Midseason in Review: Expectations vs. Reality
With the traditional halfway point of the All-Star Break approaching, I thought it would be a good time too look back at what’s happened so far vs. what we expected or worried about in the preseason.
Starting Pitching: There were three very big question marks in the rotation as the season began: Schilling’s health, Beckett’s adjustment to the AL, and which Clement we would see. Schilling has passed every test so far, and even though his stuff doesn’t look as dominant as it did a few years ago, he’s still able to pile up strikeouts, keep guys off base, and limit the damage of the HRs he allows. That’s where the good news ends. Beckett has had a few games where he’s looked like the dominant pitcher that we emptied the farm system for. But, for the most part, he’s served up BP for the opposing lineups. Is he hurt? Is it an NL/AL thing? Tek’s gamecalling? Whatever, the reason, he’s pitching like a #4, not the #2 that we need. Clement’s troubles have been another story. It seems pretty obvious to me that he’s not healhty this year. If he can get back to health, I think he’ll be a fine league average pitcher.
Others: Wake’s been what’s expected, Lester is holding his own nicely, and Johnson’s on the way out.
DH: Ortiz seems determined to prove he’s worth that ridiculous extension. So far, so amazing.
Infield: I think the big question here is how the Youkilis/Snow/Lowell would be deployed? How effective would it be? As it turns out, Francona far surpassed my expectations by playing Youkilis fulltime out of the gate, and Youkilis has rewarded him with a .301/.406/.474 line. He’s also played strong enough defense that he doesn’t need to be replaced in the late innings. Lowell has recovered from his horrible year, as predicted by projections but doubted by the worriers among us. His strong play helped to make Snow expendable as well.
Others: Loretta and Gonzalez have delivered as advertised, with perhaps a bit less power than expected. Overall the infield has gone about as well as you could hope.
Outfield: Manny has been as advertised and Trot’s given about what you’d expect, although with more singles/walks and less homers. The big acquisition of the offseason, Coco, has been a disappointment so far. Between his missed time and slump in recent weeks, he has not looked like the star I was anticipating. But he’s picked up in the past few games and I think he’ll turn it around hit something like .300/.360/.460 the rest of the year. Add in the good defense and that’s great. Wily Mo is an enigma. He looks like a great hitter but a horrible fielder. But then again, he hasn’t looked bad in CF. He or Coco should probably be traded at some point.
Bullpen: The FA signings have fallen on their faces yet again. It’s amazing that they can so perfectly pinpoint pitchers who have pitched effectively but are poised for a huge fall. They might consider trying the Costanza strategy of doing the opposite of whatever they deem to be a good move. Luckily, they seem to be doing a good job of developing young arms for the pen. Delcarmen and Hansen look solid for the #3 and #4 men, to compliment Timlin (the one FA who has worked out) and the great Papelbon. Paps has been amazing and lucky, so I’d expect more good stuff for the 2nd half, but a reasonable dropoff. The big bummer has been Foulke, who’s health has betrayed him again. The 04 playoffs were worth it, even if they have meant he’s not been good the past 2 years. I still think he could come back and be pretty good toward the end of this year, though.
The Manager: I hate the lineup--Papi would have 100 RBIs with Youks/Trot/Manny in front of him. I hate the overmanaging of the pen--it will cost us games and wear guys down by the end of the year. But as MCoA and others keep pointing out, Francona has done a great job on the biggest decisions he’s had to make this year. He put Paps in the closer role; he put Youks in the lineup fulltime (and eventually at leadoff); and he gave Wily Mo a chance in CF. Give him an A- so far, as maddening as he is to watch.
Outlook: The Red Sox are on pace for 101 despite playing 11 more road games than home games. Having projected them for something like 97 wins this year, I couldn’t be happier with the results so far. The big concern, though, is that the Yankees have kept pace despite their injuries (those gutty gritty guys!). New York will get Sheff/Matsui back eventually, and will probably make some trades for pitching and a hitter. Toronto looks like they’re in it too. So the Red Sox will not coast into this thing, and it appears the Wild Card will go to a central team. Here’s hoping ~100 wins is enough.
Darren
Posted: July 09, 2006 at 10:46 AM |
77 comment(s)
Related News:
Boston
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Nixon has exceeded my expectations. He's played 77 games, first of all. Second, his OBP is 427! Fourth in the league, just behind Manny, with Youkilis at 8th. OBP has been the great strength of this offense, though their HR and SLG numbers have climbed lately (thank you, Papi). Manny's also been a little better than I expected (4th in MLB in OPS), and Youkilis and Lowell, of course.
