abreu were all as bad as you suggest?
   44. NJ in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:56 AM (#2872737)
I'm just hoping for three good games that each take right around 3 hours from start to finish.

I don't get why people hate the long games so much. I'm a fan of the drawn roller coaster of emotions.
   45. The Good Face Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:57 AM (#2872741)
Molina's excellent. As much as I love how he throws, he calls and frames a great game. He's so much better than Posada it's like I forgot how good a C can be.


Ditto on this. I hate watching him burn through ABs, but the man is a heck of a defensive catcher. If only he could put up even an 85 OPS+...
   46. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:58 AM (#2872742)
Right now, those, a couple of those pretty good pitchers are performing way over their heads because they're throwing fastballs to the corners of the plate in ways they were never able to before. I'm skeptical.

The Yankee staff as a whole is walking a lot less batters than they used to. And they have a new pitching coach this year. I don't think it's all coincidence. Some of it is, maybe Veras, probably Farnsworth, but not all of it is.
   47. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:58 AM (#2872743)
Farnworth will come back to earth. Edwar is for real. He should start a rock band. He is that awesome, he wouldn't even have to play anything, just show up on stage and be Edwar. And the crowds would come.
   48. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:00 AM (#2872748)
Wait, Giambi won't be DH'ing full time? Why not?
   49. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:00 AM (#2872750)
Someone is reporting the Yankees are trying to get a second, completely different Molina.
   50. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:01 AM (#2872751)
Because they need to rest Damon some. And why would they start Sexson against RHP?
   51. robinred Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:01 AM (#2872752)
I'm just hoping for three good games that each take right around 3 hours from start to finish.


You got no shot on the second one, as you well know. We are talking 3:45 minimum.

Everyone watching these games will really enjoy them, though, with the exception of Joe Buck.
   52. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:02 AM (#2872754)
Someone is reporting the Yankees are trying to get a second, completely different Molina.
Boo!

I always wanted to have a Molina, and now the Yankees could get two? Not fair.
   53. aleskel Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:03 AM (#2872755)
Maybe Veras and Farnsworth and Ramirez all learned to command their fastballs

I won't argue with Veras and Farnsworth, but let me second SJ in saying Edwar is for real. He's given up 14 walks in 36 innings this year, which is about in keeping with what he did at AAA last year (14 walks in 40 innings). What happened when he hit the majors last year is looking like the real fluke, when Torre was jerking his usage around.
   54. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:04 AM (#2872757)
Because they need to rest Damon some. And why would they start Sexson against RHP?
Well, ok, Giambi plays DH once a week to rest Damon. That's smart. But doesn't Betemit play 1B against RHP, and Sexson against LHP?
   55. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:05 AM (#2872762)
More bad news, The Yankees are negotiationg the right of first refusal for all future Molinas.

The fate of the Molina Dynasty will be in the hands of Hank Steinbrenner.
   56. The Good Face Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:06 AM (#2872764)
but let me second SJ in saying Edwar is for real. He's given up 14 walks in 36 innings this year, which is about in keeping with what he did at AAA last year (14 walks in 40 innings). What happened when he hit the majors last year is looking like the real fluke, when Torre was jerking his usage around.


Thirded. Anyone who can strike out ML hitters at that rate is legit. I've never seen big leaguers look so overmatched on a changeup before. It's actually Bugs Bunny-esque.
   57. aleskel Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:08 AM (#2872768)
I've never seen big leaguers look so overmatched on a changeup before. It's actually Bugs Bunny-esque.

I read somewhere that scouts have given his changeup a full 80 grade. That's mighty impressive.
   58. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:08 AM (#2872770)
But doesn't Betemit play 1B against RHP, and Sexson against LHP?

They're both visibly worse 1b than Giambi.
   59. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:09 AM (#2872773)
I really don't think the Yankee bullpen is for real. Maybe Veras and Farnsworth and Ramirez all learned to command their fastballs and seen real qualitative changes, but I bet at least one or two of them has just been getting lucky and has the same old poor fastball command that determined their careers until this season. Veras especially. I'm going to predict he's going to get lit up badly in one of these games. Everyone loves predictions!

