600* BBWAA writers voted, but no one saw a thing.
* give or take
Read More...This, I think, was what made the Bert Blyleven-Jack Morris Hall of Fame discussion so interesting. The statistics made it abundantly clear that Blyleven was not just a better pitcher than Morris but light years better. But Blyleven just doesn’t have the Van Doren Gene … and Morris does. And so the debate over which pitcher was better raged on; in some quarters it rages on still. People don’t just see Morris as a Hall of ...
Login to Join (2 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 2.0744 seconds, 192 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >I can't pinpoint why, but Finley's OPS+ wasn't actually better in his good seasons in his 30s -- with all the home runs and extra walks -- than it was at ages 26 and 27. Except for age 31 (136 OPS+).
Some combination of park effects, increased offensive era I would imagine. It's strange, though.
Finley did change the shape of his offense in his 30s, like Dwight Evans and Luis Gonzalez to name two, but unlike those two he didn't actually get much better offensively in his 30s.
One of my favorite players, anyway.
This guy was awesome for the Mets. He was just nails for them in 2005 and he did well when they re-acquired him in 2006. Fond memories of him.
Hernandez was 1-for-2 in 1010 games for a .500 average.
Similarly with Royce Clayton, whom he calls maybe top 100 maybe top 150 in shortstops. But Royce Clayton is 16th all time in games played at short stop. Surely he isn't #16 or even #32 all-time, but having a guy you can send out there has a big value at shortstop even if you'd prefer that he could hit better.
Aha! Brilliant.
Esteban Yan's 3.500 OPS in 472 games is pretty impressive too. (2-for-2, 1 home run)
Royce Clayton, when he was briefly with the Jays, also had the worst walk-up music in history.
How quaint.
Royce Clayton is married to a British sprinter who ran for GB in the 2000 Olympics, so I always rooted for him because of that.
Dwight Evans spiked his home run totals in the 80s.
Was he on steroids too?
The Sox did shake it off, leading the Indians when the lockout came. Hernandez would be a dependable closer for the Sox until the White Flag trade, and he was dominant in 1996. Not a Hall of Famer, but a fine pitcher.
Was he on steroids too?
Evans is not really comparable. His HR totals in his late 20's were suppressed by injury.
If we look at HR/162 G's in age increments (using B-Ref) we get:
Dwight Evans - age 21-25 18HR/162, 26-30 27/162, 31-35 31/162, 36+ 19/162
Steve Finley - 21-25 4/162 (small sample), 26-30 10/162, 31-35 30/162, 36+ 21/162
Luis Gonzalez - 21-25 15/162, 26-30 17/162, 31-35 35/162, 36+ 19/162
Evans moved forward incrementally after his peak, Finley and Gonzalez exploded.
Was he on steroids too?
Must have been. It's the most reasonable argument I've heard why he's not in the HOF and Jim Rice is.
But seriously, if Dewey Evans HR path (peak of 24 before 30, 34 after 30), looks similar to Finley (11, 36) or Gonzalez (15, 57(!)) you need to have your eyes checked. Evans is normal bulking up with age, the others are bulking up through chemistry.
Do guys ever suspected of steroids say'no, it was Creatine'? You'd think they would, whether they took it or not.
"Roberto Hernandez is the answer to my favorite baseball trivia question: What major league player with at least 1000 games played has highest lifetime batting average?"
Who was the last player to bat .400 or better in a season while spending an entire season as an active player on a 25-man roster? No injury issue here - but Ted Williams is not the answer, either...
Ah, but there's a difference. Finley did not just spike his home run totals -- "Steve Finley was a shape-shifter"
Now, unless we're dealing with changelings or skrulls, I think we know exactly what he meant.
wink-wink, nudge-nudge, saynomore, knowwhatI mean.
Finley's one-time teammate Brady Anderson was a major creatine user. According to him.
Maybe he had a chat with Dwayne Murphy.
Do guys ever suspected of steroids say'no, it was Creatine'?
When the McGwire andro thing broke, Sosa said he didn't use andro but did use creatine. I'd pretty much assume every hitter was using creatine -- still legal right?
Ben Oglivie through age 29: 18 HR per 162. Ages 30-33: 35, going as high as 41. Too obvious.
