Woo-hoo…I haven’t laughed at a Strauss this hard since Stanislas “Animal” Kasava danced with Harry “Sugar Lips” Shapiro! #stalaugh17
Read More...Joe Strauss @JoeStrauss
District in meltdown. Mention Natitude and it’s as if someone shook the hive. #NotMyMarketingCampaign
Now, this is funny, because apparently a few Nats fans got angry at Strauss or something. And by writing “#NotMyMarketingCampaign,” Strauss here signifies that he did not, in fact, come up with Natitude. Meaning he’s zeroing in on ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.2292 seconds, 166 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. spike posted on July 15, 2012 at 07:42 PM # hit 0 | hit 0I mean really, Harper could have easily gotten annoyed or pissy about this but instead he takes it as it is and remains in a good enough mood to tweak Gullen a bit. Then after the game he takes the high road even with Guillen acting like a complete dick about it.
The real problem here of course is that Guillen is in general a pretty loathsome person. The White Sox are significantly more likeable and the Marlins significantly less so now that he changed teams.
But that's treading right up to the borderline of dickishness - pretty much all of the best Harper stories have him doing that.
Would this man be in baseball at all if not for 2005? A World Series Title sure buys you a lot of leeway.
Unless you're Cito Gaston.
It would have been even less professional had Bryce stroked the bat in that position, but I digress.
I was going to say philodendron, but...
But Jim Thome was so not versatile!
I used to think that zeth, but the truth is that ozzie just isn't very entertaining. He's not funny, he's not interesting or creative. He is just a puerile twatbag who craves media attention.
I've been a long time Ozzie apologist. My pops liked him in his playing days, thus I liked him. He won my favorite team a world series and for awhile there, most of what he said was more insightful than offensive or mean.
Then he stopped winning and became vindictive and petty. At the end of the day I think Ozzie is harmless and probably comes out somewhere on the right side of the ledger on the nebulous, impossible question of "is he a good person?".
That said, he's not aging well, and is getting more filled with piss and vigegar with each loss, each camera zoomed in on his flapping jaws. He should retire gracefully and take a quiet 250k a year job as a MLB pundit -- but his ego will never let him.
"Hi, I'm Bryce Harper. Dude, I GOTTA tell you about Delta Airlines."
Exactly.
I can't disagree. I just like having villains. Competent villains would be better, but beggars can't be choosers.
Or, in other words, Ozzie Guillen is an alcoholic. It's not terribly surprising to see an addict go from the guy who's fun every now and again to the guy who needs to shut the hell up and go away. Sad, but not terribly surprising.
I'd gladly trade Valentine for Guillen.
Although, now that I think about it, Guillen did run Magglio Ordonez out of Chicago. Damnit.
Take it to the Bill James/Paterno thread.
i've been wondering about this too. his comments on the subject are not comforting at all if you are sympathetic to him as a manager. he looks and sounds like he's going from functioning alchoholic to just plain alcoholic.
Harper handled it extremely well. Guillen looks less and less like the fun, irreverent guy the media played him up to be when he was successful, and more and more like Patrick Bateman in American Psycho.
"graceful" and "quiet" are not two words I typically associate with Guillen.
And Nick Swisher.
Although nobody would let Don Cherry coach a team anymore.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.