To be clear, I think the Yankee bullpen is good - Rivera is still excellent, and they've done a good job filling in around him with good pitchers. Right now, those, a couple of those pretty good pitchers are performing way over their heads because they're throwing fastballs to the corners of the plate in ways they were never able to before. I'm skeptical.


The skepticism's fair and the prediction a prediction. I want to distinguish 2 things: the performance of the BP and its use. The former has been incredible, but I agree it's not sustainable and dependent to some degree on hot streaks by people who can be expected to cool off. The use, however, is what excites me. It's so different from Torre's. Torre had become so distrustful of new/young pitchers and so locked into patterns. As Andy pointed out above, Girardi/Eiland have done a great job spreading the work and limiting the exposure of weaker pitchers to high-leverage situations. I'm impressed.
   60. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:12 AM (#2872777)
Whats more amazing, this guy was playing independent baseball for two years! He didn't play ball at all in 04.

What were his stats like in the Anaheim system? Wikipedia says he learned his changeup during his year off, but Wikipedia often lies.
   61. NJ in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:14 AM (#2872780)
What were his stats like in the Anaheim system? Wikipedia says he learned his changeup during his year off, but Wikipedia often lies.

In this case it's accurate.
   62. aleskel Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:18 AM (#2872788)
What were his stats like in the Anaheim system?

lousy. He only got 2 innings in AAA, before that he got lit up in high-A ball.
   63. Sane Joe Bivens, Obnoxious fan of Other Team Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:26 AM (#2872798)
I'm just hoping for three good games that each take right around 3 hours from start to finish.

I don't get why people hate the long games so much. I'm a fan of the drawn roller coaster of emotions.

There is a reason why roller coaster rides only take a couple of minutes from beginning to end.
   64. Loren F. Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:28 AM (#2872806)
Wikipedia says he learned his changeup during his year off, but Wikipedia often lies.

For example, Edwar did NOT murder Vincent Foster.

Ramirez has great stuff and is finally coming into his own. It's likely that one of Veras/Farnsworth comes down to earth, but that still results in a superior bullpen.

And while I can't get overly excited about any rotation that depends on Sidney Ponson, it does seem that the Yankees' big need right now is another quality bat that can actually play a corner OF position (we got enough DHs).

My bold prediction is that Jeter will finish the season at or above 115 OPS+, and Cano will come close to 100 OPS+, but that's not enough offense given the barely average/vulnerable starting rotation (what happens when Moose inevitably misses a turn or two with a mild ache or injury that happens to 39-year-old pitchers?). Sure, Giambi/platoon will generate good numbers for 1B, but who knows how Damon will hit post-DL (he hasn't exactly looked great in the last three games). An AL team that is getting subpar offense from DH, LF, CF and RF is not a strong team.
   65. rconn23 Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:32 AM (#2872812)
I've been skeptical of the Yankees bullpen, but they might actually be for real. Farnsworth, of course, can never be trusted, and most likely this will be his final season in Yankee pinstripes. But Veras and Ramirez, along with the emergence of David Robertson - who was dominant at every level of the minors - are some nice strikeout weapons to have.Mix in Melancon next year and maybe Cox, and a top-flight bullpen is in place. No need for a Fuentes or Marte.

That being said, I wouldn't be surpised to see the Sox sweep this series. Much better offense and starting pitching. Saturday is the best shot for a Yankees win. Sunday is a foregone conclusion. Ponson is horrible and Lester is really good, and that will be that.
   66. NJ in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:34 AM (#2872816)
That being said, I wouldn't be surpised to see the Sox sweep this series. Much better offense and starting pitching. Saturday is the best shot for a Yankees win. Sunday is a foregone conclusion. Ponson is horrible and Lester is really good, and that will be that.

I will concede Sunday, but today and tomorrow are toss ups.
   67. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:36 AM (#2872819)
I will concede Sunday, but today and tomorrow are toss ups.


Agreed.
   68. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:37 AM (#2872820)
NJAS...: What's the deal? Is NY gonna sign any of their 1st three picks?
   69. Sometimes it Rains (sj) Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:44 AM (#2872826)
cox is teribble.

NJAS...: What's the deal? Is NY gonna sign any of their 1st three picks?

