Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
9.00 COL Josh Outman -7
8.10 MIN Nick Blackburn - 13
7.94 CHC Chris Volstad - 9
7.76 KCR Jonathan Sanchez - 12
7.35 ARI Daniel Hudson - 9
7.04 MIN Liam Hendriks - 8
6.45 COL Alex White - 10
6.35 COL Jeremy Guthrie - 15
6.35 OAK Tyson Ross - 12
6.20 ATL Jair Jurrjens - 9
6.13 BAL Jake Arrieta - 18
6.06 SEA Blake Beavan - 13
6.00 MIN Carl Pavano - 11
2.zonk posted on July 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM #hit 0 | hit 0
Guthrie has been terrible at home (9.50 ERA, .720 SLG against) but decent on the road (3.67 ERA). However his K numbers have fallen quite a bit. The Royals will be paying him more than they did Sanchez, and I guess he looks like a better pitcher going forward, but honestly, what's the point? Just to get something for Sanchez? My worry is that Guthrie looks reasonably good, and they hand him a 3 year deal.
So I was wondering who had the most starts in a season by LHP's, and it's got to be the 1983 Yankees with 127. Their top 5 starters in GS were all lefties: Guidry, Righetti, Shane Rawley, Bob "Don't call me' Shirley, and Ray Fontenot.
8.KJOK posted on July 20, 2012 at 12:59 PM #hit 0 | hit 0
believing he’s particularly ill-suited for Coors Field.
Then why did they just trade FOR him a short time ago?
Because he was particularly ill-suited for Camden Yards then
10.puck posted on July 20, 2012 at 02:02 PM #hit 0 | hit 0
believing he’s particularly ill-suited for Coors Field.
Then why did they just trade FOR him a short time ago?
Or Moscoso, who also seems to be an extreme flyball guy.
Seems like they had success with sinkerball guys (Cook, Ubaldo, Chacin and Hammel all had pretty good ground ball rates). Granted, it's not easy to continue finding enough of those guys to fill out a staff. The latest theory, apparently based on one CJ Wilson start, is that some cut fastball theory is the getting the attention of reporters, at least. Not sure about the organization. Apodaca, the pitching coach who recently stepped down, was big into getting guys to improve the downward movement on their two-seamers.
Seems like they had success with sinkerball guys (Cook, Ubaldo, Chacin and Hammel all had pretty good ground ball rates). Granted, it's not easy to continue finding enough of those guys to fill out a staff.
They'd find it easier if they didn't trade away those guys once they have them. Not referring to Jimenez, he's looking pretty toasty, but why trade Hammel for a guy who has been essentially the same quality of pitcher over the last three seasons? Guthrie threw more innings but I assume not pitching in Coors Field and not getting pinch-hit for would account for a lot of the difference.
I once suggested that the Rockies should fill their pitching staff with guys who rely on deceptive or unusual deliveries: side-winders, submariners, pitchers with herky-jerky, stop-and-go motions like the Angels churned out every year in the early part of the decade, etc. The theory being the altitude wouldn't affect deception: the ball would be as difficult to pick up in Coors as it is in any other stadium. That was so long ago that Primer didn't have registered users; "Dan O'Dowd" replied to say that it sounded like a good idea, so he would try the plan for a week and then immediately abandon it.
A lot of these existential discussions about the impossibility of pitching in Coors lost urgency after the humidor apparently fixed things. Seeing these questions come up again is just a wonderful stroll down Nostalgia Lane.
14.davekemp posted on July 20, 2012 at 03:25 PM #hit 0 | hit 0
The theory being the altitude wouldn't affect deception: the ball would be as difficult to pick up in Coors as it is in any other stadium.
16.bfan posted on July 20, 2012 at 03:40 PM #hit 0 | hit 0
This seems like a good start to a robust MLB pass the trash game. Now, the Rockies have to move Sanchez to someone. I would suggest the Braves give up Jurrjens for him, as the Braves could use another bad lefty.