Interesting comment re: Coco and Wily Mo. Their defensive abilities/inabilities make them less complementary than one would like, but both are very far from peak value right now, so I don't see how a trade's a good idea any time soon (I realize that you did not say "soon," but only "at some point"). Maybe Pena can really play first, and next year Youkilis can play more 3B and Lowell can sit more. Coco can play RF with Wily Mo in CF against lefties (despite Coco's arm, I think that may be better defensively than the reverse, at least at Fenway).
One of my concerns for the second half include a big Lowell drop-off, per his history. What I'm looking forward to is the continued progress of Lester, Hansen and Delcarmen. The young bullpen (plus Timlin) is probably the most exciting thing about 2006 so far, along with the emergence of Youkilis as a good everyday player. And I like Lester a lot.
I agree that Lowell's in for a dropoff, but he seems to really have adjusted his approach to use the whole field this year. Maybe that will also change his "dropoff in the second half" pattern?
One thing about Nixon that surprises me is that people on SOSH seem to hate him. His defense isn't good enough, he's not ever healthy, he's a platoon player, etc. But the fact of the matter is, he's been well worth his contract in 04 and 05, despite his health issues. In 06, he's been an absolute bargain. And his D is rated as at least decent by the various metrics. I'd love to resign him for the same price. And I have a very sneaking suspicion that Cashman's planning to replace Sheffield with him.
We'll have to see. I don't suspect this. Nixon isn't nearly famous enough to play that way.
That's fine. I'll take the draft picks. I have no problem with a Pena/Murphy platoon in RF next year. I like Trot, but I don't have any interest in giving him a contract longer than 2 years.
What's up with the lack of HRs at Fenway? The HR splits for both the lineup and the staff seem extreme this year, though I haven't checked them lately, so I could be mistaken.
I don't think Cashman's as concerned with fame as with production.
That's fine. I'll take the draft picks. I have no problem with a Pena/Murphy platoon in RF next year. I like Trot, but I don't have any interest in giving him a contract longer than 2 years.
Are you sure there will be draft picks in the new CBA? Are you willing to risk going to arb with Trot? And what if those picks turn out to be supplemental and a 3rd rounder, like we got for Mueller?
Catcher: Varitek sucks. Sucks sucks sucks. Offense, pitchcalling, everything. 2007 and 2008 are going to be fun!
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/5770502
"The Red Sox inquired about Phillies right fielder Bobby Abreu, but the talks apparently failed to progress — even though a rival GM describes the Sox's interest in Abreu as 'very strong.'"
Rosenthal cites four reasons the Red Sox could be interested, but only the 4th makes sense to me: "Getting Abreu would keep him away from the Yankees."
Perhaps the Red Sox want to spin him off to another team, perhaps he's part of a much bigger deal, or perhaps (most likely?) they're just trying to drive up the cost for the Yankees (Philip Hughes and...?).
Though I would change
to
and be happy.
Absolutely.
well, it's never been a great home run park plus, and we've had some nasty weather. i'd expect more home runs at home now that we've been getting some summer weather.
is just a bit off his career norms-he's basically missing about
7 singles: big whoop. I dunno about the D and pitch calling-
the latter is too hard to sort out from what the pitcher does.
It may be tho that they will have to find a starter in a trade:
I'm not sure about this staff's chances in the postseason as
currently constructed. I still think a lot of Beckett's HRs
are a matter of bad luck, but I could be wrong: 21% of his
balls in the air (acc. to ESPN) are homers? In terms of
outfield flies that would likely be pushing 30% or so, which
would be completely unprecendented for a whole season.
are a matter of bad luck
Probably true, but his .245 BABIP is good luck. In the end, they probably balance each other out.
All told, I have to say that if you had told me in March that we'd get zip from Clement and almost zip from Wells, and both Seanez and Tavarez were sucking, that we'd have won 50 games at the break, I'd be very happy with that.
Arthur I sort of like that Wily/Coco thing for next year too; though maybe Coco in left on the road and Manny in right? Do teams ever do that?