FWIW, the commish office usually holds up contracts that sign for more than slot money. It could be some of that too.
   70. NJ in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:47 AM (#2872829)
NJAS...: What's the deal? Is NY gonna sign any of their 1st three picks?

Of course.
   71. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:55 AM (#2872837)
But Veras and Ramirez, along with the emergence of David Robertson - who was dominant at every level of the minors - are some nice strikeout weapons to have.Mix in Melancon next year and maybe Cox, and a top-flight bullpen is in place. No need for a Fuentes or Marte.
This never happens. Well, it happened to Anaheim once. It won't happen to the Yankees.
   72. Andy Posted: July 25, 2008 at 11:57 AM (#2872839)
Just saw one bit of good news: Kennedy gave up one hit over seven innings for Wilkes-Barre last night, and has a current WHIP of 0.84. I still remember how well he pitched last year, and I wouldn't write him off.
   73. NJ in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 12:07 PM (#2872848)
Just saw one bit of good news: Kennedy gave up one hit over seven innings for Wilkes-Barre last night, and has a current WHIP of 0.84. I still remember how well he pitched last year, and I wouldn't write him off.

I don't see this as good news. This is expected, we knew this was going to happen, and it happened. Ian Kennedy (and Phil Hughes for that matter) don't really have anything to learn in the minors. Whatever flaws they may or may not have will not be exposed at that level because they are too good, as is. Rasner to the BP, Kennedy to the rotation, Hawkins DFA'd.
   74. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 12:19 PM (#2872865)
Just saw one bit of good news: Kennedy gave up one hit over seven innings for Wilkes-Barre last night, and has a current WHIP of 0.84. I still remember how well he pitched last year, and I wouldn't write him off.

I don't see this as good news. This is expected, we knew this was going to happen, and it happened. Ian Kennedy (and Phil Hughes for that matter) don't really have anything to learn in the minors. Whatever flaws they may or may not have will not be exposed at that level because they are too good, as is. Rasner to the BP, Kennedy to the rotation, Hawkins DFA'd.


Agree completely, unless NY is trying to trade Kennedy and doesn't want him in the majors "proving" he's not that good.
   75. Lassus Posted: July 25, 2008 at 12:26 PM (#2872873)
I'm just hoping for three good games that each take right around 3 hours from start to finish.

I'm going to defer to Rusty from the Steve Garvey thread:

36. Hello Rusty Kuntz, Goodbye Rusty Cars Posted: July 24, 2008 at 11:47 PM (#2872256)

People in hell still waiting for ice water
   76. rconn23 Posted: July 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM (#2872883)
"cox is teribble."

Simply not true. He doesn't have closer-type stuff, but he can be a late inning guy.

"This never happens. Well, it happened to Anaheim once. It won't happen to the Yankees."

What doesn't happen? Being able to build a good bullpen internally? Melancon and Robertson are very good arms. Cox was on the fast track to the majors before his TJ surgery.

It may not happen that often, but more teams should look at building a bullpen from the farm than throwing away $4 million a year on the Kyle Farnsworths of the world.
   77. JC in DC Posted: July 25, 2008 at 12:41 PM (#2872896)
It may not happen that often, but more teams should look at building a bullpen from the farm than throwing away $4 million a year on the Kyle Farnsworths of the world.


More teams do do that. It's the Yankees that didn't in the past. I believe Matt's point is the notion you have some "set" bullpen is betrayed by overwhelming recent experience: bullpens are pretty damned fickle things and vary from year to year. Sure, NY's bp is doing well right now, and they have some nice young arms, but that doesn't mean "a top flight bullpen is in place." Count on, for instance, both Veras and Farnsworth sucking, Melancon or whoever having growing pains, and all of a sudden, the bp doesn't look so good. And eventually Rivera's gonna have to diminish. Right?
   78. Andy Posted: July 25, 2008 at 12:41 PM (#2872898)
Just saw one bit of good news: Kennedy gave up one hit over seven innings for Wilkes-Barre last night, and has a current WHIP of 0.84. I still remember how well he pitched last year, and I wouldn't write him off.

