Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
He looks hurt. He looks tired. He looks out of place. He looks … well, truth is, who is even looking anymore?
Those are his WORST numbers in those first 10 years.
Oh, I agree that the old Pujols is gone. But I think the "new" one is being underrated because of his raw numbers not being adjusted to park/era and because of the small sample size of his 2013.
I'm not sure he won't be perpetually injured from here on out; it's happened to plenty of 33 y.o. sluggers.
I can see your point of view. But, I just have no idea who the new Pujols is. I'm not sure he won't be perpetually injured from here on out; it's happened to plenty of 33 y.o. sluggers. And, I don't know how much his skills have eroded.
This has the potential to make the second ARod deal look good.
I did not.
hand it to the Cardinals, they made the right call
I've found the opposite to be true. I tried resting for months and months and all I did was gain weight. Actually exercising my feet and forcing them to work by wearing less and less footwear has made a lot more difference, for me.
As great as Pujols has been (and A-Rod is in the same boat), it is disappointing that they started declining in their early 30's.
Consider yourself lucky if my feet are all I bare!
That was a smart comment about park effects. The Angels have had several years now playing in a pitcher's park.
.312 average, .394 on-base, .561 slugging, 33 doubles, 34 homers, 117 RBIs, 99 runs.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (0 members)
Page rendered in 2.1460 seconds, 74 querie(s) executed