1 Barry Bonds 2986 2007 1986 1986 2007 21-42 12606 .298 .444 .607 1.051 *78/D9 PIT-SFG 2 Craig Biggio 2850 2007 1988 1988 2007 22-41 12504 .281 .363 .433 .796 *4287/D9 HOU 3 Steve Finley 2583 2007 1989 1989 2007 24-42 10460 .271 .332 .442 .775 *89/7D1 BAL-HOU-SDP-ARI-TOT-LAA-SFG-COL 4 Julio Franco 2527 2007 1982 1982 2007 23-48 9731 .298 .365 .417 .782 643D/579 PHI-CLE-TEX-CHW-TOT-TBD-ATL-NYM 5 Sammy Sosa 2354 2007 1989 1989 2007 20-38 9896 .273 .344 .534 .878 *98D/7 TOT-CHW-CHC-BAL-TEX 6 Royce Clayton 2108 2007 1991 1991 2007 21-37 8164 .258 .312 .367 .679 *6/5D SFG-STL-TEX-CHW-MIL-COL-ARI-TOT 7 Kenny Lofton 2103 2007 1991 1991 2007 24-40 9235 .299 .372 .423 .794 *8/7D9 HOU-ATL-CLE-TOT-NYY-PHI-LAD 8 Jeff Conine 2024 2007 1990 1990 2007 24-41 7782 .285 .347 .443 .789 379/D5 KCR-FLA-BAL-TOT 9 Shawn Green 1951 2007 1993 1993 2007 20-34 7963 .283 .355 .494 .850 *93/87D TOR-LAD-ARI-TOT-NYM 10 Mike Piazza 1912 2007 1992 1992 2007 23-38 7745 .308 .377 .545 .922 *2D/3 LAD-TOT-NYM-SDP-OAK 11 Reggie Sanders 1777 2007 1991 1991 2007 23-39 7043 .267 .343 .487 .830 *978/D CIN-SDP-ATL-ARI-SFG-PIT-STL-KCR 12 Ryan Klesko 1736 2007 1992 1992 2007 21-36 6523 .279 .370 .500 .870 73/9D ATL-SDP-SFG 13 Jose Valentin 1678 2007 1992 1992 2007 22-37 6317 .243 .321 .448 .769 *654/78D93 MIL-CHW-LAD-NYM 14 Jeff Cirillo 1617 2007 1994 1994 2007 24-37 6136 .296 .366 .430 .796 *5/34D671 COL-SEA-SDP-MIL-TOT 15 Rondell White 1474 2007 1993 1993 2007 21-35 5852 .284 .336 .462 .799 *78D MON-TOT-CHC-NYY-DET-MIN 16 Neifi Perez 1403 2007 1996 1996 2007 23-34 5510 .267 .297 .375 .672 *64/52D COL-TOT-KCR-SFG-CHC-DET 17 Sandy Alomar 1377 2007 1988 1988 2007 22-41 4865 .273 .309 .406 .716 *2/D3 SDP-CLE-CHW-TOT-TEX-NYM 18 John Mabry 1322 2007 1994 1994 2007 23-36 3765 .263 .322 .405 .727 3975/D81 TOT-SEA-STL-CHC-COL 19 Tony Batista 1309 2007 1996 1996 2007 22-33 4959 .251 .299 .453 .752 *56/4D3 OAK-ARI-TOT-TOR-BAL-MON-MIN-WSN 20 Todd Walker 1288 2007 1996 1996 2007 23-34 5055 .289 .348 .435 .783 *4/53D76 MIN-TOT-CIN-BOS-CHC-OAK 21 Scott Spiezio 1274 2007 1996 1996 2007 23-34 4413 .255 .329 .419 .747 345/D791 OAK-ANA-SEA-STL 22 Juan Encarnacion 1259 2007 1997 1997 2007 21-31 5095 .270 .317 .441 .758 *987/D DET-TOT-FLA-STL 23 Mike Lieberthal 1212 2007 1994 1994 2007 22-35 4695 .274 .337 .446 .783 *2/D PHI-LAD 24 Orlando Palmeiro 1206 2007 1995 1995 2007 26-38 2706 .274 .351 .350 .701 798/D CAL-ANA-STL-HOU 25 Mike Stanton 1178 2007 1989 1989 2007 22-40 26 .333 .360 .375 .735 *1 ATL-TOT-NYY-NYM-CIN Rk Player G To From From To Age PA BA OBP SLG OPS Pos Tm 26 Preston Wilson 1108 2007 1998 1998 2007 23-32 4436 .264 .329 .468 .797 *87/9 TOT-FLA-COL-STL 27 Jose Mesa 1023 2007 1987 1987 2007 21-41 4 .000 .333 .000 .333 *1 BAL-TOT-CLE-SEA-PHI-PIT-COL 28 Roberto Hernandez 1010 2007 1991 1991 2007 26-42 2 .500 .500 .500 1.000 *1 CHW-TOT-TBD-KCR-ATL-PHI-NYM 29 Damian Miller 989 2007 1997 1997 2007 27-37 3558 .262 .329 .411 .740 *2/D39 MIN-ARI-CHC-OAK-MIL 30 Desi Relaford 939 2007 1996 1996 2007 22-33 3347 .243 .319 .347 .666 645/798D1 PHI-TOT-NYM-SEA-KCR-COL-TEX 31 Mike Myers 883 2007 1995 1995 2007 26-38 2 .000 .000 .000 .000 *1 TOT-DET-MIL-COL-ARI-BOS-NYY 32 Ricky Ledee 855 2007 1998 1998 2007 24-33 2307 .243 .325 .412 .737 798/D NYY-TOT-TEX-PHI-LAD-NYM 33 Robert Fick 846 2007 1998 1998 2007 24-33 2658 .258 .328 .405 .732 392/D75 DET-ATL-TOT-SDP-WSN 34 Bob Wickman 835 2007 1992 1992 2007 23-38 2 .000 .000 .000 .000 *1 NYY-MIL-TOT-CLE 35 Steve Kline 796 2007 1997 1997 2007 24-34 18 .143 .143 .214 .357 *1 TOT-MON-STL-BAL-SFG 36 Kelly Stinnett 734 2007 1994 1994 2007 24-37 2290 .234 .313 .379 .692 *2/D NYM-MIL-ARI-CIN-TOT-KCR-STL 37 Olmedo Saenz 733 2007 1994 1994 2007 23-36 1893 .263 .340 .465 .805 35D CHW-OAK-LAD 38 Mark Bellhorn 731 2007 1997 1997 2007 22-32 2491 .230 .341 .394 .735 45/36D987 OAK-CHC-TOT-BOS-SDP-CIN 39 Roger Clemens 709 2007 1984 1984 2007 21-44 213 .173 .236 .207 .443 *1 BOS-TOR-NYY-HOU 40 Rheal Cormier 683 2007 1991 1991 2007 24-40 228 .188 .212 .219 .431 *1 STL-BOS-MON-PHI-TOT-CIN 41 David Wells 660 2007 1987 1987 2007 24-44 200 .129 .148 .140 .289 *1 TOR-DET-BAL-CHW-NYY-SDP-BOS-TOT 42 Hector Carrasco 647 2007 1994 1994 2007 24-37 28 .038 .038 .038 .077 *1 CIN-TOT-MIN-BAL-WSN-LAA 43 Rick White 615 2007 1994 1994 2007 25-38 46 .093 .114 .116 .230 *1 TBD-TOT-NYM-CLE-PIT 44 Antonio Alfonseca 592 2007 1997 1997 2007 25-35 15 .143 .143 .143 .286 *1 FLA-CHC-ATL-TEX-PHI 45 Curt Schilling 571 2007 1988 1988 2007 21-40 901 .151 .178 .171 .348 *1 BAL-HOU-PHI-TOT-ARI-BOS 46 Doug Mirabelli 566 2007 1996 1996 2007 25-36 1655 .231 .317 .407 .724 *2/D3 SFG-TOT-BOS 47 Paul Shuey 476 2007 1994 1994 2007 23-36 7 .143 .143 .143 .286 *1 CLE-TOT-LAD-BAL 48 Woody Williams 443 2007 1993 1993 2007 26-40 617 .194 .222 .267 .489 *1 TOR-SDP-TOT-STL-HOU 49 Alberto Castillo 418 2007 1995 1995 2007 25-37 1173 .220 .293 .297 .590 *2/D NYM-STL-TOR-NYY-SFG-KCR-TOT-BAL 50 Donnie Sadler 418 2007 1998 1998 2007 23-32 861 .202 .262 .284 .546 4/65879D BOS-TOT-TEX-ARI Rk Player G To From From To Age PA BA OBP SLG OPS Pos Tm 51 Jay Witasick 405 2007 1996 1996 2007 23-34 45 .071 .093 .071 .164 *1 KCR-TOT-SFG-SDP-OAK 52 Aaron Sele 404 2007 1993 1993 2007 23-37 73 .155 .197 .190 .386 *1 BOS-TEX-SEA-ANA-LAD-NYM 53 Tom Martin 376 2007 1997 1997 2007 27-37 13 .000 .000 .000 .000 *1 HOU-CLE-NYM-TBD-LAD-TOT-ATL-COL 54 John Wasdin 328 2007 1995 1995 2007 22-34 21 .158 .200 .211 .411 *1 OAK-BOS-TOT-TOR-TEX-PIT 55 Dee Brown 271 2007 1998 1998 2007 20-29 874 .233 .280 .333 .613 *7/D98 KCR-OAK 56 Todd Williams 227 2007 1995 1995 2007 24-36 4 .250 .250 .250 .500 *1 LAD-CIN-SEA-NYY-BAL 57 Jaret Wright 227 