Pedroiadolia: The psychological phenomenon of seeing wacko images on dirty uniforms.
Read More...The narratives around the two players, however, could not be different. Pedroia is almost the prototype of the over-achieving “scrappy” player. He is a 5’8” middle infielder who does the little things well. This ignores that he was also a second round draft choice who played baseball at a top baseball school. Cano, on the other hand is bigger, more athletic and does not project scrappiness at all. Throughout ...
Login to Join (1 members)
{/exp:tag:subscribed}Page rendered in 2.2627 seconds, 132 querie(s) executed
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Pat Rapper's Delight posted on October 22, 2012 at 09:48 AM # hit 0 | hit 0Citing preseason predictions by either the "experts" or people here is pretty meaningless, especially with regards to the Yankees. The "experts" often make picks purely to generate controversy/page hits or as fodder for an article. Many, many people here(and elsewhere) either hate the Yankees or just don't like seeing them win so often, so they pick against them based on that alone. Pretty sure that most of the projection systems had the Yankees as the best or one of the best teams. That said, this season should still not be considered a failure or anything like that.
I bet if you look at the preseason BTF predictions, even fewer people will have picked the actual winner. Picking the WS winner in April is quite difficult, particularly with the whole crapshooty playoff format. The Yankees were expected to be one of the best teams in baseball this year, by both us and the rest of the baseball-watching public. And we got that one right.
Hey!
I would say they did slightly better than they should have been expected to.
With the injuries they had (which, frankly, didn't seem any less severe than my woe is me team), I think they did significantly better than they should have been expected to.
The Blue Jays didn't really fall apart until August. They were 51-51 on July 30th and then went 22-37 to close out the season. The Yanks from August on went 8-5 against the Blue Jays. The Red Sox as well didn't fall apart until August. They were 55-55 on August 6th and then went 14-38 to close out the season. The Yankees went 7-2 from that point on. So they went 15-7 against the Blue Jays and Red Sox from August on. The Yankees heading into August were 60-43 and would go 35-24 from there on out. I'd say playing those two teams as they folded probably added 3 wins or so to the Yankees win column.
Looking at those 50 "experts,": 49 of them picked the Yankees to make the playoffs, and 38 of them picked the Yankees to win the AL East. Zero picked either Oakland or Baltimore to make the playoffs.
Equating their performance versus expectation to those of the A's and Orioles is crazy.
That would have been nice, and resulted in a Baltimore - Detroit ALCS.
What if this happened: 8th inning, bases loaded, 2 outs, J.J. Hardy gets a hold of one against Sabathia for a grand slam. Baltimore up 5-3. In the bottom of the 9th against Jim Johnson, Yankees get a bit of a rally going, ending up with bases loaded for Eric Chavez. He pops out to Manny Machado to end the game.
Would that outcome be easier for Yankee fans, losing a well-fought close series instead of advancing to a butt-whuppin?
The story would be on Girardi - leaving Sabathia in too long when Robertson could have come on in the 8th, and benching A-Rod in favor of the guy who makes the final out.
When King George ran the team, I used to figure a sorry showing like they had in the ALCS would lead to big changes, often to their long term detriment. Now, there will be no panic, though there will be moves.
I think the Yankees are the embodiment of the "loudness" button on a stereo system--in their case, it's automatically on from the get-go and the nuances of their success can never be seen or heard in terms of a decibel level that would be roughly equivalent to "quiet." Their emphasis this year on the long ball further helped to further obscure any subtlety or nuance in how they played and how they won, particularly in that stretch drive. So while Tim is onto something in what he wrote, he doesn't appear to have quite gotten the words that best express the concept into play.
You and me both. About the only difference is that in 1980 the O's caught up a bit earlier, after beating the Yanks 6 out of 8 times over a 10 day stretch in mid-August. Those 5 games in Baltimore drew the largest 5 game series crowd in the history of Memorial Stadium, and the last two games have to both rank in the top 10 or 15 regular season games in Orioles' history. Scott McGregor beat Rudy May on Sunday in a classic 1-0 pitchers duel, striking out Reggie three straight times while throwing nothing but high and inside fastballs that Jackson couldn't lay off of. And the Monday night game ended with Bucky Dent taking a called third strike from Tim Stoddard with the tying and winning runs in scoring position. Dent just sat there screaming at Rich Garcia for what seemed like a full ten minutes, but I was sitting directly behind the plate in the upper deck and that pitch was right down the middle. Great as this year's Orioles season was, it couldn't come close to matching the frenzy of Memorial Stadium during the Hagy years.
Yea, but the O's weren't the doormat they usually are, and the Rays were still pretty good.
I think there was a tremendous amount of parity in the AL this year though. I thought the Rangers were the closest thing to a dominant team, and they fall apart in the last three weeks. No team strikes me as just god awful with maybe the Twins being the closest. I look forward to the day in which every team finishes 82-80!
I look forward to the Astros.
But it is kinda good now (for the Yankees, not for everyone else) that the Yankees top brass generally has a cool head and no longer make those knee jerk crazy moves that often anymore. though obviously given the team's age it's inevitable they need some serious turn over soon.
One week, please. With six games to play, they'd just split a series with Oakland to stay four games ahead. I still prefer the story of that "collapse" to be an Oakland win instead of a Rangers' loss. Yes, the Rangers played like they were narcoleptic, but Oakland still had to sweep Seattle to be in a position to win the division with another sweep. I prefer the story to be that the A's won, for lots of reasons
Given the parity, and relative to expectations, should any team be all that disappointed? The Angels improved over '11. The White Sox didn't really figure to get as close as they did. Cleveland, maybe. But even Texas had a lot of good weeks till their one bad one. I won't tell Yankees fans whether to be disappointed or not, though. Suffering is subjective :(
I can think of one. Well, I can think of two. But fear not. The first went out and got the guy who managed the second. Yay.
Hey, it beats your earlier tendency toward being carcinogenic.
:-D We can all safely root for the Tigers now without threatening public health.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.