Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Tax payers fund questionable Royals expenses
Don Fehr regarding public funding of stadia a few years ago. He was against funding for public policy reasons
This is a textbook example of how to write something that looks like an indictment but contains no actual wrongdoing.
I am outraged that a publicly subsidized stadium meant to financially benefit a private sports team has ended up being used by a private sports team to their financial benefit!
$657,838 in "supplies" could mean just about anything. Not sure if that thought means I'm a cynic, or just an attorney.
An R&D departement in a sprawling multinational company I'm rather familiar with hid a thousand unauthorized consultants under the label of "supplies" in the expense column. There were strong words after discovery.
I hate when Obama-loving socialists like the Glass family and Albert Belle suck on the public teat.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
Login to Join (30 members)
Page rendered in 0.4709 seconds, 58 querie(s) executed