2007 1997 1997 2007 21-31 92 .141 .171 .205 .376 *1 CLE-TOT-ATL-NYY-BAL 58 Orlando Hernandez 220 2007 1998 1998 2007 32-41 132 .155 .162 .198 .361 *1 NYY-CHW-TOT-NYM 59 John Thomson 216 2007 1997 1997 2007 23-33 381 .198 .225 .223 .448 *1 COL-TOT-TEX-ATL-KCR 60 Dan Serafini 105 2007 1996 1996 2007 22-33 51 .070 .130 .070 .200 *1 MIN-CHC-TOT-CIN-COL 61 Tim Harikkala 73 2007 1995 1995 2007 23-35 5 .250 .250 .250 .500 /*1 SEA-BOS-COL-OAK
fwiw, Alomar is 126th in bWAR among catchers, 128th in JAWS. He caught a lot of games because he was in the league until he was 41, but in his last ten years (spanning 635 games), he had a bWAR of 0.5.
By putting Alomar at 50-60 because of games played, you are giving him a boost for hanging around as a replacement level player.
Also, as Poz notes in his piece, Alomar was basically a part-time player his whole career. He had four seasons where he appeared in at least 100 games. That's it.
I wonder how much of the difference in slugging percentage was due to the changing era and different ballparks. Finley started his career in Baltimore playing in Memorial Stadium, which was a slight pitcher's park at the time. He then spent four seasons playing in the Astrodome. His home runs actually might have spiked a bit in 1994 if the strike hadn't happened. In 417 PA, he hit 11 home runs, which was a new career high. Finley smacked a homer once every 93 at-bats prior to 1994. That season, he hit a homer every 33 at-bats. From 1995-98, Finley played for San Diego. As a Padre, he hit a home run every 29 at-bats. Of course, then he played for Arizona, and his AB/HR ratio took another leap forward. From 1999-2004, he knocked a home run every 19 at-bats (includes one-third of a season in Los Angeles).
His walk rates were always decent, so the biggest difference is definitely the home runs. I wonder if the combination of a changing era and team changes explain the rather similar OPS+ numbers of young Finley and old Finley.
I do not think that Lofton is one of the ten best players on the ballot. However, I do think he might be a deserving Hall of Famer, especially if we can trust his defensive numbers. (And I really want to trust his defensive numbers. He always looked really good.) He's the type of player that I would like to take a few years to evaluate. If we have more confidence in defensive metrics in five years, then I would have no problem voting for him. Taking this into consideration, would a voter be justified in leaving someone like Biggio off his ballot in favor of Lofton? The hope would be that you help to bump Lofton above five percent and pray that he stays on the ballot despite the coming bottleneck. I'd hate to stiff Biggio (or someone else), but he's clearly going to receive at least five percent and go into the Hall at some point.