So I was wondering who had the most starts in a season by LHP's, and it's got to be the 1983 Yankees with 127. Their top 5 starters in GS were all lefties: Guidry, Righetti, Shane Rawley, Bob "Don't call me' Shirley, and Ray Fontenot.
High Heat Stats looked into that last week, and they agreed.
This seems like a good start to a robust MLB pass the trash game. Now, the Rockies have to move Sanchez to someone. I would suggest the Braves give up Jurrjens for him, as the Braves could use another bad lefty.
For a hot prospect like Jurrjens you might be able to get Sanchez, Outman AND Moscoso. Or ask the Twins for a package centered around Nick Blackburn and P.J. Walters.
20.zenbitz posted on July 20, 2012 at 03:56 PM #hit 0 | hit 0
The good thing about Sanchez in Coors is that vintage Sanchez had an extremely low BIP rate. The, uh, less good thing all the extra baserunners.
In 230 PAA there he has 50Ks, 31BBs and an OBP against of .655 (81 tOPS+).
Most of that was back when he was kinda good though.
Getting rid of a 53 ERA+ for a 73 ERA+. Dayton Moore wins!
23.Bhaakon posted on July 20, 2012 at 07:03 PM #hit 0 | hit 0
The theory being the altitude wouldn't affect deception: the ball would be as difficult to pick up in Coors as it is in any other stadium.
It would be interesting to see how valuable deception really is. I suspect that a large part of the value of unusual deliveries isn't the batter being unused to the release point of a side-armer or submariner as being unused to the movement created by those arm angles, an advantage that shrinks dramatically at altitude.
It would be interesting to see how valuable deception really is. I suspect that a large part of the value of unusual deliveries isn't the batter being unused to the release point of a side-armer or submariner as being unused to the movement created by those arm angles, an advantage that shrinks dramatically at altitude.
That's one of the things I keep coming back to when I convince myself the "deception" angle is a good one for the Rockies. Most of your sidearmers and submariners don't throw very hard, relying instead on movement and impeccable location. The movement, as you say, is going to be severely limited at Coors.
I was thinking about guys like Steve Reed (140 ERA+ for the Rockies) and Mike Myers (205 ERA+) as examples of the kind of pitchers who might, by nature of their deliveries, be successful at Coors. Obviously two pitchers do not a sufficient sample size make.
While there is certainly something to the notion that the Rockies would benefit from figuring out what type of pitcher is least affected by the harsh-for-pitchers conditions a mile above sea level, I've long suspected that at the end of the day that's a marginal issue. The primary objective of the Rockies is and always has been: have better players than the other team. They're rarely been successful in that pursuit.
Some Royals fans saw me as the throw-up part of the deal.
30.puck posted on July 20, 2012 at 10:48 PM #hit 0 | hit 0
I was thinking about guys like Steve Reed (140 ERA+ for the Rockies) and Mike Myers (205 ERA+) as examples of the kind of pitchers who might, by nature of their deliveries, be successful at Coors. Obviously two pitchers do not a sufficient sample size make.
Brian Fuentes isn't a submariner, but he fits, I think. OTOH, there's also Javier Lopez and Byung Hyun Kim. But you could say those guys were just getting started/washed up, respectively.
the Rockies have traded Jeremy Guthrie and his 6.35 ERA to the Royals for Jonathan Sanchez and his 7.76 ERA.
No doubt some jackass on Wall Street somehow made millions on this swap.
I thought we had figured out what sort of pitcher "succeeds" at Coors -- keep the f'ing ball down. Hard sinkers, hard split fingers, probably the right sort of changeup.
32.MM1f posted on July 21, 2012 at 02:33 AM #hit 0 | hit 0
I thought we had figured out what sort of pitcher "succeeds" at Coors -- keep the f'ing ball down. Hard sinkers, hard split fingers, probably the right sort of changeup.
Aaron freakin' Cook. Hard sinker, over n over n over n over again. It was kind of a poor man's Mariano repitoire. You knew it was coming, you just couldn't do much with it. You could put it in play, but it wouldn't go very far.