I don't see this as good news. This is expected, we knew this was going to happen, and it happened. Ian Kennedy (and Phil Hughes for that matter) don't really have anything to learn in the minors. Whatever flaws they may or may not have will not be exposed at that level because they are too good, as is. Rasner to the BP, Kennedy to the rotation, Hawkins DFA'd.


Point well taken, but I'd still see last year's Kennedy as a big improvement over this year's Rasner, and that's what I was referring to. Though you're right in implying that getting "last year's Kennedy" isn't exactly a certainty. I just hope they don't leave him down there too long, since both Rasner and Ponson put more strain on the bullpen than I'd like to see.
   79. rLr Is A Special Person With Needs Posted: July 25, 2008 at 12:42 PM (#2872901)
And eventually Rivera's gonna have to diminish. Right?

Archangels don't decline.
   80. rconn23 Posted: July 25, 2008 at 12:54 PM (#2872917)
"More teams do do that. It's the Yankees that didn't in the past. I believe Matt's point is the notion you have some "set" bullpen is betrayed by overwhelming recent experience: bullpens are pretty damned fickle things and vary from year to year. Sure, NY's bp is doing well right now, and they have some nice young arms, but that doesn't mean "a top flight bullpen is in place." Count on, for instance, both Veras and Farnsworth sucking, Melancon or whoever having growing pains, and all of a sudden, the bp doesn't look so good. And eventually Rivera's gonna have to diminish. Right?"

No bullpen cobbled together is ever assured of success. What I meant is that the pieces are now in place. Injuries are always a caveat and young arms, may or may not go through growing pains. To your other point, while Farnsy has a track record of blowing, I'm not so sure that Veras hasn't have gotten over the hump. He certainly has the stuff to break through.
   81. Biff, Red Sox Jinx Posted: July 25, 2008 at 12:58 PM (#2872928)
This never happens. Well, it happened to Anaheim once. It won't happen to the Yankees.

It certainly never happens to the Red Sox.

And eventually Rivera's gonna have to diminish. Right?

One would think...
   82. TVerik Posted: July 25, 2008 at 12:59 PM (#2872930)
Sunday is a foregone conclusion. Ponson is horrible and Lester is really good, and that will be that.


I disagree. We'll see how it comes out, but I'm really tired of predicting single game results based on pitching matchups. Pontoon could throw a gem while "Moe" Lester blows up. A 26-24 bullpen "battle" is not out of the question with these two teams.
   83. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 02:34 PM (#2873059)
Good article from Edes in the Globe today, recapping how well the Red Sox have hit in the absence of Ortiz. He also notes that Francona is considering moving Ellsbury down in the lineup, which sounds like a good idea to me. I think the 2007 lineup is crying out for a resurrection-

Pedroia, Youkilis, Ortiz, Ramirez, Drew, Lowell, Varitek, Lowrie, Ellsbury

We have a good offense.
   84. Dan Posted: July 25, 2008 at 02:39 PM (#2873067)
Lineup for tonight is

2B Pedroia
1B Youkilis
DH Ortiz
LF Ramirez
3B Lowell
RF Drew
SS Lowrie
C Varitek
CF Ellsbury

I like that lineup, but I would swap Drew and Lowell, although I suppose having both Manny and Lowell in between Ortiz and Drew makes lefty relievers less likely to be used against them. If it's only Manny, then you probably see more lefties come in to face Ortiz and pitch around Manny then pitch to Drew.
   85. The Marksist Posted: July 25, 2008 at 02:50 PM (#2873080)
Almost nailed it MCoA. Did you peek?
   86. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 02:52 PM (#2873084)
I like that lineup, but I would swap Drew and Lowell, although I suppose having both Manny and Lowell in between Ortiz and Drew makes lefty relievers less likely to be used against them. If it's only Manny, then you probably see more lefties come in to face Ortiz and pitch around Manny then pitch to Drew.
As you say, batting Drew behind Lowell is, in general, defensible as a tactical choice. It makes no sense against the Yankees, though - the only lefty on their pitching staff is Andy Pettitte. The Red Sox can bat Ortiz and Drew back to back if they feel like it.
   87. Dan Posted: July 25, 2008 at 03:05 PM (#2873099)
That's true, I hadn't really thought of that. But if it's going to be done in general as a tactical move, then there's no real reason to shuffle guys around for just the one series.
   88. villageidiom Posted: July 25, 2008 at 04:25 PM (#2873232)
A lot of the Yanks chances will hinge on Good Andy showing up more often than Bad Andy, especially against the good teams.