For the Beckett stuff, it seems like THT's stats are interesting in this case. ERA of 4.75, FIP of 5.75, xFIP of 4.50. So, exactly as nycfan said, the line drives and the homers pretty much balance out. There's been way too much hard contact off Beckett for him to be an effective front-of-the-rotation starter. I didn't really expect that. As I've discussed before, I'm really growing to dislike Beckett for his apparent inability or lack of desire to make adjustments. There's no way a guy with his stuff should be struggling so consistently. I don't like it.
The Wily Mo question you bring up is a good one. Really, the Sox as presently constructed are a terrible fit for Wily Mo. He seems like a liability at every defensive position, and the Sox have the best DH in baseball. Not only that, but putting Wily Mo at LF or 1B would entail moving an excellent hitter to a defensive position where he'd be quite a bit worse, thus doubly hurting the team defense. I guess the happy scenario is that Youkilis is a solid average 3B, and Wily Mo can be such at 1B. I think htat's pretty unlikely, but I guess it's possible.
The idea of Wily Mo taking Nixon's job scares the hell out of me, and out of the Red Sox pitching staff. What will they do with him next year?
Interesting thoughts on the outfield and Coco/Wily Mo specifically. I'm sorry if I'm missed some posts or chatters or something but what the heck are all of you talking about Wily Mo playing center field when he returns? He was doing that when Coco was hurt, that was it. He's a CF back-up strictly, two reasons. One, Theo is in love with Coco and will give him at least a year and a half (call it Millar-time) to get his feet wet. Second, they already admitted as much by trying to get him some time at 1st base.
The main difference between 2006 and 04/05, though, is singles. Singles account for a bit more than 2/3 of the decline. So, one could argue that luck plays a part.
The thing that makes me pause, however, is that Varitek's LD% and HR/FB are both down by notable margins this year. That suggests he just isn't hitting the ball very hard. It seems reasonable - especially having watched Varitek hit this year - to assume that the grounders he's hitting this year are less likely to turn into base hits than the grounders last year. And so a good chunk of the decline would be quite real.
I think Varitek's a good bet to get back up toward a 750 OPS, as I am sure he's not a real .230 hitter. But I don't expect a particularly good second half.
But presumably they would pitch to Manny in that spot, too, right? Flipping them in the order means he's the one at bat in those situations, and I have no problem with that.
I'm with most people on this board in thinking that Youk/Nixon/Manny/Ortiz would be fantastic. Loretta could hit second against lefties.
Batting Manny after Ortiz is exactly what the Red Sox should be doing, according to our best statheads, according to my memory.
I can agree with wanting someone else in the two-hole, but that would have to be Nixon, and then you've gotta switch Manny with Ortiz, which is apparently a downgrade. It's probably still worth it to get Trot up there, depending on how much of his OBP spike is real, but I don't see it as that much of an upgrade.
But, of course, that will never happen. I think it's probably the way to go, if anyone could sell it to the players.
I think Sox fans should be more interested in Loretta/Lowell/Nixon all staying healthy and productive for the second half rather then fussing over who hits where.
Actually, it used to be a great home run park (especially for RHBs, of course). Across the 1960s and 1970s it was one of the best HR parks in baseball. What's happened in more recent decades is that many other parks have come to be just as HR-friendly, of not moreso, so on a relative basis Fenway is no longer a great HR park.
Most teams don't have a Youkilis to lead off, though, or an Ortiz to bat cleanup. Maybe that doesn't change the above, but my own sense is that lineup rules have to be adjusted some from team to team.
And, yes, these are minor quibbles, but I'm not sure what else to discuss. I don't see any obvious trades that make sense (the whole Abreu thing clealry doesn't), and I'm fairly happy with the way the bullpen is shaping up.
On the other hand, what's this I hear about Tavarez possibly maybe perhaps getting a start at some point? Seems worth a gander to me. I imagine he'd be a bargain as a 5th starter if he could keep his ERA around 5 or so, and go 5-6 innings per start.
I believe some renovations in the late 80's also having an impact. I seem to remember a SABR presentation discussing the Fenway homer rate dipping around 1990 or so. But perhaps my neurons are misfiring..........
When was that renovation work done?
It was back in the 1980's, I believe. Wade Boggs was the first to notice that the hitting environment was changed after the 406 club was put on.
The Red Sox have constantly tinkered with Fenway over the past twenty years, looking for ways to add revenue. I wouldn't be surprised if there were other changes that affected wind currents.
Actually, they just destroyed the 406 club this year, but they did build three new towers right next to the field that I'm sure have effected wind.