I don't think it makes a lot of sense to leave a better player off in favor of a worse one, but I suppose the rules don't prohibit it.
To my mind, you pick your 10 best candidates, and submit your ballot. It seems wrong to leave Biggio without a chair when the music stops when you know Biggio is more qualified.
The flaw in this argument is that no one makes it into the HoF if they start off needing one more vote to avoid being taken off the ballot.
I agree, but the writers have made such a mess of the situation that there are more than a dozen deserving candidates on the ballot this year. Someone, such as Kenny Lofton, could very well drop off the ballot despite being of borderline Hall of Fame quality. I guess the circumstances are so disorganized that someone is probably going to get screwed. Any attempt to prevent this outcome is probably worse than the outcome itself. Maybe we will look back on Lofton like we look back on Whitaker falling off the ballot after one vote.
That's true. I think some hopelessly naive, "what if?" part of me would like to see Kenny Lofton get the consideration he deserves. I need to stop caring about the Hall of Fame.
as to woody williams i will have a hard time not believing williams wasn't throwing a spitball while with the cards. the guy would get two strikes and then throw a pitch that just burrowed into the ground after years of being 'just a guy'.
i also find it amusing that williams hit more guys in far fewer innings with the cards.
throw inside more. throw a spitter. that's a classic formula that nobody in 21st century would recognize. everything old is new again at some point.
Al Leiter, Kevin Brown, Mulholland, Schilling, Moyer, Randy Johnson, Zito, Javier Vazquez, and incredibly, Vicente Padilla are the others mentioned in that link. Derek Lowe did it this year when he beat the Red Sox [twice!]. Did anyone else complete the thirtyfecta this year?
And at first base or left field, I'd have no problem heavily discounting a long-term player who was barely above replacement for 10 years.
But--this is an honest question, I don't know--are the replacement levels reliable for catcher and shortstop? Those are awfully hard positions to fill, especially catcher, and there are always people out there on rosters who are truly awful. I would guess--but I could easily be wrong--that having a catcher who's reliably not awful on your roster is actually pretty valuable, and I would guess that there aren't that many catchers in baseball history. Counting a catcher's season as 120 games catching, Alomar is two seasons ahead in games played of the #92 catcher in games player.
Baseball ref lists 306 players with negative WAR last year, 95 with -0.5 WAR or worse, and 41 with WARs at -1.0 or worse. Eight of those 41 played some shortstop, 4 played some catcher. Some of the people who played shortstop also played several other positions.
Right, that's a good summation of my view too. I don't think Lofton is so good that the HoF would be compromised without him. And I don't think he's clearly one of the top 10 this year (though I think there's a case.) But he was a great player and I want there to be a real, sustained conversation about his case for the HoF, and I think that's just not going to happen.
80 Bo Diaz
81 Ivey Wingo
82 Sandy Alomar
83 Mike Heath
84 Al Lopez
To take a sample from the mid 50s
53 John Roseboro
54 Earl Battey
55 Paul LoDuca
56 Clay Dalrymple
57 Ernie Whitt
I'm pretty amatuer at evaluating players, so this isn't meant to prove anything. But more of a thought excerise...which group is more fitting for Alomar to belong to?
But figuring out whether someone like Sandy is more like Mike Heath or Ernie Whitt is a much-more open-ended question
How far down the list do you have to go before you get to somebody besides Biggio who played for only one team?
Sent with Bret Boone to the Padres in the Braves steroid purge trade of 1999. Worked out terribly of course. Reggie Sanders was terrible, Wally Joyner was toasty, Quilvio Veras was Quilvio Veras. The late Klesko years when he got off the juice and was basically half of his former self (Pudge style) were memorable.
Spanning Multiple Seasons or entire Careers, From 1901 to 2012, (requiring year_max=2007, year_min<=1998 and franch_count=1), sorted by smallest franch_count
Seasons/Careers found: 1.
So to rephrase for those like me, the point is that Biggio is the only one-team player eligible for the HOF this year.
Also it looks like there will be no such players (who retired in 2008) eligible for the HOF next year.
Spanning Multiple Seasons or entire Careers, From 1901 to 2012, (requiring year_max<=2009, WAR_bat>=5, franch_count=1 and year_max>=1975)
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.