Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, Mike Piazza and Craig Biggio have been elected to the Hall of Merit!
The timing for our first year electing 4 candidates could not have worked out better, since class of 2013 is the strongest in terms of electees that we’ve ever had. The top of the 1934 ballot included Ty Cobb, Tris Speaker, Eddie Collins, Pop Lloyd, Smokey Joe Williams and Cristobal Torriente, but only 2 were elected.
Bonds and Clemens were each unanimous at 1 and 2. I believe that’s the first ...
Read More...Login to Join (8 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 5.4193 seconds, 120 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Tim Wallach was my Hero posted on July 29, 2011 at 05:44 PM # hit 0 | hit 0That was after MLB and ownership tried to run the team into the ground for years. No reflection on the city or the fans.
I'd like to know too.
There's one recent example we may use to get an idea. Quebec City, the capital of the province Montreal is part of, is trying to get a new publicly funded hockey arena. The project is backed by most of the Conservative class of the province who think this would be a wonderful economic opportunity for the city because it might lure a NHL team back to the city. It is of interest to know that most of those "right wingers" are from Quebec City.
However, the left-wingers in the province (most of whom, interestingly enough, are from Montreal) are against the project because they don't want to publicly finance an industry that has billions in revenues.
So, just like in the US, the building of a new baseball stadium would become a political issue. Only, I have no idea how it would end up. Would left-wingers be in favour of building a baseball stadium because it would be based in their own city, even though it would support an industry that has billions in revenue? Or would they still be against it? I think the latter is likely because they are always critical of the Conference Board.
And what about the Quebec City right wingers? Would they consider that using public money to finance a baseball stadium is a waste of money as they usually argue when the government spends money on almost anything, or would they use the arguments they are now using to back up the arena project?
I have no idea. [as always, sorry for my English.]
Is it really a left- or right-wing thing, or simply a revival of the old Canadiens-Nordiques rivalry? I can't see anyone from Montreal looking to support the return of the NHL to Quebec.
J'aimerais voir un retour de les Nordiques ET de mes chers Expos, mais je ne suis pas optimiste.
(and your English is just fine)
They'd probably still be my #2 team behind the Leafs, but it would be close.
Ignoring the local politics for a moment, the above-referenced report hardly positioned Montreal as the most logical relocation or expansion destination. Unless I saw cherry-picked quotes, it basically said that even under optimum conditions, Montreal would be a bottom-third team in both revenue and payroll and would need subsidies to both survive and contend. (And this is with the U.S. and Canadian dollars at close to par, so currency fluctuations could render the outlook even worse.)
Pierre Karl Péladeau has been negotiating with the city for some time now but in order to be acceptable for the province (who will end up paying 50% of the new arena), a new law has to be voted by the legislative assembly which somehow requires the unanimity. One deputy, the socialist Amir Kadhir, is REALLY against the whole project.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.