EMC Club
No doubt. But other ballparks get tinkered with all the time too.
I think it's a very safe assumption that the primary driver in making Fenway stand out less as a HR and run-scoring park in the modern era has far less to do with the structure itself than it has to do with the collection of ballparks it's being compared against.
Quite possibly. But I am fairly certain the research I saw showed a pretty dramatic dip that remained with respect to home run frequency.
Now if I could just FIND it. Grrrr.........
Without seeing any studies, I don't think this is a very safe assumption at all. My instinct is that the degree to which Fenway has dropped as a HR park in the last twenty years is much greater than what would be predicted by the introduction of other parks. At least I think this is true, once again, a study would be helpful.
And its also very possible that the tinkering has had a greater impact on Fenway than it would on other parks.
Even if we take it as given that such protection exists, you're playing a zero-sum game here. If the Red Sox are winning games because teams have to pitch to Ortiz, aren't they also losing games because teams are able to pitch around Manny. Wouldn't flipping them mean that teams would no longer be able to pitch around Manny (who's actually a better hitter)? I actually think it would be even more effective, protection-wise, because Ortiz has more of a reputation as a super clutch god.
According to THE BOOK, teams should never bat their best hitter 3rd, especially if he has great on-base skills. The 3rd spot in the order is the least likely to lead off an inning, and the most likely to bat with the bases empty and two outs. Players with excellent on-base skills have less value in the #3 spot than in the surrounding spots (1-2, 4-5).
I'm a little surprised by this. But still, you're going to have one of your best hitters, either Manny or Papi, in the #3 spot. I would think that simulations would show that it's better to have the big OBP guy (and better all-around hitter) getting more PAs and hitting in front of the big power guy. As you note, the best way to accomplish this is probably to bat Manny 2nd, but that ain't happening. (Neither is my idea, of course.)
Why? There has been unprecedented turnover in ML parks over the past 20 years, as well as unprecedented revision in the scheduling practices. Fenway is being compared against a wider variety of new and different parks in the modern era than ever before, by a long shot.
And its also very possible that the tinkering has had a greater impact on Fenway than it would on other parks.
It's possible, of course, but why should be think it likely? Parks such as Oakland and Anaheim have had vastly more significant reconfigurations than Fenway.
Manny is the best hitter on the Red Sox, will be and has been for years, and I'm sure glad we never traded him.
That would make me happy.
This seems especially true given that the team's greatest need is a good starting pitcher, a 2 or 3, and those guys don't come cheap. I have enough faith in Delcarmen and Hansen to be not terribly worried about the bullpen at this point, the offense is fine, and the defense is decent. Should they trade for a bench player? Cora has been surprisingly effective, I'm ok with Kapler. Could they use (and acquire, for that matter) a Craig Wilson type? Or are we set with Wily Mo coming back eventually? And wouldn't it be nice if Hee Seop Choi was hitting at all?
I just want to get Wily Mo Pena back, and Choi freed.
Harvey, the first season with the .406 club was 1989 I believe. The new renovation should further decrease homers according to the studies the club did. The difference is supposed to be very small though.
The Red Sox need to weigh the likelihood of Clement or Wells returning and pitchign effectively. If that's not too likely, they need to get into the starting market. As any pitcher with something like 2-3 ability will probably cost a ridiculous amount, I'm hoping the Sox go for just someone competent - someone like Jason Johnson circa 2005. Someone like Jeff Suppan circa 2004, I guess, except I want it to work out.
I guess the Sox could make another Johnson-esque deal where they basically take someone off a team's hands. This might be easiest if there's an ok but not that good starter who makes good money on a bad team. Anyone fit that description? Or are there any particular starters people think the Sox should and could acquire?
oh right i forgot about him.
You need an extra bat on the bench, that bat is Willy Mo. He covers for all three outfielders getting injured, the DH, the 1b, and the 3b, how? Any OF gets hurt he takes their spot. Ortiz gets hurt he slides in. Youklis gets hurt, Ortiz and him split DH and 1b. Lowell gets hurt Youklis slides to 3b, see above. Longer term, he is insurance if Nixon leaves, if a great Manny or Coco trade comes up, etc. Manny's knee will need some rest until he can have cleaned in the offseason, so between spotting Coco, resting Manny, and platoonning on the road with Nixon, PH and Lowell and Youklis getting time off, he'll get his ABs in.
