About Baseball Think Factory  Write for Us  Copyright © 19962014 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints  Privacy Policy  Terms
of Service  Advertising
You are here > Home > Hall of Merit > Discussion
 
Hall of Merit — A Look at Baseball's AllTime Best Sunday, October 01, 2006Bobby BondsJohn (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy
Posted: October 01, 2006 at 10:29 PM  26 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Related News: 
BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsDon Newcombe
(107  1:22pm, May 24) Last: . . . . . . Latin American Players and Pitchers Home Page (73  9:37pm, May 23) Last: Dr. Chaleeko 2019 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (118  9:35pm, May 22) Last: Kiko Sakata Hank Thompson (20  9:02pm, May 09) Last: Dr. Chaleeko Artie Wilson (47  8:58pm, May 09) Last: Dr. Chaleeko Most Meritorious Player: 1943 Discussion (9  11:47am, May 07) Last: DL from MN Most Meritorious Player: 1942 Results (6  6:17pm, May 03) Last: Chris Fluit Silvio Garcia (23  5:08pm, May 03) Last: Dr. Chaleeko Bus Clarkson (233  5:06pm, May 03) Last: Dr. Chaleeko Most Meritorious Player: 1942 Ballot (13  4:02pm, May 02) Last: DL from MN Sam Bankhead (4  12:32pm, Apr 27) Last: Dr. Chaleeko Pelayo Chacon (4  12:31pm, Apr 27) Last: Dr. Chaleeko Most Meritorious Player: 1942 Discussion (12  8:50am, Apr 27) Last: Tubbs is Bobby Grich when he flys off the handle Carlos Moran (70  6:27pm, Apr 11) Last: Dr. Chaleeko Oliver Marcelle (12  6:24pm, Apr 11) Last: Dr. Chaleeko 

Page rendered in 0.2072 seconds 
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: October 01, 2006 at 10:34 PM (#2194021)Always liked him as a player. His baseball card was always one of the most coveted on the playground.
Bonds played 285 games in CF, 1472 in RF and 65 in LF. His career: 1736 games, 8090 PA. (He got a huge number of PA per year  three times over 720  because he was a leadoff hitter.)
Smith played 808 games in CF, 874 in RF and 3 in LF, along with 21 at 2B/3B and 186 at 1B. His career: 1987 games, 8050 PA.
Wynn played 1181 games in CF, 355 in RF and 298 in LF, along with 23 at SS/3B. His career: 1833 games, 8010 PA.
Now  one of my offensive charts, year by year, best to worst:
Wynn 76 58 57 56 52 48 39 34 19 15 7 6 41112
Bonds 55 52 48 46 46 35 32 28 27 24 22 16 3 6
Smith 64 49 42 42 37 34 30 30 29 29 27 23 12 9 7
Of the three, Smith had the best career after the age of 30. In fact, he's the only one whose career shape seems like a normal decline; Wynn and Bonds both declined more abruptly than you'd expect.
Compared to Wynn, Bonds seems to have a lower peak but a possibly better career. The problem with Bonds as a prime/career candidate is that he would seem to lose out to Smith on that. Bonds played the least CF of these three, and only a tiny bit of that was from being the teammate of Willie Mays.
I'm inclined to start Bonds out behind Wynn  Wynn has the peak seasons (albeit nonconsecutive), and Wynn was primarily a CF to Bonds being primarily a RF.
oh, wrong bonds.
:)
oh, wrong bonds.
:)
:D
NL:
1963 Aaron 121
1964 Allen 125, Mays 121
1965 T. Harper 126
1966 F. Alou 122
1969 Bonds 120, Rose 120
1970 B. Williams 137, Bonds 134, Rose 120
1971 Brock 126
1972 Morgan 122
1973 Bonds 131
1976 Rose 130
1977 G. Foster 124
1982 L. Smith 120
1983 Raines 133, Murphy 131
1987 Raines 123, Coleman 121
1993 Dykstra 143, Ba. Bonds 129
AL:
1965 Versailles 126
1966 Robinson 122
1969 Re. Jackson 123
1970 Yastrzemski 125, C. Tovar 120
1977 Carew 128
1978 Le Flore 126, Rice 121
1979 Baylor 120
1980 Wilson 133, Yount 121
1981 [none, but Henderson extrapolates to 132 for 162 games]
1982 Molitor 136, Yount 129, Dw. Evans 122
1983 Ripken 121
1984 Dw. Evans 121
1985 Henderson 146
1986 Henderson 130
1988 Boggs 128, Canseco 120
1991 Molitor 133
1993 Palmiero 124, Molitor 120
Gotta be BobbyBarry Bonds; if not, then the Ken Griffeys.
