Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Hall of Merit > Discussion
Hall of Merit
— A Look at Baseball's All-Time Best

Wednesday, December 22, 2004

Addie Joss

Durability aside, there weren’t too many pitchers greater than him.

John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: December 22, 2004 at 10:23 PM | 6 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Related News:

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: December 22, 2004 at 10:34 PM (#1036776)
hot topics
   2. Ardo Posted: December 23, 2004 at 10:37 PM (#1038792)
Rube Waddell (194-134) is Addie Joss (160-97) plus 34-37, as near contemporaries in the same league. Why is Waddell 11th on the 1941 ballot, and Joss in danger of dropping out?
   3. sunnyday2 Posted: December 23, 2004 at 11:23 PM (#1038837)
This is another version of "if-then." If Rube, then Addie. If 194-134, then 160-97. The fallacy in this particular version--well, there are a bunch, including the validity of W-L as the only or key measure of value, plus offensive and defensive support, and others--but in this particular version the particular fallacy is that Rube didn't go 160-97 and then, instead of retiring, 34-37. The 34-37 is embedded in his career, inside of seasons in which he was exceptionally effective.

Let's compare W-L records, since that what Ardo is focused on, from high to low with ERA+ thrown in for fun.

Best--Waddell 27-10 (180) Joss 27-11 (137)--advantage Rube
Next--Joss 24-11 (205) Waddell 25-19 (165)--Joss
3rd--Waddell 24-7 (179) Joss 21-9 (152)--Rube
4th--Joss 20-12 (131) Waddell 21-16 (125)--too close to call without more info
5th--Waddell 19-13 (121) Joss 18-13 (130)--too close to call
6th--Waddell 19-14 (127) Joss 17-13 (124)--too close
7th--Joss 14-10 (159) Waddell 15-17 (123)--Joss
8th--Joss 14-13 (150) Waddell 14-16 (108)--Joss
9th--Waddell 11-14 (102) Joss 5-5 (114)--Rube
10th through 14th--Waddell 8-13 (153), 7-2 (125), 3-1 (70), 0-1 (133)--Rube

Throw out Rube's advantages in years 9 through 14 if you like, but then you also have to discount Joss' very minor advantages in years 7-8, and Rube had 3 of the 4 best seasons either of them ever had. Each won 20 games 4 times. Joss' ERA+ was better than 120 8 times when he went 155-92. Rube's was better than 120 (and eligible for ERA title) 8 times at 158-109.

Joss career ERA+ was 142 with no decline. Rube's was 135 in 600 more IP, and was 146 during those 8 peak years.

So Rube was more effective during his peak. Do several years at 34-37 versus Joss at 0-0 push Joss ahead? If you want to argue as much, this is the other fallacy represented here--the inference is that 34-37 (actually, outside of his 8 peak years 35-34 with an ERA+ that is still around 108) is of negative value. This is not a generally accepted interpretation, either.

The issue with Waddell is whether his ERA+ is especially misleading because of UER, though his RA+ is still pretty good. But for those who feel the UER diminish Waddell's case, fine, but it doesn't have anything to do with making a stronger candidate of Addie Joss.

For the record, both were on my ballot last time, but I have Waddell higher and I am pretty sure I always will.
   4. jimd Posted: December 24, 2004 at 01:28 AM (#1038998)
Adding to what sunnyday2 said:

When BP factors in all of Waddell's unearned runs, and factors in the fact that Joss played most of his career for contenders with good defenses, BP comes to the conclusion that they were just about equally effective, Waddell 3.63 DERA and Joss 3.65 (4.50 being average). When you consider Waddell's 600+ IP edge, Waddell comes out ahead, though neither are on my ballot.
   5. Ardo Posted: December 24, 2004 at 06:55 AM (#1039401)
Good analysis, sunnyday. I did not mean to argue 34-37 with about a 108 ERA+ is of negative value; in fact, it is of more (positive) value than it first seemed to me. That said, Waddell's better peak seasons and IP edge place him a tier ahead of Joss.
   6. Fred Lynn Nolan Ryan Sweeney Agonistes Posted: January 29, 2010 at 06:11 PM (#3449775)
Hey, how do you say "goodbye" in Spanish?

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
BFFB
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Syndicate

Page rendered in 0.1096 seconds
68 querie(s) executed