Pitching is a concern. Lowell is the big question, if he gets his stuff together we are fine. Clement or Lowell will be okay. I'm hopefull about Foulke. BTW the FA bullpen thing: Timlin and Foulke were both good signings. Whatever they pay Foulke is more than made up by the fact they won the World Series.
3 to 4 year trend in decay? His OPS+ from 2003 to 2005 was 120, 121, and 125. I don't think this qualifies as a decline. I think its more accurate to say his performance was remarkably stable, and then fell off a cliff this year.
I love Tek, and I'm happy to have Belli back to handle Wake, but I really wish we didn't have to trade Josh Bard to reacquire Dougie.
It would have been nice if Bard could catch a knuckleball, but he couldn't so it was a no-brainer.
Apparently the FO thought enough of him to trade Shoppach, who was one of the Red Sox top rated prospects, for him in the Coco deal.
I think its more accurate to say the Red Sox didn't think particularly high of Shoppach, had Varitek locked up for three more years, and desperately needed a center fielder. I doubt they ever though particularly highly of a back up catcher with a .289 on base percentage. They probably thought he would be adequate as a back up catcher. I don't think there was much of a reason to think Bard would outhit Mirabelli, and there was no way in Hell he was going to get Tek's at bats.
It would have been nice if someone in Boston's front office had KNOWN that Bard couldn't catch a knuckleball before he was acquired, in which case these trades wouldn't have been needed in the first place. That strikes me as the no-brainer.
I don't see what the front office should have done differently. First, I didn't like the idea of trading Mirabelli, but they were getting Loretta in return, so it would have been difficult to turn that down. Second, how could they have known which catchers could learn to catch the knuckleball and which couldn't? Its not like most catchers have a whole lot of history doing it in the past.
In the grand scheme of things, its hard to imagine how things could have worked out better - the Sox ended up getting Loretta and Mirabelli to catch Wakefield.
I think the FO remembered the last time the starting catcher tried to catch Wakfield (ALCS against the Yanks). They probably figured his skills hadn't improved much through disuse.
If you are acquiring a person whose main job is to catch a knuckleball pitcher, then wouldn't you want to know (1) whether the person actually CAN catch a knuckleball pitcher and/or (2) how difficult it is for a catcher with no experience to catch a knuckleballer? If you are getting rid of a guy who catches a knuckleballer, isn't it imperative that you do this analysis?
Well for the first question, you still didn't answer how they are supposed to do this analysis. How do you figure out whether this guy or that guy can learn to catch a knuckleball when none of them have had to do it in the past? There's no data, no reliable information. All they knew is that Bard works hard and was willing to give a full effort to try, which seems pretty reasonable.
As to the second question, I think they knew that it would be difficult, but its not like they had a whole lot of other options. They figured that some guys could learn it and some couldn't, and they'd take a chance on someone.
The only other option they had was not trading Mirabelli in the first place, which means not acquiring Mark Loretta.
(1) whether the person actually CAN catch a knuckleball pitcher and/or (2)how difficult it is for a catcher with no experience to catch a knuckleballer?
I'm sure the Red Sox would have loved to do that analysis, if they didn't do it already. There's a sample size of what, like 3 guys? I'm guessing the result would be something like, "it's not easy, but with some practice you could learn." There's only one guy in the majors who throws a knuckleball well (ie, throws it 90% of the time), so trying it out is pretty much the only way you're going to be able to do an "analysis". I'm sure the Indians weren't going to let Wakefield throw to Bard to find out. It's a pretty specialized skill, and since Mirabelli was bringing back Loretta, I think they were understandably willing to give it a shot with Bard.
I think I pretty much understand what went into the original acquisition of Bard and can't really fault the Red Sox FO too much on the moves one-by-one. I just wish there was more of a plan going into it.
Loretta for Dougie was a good move if they weren't bringing back Mueller or going back after Todd Walker at 2B. After all, Loretta plays everyday vs. Mirabelli once a week and heck, Loretta's an All-Star. Still, I hated to see Dougie go, because I feel Wake has been an extremely important piece of the puzzle over the past several years and I doubted he'd be as comfortable or confident with anyone else behind the plate. Once Belli was gone, and they apparently didn't think Shoppach could learn to handle Wake's Knuck (and perhaps that he was overrated as a prospect anyhow) they needed to make another acquisition. They brought in Bard, Flaherty, and Huckaby from Toronto (what's up with him? I see he has a .456 OPS in 57 Games w/ Pawtucket - YUCK!) as potential back-up/specialist for the Knuck. Unfortunately the moves were all too close to the start of the season and they had not enough time to really allow any of these guys to fully learn the trade. I mean Wakefield can only throw so many pitches a week. So, they either needed to bring Dougie back or stop pitching Wake with anyone on base. With the pitching staff as it was/is the only option was bringing Belli back - and then obviously San Diego needed to save face with a decent catcher coming in exchange for what they had traded Mark Loretta away for.
