Boz pays homage to the gritty, gutsy, scrappy, first place 2013 underdog Yankees:
Read More...Perhaps for the first time in their history, the Yankees now epitomize exactly the kind of team that always used to try to beat them: a group of inspired-by-adversity, too-old-or-too-young, one-last-chance players who band together to prove that baseball is a team game, not just an aggregation of talent and fat contracts.
Put a few all-star seasons, such as Cano’s 31 RBI, Kiroda’s 1.99 ERA and Rivera’s 16 ...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 0.9639 seconds, 176 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >He's been pure nails for them over and over throughout these last two months, and it's been yet another inspiring aspect of the O's play. Machado's go-ahead homer was dramatic, of course, but there was a truly Brooks Robinson-esque double play he started earlier in the game that was far more impressive, where he fielded the ball lunging towards the 3B bag, spun around as his momentum carried him well into foul territory, and then unloaded a bullet to second. (Mark Reynolds actually made a pretty impressive catch to dig it out at 1B as well.) Just the sort of play that makes a lover of good defense want to jump up and down.
I think if things break just right, 4 of the 5 playoff spots could be clinched today (and Detroit could clinch at least a tie in the Central as well).
Win out and get a little help (although if they win out that would include a 3-game sweep of Baltimore, which would be a big help to them).
Sunday: Baltimore, New York, Detroit, and Texas (twice) all lose. Oakland, and Chicago win.
TEX 92-67
BAL 91-68
NYY 91-68
OAK 91-68
DET 85-74
CWS 84-75
Monday: New York, Baltimore, Texas, and Detroit all lose. Oakland and Chicago win.
TEX 92-68
OAK 92-68
BAL 91-69
NYY 91-69
DET 85-75
CWS 85-75
Tuesday: Oakland and Detroit lose. Texas, Baltimore, New York, and Chicago win.
TEX 93-68
OAK 92-69
BAL 92-69
NYY 92-69
CWS 86-75
DET 85-76
Wednesday: Texas and Chicago lose. Oakland, Baltimore, New York, and Detroit win.
TEX 93-69
OAK 93-69
BAL 93-69
NYY 93-69
CWS 86-76
DET 86-76
So there would be a 4-way tie in the AL East and West, with two teams getting the division, and two teams getting the wild-card spots.
Do they play one-game playoffs for the division titles, then the wild-card play-in game?
Or would division/WC determination be based on head-to-head records, so only the wild-card play-in game is needed?
If they need to play a game for the division/wild-card determination, then there would be three games on Thursday (all to determine division winners), and then the wild-card play-in game on Friday.
This could lead to one team playing on the road on Wednesday (game 162), travelling to a new location on Thursday (division/wc determination game), travelling to a new location on Friday (wc play-in game), getting one day off (Saturday) and then playing at home on Sunday. Four different teams, in four different cities, in five days.
Texas playing Oakland ruins it for LAA, while TB playing Baltimore means that they'd have to knock them out to get a chance.
If Tampa wins out and NY and Balt lose out, they would all end up 91-71. I think Oakland and LAA could also both still conceivably end up 91-71, although in that case Texas would win the AL West outright.
Tampa, NY, Baltimore end up tied for AL-East, with Oakland and LA ending tied with those three for the 2 wild card spots.
Texas wins a playoff spot, while Chicago and Detroit could also end up tied for the AL Central.
Oh, that's much more of a clusterf*ck.
I guess that's what I'm cheering for!
Actually my guess is they would play the ALE/ALW divisional 1-gamers on Thurs then the ALC/WC 1-gamers on Fri to build viewers on Fri. Might depend on which AL playoff series needs to start first.
Yes, #7 is the screwy one.
About three days worth of heavy rain in Baltimore and Atlanta, beginning on Thursday. Not all dreams have happy endings.
I didn't go through every season one by one (not enough time), but I think it's the record. It's also the first time that we would have 6 90 win teams with such similar records.
#10: Post #7 would involve the Angels and A's both finishing at 91-71, not the Rangers. Texas would then have the best record in the American League, and five teams would tie at 91-71, with a potential Tigers - White Sox tie still possible.
With Darvish and Holland going (and Jered Weaver resting), the Rangers have as good a chance at a sweep as they could, and a sweep would clinch a division tie for them: maybe the division outright, of Oakland loses. All the same, I have a deep sense that they will be swept, and will become this year's big collapse. But I'm strangely equanimous about that. It was a good year for the Rangers, and I enjoyed it. And I have my 2013 pocket schedule to consult every day between now and April :)
Yep. Although my guess is there don't end up being any one-game divisional or WC playoffs.
But the AL East is awesome. I never imagined the O's would actually hang around this long and they have to have close to a 50/50 shot at the division now.
Ordinarily I'd agree with that comment, but in this case what else could be done when if you scheduled an old fashioned doubleheader there would be thousands of seats with two different ticketholders? You can't just give last night's ticketholders refunds and not expect a huge kickback.
Today is the last home game here for '12, so you'd be giving them rain checks for next year, which I admit would cause some grief. OK, in the circs, it's only a semi-cheap### move :)
A's beat Yankees in the wild card.
Orioles upset Rangers in ALDS.
Tigers beat the A's in the other ALDS.
Tigers beat Orioles in seven.
Tigers beat the Nationals in seven.
Any questions?
"Yay! I still get to see a Rangers-Angels game this weekend!"
"Rats! I have work/a wedding/Bible study/flight back to Orange County tonight, and now I don't even get a rain check!"
I could be wrong about the raincheck situation, though. Anyway, the Yays will probably outnumber the Ratses, so my "semi-cheap" comment in #17 might be modified to "quarter-cheap."
2011: 7-20
2012: 7-18
Why, that's the dumbest thing ever posted on BB...oh, wait, you're right. Holy cow.
Well, yes and no. It's nice to have a slim chance at the division but I'd like to get the Angels killed off, too. I would REALLY like the Angels killed off.
First, I want the A's to win today, of course. Nothing is certain there. After that, I think I'd like Texas to win the nightcap. That still gives the A's a chance at the division and puts them 3 up on the Angels. I'll take that.
Nah. Gotta root for the Angels. If the Rangers lose and the A's win, you can force a divisional playoff game with a 2-1 series.
If the Rangers win, you need a sweep.
I have a joke about a Dolly Parton bust almost ready to go here, but ###### if I'm not too stressed myself to form it properly.....
You all laughed when I said in March that the Orioles would be in a position to win the division and have the best record in the AL...fools!
(ok, I didn't really say that. But at least I didn't say that the Orioles were the #30 organization in baseball with the longest road to travel before they become contenders.)
Page 1 of 2 pages
1 2 >You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.