User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets. |
We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule |
Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers |
Page rendered in 0.5628 seconds
62 querie(s) executed


Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
The last 3 days have sucked an enormous of ass.
I don't know what was sadder: watching Kevin Youkilis being pitched around, or watching Papelbon come on with a 5 run deficit because he needed work due to lack of need.
Kottaras looks like at least a starting-caliber catcher and possibly more. For six weeks of David Wells that is about as good as the Red Sox could have hoped for.
Link
I hope they're both back healthy--and getting beaten by the Yankees--next season
Oh, if it ever gets really, really bad
Let's not kid ourselves, it gets really, really bad
Let's hope it's an infection.
On the Wells front: Kottaras would be a very satisfactory get. He's young and has put up 800+ OPS's at every level. According to that Olney article, he also "has a reputation as a solid defender"-- don't know how accurate that is, but I'll take it for now.
Looking at the Internets, though, I think non-Hodgkins is the really, really scary one.
TB would be low on the differential. Lester doesn't have the risk factors for it.
Of course, viral infections can cause this. But I expect that the Red Sox medical staff is pretty good and would not be alarmed by viral symptoms, which tend to be milder. (Then of course, the Rangers staff didn't work up Park's GI bleed with a Meckel's scan, leading to an unnecessary repeat episode, so everyone misses things once in a while.)
It wasn't your fault, but following up a Lemieux post by abbreviating Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma confused the hell out of me. I was wondering what playing in the NHL had to to do with the seriousness of the disease.
How about TB? I wasn't sure whether we were talking about tuberculosis or Tampa Bay. Neither sounds too good.
There is none. They're all bad. All cancer is bad. He'll have to endure chemo, which will knock the stuffing out of him for a few months.
For several hours yesterday afternoon, it looked like tonight's tilt might have to be cancelled as an unprecedented swarm of locusts had descended on Fenway Park. "Thankfully, grounds crews were able to clear the field using snowplows," said owner John Henry, whose personal fortune was cut in half yesterday by an ill-informed investment orange juice futures.
Sox Pox... Catch It!
Oh, if it ever gets really, really bad
Let's not kid ourselves, it gets really, really bad
Sometimes a pony gets depressed.
Sheesh, what next?
Manny? Check
Papelbon? Check
Lester? Check
Schilling? Check
Wakefield? Check
Clement? Check
Nixon? Check
Gonzalez? Check
Varitek? Check
What a shitty season.
As I posted elsewhere, good thing Beckett is healthy!
113 David Wells
99 Lenny Dinardo
78+ Matt Clement
73+ Hee Seop Choi
66 Keith Foulke
54+ Phil Seibel
51+ Wily Mo Pena
47 Coco Crisp
46 Mike Holtz
43+ Tim Wakefield
40 David Riske
33+ Trot Nixon
32+ Jason Varitek
30+ David Pauley
19+ Abe Alvarez
15 Mike Timlin
15 Ken Huckaby
15 Enrique Wilson
12+ Adam Stern
11+ Alex Gonzalez
5+ Jon Lester
Obviously the list does not include Pena (7+ days), Ramirez (6+ days), and Ortiz (5+ days), all of whom have been unavailable lately though not on the DL. And it doesn't count the coming days that we know Clement, Lester, Wakefield, and Stern will miss.
The above totals 897 person-days on the DL through 9/1, which works out to roughly 6 people on the DL each day of the season. Of those on the list, roughly half would have been on the MLB roster and the other half would have been minor league "ready replacements" for those MLB players.
This is not out of the ordinary. By 9/1 the 2004 Red Sox had missed 990 days to the DL among comparable players. But unless Byung-Hyun Kim is counted as a starter, the entire starting rotation accounted for 0 days in 2004, vs. 239 days for the 2006 team. On offense, the 2004 team was hit worse - 283 days lost for Trot, Nomar, Reese, Mueller, and Bellhorn, vs. something like 190 for the 2006 "starters" - but as you could guess starting pitching is harder to replace. Much of the impact to the 2004 team was in the bullpen (Kim, Williamson, Dinardo, Mendoza, Leskanic, Bobby Jones) or on the bench (Ellis Burks), areas where additional temporary help is not as difficult to find. Furthermore, in the bullpen their three biggest role players remained healthy: Foulke, Timlin, and Embree.
(Thanks to soxprospects.com for the transaction info that led to the above list.)
People tend to forget this when talking about the 2004 team. They note how lucky the team was to not have their starters miss any games, forgetting that Kim was supposed to be in the rotation originally and was instead out for the year. Having Arroyo around was very nice depth. The way in which the team was lucky was that they lost exactly 1 sp and his replacement stayed healthy the whole year. This meant they never had to go to starter #7 or 8.
I have a hard time believing this team's injury woes are "not out of the ordinary" even in the sense that you suggest. I guess it's just that this year's team is missing good players as opposed to the 04 team.
In my view, a better team than 2004, but 2004 got very lucky, and this team has got even more unlucky. If it plays decently from now till the end of the season, and finishes in the 88-92 win range, that will prove my point (if it collapses further, it's a 2001 repeat (poor chemistry) or we all badly overestimated its talent.)
And timing, too. On average they've been missing two starting pitchers all year, but it was one in the first half (Wells) and three in the second (Clement, Wakefield, and some combo of Wells and Lester). In the first half they lost Coco, but in the second half they lost Varitek, Nixon, Pena, Gonzalez, and have had significant non-DL time lost for Ramirez and Ortiz.
Many good teams can miss one starter and still win at a good clip. Few can lose three and do the same. Similar statements can be made about the lineup: they can stand losing one bat, maybe two, but when they lose six or seven at a time it's hard to compete.
But I still want a pony.
---
I'm going to the game tonight. I hope they win, but, you know, whatever. According to redsox.com, Papelbon's MRI is scheduled for today. I'm still a big enough idiot that I think it might turn out ok.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main