Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
My feeling is that would have drawn cheers, not jeers, from a public that I sense is beginning to see this for what it is becoming: a witch hunt.
MLB, Yankees better be clean in A-Rod mess
The teams really get off the hook on the steroid stuff. If you are one of those who believe steroids are some magic bullet that was required for success in the late90s/early00s then why is there never an assumption that teams like the Yankees, Red Sox, Braves, Cardinals, that had great success in those years weren't actively distributing the things? Of course then we might have to consider the possibility of people like Jeter or Maddux doing steroids and of course they never did, they are pure as the driven snow.
Yeah, the Braves were pushing steroids to Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, Denny Neagle, Steve Avery, Bruce Chen (how else can you explain the fact that he's STILL pitching?), and the rest of the gumby-looking staff that was the impetus behind the Braves title run.
Leo Mazzone was clearly on greenies. How else do you explain his incessant rocking?
As far as I recall, all we know about Sheff was his statements about not being comfy with whatever Greg Anderson was giving him during his brief co-training with Bonds.
Yankees have won 5 in a row and are only 3.5 out of the second WC.
Ray, why would any player place any kind of trust in Mitchell?
he didn't like the effects of what Anderson was giving him.
you have the Diamondbacks
What lie? He didn't say "no, I'm not an owner", he acknowledged that he owned a piece of the team. I don't see anything untrue in what you quoted.
He did say "no, I am not an owner in his "own" Report.
It's easy - you either own a piece or you don't. Was Mitchell delusional while writing the Report or did he commit MLB's version of perjury by lying to the Office of the Commissioner during an investigation by inserting this?
I guess it's also technically possible that he could have threaded the needle by divesting himself of his ownership stake, whatever it was, before he started working on the report. He only says that he doesn't have an "ownership or equity interest" at that time, not that he never did.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (0 members)
Page rendered in 0.2831 seconds, 58 querie(s) executed