But that leaves the Sox no catching long term. The top guy in either AAA or AA currently has an OPS of .669. They need to address this void in the system ASAP! I know there is a shortage of quality catchers league-wide, but a team with the resources of the Red Sox needs to be better stocked than this. It is a glaring, gaping hole when you look toward the last year or two of Tek's contract and beyond. From what I've been able to find, you need to look all the way down to 22 year-old Mark Wagner at Greenville, 21 year-old Roberto Sosa at the Gulf Coast, or 19 year-old Luis Exposito at Lowell to find any catcher in the organization showing signs of being able to put up reasonable offensive numbers.
Anyway, who has been catching Charlie Zink in the minors the last couple of seasons? Couldn't theat guy have served as the back-up and Wake's personal catcher while Bard put in the work to learn how to handle it more effectively?
It just seems like everything came about as isolated transactions rather than moves with a master plan thought out in advance. Much like the whole SS thing. Alex Gonzalez has turned out to be alot better than I thought he would be, because his defense is great and he's dramatically reduced his number of K's while apparently focusing less on the the dillusion of putting up big power numbers like he had in the past. But really, trading Hanley Ramirez in the Beckett/Lowell deal because they had Edgar Renteria signed for multiple years and then trading Edgar to get a chip to trade for Coco smacked of no real plan at SS. Sure the trade for Beckett and Lowell was a "no brainer" and Coco was obviously a major target for Theo - but did Hanley have to be included in the deal with the Marlins? I think Florida was mostly interested in nearly MLB-ready prospects for dumping of large contracts. Couldn't this have been done with other OF prospects as easily as a soon-to-be-needed SS? In retrospect the whole Nomar ---> OC ---> Edgar/Hanley ---> AGon progression over the past 2.5 seasons seems pretty ridiculous.
That's just my "hot button" at this point in what is otherwise a very successful and promising season to date.
The best OBP guy should bat 4th and Manny has historically been that bat and hits in that spot. Papi is good in the #3 hole. An argument could be made that Nixon is the best choice for the 2-hole against righties but Loretta makes a solid #2 hitter and hitting him there provides consistency at the top of the lineup.
I would not be shocked to see the Red Sox make a move for Abreu and quite a bit of logic exists for such a move. The money Abreu would cost basically comes off the books after this season with the contracts of Nixon and Foulke expiring. If such a deal were to be considered, I would suggest moving Nixon and Crisp in such a deal for Abreu. I think Wily Mo can handle playing CF as Crisp is not that great there as it is and I would move Crisp for Abreu. Nixon is irrelevant as he is gone at the end of the season anyway. Youks, Loretta, Ortiz, Manny, Abreu, Wily Mo, Lowell is a formidable front 7.
Why is this?
Nixon and Crisp for Abreu might make some sense, though I don't think it's likely. Crisp's defensive numbers so far have been very bad-- but that's in a pretty small sample. Anecdotally, he seems to get bad reads fairly often, but usually makes up for that in speed. When he does get a good read, he can catch almost anything, it seems. Overall, I think he might be slightly below average in CF, but not the -17 currently showing up in Dial's metrics, or the -24 showing up in mgl's.
Those defensive numbers are crucial, because if there really isn't a big difference between Wily Mo and Coco defensively, then dealing Crisp and Nixon for Abreu might work. Obviously, it depends on how highly Philly rates Coco (I'm presuming the Sox would not also need to include a major prospect-- no one in their top 5; otherwise, it's too much).
Or maybe the trade could be Nixon and Wily Mo, if Philly likes Pena? I do wonder to what extent marketing would play into this-- Coco was clearly made a big part of Sox marketing this spring. Of course, they traded Nomar, and, thanks to the injury, I don't think Sox fans have gotten that attached to Coco. But it would at least appear to be a pretty significant change in direction.
Providence Journal (RR)
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main