No one dreams up a starting pitcher who relies so much on one pitch, but when your one pitch is a hard sinker you can throw for strikes, it works.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Crispix Attacks 2: Swag Airlines posted on July 20, 2012 at 12:23 PM # hit 0 | hit 09.00 COL Josh Outman -7
8.10 MIN Nick Blackburn - 13
7.94 CHC Chris Volstad - 9
7.76 KCR Jonathan Sanchez - 12
7.35 ARI Daniel Hudson - 9
7.04 MIN Liam Hendriks - 8
6.45 COL Alex White - 10
6.35 COL Jeremy Guthrie - 15
6.35 OAK Tyson Ross - 12
6.20 ATL Jair Jurrjens - 9
6.13 BAL Jake Arrieta - 18
6.06 SEA Blake Beavan - 13
6.00 MIN Carl Pavano - 11
Bring back Jamie Moyer!
Then why did they just trade FOR him a short time ago?
Or Moscoso, who also seems to be an extreme flyball guy.
Seems like they had success with sinkerball guys (Cook, Ubaldo, Chacin and Hammel all had pretty good ground ball rates). Granted, it's not easy to continue finding enough of those guys to fill out a staff. The latest theory, apparently based on one CJ Wilson start, is that some cut fastball theory is the getting the attention of reporters, at least. Not sure about the organization. Apodaca, the pitching coach who recently stepped down, was big into getting guys to improve the downward movement on their two-seamers.
They'd find it easier if they didn't trade away those guys once they have them. Not referring to Jimenez, he's looking pretty toasty, but why trade Hammel for a guy who has been essentially the same quality of pitcher over the last three seasons? Guthrie threw more innings but I assume not pitching in Coors Field and not getting pinch-hit for would account for a lot of the difference.
A lot of these existential discussions about the impossibility of pitching in Coors lost urgency after the humidor apparently fixed things. Seeing these questions come up again is just a wonderful stroll down Nostalgia Lane.
Interesting thought, actually
High Heat Stats looked into that last week, and they agreed.
So did Ubaldo Jiminez.
For a hot prospect like Jurrjens you might be able to get Sanchez, Outman AND Moscoso. Or ask the Twins for a package centered around Nick Blackburn and P.J. Walters.
In 230 PAA there he has 50Ks, 31BBs and an OBP against of .655 (81 tOPS+).
Most of that was back when he was kinda good though.
It would be interesting to see how valuable deception really is. I suspect that a large part of the value of unusual deliveries isn't the batter being unused to the release point of a side-armer or submariner as being unused to the movement created by those arm angles, an advantage that shrinks dramatically at altitude.
That's one of the things I keep coming back to when I convince myself the "deception" angle is a good one for the Rockies. Most of your sidearmers and submariners don't throw very hard, relying instead on movement and impeccable location. The movement, as you say, is going to be severely limited at Coors.
I was thinking about guys like Steve Reed (140 ERA+ for the Rockies) and Mike Myers (205 ERA+) as examples of the kind of pitchers who might, by nature of their deliveries, be successful at Coors. Obviously two pitchers do not a sufficient sample size make.
Sounds like you're getting the hang of this Dayton Moore thing.
Some Royals fans saw me as the throw-up part of the deal.
Brian Fuentes isn't a submariner, but he fits, I think. OTOH, there's also Javier Lopez and Byung Hyun Kim. But you could say those guys were just getting started/washed up, respectively.
No doubt some jackass on Wall Street somehow made millions on this swap.
I thought we had figured out what sort of pitcher "succeeds" at Coors -- keep the f'ing ball down. Hard sinkers, hard split fingers, probably the right sort of changeup.
Aaron freakin' Cook. Hard sinker, over n over n over n over again. It was kind of a poor man's Mariano repitoire. You knew it was coming, you just couldn't do much with it. You could put it in play, but it wouldn't go very far.
No one dreams up a starting pitcher who relies so much on one pitch, but when your one pitch is a hard sinker you can throw for strikes, it works.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.