Major League Soccer Commissioner Don Garber announced today that a partnership of global sports powers, Manchester City Football Club and the New York Yankees, has acquired the League’s 20th expansion club. The new team will be named New York City Football Club (NYCFC) and expects to begin play in 2015.
Wait, I thought Manchester United was the Yankees’ fellow member of the Legion of Doom, not Manchester City!
Login to Join (6 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 1.9261 seconds, 182 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Page 1 of 14 pages
1 2 3 4 5 6 > Last ›He brings up the fatigue factor for Spurs. Now that the euphoria has died down, the fitness of the team is the one thing this season that worries me. They've had trouble finishing strong all season and it's only the first of October.
I am moving to NYC in a week or two, but my place is basically in Inwood so I'm not sure if the space shuttle program will be reactivated in time to get me down there.
Look for the GIANT Irish flag on the west side of 3rd avenue.
God dammit. I'd come to believe that Cox wasn't going to analyze Saturday's game for some reason, so I shamelessly aped his style in writing up a tactics-y blog post last night for the same site that carried my NYRB-THFC match report. Then I wake up this morning to discover that, not only has he written something about it for the Guardian, but he's got a full analysis up on ZM.
On the one hand, it's nice to have a ZM breakdown on a game Spurs actually won (first time that's happened in at least two years). On the other hand, I'm going to look like a mug when my post gets published tomorrow.
I'd say they finished pretty strong against Reading and QPR. Yes, they were totally gassed with 15-20 minutes left to play on Saturday, but I think there were a couple reasonable explanations for that.
One, they pressed very aggressively in the opening half hour and broke forward quickly as a unit when they won possession. All that running will take its toll; there aren't too many teams around that can maintain that ultra-high tempo for even an hour, let alone the whole game.
Two, United were just flat out fantastic in the second half. Spurs never had the ball for more than about ten seconds. They just couldn't keep it long enough to give themselves even a short breather. I don't know whether that was a cause of the fatigue or a symptom, probably a bit of both. With United pummeling them, Spurs were so deep and just didn't have the legs to be dangerous on the break or get up and support Defoe. There were about three or four counter-attacking opportunities where a fresher Bale, Vertonghen, or Demebele would have caused major problems for United, but the key pass went astray or a touch was too heavy and United was able to recover and win the ball back.
The other charitable interpretation is that it probably takes more than a few months to build up the sort of fitness levels required to sustain AVB's high tempo style over longer periods.
QPR staggering down the road towards two points from eight games. And we all know what that means...
QPR staggering down the road towards two points from eight games. And we all know what that means...
It's going to happen, isn't it?
Depending on what is closer, take the 1 to 96th or the A to 125th and then the C to 96th and then take the 96th street bus cross town.
In your heart, you know it would be hilarious.
EDIT: Mark Hughes not looking long for the job, since they have to travel to West Brom and Arsenal for two of their next three. Five points through nine games is exactly the kind of thing that gets 'Arry 'ired. I hope Tony Fernandes is ready to open the checkbook. I wonder how long it will take him to get Crouch...
In your heart, you know it would be hilarious.
Hilarious, of course, but I think he could do a job for them. He could even get Parker and Dawson from Spurs in January, probably. Those two love Harry and they'd be automatic first 11 again.
Harry would have to pull Crouch out of Tony Pulis' cold dead hands, I think. And yes, that's as close to onanistic imagery as I care to get in a public forum.
QPR host Everton between those two away days, as well. I don't know if even five points from nine games is a real good bet at this rate.
It would, of course, be a 'triffic irony if Harry got hired at that point, because six points from nine games (from the 5-2 loss at the Emirates through the 0-1 loss to, who else, QPR at the Lane) is, as much as anything else, what got Harry the other kind of 'ired this summer.
A pretty cool idea, if you ask me.
They'll have to buy out Sven's contract in Thailand.
Also, the last 20 minutes of Celtic-Spartak should be fun. Spartak down to 10, should get both sides pretty open.
Well, well. Look at Nostradamus here.
Spartak don't really have an oligarch.
Yeah, let's not talk crap about Spartak, the greatest club in Russia.
Aren't these two statements contradictory?
I'm currently watching BATE-Bayern because of the shocking scoreline. Frankly, BATE have had the better chances in the second half so far.
3-1 the final.
Early reports are that the Puyol injury is "only" a dislocated elbow, which would be incredibly lucky.
Early reports are that FPH was dancing naked in the street.
Thanks. I wasn't watching that game so those statements next to each other seemed weird to me.
Indeed. That was right up there with Rooney's leg for most gruesome injury of the season so far. Hopefully there won't be any more contenders.
And I just got this. Surprisingly juvenile from the bear, but funny.
Sounds like he needs to hire The Bobs from Office Space.
"So, Peter. What would you say...you do here?"
I thought Michael Parkhurst looked very good for most of the game. He shut down Victor Moses and while I'm not sure how much he had to do with keeping Ashley Cole in check, you didn't see Cole in the Chelsea attack much. When Cole did make runs, Parkhurst kept him in check. On the offensive end, Parkhurst wasn't afraid to go forward and did a very nice job of making runs and distributing the ball once it was fed to him. He had two very good crosses that could have converted into goals for Nordsjælland. I was impressed with the distribution, more so because I would think the natural tendency would be to stay at home against an opponent like Chelsea.
That said, he committed the foul on Torres in 80th after getting muscled off and that freekick ended up being a David Luiz goal that made it 2-0. I somewhat excuse Parkhurst for that, he was trying to defend Torres after the defender that was marking Torres failed, so Parkhurst was put in a difficult position. I blame the other defender much more for getting beat by Torres in the first place than I do Parkhurst for having to foul him.
And the other big negative was that he probably was at fault on the Ramires goal in minute 89 that made it 4-0. I'm probably sounding like a Parkhurst apologist but I also think it's hard to blame him too much for this. He was sort of in no man's land. He was responsible for tracking Hazzard on the wing and Oscar ended up making a very good run and Parkhurst ended up being a bit too far away to switch to Oscar. He was being asked to mark two players. The central mid should have been tracking Oscar's run. I think that goal was probably more a result of a Nordsjælland team that had sort of given up being down 3-0 after really pushing it to Chelsea for a good portion of the 2nd half and looking like it would tie the game.
It's kind of hard to walk away impressed with a fullback's performance when he is responsible for giving up two goals but I somehow pulled that off. He was really good for 89 minutes and I think the two he conceded were as much the fault of his teammates than Parkhurst. If Klinsmann were to have watched the game, I think he would have liked what he saw. Especially since Cherundolo probably won't be in the picture much longer.
Despite the final score (which doesn't reflect most of the game), I thought Nordsjaelland was quite good especially in defense. Parkhurst was extremely solid and did negate Moses for most of the match. However, the best player on the pitch might have been Okore. He's a really good young CD (20 year old) and I wouldn't be suprised to see a ManU or Arsenal go after him. Reminds me a bit of Agger in his aggressivness.
And of course, I'd add Chelsea as a team that might go after him.
Page 1 of 14 pages
1 2 3 4 5 6 > Last ›You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.