Bondses are at 693 (thorugh 9/22) and 302 = 995
Griffeys are at 371 (through 9/22) and 259 = 630
Collinses are at 574 and 3 = 577
Roses are at 547 and 0 = 547
Alous are at 270 (thruugh 9/22) and 241 = 511
Alomars are at 376 (R) and 104 = 480
Bells are at 301 (Buddy) and 175 (Gus) = 476
Cruzes are at 129 (through 9/22) and 313 = 441
Boones are at 208 (Bret) and 210 (Bob) = 418
Bells are at 114 (David, through 9/22) and 301 = 415
Gwynns are at 0 (through 9/22) and 398 = 398
Perezes are at 43 (through 9/22) and 349 = 392
Raines are at 0 and 390 = 390
Boones are at 210 (Bob) and 166 (Ray) = 376
Sislers are at 292 and 71 (Dick) = 363
McRaes are at 230 and 132 = 362
Wills are at 94 and 253 = 347
Matthews are at 75 (through 9/22) and 257 = 332
Averills are at 280 and 32 = 312
Bandos are at 27 and 283 = 310
Trouts are at 76 and 228 = 304
Hodges are at 38 and 263 = 301
Walkers are at 278 and 22 = 300
I think that's all the ones that add up to 300 combined WS. Actually it's not. The other Sisler pairing does too, but I think these are all the families that contain a 300 WS fatherson pairing.
I had always thought that Andujar Cedeno was the son of Cesar, but now that I look at bbref, I don't see any evidence that it's true.
Bondses are at 693 (thorugh 9/22) and 302 = 995
Griffeys are at 371 (through 9/22) and 259 = 630
Collinses are at 574 and 3 = 577
Roses are at 547 and 0 = 547
Alous are at 270 (thruugh 9/22) and 241 = 511
Alomars are at 376 (R) and 104 = 480
Bells are at 301 (Buddy) and 175 (Gus) = 476
Cruzes are at 129 (through 9/22) and 313 = 441
Berras are at 59 and 375 = 434
Boones are at 208 (Bret) and 210 (Bob) = 418
Bells are at 114 (David, through 9/22) and 301 = 415
Gwynns are at 0 (through 9/22) and 398 = 398
Perezes are at 43 (through 9/22) and 349 = 392
Raines are at 0 and 390 = 390
Boones are at 210 (Bob) and 166 (Ray) = 376
Sislers are at 292 and 71 (Dick) = 363
McRaes are at 230 and 132 = 362
Willses are at 94 and 253 = 347
Matthewses are at 75 (through 9/22) and 257 = 332
Averills are at 280 and 32 = 312
Bandos are at 27 and 283 = 310
Trouts are at 76 and 228 = 304
Hodgeses are at 38 and 263 = 301
Walkers are at 278 and 22 = 300
And uncle & nephew! Eeeeew!!!
And uncle & nephew! Eeeeew!!!
Nothing wrong with that; freakylooking family tree, though.
Damn; Barry Bonds alone would top the list.
Or do you mean Oms?
Bandos are at 27 and 283 = 310
Sal and Chris were brothers actually but their careers hardly overlapped.
As for the Bonds/Wynn/RSmith comparison what does a WS slant have when comparing the three of them? Right now I'm leaning Bonds due to the added SB dimension beyond what the others did.
My table in post #2 was based on RC; the SB have already been included in that.
Good idea. Just like the PowerSpeed number. Ranking them by the lesser of the pair would do something similar. The Bonds have the highest lower number as well as the highest upper number, so I'm certain they'll top the list no matter how you skew it. Griffeys a certain #2, then the Alous.
Don't some MLBers have famous NeL fathers? (Tiant?) They deserve a mention.
Given two positive numbers A and B, the mean of order p is this expression: [(A^p+B^p)/2]^(1/p).
There are three extra cases to be inserted:
For p = +infinity, use max(A,B) (the larger of the two)
For p = 0, use sqrt(A*B) (the geometric mean)
For p = infinity, use min(A,B) (the smaller of the two)
The p=1 case is the arithmetic mean. The p=1 case is the harmonic mean. For fixed A and B, the resulting function of p is continuous and strictly increasing on [infinity,+infinity].
Using the sum, as Dr. Chaleeko did in #10, is the same as using the arithmetic mean. The problem with that is that you wind up with Babe Ruth and his father, which isn't exactly what you meant when you asked the question. You want a real contribution from the lesser member. That points to using some mean with p <= 0, because in all such cases, if either A or B is zero, then the mean is zero. The problem with the minimum (the infinity mean) is that it doesn't care how good the better member of the pair is  but it is in common use. (e.g., the "4040" club, where it doesn't count unless both numbers are at least 40). The harmonic mean (p=1) is a good one, but you might want to experiment with the geometric mean just to see if you like it. Or be an oddball and use p=1/2 or something like that.
[/math lecture]
Always liked him as a player. His baseball card was always one of the most coveted on the playground.
John,
Yes, strangely I do (relative to the second portion of this response). Because I remember so much negative talk about his strikeouts as well as sidelong references to the reasons he moved around so much in the late 1970s. But mostly the strikeouts, usually accompanied by whatif scenarios asking what would happen if he could just have cut down the Ks. Well, what would happen is he'dve hit into more 63 putouts I'd guess.
Anyway, as to the second item, in my time the most coveted cards were Don Mattingly, Doc Gooden, and Darryl Strawberry because I was in the NYC suburbs during elementary school. Canseco was big among nonNY guys, so were Clemens, Eric Davis, and Puckett. A couple years before it was Dale Murphy. I guess Rickey too. Nolan Ryan didn't get hot until fourfive years after, around the time little Griffey got popular.
the geometric mean (as you made reference to) would be th eone I'd rrate as the best for this type of exercise
.......................arith harm geom
bro WS1 WS2 mean mean mean
aaaaa ...2 400 ...201 ...4....28
bbbbb .40 200 ...120 ..7 ...89
ccccc 100 250 ...175 143 .158
ddddd 150 150 ..150 150 .150
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main