|
|
|
Hall of Merit— A Look at Baseball's All-Time Best
Monday, July 25, 2005
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Most Meritorious Player: 1982 Discussion (48 - 9:05pm, May 19)Last: Mr. CMost Meritorious Player: 1981 Results (11 - 3:30pm, May 16)Last: DL from MN2014 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (85 - 11:09am, May 13)Last: bjhankeMost Meritorious Player: 1981 Discussion (72 - 10:54am, May 13)Last: bjhankeMost Meritorious Player: 1981 Ballot (47 - 9:51am, May 06)Last: DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: 1979 Discussion (115 - 2:09pm, Apr 19)Last:  DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: 1980 Results (10 - 12:23pm, Apr 15)Last: DL from MNGeorge Scales (70 - 10:52am, Apr 10)Last: Ivan Grushenko of Hong KongLarry Doby (94 - 12:28am, Apr 10)Last: KJOKMost Meritorious Player: 1980 Ballot (21 - 11:03pm, Apr 09)Last: DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: 1980 Discussion (45 - 1:04am, Apr 09)Last: lieiamMost Meritorious Player: 1979 Results (12 - 4:30pm, Mar 14)Last: TomHMost Meritorious Player: 1979 Ballot (35 - 4:06pm, Mar 12)Last: TomHNew Eligibles Year by Year (956 - 3:11pm, Mar 12)Last:  Chris FluitMike Mussina (46 - 8:36am, Mar 12)Last: Rants Mulliniks (formerly Cold Prosimian)
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: July 25, 2005 at 06:34 PM (#1496772)TIEE's Article on Jethroe and its responses
I don't know where Mr. Russell got his numbers, but I'll double-check them this evening against Riley. I'll try to post about them and also post up Brown's numbers either tonight or tomorrow.
So where was he before 1944 and could he possibly have some additional MLEs coming? I don't know the answer to either question.
After 1952 he probably was still a ML player but only for 1953 and '54, I'd guess. I mean he might under different circumstances have been given 1955 as a bench player but not any more.
So that makes maybe 12 years of MLEs unless we can determine something prior to '44.
His HR numbers are certainly interesting, however. One would have to conclude that the white world valued HR more so than the NeLs did, or else he just developed a power stroke real late.
Where data was missing I tried to fill in using surrounding seasons or career norms.
Walk rate is based on his MLB walk rate which was roughly a walk for every 10 ABs.
I don't think this is a HOM-level player, however, I'm glad to at least have made sure of it. The only thing that could change my mind is if my Q&D conversion rate for the IL is too low. That might make him look a little better, but unlikely to make him look good enough to jump into the 1958 three-inductee sweepstakes.
>The only thing that could change my mind
Or if he was active at an MLE worthy rate before 1944 (age 26)??? I suspect somebody will tell us eventually.
It would seem likely (but you guys are more expert than me) that about the same proportion of NEL and ML players went into the services, so the factors remain the same, but the MLEs should be given a "Wartime discount" (and conversely those NEL players in the services in 1942-45 should be given credit for those years.)
Several of Chris Cobb's posted MLE's contain data from 1943-45. When calculating OPS+, I use the actual NL data from those years as a context. I have no idea if there is an implied discount that needs to be applied on top of that.
Yes. We were just pegging down the context level, not the talent level. For example, SLG numbers were down in the NL from 1941-46. (War years 43-45 are about the same context as 41,42,46) So a .400 translated SLG is worth more in this period than before or after.
Its nowhere near as drastic as the shift that occurred between 1930 and 1931, but little stuff like this can make some noticeable changes in OPS+.
But, yes, Chris does the hard part. I don't know how wartime play is handled in the MLE's.
Caveat: these are NOT Chris-Cobb-Certified MLEs, these are Doc's Quick and Dirty MLEs in a Bottle. Like liquid smoke, they are are designed to give you flavor, not authenticity. (As in, "he needs a longer look" or "I'm cool with remanding him deep into the backlog without going too much deeper.")
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main