Whoa, thought that read “Sabermetrician is a tool”...and that they were dredging the statistically-polluted East River for an old quote from John Sterling about Rob Neyer!
It isn’t often that I disagree with Tango, but I would (albeit slightly) with this statement:
Sabermetrics is a process, a tool. It is not an ideology. Sabermetrics would say that a player’s RBI adds no new information, once you know all these other things. Sabermetrics would say that a pitcher’s wins, losses and saves adds no new information, once you know all these other things. This is not an ideology.
What sabermetrics says is: IF (that’s the start of a conditional clause) you are intent on using numbers, THEN (that’s the start of a main clause, dependent on the condition) you should use the numbers this way and that way but don’t use it the other way.
I would argue that it isn’t simply a tool or process, like controlled experiments or case studies or econometrics. Rather, it is a philosophical mindset, a position one takes prior to leveraging the various tools and metrics that have been developed to support that mindset.
Login to Join (8 members)
Page rendered in 0.6480 seconds, 68 querie(s) executed