Odds of being attacked by a shark marlin: 1 in 11.5 million.
Read More...Pierre’s clout came leading off the bottom of the first for the Miami Marlins against the Cincinnati Reds.
Pierre’s homer was his first since June 23. He whooped when the ball went over the fence down the right-field line.
“I don’t know how to react to those things, so it’s just a spur-of-the-moment deal,” Pierre told reporters of his homer reaction. “That’s about the only time you’ll see me smiling on the baseball field.”
...
Login to Join (0 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 0.9091 seconds, 97 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. filihok posted on January 17, 2013 at 12:04 AM # hit 0 | hit 0.372/.375 (OBP/SLG), 105 stolen bases
A little high, no?
The Bill James Handbook projections that are built primarily from minor league track records are basically useless. In comparison to projections from in-depth systems (Zips, Steamer, Cairo, Oliver, Pecota, etc), it's obvious that they assume very little penalty in the MiLB to MLB transition. The other systems, while having their variations, have a decent level of agreement with each other showing significantly lower performances for minor leaguers. They simply have much more severe MLE factors.
.372/.375 (OBP/SLG), 105 stolen bases
Bill James projections for filihok:
242/315/378 with 37 steals
so what are you doing here son? :-)
The sentences were longer than what most sportswriters put out, but I don't see what was wrong with that article.
That sounds like a lot of strikeouts for a non-power hitter, but it's really not that bad. Hamilton averaged a K every 4.5 ABs (or if you prefer he made contact in 77.9% of ABs); my rough rule of thumb is that as long as the K rate is better than 1/4 (or contact in at least 75% of ABs) it's acceptable. And while the rate deteriorated in AA, it was still tolerable (1 K/4.09 AB, contact rate of 75.5%). Stubbs, by contrast, had 123 Ks in 470 ABs at three levels in 2008 (one per 3.82 ABs, contact rate of 73.8%) and he was below 75% throughout his minor league career.
I think Hamilton's inability to drive the ball is a more serious concern.
-- MWE
The last time I checked in any great detail was early days of BP. And the James/STATS projections had a noticeably smaller standard error (which prompted BP to change their methodology)
It'd be interesting to track the standard error of the various systems when it comes specifically to rookies. I don't know that anybody's ever looked at that.
One of the problems in projecting Hamilton is that a high portion of his value lies in his walk rate and walk rate is the least stable part of any minor to major transition.
I think Hamilton's inability to drive the ball is a more serious concern.
Well, those two problems kind of compund each other, don't they? I mean if you can drive the ball, then swing hard, even if you K. But if you can't, you should be adjusting your hitting style to optimize your speed.
Hamilton should be choking up and pounding the ball into the ground and legging them out, or bunting. He should be watching video of Phil Rizzuto and adjusting accordingly.
Maybe an overbid, but not by much. IIRC correctly, they have different run environments for offense and defense, i.e. they project MLB to collectively score far more runs than it allows. That kind of basic error moves you pretty close to useless in my book.
"Every time I see you hit one in the air, you owe me twenty pushups."
I was thinking of Willie Mays Hayes when I wrote that :-) As an added bonus, enough pushups and he might gain the strenght to actually drive the ball.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.