User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.1542 seconds
66 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. OCF Posted: July 11, 2003 at 08:04 PM (#515550)No need to repeat them here.
The Galvin/Radbourn debate about the quality&effect; of the fielding behind them is present here, but even more dramatically. BP claims that Whitney was affected by bad defense even more than Galvin was, and that Caruthers benefited far more from great defense than Radbourn did. This isn't that surprising a conclusion when examining the teams that Whitney and Caruthers played for.
DERA-NRA, i.e. how much team fielding helped (+) or hurt (-) career ERA
I'm leaning toward putting my pitchers into this order:
Radbourn, Galvin, McCormick, Welch, Caruthers (would be lower except for his hitting), Mullane. McCormick and Welch ahead of Caruthers and Mullane as an AA discount.
(Oh - Weyhing isn't eligible yet, but he would be if he'd retired when he was still good.)
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main