The surest sign that fortunes have changed for BTF Yankees fans is that they don't bother with the trademark.

Should be a good series... and a good series of Game Chatters if both teams are adequately represented.
   89. Cowboy Popup Posted: July 25, 2008 at 04:32 PM (#2873258)
Should be a good series... and a good series of Game Chatters if both teams are adequately represented.

If I chatter, I'm coming here. Some of the posters at RLYW have decided this game will only be a success if Joba hits someone, which I'm pretty sure is one of the dumbest things in the world.
   90. Darren Posted: July 25, 2008 at 05:16 PM (#2873384)
Wow, I finally get around to posting a thread and most of my favorite NY and Boston posters show up. Yay.

I think the lineup change was long overdue. They should flop Lowell and Drew, though. First, it keeps the L-R-L-R deal going. Second, IIRC, neither Drew nor Ortiz is that bad vs. lefties. So bringing one in means mediocre results against those two and Manny mashing in the middle.

I hate all of the good nobodies that have crawled out of the woodwork for the Yankees and I'm hoping this year ends for them the way 2006 did for the Red Sox (both teams have faced a bunch of injuries). But I doubt it will.
   91. Darren Posted: July 25, 2008 at 05:26 PM (#2873410)
Manny's a late scratch for this game due to his knee. Ugh.
   92. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 25, 2008 at 05:33 PM (#2873427)
Manny's a late scratch for this game due to his knee. Ugh.
Oh crap. This is bad for the game, but really bad because it's going to be the only thing that the Boston media talks about regardless of the outcome. I was really hoping Manny would have his typical explosive Yankee series and at least quiet the haters for a week or two.
   93. OCD SS Posted: July 25, 2008 at 06:10 PM (#2873471)
It's worse than that. Apparently XM said that Manny had been suspended by ownership. That does not seem to be confirmed by the Globe blog talking to the owners, but it does point to another Manny soap-opera in the next 6 days.
   94. OCD SS Posted: July 25, 2008 at 06:32 PM (#2873488)
And now XM is saying "'might' be suspended." I think I was probably right about the soap opera thing, though.
   95. Dan Posted: July 25, 2008 at 06:35 PM (#2873492)
Did they have any actual specifics on why he would be suspended?
   96. Marcel Posted: July 25, 2008 at 06:55 PM (#2873506)
Well Tom Werner was just on the pre-game show and he didn't say anything about Manny being suspended.
   97. OCD SS Posted: July 25, 2008 at 09:03 PM (#2873970)
During the game NESN announcers reported that Manny is going for an MRI.
   98. Watch Crispix Attacks geek out Posted: July 25, 2008 at 09:07 PM (#2873996)
Suspended by ownership? Knee? Not hardly. He's being traded to the Yomiuri Giants for Barry Bonds in an unprecedented sign-and trade deal.
   99. OCD SS Posted: July 25, 2008 at 09:16 PM (#2874040)
He's going out to get me more vodka.
   100. Darren Posted: July 25, 2008 at 10:38 PM (#2874435)
What a terrible game.
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Why Won't These Teams Lose?
(51 - 10:21am, Sep 02)

Bowden Begins
(16 - 1:55pm, Sep 01)

Who Can I Blame for This?
(9 - 3:56am, Aug 31)

Kooky Lineups
(27 - 10:22am, Aug 30)

Last Waltz at the Stadium
(31 - 7:10pm, Aug 28)

Daisuke Then and Now
(27 - 6:06pm, Aug 24)

19-17
(25 - 11:22pm, Aug 15)

That Was Brilliant
(60 - 4:07am, Aug 11)

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

Ticket Nest sells Braves, Cubs, Padres, Indians, Marlins, Nuts, Pirates, Rangers, Patriots, Royals, Stars, Tides, Tigers, Twins, Phillies, Wings, Mets, Yankees, Angels, Dodgers tickets, and Dragons tickets.

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 0.7312 seconds
62 querie(s) executed