Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
“If we were spending more, I probably wouldn’t have the same sense of satisfaction,” he said with a laugh.
Nothing satisfies like a pocket full of free cash, does it Lew?
$7.5 mill for a 1B with a 91 OPS+, and who had a 103 OPS+ when he was there last. Moneyball.
It doesn't make sense that fans would care what a team spends on players
And yet over and over and over, I have seen RSox fans quibble as if some great victory has been achieved if a guy lives up to his contract, and sell their children rather than get caught on the tail end of a guy getting older.
You're crazy. Red Sox fans don't like overpaying because it means there's a budget and the more you spend on bad players the less you can spend on good ones.
I'm calling it now: Oakland vs. San Francisco in the World Series. Winner gets San Jose.
I'd like to a repeat of '89, though with less earthquakes.
There's an easy way to cut the A's off from revenue sharing: let them move to San Jose.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (0 members)
Page rendered in 0.4130 seconds, 57 querie(s) executed